Жирный котяра уже здесь. 🍿 Mistral представила новую модель — Mistral Large 4, она же Le Chonk. 1 трлн параметров, 49 млрд активных 62% на DeepSWE в задачах программирования Обходит GLM-5.3 на DeepSWE По словам команды, SOTA в киберзащите, производстве и финансах Открытые веса выйдут 27 октября На AA модель набрала 38 — столько же, сколько Luna. Только при этом она дороже Luna. Модель доступна через API уже сегод…

Channel
Вайб-кодинг
@vibecoding_tg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
63,609subscribers
+12,519 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001555418015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vibecoding_tg |
| Description | Авторский канал по ВАЙБ КОДИНГУ Ссылка для друзей: https://t.me/+ll3pbl442dNkZmYy Cотрудничество: @devmangx РКН: https://clck.ru/3RRVfk |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vibecoding_tg |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 63,609 | +534 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 63,075 | +440 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:02 | 62,635 | +68 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 62,567 | +50 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 62,517 | +83 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 62,434 | +92 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 62,342 | +186 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 62,156 | +167 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 61,989 | +143 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:49 | 61,846 | +88 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 61,758 | +173 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 61,585 | +130 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 61,455 | +71 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 61,384 | +51 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 61,333 | +229 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 61,104 | +66 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 61,038 | +69 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 60,969 | +42 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:09 | 60,927 | +100 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 60,827 | first reading |
Engagement
342 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 128 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 28.3%
- avg views ÷ 63,609 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 18,000
- 172 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 172
- of 342 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 172 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 342 (1 August 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 3,095,330 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,200
- Videos
- ≈948
- Links
- ≈1,510
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 52m
- Average length
- 1m 00s
Measured directly from 112 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 532
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 96
- of 342 we hold a reading for · 28%
- Most on one post
- 51
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vibecoding_tg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 342 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.17%
- 4 of 342 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 4
- posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 17,200
- over 4 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 17,900
- over 338 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Vfnxwpmri8 | 1 | 25 September 2026 | 25 September 2026 |
| 2Vtzqv12twv | 1 | 2 October 2026 | 2 October 2026 |
| 2VtzqwBMKg8 | 1 | 18 September 2026 | 18 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFG6h4jb | 1 | 28 September 2026 | 28 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 342 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
Подписки Anthropic более чем в пять раз выгоднее подписок OpenAI. 🫣 Ещё в июне преимущество было у OpenAI: подписка за $200 давала объём работы, который через API стоил бы примерно до $14 000. После урезания лимитов на прошлой неделе ситуация перевернулась. SemiAnalysis сравнила Opus 5.5 и GPT-6.1 Sol, пересчитав полностью использованные месячные лимиты в стоимость того же объёма работы через API: > За $200: Claud…
Кто то уже зареверсил продукты Adobe: https://getartcraft.com/apps Теперь у всего будет версия с открытым исходным кодом. 😆
Astra и GPT-6.1 Sol теперь должны работать примерно в полтора раза быстрее — выдавать около 50 токенов в секунду вместо прежних ~30.
Это сгенерировал американский ИИ:
Вот и первый день обещанных релизов от OpenAI: В ChatGPT и Codex начинают внедрять водяные знаки в тексте. В отличие от Anthropic и Google, OpenAI пока запускает свою технологию textGrain только в странах Евросоюза. 😏😏😏
Каково это — просить китайские ИИ-модели помочь с тем, на что Claude не соглашается.
Ещё один полезный инструмент для ИИ-агентов, который позволяет реверсить приложения и игры через MCP или командную строку. С его помощью можно декомпилировать бинарники, разбираться в работе конкретных функций и реализовывать похожие в своём проекте. "Йо, Claude, зареверси бинарники CapCut." 🤓 https://github.com/morluto/rea
Команда OpenAI встала на путь искупления. Теперь каждый день — либо действительно полезная функция, либо полный сброс лимитов. 🚬
Если хочешь разобраться, как с помощью ИИ делать моды или смешивать разные игры, посмотри этот проект: https://github.com/rehan-remade/universal-modder
Германия впервые выпустила модель. С результатом почти 97% в математике. Всего 78 млрд параметров, из которых на каждый токен активируются только 3,46 млрд. Открытые веса под лицензией Apache 2.0. Модель обучена для немецкого и английского языков. По собственным оценкам Aleph Alpha, модель набирает 96,9% в олимпиадной математике и 84,3% на сложных научных вопросах. В совокупности тестов на немецком языке немного оп…
Showing the 12 most recent of 342 posts we hold for @vibecoding_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@vibecoding_tg edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 2 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@deeplearning_ru · 3,69511 postsВайб заметки
@vibe_notes_by_ivan · 1011 postsIT Portal
@IT_Portal · 99,7776 postsInteresting IT, 3D printing and other stuff
@interestingIT · 336 postsNeiroKaufman
@neiro_kaufman · 56 postsИИшница - новости искусственного интеллекта
@iishnaya · 124 postsКирилл Lead | Карьера и жизнь в IT
@avoska_apple · 3673 postsОцифрованный схоласт
@ID_sholast_ID · 8292 postsBard AI | Нейросети & IT
@NeuralToday · 30,2602 postsИИ для бизнеса: Кейсы → Обучение → Внедрение
@SynergAi · 2572 postsНайт-Сити 👾
@aleksei_hunt · 4232 postsAI СКЛАД
@bizzi_AI · 1942 postsПрогер
@proger3 · 87,5492 postsvery vibe coding
@veryvibecoding · 1202 postsGameDev Portal | Разработка Игр
@GameDevgx · 7,9761 postПросто Harness
@HarnessLLM · 1651 postАйтигребец
@ITrower · 7681 postNeural Shit
@NeuralShit · 54,3211 postMath School
@WestMathSchool · 5681 postDM
@ai_generat · 2221 postАльтман уже может
@aicanalready · 621 postAI Security | Безопасный ИИ
@aisecur · 1271 postАйтишная
@aitshnya · 69,4941 postКУРСЫ БПЛА 🇷🇺 БЕСПЛАТНО ✈️
@bpla_ru_dpo_ru · 5411 postCL Vibes
@clvibes · 141 postEvgeniy Shevchenko CRYPTORUN
@cryptorun · 126,2571 postdev warrior
@devwarrior · 1311 postДля чтения
@dlya_chtenia · 11 postЭхо Нулей
@echoes_of_zeroes · 461 postErrorNil. iOS-разработка
@error_nil · 6851 postIndra.Dev(ai)
@indradev4 · 661 postЭкономика нейросетей | Николай Божков
@jur_perevod · 421 postЮрий Солар | Бали, виллы, AI
@mr_solar_blog · 4511 post🖐️ Петров разбирает(ся)
@onedaynote · 2021 postProductivity Tools
@productivitytools · 8471 postVibe Coding: OpenCode, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Kilo
@prog_ai · 4,5201 postТитов Никита | IT инновации в недвижимости
@proptech_tita · 2961 postrich as fuck
@rich_as_fuck · 261 postYou are absolutely right!
@you_are_absolutely_right · 41 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 148 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@frontendInterview · 10,4057 postsГовнокод
@g_code · 14,8496 postsGenDesign | CMD
@gendesigncmd · 14,5356 postsJust Python
@justpython_it · 9,8006 postsНейро́нити
@neironity · 11,3556 postsСборник IT знаний
@sbornik_znanii · 10,4476 postsSenior Frontend - javascript, html, css
@seniorFront · 23,8526 postsЗаметки Бэкендера
@backend_it · 18,8955 postsBackend Portal | Программирование
@BackendPortal · 16,0765 postsDezzigners
@dezzigners · 8,4745 postsIT-Сэнсэй | Уроки по программированию
@it_sensei · 11,1405 postsКнижное хранилище
@knijnoe_xranilishe · 19,6005 postsThe Open Ai | Нейросети
@TheOpen_Ai · 13,0575 postsКнижный IT сборник
@book_sbornik · 25,0074 postsБукич IT
@booki47 · 33,1804 postsCodHub | Программирование
@CodHub_CH · 10,9534 postse/acc
@cryptoEssay · 62,5554 postsGitHub Разработчика
@git_developer · 17,0124 postsИИ в деле
@ii_v_dele · 7,5524 postsIT-Academy | Айти
@it_academy_tg · 12,6524 postsАйти мемы
@it_to_mems · 15,6884 postsТочка входа в IT
@it_tochka · 18,0424 postsOpen Design | Графика, Дизайн, Моделирование
@opendesign_it · 19,2514 postsTrue Figma
@true_figma · 26,0134 posts
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@wb_code · 4,326#1
@simple_js · 4,730#2
@frontendGA · 7,690#3
@it_to_mems · 15,688#4
@codewebx_it · 4,445#5
@ThisFrontend · 2,938#6
@animate_css · 6,415#7
@notesjs · 7,446#8
@free_html_lessons · 4,502#9
@frontenderrrr · 3,138#10
@webdevlair · 7,934#11
@job_webdev · 7,467#12
@codepen_amazing · 4,763#13
@FrontendPortal · 36,370#14
@true_js · 5,899#15
@whilet_ru · 1,171#16
@reactify_IT · 6,456#17
@guides_js · 7,149#18
@xCode_Journal · 13,905#19
@HtmlGram1 · 9,102#20
@WebTaverna · 4,547#21
@katerina_profrontend · 2,849#22
@web_craft · 5,015#23
@simple_frontend_tg · 7,487#24
@senior_front · 19,233#25
@frontendnoteschannel_ru · 31,223#26
@jstutors · 813#27
@frontend_tg · 5,637#28
@senior_frontender · 9,157#29
@code_ready · 21,675#30
@qa_logia · 7,861#31
@seniorFront · 23,852#32
@we_use_js · 10,759#33
@sWebDev · 7,455#34
@vibeshcoding · 734#35
@codebase_frontend · 1,932#36
@easy_frontend_tests · 7,197#37
@github · 155,595#38
@javascriptv · 16,939#39
@veras_it · 209#40
@figma2html · 45,301#41
@easy_javascript_ru · 17,635#42
@htmlshit · 14,416#43
@sitodel · 25,662#44
@framixapp · 1,687#45
@JScript_jobs · 12,486#46
@frontend_web_space · 6,274#47
@explore_digital · 697#48
@it_fullstak · 10,926#49
@JS_per_month · 4,239#50
@react_tg · 16,236#51
@skladitshki · 7,163#52
@fullstack_coding · 185#53
@front_end_dev · 25,809#54
@frontendblok · 6,908#55
@ITSyndicate_23 · 8,558#56
@frontend · 3,355#57
@frontendInterview · 10,405#58
@frontendproglib · 20,812#59
@it_academy_tg · 12,652#60
@itverstak · 6,894#61
@yeahub_frontend · 3,162#62
@Frontend_Task · 8,374#63
@developer_shelf · 26,796#64
@coderoll · 4,075#65
@books_itishki · 7,420#66
@ru_react_notes · 3,429#67
@itles_tg · 15,953#68
@mavenjs · 1,131#69
@IT_Portal · 99,777#70
@videos_it · 5,990#71
@BackendPortal · 16,076#72
@css_doshik · 4,628#73
@tests_js · 3,996#74
@codepen_js · 8,819#75
@made_in_html_css · 1,210#76
@figma_maketss · 35,123#77
@unilance · 14,802#78
@frontendVacancy · 2,404#79
@true_figma · 26,013#80
@UmarSadullayev · 5,209#81
@codecamp · 180,250#82
@Figmaa · 3,407#83
@porscode_archive · 9,701#84
@UstozShogird · 22,971#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@seniorFront · 23,852
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
@sitodel · 25,662
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
@senior_front · 19,233
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 October 2026
@code_ready · 21,675
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 September 2026
@FrontendPortal · 36,370
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вайб-кодинг” (@vibecoding_tg), 63,609 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vibecoding_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.