Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Про Проекты и карьеру в ИТ | Романова

Channel

Про Проекты и карьеру в ИТ | Романова

@proProject1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,323subscribers

+217 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001313063129
TypeChannel
Username@proProject1
DescriptionКак получить работу в ИТ с зп 300к+ 800+ офферов с ЗП до 1,2 млн. руб. Узнай свои шансы на бесплатной карьерной диагностике - @projectpro3 По вопросам рекламы @LocalTalent_bot № 49350375
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/proProject1

Growth

36,05936,32336,1916 August 2026 — 36,106 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,165 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,137 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,124 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,059 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,123 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,170 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,235 subscribers14 August 2026 — 36,251 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,235 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,217 subscribers18 August 2026 — 36,241 subscribers19 August 2026 — 36,167 subscribers20 August 2026 — 36,245 subscribers21 August 2026 — 36,323 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net +217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,019–36,363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 14:4936,323+78
20 Aug 2026, 14:3736,245+78
19 Aug 2026, 15:4836,167-74
18 Aug 2026, 15:3336,241+24
17 Aug 2026, 16:3736,217-18
16 Aug 2026, 13:4736,235-16
14 Aug 2026, 20:5436,251+16
13 Aug 2026, 08:4736,235+65
12 Aug 2026, 06:5336,170+47
11 Aug 2026, 03:5436,123+64
10 Aug 2026, 04:3336,059-65
9 Aug 2026, 01:3136,124-13
7 Aug 2026, 23:4536,137-28
7 Aug 2026, 02:5436,165+59
6 Aug 2026, 03:3236,106first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 36,323 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,300
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held37 (27 July 202621 August 2026)
Views total196,060
Reactions total2,150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
764
Videos
129
Links
1,030

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,150 reactions across 37 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥68531.9%
39418.3%
😁27212.7%
🤣25812.0%
😱1446.70%
👍713.30%
🤬532.47%
👏452.09%
💯452.09%
💔351.63%
😭291.35%
🗿271.26%
🙈241.12%
🤯110.512%
❤‍🔥70.326%
👌70.326%
😢70.326%
🤝60.279%
😨50.233%
🐳40.186%
10 further kinds210.977%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 37 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @proProject1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.70%
1 of 37 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
4,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,540
over 36 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvZtKB1117 August 202617 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈2,220 views47 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Вы еще правда в ИТ хотите? 🤔 Или свеженькие рейтинги от hh за ИЮЛЬ подъехали. хуже разве что в ТОП менеджменте, маркетинге, стратегии и развлечениях 🙈 Может все-таки в сантехники, трактористам наверное должно быть неплохо еще... Ну а самоубийцам - велкам в карьерную группу 😂 https://forms.gle/W6jTrFNDtgvJakte8

🤣33😢7🗿61

21 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC≈2,570 views29 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

😱 День открытых дверей в карьерную группу. Впервые за все время существовавания продукта! Как за 3 месяца дойти до оффера в Avito, Яндексе, Т-Банке или OZON, с полной удаленкой и заплатой на 20-30% выше средней, а еще при этом не сойти с ума в процессе В 2026 году рынок труда в IT и digital изменился: поиск работы вместо 2 недель занимает 3-6 месяцев, а резюме, которое год назад «залетало», теперь молчит неделями.

🔥176👍6

20 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC≈2,970 views24 reactionsread 22 August 2026

«Ну так человек за 2 года мог измениться» Или подъехала пояснительная бригада под вчерашнее голосовое. Многие написали в комментарии: «что за несправедливость», ведь человек за 2 года мог прокачаться/ измениться / набраться опыта Давайте 2 кейса рассмотрим, тк Тут нельзя все под одну гребенку грести. 1. Сценарий первый - человеку в первый раз отказали, потому что он реально был плох/ токсичил / душнил / плохо пока

21👍3

19 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈3,260 views116 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Что делать, если вас пытаются сократить Или хороши мем в тему вчерашнего обсуждения 🤣

🤣85😁207👍2😭2

19 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC≈3,380 views45 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Voice message

🎧 Подкаст. "Я уже был на многих собесах и увы везде отказы, что делать?" Сегодня важный подкаст о том, что делать, если вы засветились во многих компаниях. Будет полезно тем, кто еще не выходил на рынок труда, чтобы предостеречь вас от ошибок, ну и тем, кто уже «наследил», - дам несколько топ лайфаков. 01:00 Короткий обзор, что изменилось на рынке труда и почему сейчас такие сложности 02:03 Позиционирование - глав

38👍2💊2🤝2😱1

18 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈3,650 views83 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Оххх… сколько гнусных манипуляций происходит у клиентов в связи с сокращениям, как все мерзко… Внезапные отчеты, невыполнимые задания, функции вооьще других ролей 🥲 Делитесь своими Истриями, какая у вас практика «выжимания» из компании

💔35😭27🤬7💯64🗿2👀1🤣1

18 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC≈3,760 views28 reactionsread 22 August 2026

😱 Я не знаю, откуда вы берете все эти офферы или Как получить оффер с ЗП выше рынка на 20-30% даже в условиях полной ж... на рынке труда Или что такое карьерная группа, как туда попасть и почему ВАМ НАДО, даже если вы не планируете менять работу сейчас! Для тех, кто в танке Карьерная группа - это моя авторская ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ карьерного сопровождения, по которой 94% ИТ и digital специалистов за 3 месяца получают ТОПовы

👍11🔥87😁2

17 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC≈4,000 views31 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqvZtKB1

Очень удобно думать, что прокрастинация - это лень. Да ещё и подбадривать себя, типа «соберись тряпка». Вот мой ТОП 3 разлочек, чтобы помочь себе 1. Вам, да и нам всем, трудно говорить о своих успехах и достижениях - ну не учили нас этому в детстве, не высовывайся, куда ты лезешь и т.д. ✔️Что с этим делать: начать отмечать свои маленькие шаги к вашей цели ЕЖЕДНЕВНО. Вот вы пока пост этот читаете, возьмите ексельку

22🙈6🤬3

15 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈4,340 views64 reactionsread 22 August 2026

у меня сегодня у одной клод работает как тупой РП первогодка от подрядчика? 🙈😂 я аж работу вспомнила, там такие фразы звучат: • ты совсем еб..ся • ты почему это удалил... • я же просила тебя • я тебе уже несколько раз об этом говорила • тебе что, трудно, просто взять и сделать .... вообщем, можно Олю вытащить из найма, но найм из Оли видимо нет... а что еще страшнее, что ты понимаешь, что эти фразы не возымеют на н

😁33🤣23💯62

14 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈4,830 views16 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🔥 10 повторных бесплатных диагностик от меня Для тех, кто уже был у нас на диагностике, но почему-то не решился. После вчерашнего эфира мне написали многие ребята со словами "ООО, теперь я понял, что ты имела ввиду, когда говорила..." - и я понимаю, что для многих мое мнение часто становится решающим. В том числе 3-м своим клиентам в этом меяце я настоятельно рекомендовала не выходить рынок, и вам очень часто снимаю

16

13 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC≈5,140 views10 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Сегодня было ОЧЕНЬ много вопросов про возраст. Вот тут был очень важный подкаст ☝🏻

🔥8👍2

13 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC≈5,240 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🟢 мы уже в эфире) Ссылка на зум тут https://t.me/Prouprav_bot?start=c1786359142447-ds

🔥4👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @proProject1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@proProject1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 15,335 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Максим Дорофеев: Прокрастинация и джедайские техники
@mnogosdelal · 24,702
10 posts
Про Управление
@ProYpravlenca · 31,514
8 posts
Senior Frontend - javascript, html, css
@seniorFront · 24,225
7 posts
Я работаю в digital, детка 🚀
@digital_rabota · 33,887
6 posts
Нестыдная фасилитация
@no_shame_facilitation · 23,037
6 posts
Продакт аналитикс
@productanalyticsfordummies · 9,486
6 posts
Системный и Бизнес-анализ
@ba_sa_analytics · 52,130
5 posts
Что вы мне рекламируете?
@honestmarketing · 30,365
5 posts
I’m CTO, bitch
@ctobtch · 20,215
4 posts
Local Talent | Design
@local_talent · 9,197
4 posts
Frontend Interview - собеседования по Javascript / Html / Css
@frontendInterview · 10,577
3 posts
СЕТИ — IT & Digital вакансии
@it_vakansii_jobs · 93,552
3 posts
Вакансии с ЗП выше 100 тысяч
@theypaywell · 26,034
3 posts
Frontend Головного Мозга
@frontend_mind · 6,386
2 posts
Local Talent | Product
@local_talent_product · 7,644
2 posts
Local Talent | Project
@local_talent_project · 4,037
2 posts
Boga Goga
@bogagoga · 116
1 post
LinkedIn & Career | Alex Lepeshkin
@CareerPump · 18,038
1 post
Datalytics
@datalytx · 8,806
1 post
Хороший интерфейс
@goodux · 6,774
1 post
Кисткин. Слово
@kistkinword · 1,150
1 post
Павел Рогожин | Размышления ПиэМа
@pm_rogozhin_skepsis · 380
1 post
BA & SA | 10000 Interview questions
@SystemAnalystInterview · 10,355
1 post
privet yeba |-/
@whoisprivetyeba · 2,670
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Job for Products and Projects
@forproducts · 68,642
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Без aspera
@bezaspera · 71,890
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
ФРИЛАНС | ВАКАНСИИ | УДАЛЕНКА
@freelancce · 62,445
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Про Проекты и карьеру в ИТ | Романова” (@proProject1), 36,323 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proProject1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.