Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Junior AI PM

Channel

Junior AI PM

@junior_pm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,377subscribers

+60 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001378472217
TypeChannel
Username@junior_pm
Created9 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/junior_pm

Growth

7,3177,3777,3476 August 2026 — 7,317 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,317 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,326 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,329 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,346 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,347 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,351 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,352 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,372 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,377 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 30 days, net +60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,308–7,386 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 23:207,377+5
31 Aug 2026, 21:357,372+20
25 Aug 2026, 23:587,352+1
22 Aug 2026, 21:487,351+4
19 Aug 2026, 08:077,347+1
16 Aug 2026, 08:077,346+17
12 Aug 2026, 16:367,329+3
9 Aug 2026, 18:127,326+9
6 Aug 2026, 15:027,317no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:327,317first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 7,377 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,140
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held13 (18 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total3,431
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5029.9%
🔥3822.8%
💩2816.8%
🤡116.59%
💅84.79%
🥴84.79%
👏52.99%
🤔52.99%
👀42.40%
👎42.40%
🎉21.20%
😁21.20%
🕊10.599%
🤯10.599%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC189 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026

#мнение Безответственность при работе с агентными скиллами Есть любопытный прецедент от Вани Замесина в репозитории Next Move Theory Canon and Skills. Классный пак, переодически оттуда таскаю идеи Ваня, известный продуктовый эксперта: экс-руководителя продукта Яндекс.Картинок, основателя проданного Profi.ru сервиса Мета и автора Advanced Jobs To Be Done. По данным Next Move Theory, его программы прошли более 14 000

👍3🔥2🤯1

11 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC≈2,270 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#иное Комьюнити-эфир 12 августа. Живая дискуссия про AI coding Без докладов и презентаций -> просто собираемся и обсуждаем, как сейчас реально работаем с AI-разработкой 🎙 Максим Ключников -> техлид и автор канала Этихлид, много экспериментирует с AI в разработке и инженерных процессах https://t.me/etechlead 🎙 Денис Киселёв -> AI SOLO founder, автор канала про AI-разработку, агентов и инженерные инструменты https:

👍6🔥4💩1🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC972 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#кейс_стади Разбор с СEO, вайбкодом и Едрит Многие ответили на задачу с позиции мидл-менеджера: провести ретро, спросить архитектора, поправить процессы, не лезть в чужую работу. Но CEO здесь вообще в другой позиции. У него сорван крупный контракт, под риском следующий рейз, потеряно доверие к инженерным оценкам и появился контрпример. Его задача быстро вернуть управляемость Первое Показать свою ветку CTO и постави

🔥7🤔5👍2🤡2💩1

3 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC≈4,400 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#мнение Сейчас Codex лучше Claude Code Здравствуй, неподгоревший читатель. Этот пост про то что сейчас рабочая лошадка из фронтир моделей. Также ответ на Пашино https://t.me/evilfreelancer/1846 Если нужен один дефолт -> GPT-5.6 Terra в Codex Pro с medium usege без Fast mode. Мое глубокое субъективное имхо на 3 августа 2026. По кредитной шкале при одинаковом токенном профиле Sol : Terra : Luna = 25 : 10 : 1: Terra ж

💩8👍6😁2🤡1🥴1

31 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,490 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @countwithsashaPhoto

Туту проводит хакатон: хороший способ познакомиться с командой Помните я рассказывал, что запустили MCP для сервиса путешествий Туту. Самый популярный запрос в личку по итогам анонса был про то, как я нашел проект и договорился с командой. Ответ простой, команду я уже знал, прототип приготовил за вечер. Сделал демо, оно зашло. Вчера Туту анонсировали хакатон с призами: https://hackathon2026.tutu.ru Призы символиче

🎉2💩2🤡2

31 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,390 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

#иное У Туту будет славный хакатон вокруг их MCP(вы можете организовать поездки прямо из Claude) , Саша еще и сидит в жюри За день команда до 5 человек собирает работающий продукт на живом поиске билетов и отелей -> агента, бота, интерфейс или улучшение самого MCP Формат очень здоровый: до 30 команд, менторы из Туту, исходники + короткий питч, оценивают продукт, UX и технику Хороший шанс помериться силушкой вайбк

🔥2👎1💩1🤡1

30 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC≈8,700 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026

#полезное Постоянный канал с вакансиями для AI-инженеров https://t.me/ai_engineer_jobs. Туда автоматически летят вакансии для AI Engineer, LLM Engineer, Agent Engineer, AI Product Engineer, vibe coder и других около-AI ролей. Сейчас подключено 22 источника -> чуть позже будет 400+ Поддерживает Telegram, RSS, API, карьерные сайты и вообще любые источники, которые удастся обнаружить и распарсить. Также содержит продв

👍4🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,500 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

💩5🥴5👀2🔥2🤡1

29 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,350 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#кейс_стади Задача на подумать для менеджера Ты фаундер и CEO сервиса доставки продуктов Едрит. Компании пять лет. За последние полтора года разработка выросла с 4 до 51 человек, ФОТ апнулся почти 10 раз, а средний срок заметной фичи с 2 недель до 2 месяцев (точно вы не знаете). Новые разработчики, тимлиды и архитекторы появляются регулярно. Больше деливери и качественнее почему-то не становится. Чувство развода ско

💩3👀2🥴2🔥1🤡1

27 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,040 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026

#рецепт В чём настоящая ценность Agent Skills. Часть 3 В первых двух частях мы дошли до мысли, что skill - это повсеместная база. Скоро так точно. Теперь мое любимое: если артефакт можно установить, обновить, пошарить команде и дать ему shell/GitHub/Jira, это уже supply chain и его можно атаковать! У обычного npm-пакета чаще опасен код. У skill опасен код, зависимости, allowed-tools, scripts/, references/, descript

🔥5👍3👏2💩2🤡1

27 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,080 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#рецепт В чём настоящая ценность Agent Skills. Часть 2 В прошлой части я докрутил мысль, что skill - это workflow package, а не промпт в папочке. Теперь о том, почему у одних скиллы работают, а у других превращаются в markdown-папку с надеждой на чудо или вообще не вызываются Главный подвох: настоящий прикол не только в SKILL.md, а в связке Skill + Agent Harness. Harness - это рантайм вокруг модели: поиск skills, в

👍3💩3🔥3👏2🤡1

27 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,230 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#рецепт В чём настоящая ценность Agent Skills. Часть 1 Здравствуй, дорогой читатель. Скиллы до сих почти никто не понял. Я уже писал вводный пост про скиллы и почему менеджерам стоит смотреть на них как на святой грааль: https://t.me/junior_pm/422 После доклада про Agentic Harness хочу докрутить мысль инженернее. Скилл - это не "промпт в папочке", а слой поведения агента. MCP, API и CLI дают агенту руки, а skill об

🔥8👍4💩2👏1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @junior_pm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@junior_pm edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Про Проекты и карьеру в ИТ | Романова
@proProject1 · 36,553
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Про Управление
@ProYpravlenca · 31,614
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 6 September 2026
Вакансии для продактов и проджектов
@product_jobs · 35,931
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Job for Products and Projects
@forproducts · 69,033
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Junior AI PM” (@junior_pm), 7,377 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/junior_pm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.