Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Оцифрованный схоласт

Channel

Оцифрованный схоласт

@ID_sholast_ID

Not marked by Telegram, checked 31 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

825subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002245095413
TypeChannel
Username@ID_sholast_ID
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ID_sholast_ID

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

814825819.57 August 2026 — 815 subscribers8 August 2026 — 815 subscribers16 August 2026 — 814 subscribers23 August 2026 — 815 subscribers13 September 2026 — 825 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 37 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 812–827 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 08:59825+10
23 Aug 2026, 04:25815+1
16 Aug 2026, 02:57814-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:33815no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:49815first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2337.1%
👍1219.4%
👀69.68%
🤡69.68%
😢34.84%
🎉23.23%
💯23.23%
🔥23.23%
❤11.61%
👎11.61%
👾11.61%
🙈11.61%
🤣11.61%
🤯11.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bbbreaking

Конкурс на новый факультет искусственного интеллекта МГУ составил 127 человек на место, сообщили РИА Новости в пресс-службе вуза.

7 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC122 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @technosplitPhoto

🇷🇺 Россия вновь стала абсолютным чемпионом IOAI по ИИ Российская сборная выиграла международную олимпиаду по искусственному интеллекту IOAI в Казахстане, завоевав 8 медалей и обойдя Китай и Польшу. В команде 7 золотых и 1 бронзовая награда, а Артём Горохов получил звание абсолютного победителя. Россия выигрывает IOAI третий год подряд. @technosplit

❤1👍1

7 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC123 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bbbreaking

❗️Американские ученые впервые использовали искусственный интеллект для создания новых видов вирусов, которые не существуют в природе, сообщает газета New York Times со ссылкой на результаты исследования. "Впервые ученые использовали искусственный интеллект для создания новых видов вирусов. Это открывает перспективы для развития медицины, но одновременно вызывает тревогу из-за возможности того, что однажды эту технол…

👎1🤯1

7 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC156 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @prime1

🤖🌿 ИИ нашел борщевик — владельцу участка выписали штраф В Подмосковье впервые оштрафовали собственника за борщевик, выявленный с помощью ИИ и дрона. Штраф составил 150 тысяч рублей. Система определяет очаги растения, сопоставляет данные с кадастром и помогает находить нарушителей. Подписывайтесь на ПРАЙМ в Макс​

👍1👾1

7 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC157 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @romanovskiy_pboyul

Как говорил мой друг Гена: "95% людей тупые". На самом деле я пересчитал точнее - 97,5%. Но это не повод расслабляться - 5 умных человек на 200 достаточно, чтобы вы никогда не зарабатывали больше 150 тысяч рублей, если не входите в эти 2,5%. Да даже и если входите. Больше миллиона в месяц в России зарабатывает только 0,16% населения. То есть на лямчик в месяц нихуёвая такая конкуренция даже среди умных. Кстати, несмо…

🤡4👍3

7 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC160 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @grigorianthouths

Почему не стоит писать тексты с помощью ИИ Казалось бы, с простым текстом нейросеть может справиться довольно легко, так что можно ей делегировать эту задачу, а самому заняться более важными делами. Например, погрузиться в пучину рилсов в известной социальной сети. Однако делать этого не стоит. Письмо — это не просто утилитарное действие, предполагающее движение ручкой или нажатие на клавиатуру. Письмо — это своего…

💯2🤡2

7 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC169 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dealerAI

🕸 "не проиграл - он вышел из гонки ИИ добровольно"(с) С такого тезиса начинает автор статьи. Основные тезисы: 1. OpenAI и Anthropic вышли на петлю самоулучшения (RSI). 📈 RSI-концепция – модель А создаёт модель Б, которая создаёт модель В, и так далее по экспоненте. Их подход опирается на "горький урок" Ричарда Саттона: "грубая сила вычислений и масштабирование решают всё". 🧠 2. Сегодня те, кто сможет сделать моде…

6 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC189 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ai_newzPhoto

Meta выпустила собственного агента — Muse Code Вместе с этим релизнулась Muse Spark 1.2. Заявляют что новая модель с официальным харнесом лучше Grok 4.5, но не дотягивает до Opus 5. Самое интересное тут — новая ценовая политика. Теперь, если вы позволите Meta тренировать модели на ваших данных, то модель отдают совсем за бесценок — $0,1/$0,2 за миллион токенов, против обычной цены в $1,25/$4,25. Это делает её дешев…

6 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC197 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vibecoding_tgPhoto

Плохие новости: на странице API DeepSeek написано, что в ближайшее время стоимость использования API DeepSeek значительно вырастет. Самое время выжать максимум из Flash, пока он не подорожал. 👀

😢3

6 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC210 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @degradat1Photo

Совпадение? НЕ ДУМАЮ! Деградат нация. Подписаться.

😁8🙈1

5 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC215 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @packofpicturesPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ID_sholast_ID. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Инфляционный шок!
@inflation_shock · 39,951
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Angry Bonds
@angrybonds · 24,201
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Оцифрованный схоласт” (@ID_sholast_ID), 825 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ID_sholast_ID.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.