📜 Страница скроллится, а window.scrollY показывает 0 У каждой страницы есть главный контейнер прокрутки, root scroller. Только он получает восстановление позиции при возврате «назад», прокрутку пробелом и стрелками, сворачивание адресной строки на телефоне. Потерять его легко. Вот частая комбинация: html, body { height: 100%; overflow-x: hidden; } Из-за overflow-x: hidden по вертикали у body получается auto. …

Channel
Senior Frontend - javascript, html, css
@seniorFront
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,852subscribers
-508 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001330416745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seniorFront |
| Description | Senior Front - канал для frontend программистов, практические задачки, проверки знаний, интересные статьи Админ, сотрудничество, реклама:@seniorFrontPromo, @maria_seniorfront Канал в реестре РКН https://rknn.link/bsU |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seniorFront |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 07:35 | 23,852 | -52 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 23,904 | -55 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 23,959 | -25 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 23,984 | -30 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 24,014 | -9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 24,023 | -23 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 24,046 | -15 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 24,061 | -26 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 24,087 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 24,088 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:24 | 24,098 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:46 | 24,115 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 24,125 | -20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 24,145 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 24,155 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 24,159 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 24,168 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 24,179 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 24,195 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 24,205 | first reading |
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 5 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.30%
- avg views ÷ 23,852 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,260
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.21%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (5 December 2025 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 18,955 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Oct 2026, 01:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,290
- Videos
- ≈2,250
- Links
- ≈690
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 9m 55s
- Average length
- 2m 29s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
260 reactions across 36 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 87 | 33.5% | |
| 👎 | 78 | 30.0% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 17.7% | |
| 👍 | 43 | 16.5% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 2.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2025 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.17%
- 1 of 46 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 3,230
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 3,130
- over 45 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwtvJQL | 1 | 15 September 2026 | 15 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2025 to 6 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
✨ Одна и та же CSS-переменная может дать 1, а может 2 Кастомные свойства вроде --index по умолчанию хранятся как кусок текста. Вычисляется он там, где переменную подставили через var(), а не там, где объявили. Пример Джейка Арчибальда. У второго div задано --index: sibling-index() (номер элемента среди соседей, с единицы). Его первый ребёнок, абзац, получает scale: var(--index). Масштаб будет 1: функция считается у…
🎉 iframe, который сам подстраивается под содержимое Обычно у <iframe> фиксированный размер. Встроенная форма или виджет комментариев выросли, и появляется полоса прокрутки. В Chrome 154 фрейм умеет брать размер из встроенного документа. Нужно согласие обеих сторон. Внешняя страница задаёт фрейму свойство frame-sizing: /* In styles.css for index.html */ iframe { frame-sizing: content-height; width: 100%; } А д…
❤3🔥1
⚽ Одна обёртка, две стороны сетки: турнирная таблица на subgrid Турнирную сетку плей-офф рисуют симметрично: часть пар раунда слева, часть справа. На сайте FIFA каждая такая половина свёрстана отдельным div, и разметка просто повторяет картинку. Есть вариант чище. Раунд остаётся одним элементом с детьми .start и .end. Он растягивается на всю общую сетку .rounds и через subgrid получает её колонки и строки: .round-…
👍1
3 дня бесплатного обучения во Frontend-разработке! Вместо лекций пройди симуляцию настоящего первого заказа. Скучных уроков не будет. Их заменяет сюжет, где ты уже начинающий Frontend-разработчик и у тебя есть первый клиент. За 3 дня ты: - Получишь первую задачу от «клиента» стоимостью 10 000 руб. и соберёшь структуру сайта на HTML; - Оформишь внешний вид сайта по пожеланиям клиента с помощью CSS; - Добавишь на …
✨ Как не оставить один пункт меню одного на новой строке Когда во флексбоксе включён перенос (flex-wrap: wrap), элементы уходят на следующую строку, как только перестают помещаться. Бывает, что там оказывается ровно один: пять пунктов меню сверху и одинокий «Speaking» снизу. Обычно это чинят медиазапросом, но он легко ломается, стоит поменять текст. Новое значение flex-wrap: balance делает иначе: браузер сам раскла…
👍2
📦 Почему карточка ломается на широком мониторе Медиазапрос @media знает только ширину окна. Положите карточку в колонку 300px на экране 1920px, и правило min-width: 1024px всё равно сработает. Карточка получит широкую раскладку и начнёт сжиматься и вылезать за края. Контейнерный запрос @container спрашивает другое: сколько места у компонента именно здесь. Обёртку объявляем контейнером, а стили карточки завязываем н…
🔥2❤1
Posted without readable text
✅ Свой чекбокс, который не ломает фокус Родной чекбокс в CSS почти не настраивается: по сути, только цвет через accent-color. Псевдоэлемент ::checkmark уже есть в спецификации, но, по словам автора, браузеры над ним пока не работают. Приём простой: настоящий <input> не прячут, а кладут внутрь span с рамкой, снимают родной вид и растягивают поверх коробки: .checkbox input { margin: 0; width: 100%; height: 100…
❤1👍1🔥1
🤖 AI для фронтенд-разработчика: собираем инструменты на Podlodka Frontend Crew AI-инструменты уже используют все, но порой в обсуждении с LLM возникает ощущение, что голова полна ответов, но их всё ещё недостаточно, чтобы разрешить вполне себе прикладные вопросы. Эксперты Podlodka Frontend Crew собрали онлайн-конференцию «Фронтенд с AI», чтобы вместе с практиками из индустрии увидеть, как работает AI в разных аспек…
Posted without readable text
🎯 Иконка в списке съезжает, когда подпись переносится на вторую строку Иконка и текст стоят в flex-контейнере с align-items: center. Когда текст переносится, иконка встаёт посередине всего блока, а не напротив первой строки. С align-items: start она поднимается выше букв: у строки есть пустое место от шрифта. Сдвиг на фиксированные 3px ломается, как только меняется шрифт или размер иконки. Надёжнее считать сдвиг ч…
👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @seniorFront. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@seniorFront named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 6 October 2026 – 7 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@frontendnoteschannel_ru · 31,223#1
@sWebDev · 7,455#2
@front_end_dev · 25,809#3
@frontendInterview · 10,405#4
@code_ready · 21,675#5
@FrontendPortal · 36,370#6
@easy_javascript_ru · 17,635#7
@frontendGA · 7,690#8
@we_use_js · 10,759#9
@tproger_web · 22,373#10
@senior_frontender · 9,157#11
@frontendproglib · 20,812#12
@godinhtml · 9,284#13
@notesjs · 7,446#14
@webdevlair · 7,934#15
@frontend_mind · 6,289#16
@senior_front · 19,233#17
@javascriptv · 16,939#18
@simple_frontend_tg · 7,487#19
@webb_dev · 8,284#20
@godofjs · 3,390#21
@guides_js · 7,149#22
@wb_code · 4,326#23
@frontendquestions · 6,722#24
@yeahub_frontend · 3,162#25
@ThisFrontend · 2,938#26
@frontend_1 · 10,401#27
@coderoll · 4,075#28
@codeclean · 12,021#29
@yandex4frontend · 10,852#30
@codebase_frontend · 1,932#31
@frontenderrrr · 3,138#32
@free_html_lessons · 4,502#33
@forwebdev · 13,060#34
@frontendlib · 8,438#35
@vibecoding_tg · 63,609#36
@jsdevjob · 9,593#37
@frontendblok · 6,908#38
@figma2html · 45,301#39
@HtmlGram1 · 9,102#40
@htmlshit · 14,416#41
@codepen_amazing · 4,763#42
@js_test · 9,713#43
@web_craft · 5,015#44
@animate_css · 6,415#45
@codepen_js · 8,819#46
@css_doshik · 4,628#47
@react_tg · 16,236#48
@Frontend_Task · 8,374#49
@xCode_Journal · 13,905#50
@codewebx_it · 4,445#51
@reactify_IT · 6,456#52
@sitodel · 25,662#53
@javascriptquiz · 4,646#54
@easy_frontend_task · 8,357#55
@katerina_profrontend · 2,849#56
@web_stack · 4,114#57
@true_figma · 26,013#58
@tproger · 78,074#59
@true_js · 5,879#60
@simple_js · 4,730#61
@vladm · 39,288#62
@ithumor · 60,541#63
@codecamp · 180,077#64
@ru_react_notes · 3,429#65
@github · 155,595#66
@whilet_ru · 1,171#67
@itmemes · 122,995#68
@proglibrary · 78,238#69
@frontendquiz · 1,510#70
@nuancesprog · 56,362#71
@artalog · 4,212#72
@job_react · 16,425#73
@JScript_jobs · 12,486#74
@prog_way_blog · 2,201#75
@IT_Portal · 99,777#76
@easy_frontend_tests · 7,197#77
@figma_start · 9,291#78
@job_webdev · 7,467#79
@frontend · 3,355#80
@programmer_memes · 51,030#81
@tests_js · 3,996#82
@frontend_info · 5,286#83
@uzdev_jobs · 26,038#84
@unilance · 14,802#85
@UstozShogird · 22,971#86
@frontEndJobo · 10,586#87
@figma_maketss · 35,123#88
@javascript · 31,076#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@front_end_dev · 25,809
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
@frontendnoteschannel_ru · 31,223
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
@senior_front · 19,233
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 October 2026
@code_ready · 21,675
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 September 2026
@tproger_web · 22,373
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
@FrontendPortal · 36,370
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
@frontendproglib · 20,812
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 September 2026
@webguild · 51,126
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
@fedevelopment · 28,661
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
@vibecoding_tg · 63,609
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@figma2html · 45,301
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
@sitodel · 25,662
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
@true_figma · 26,013
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
@front_end_first · 25,862
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
@webdevelopment657 · 22,266
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
@frontend_trend · 19,053
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 October 2026
@webde · 31,715
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
@EnglishScript · 44,988
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
@javascript · 31,076
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
@nuancesprog · 56,362
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@porscode_tg · 28,353
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
@the_coding_wizard · 177,960
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@Codewithrandom · 229,782
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
@helpme_coder · 19,486
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Senior Frontend - javascript, html, css” (@seniorFront), 23,852 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seniorFront.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.