Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for pmclub — учим управлять

Channel

pmclub — учим управлять

@pmclub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,773subscribers

-169 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001121717925
TypeChannel
Username@pmclub
Created7 June 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pmclub

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,77320,94420,858.56 August 2026 — 20,942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,938 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,936 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,943 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,944 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,922 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,913 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,903 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,896 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,881 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,887 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,882 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,875 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,876 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,871 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,870 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,864 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,859 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,847 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,846 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,843 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,845 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,834 subscribers5 September 2026 — 20,829 subscribers8 September 2026 — 20,821 subscribers11 September 2026 — 20,807 subscribers13 September 2026 — 20,796 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,787 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20,785 subscribers19 September 2026 — 20,773 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 44 days, net -169. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,747–20,970 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:0120,773-12
16 Sept 2026, 16:5720,785-2
14 Sept 2026, 19:1920,787-9
13 Sept 2026, 06:5920,796-11
11 Sept 2026, 07:1820,807-14
8 Sept 2026, 14:2020,821-8
5 Sept 2026, 09:0220,829-5
2 Sept 2026, 04:4320,834-11
1 Sept 2026, 04:3620,845+2
31 Aug 2026, 05:0420,843-3
30 Aug 2026, 02:0920,846-1
29 Aug 2026, 03:5520,847-12
28 Aug 2026, 05:2720,859-5
27 Aug 2026, 04:1820,864-6
24 Aug 2026, 10:1320,870-1
22 Aug 2026, 15:5720,871-5
20 Aug 2026, 05:4920,876+1
19 Aug 2026, 08:3820,875-7
18 Aug 2026, 11:5620,882-5
17 Aug 2026, 10:5520,887first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.38%
avg views ÷ 20,773 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held37 (27 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total13,243
Reactions total142
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 17:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
1m 48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

557 reactions across 33 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13624.4%
🔥12823.0%
😁9316.7%
👍8615.4%
🤷‍♂244.31%
💯193.41%
🤓183.23%
❤‍🔥132.33%
👀132.33%
🎉111.97%
🙏71.26%
🏆61.08%
🐳30.539%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 581 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 11:20 UTC743 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#вакансии_недели Project Manager (PM client-facing, DACH) at Xmethod.de https://pmclub.pro/tpost/xtxuoro2v1-project-manager-pm-client-facing-dach-at Project Manager Middle в ООО Амига (сертификат или понимание P3.express приветствуется) https://hh.ru/vacancy/136705240 Старший руководитель проектов в BI.ZONE (Направление Управление проектами) (важно наличие действующих сертификатов по УП) https://hh.ru/vacancy/1365

😁122🐳2💯1

2 Sept 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,060 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ребята из большинства — мы за вас искренне рады. Почти от всего сердца ❤️ Ребята, которым не так кайфово пришлось в школьные годы, — не расстраивайтесь, мы создали норм школу. Серьёзно, посмотрите на отзыв от 31 августа. ☝️ Приходите! P.S. Участники ПМ101 и P3.express, вам на почты вчера прилетело письмо со скидосами, используйте до 6 сентября. Если не нашли, пишите Елене @pmclub_help_bot. Всем классного учебно

6❤‍🔥2🤓1

1 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,160 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Пикчер гений, статья топ. Друзья из @kaiten_ru поделились главой про риски из книги «Не усложняй! Управление проектами по методу P3.express» Кстати, в Кайтене есть отличный шаблон для P3․express — для рисков там отдельная доска.

🔥74👍2

1 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,220 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

💁‍♀️ В честь такого дня хочется спросить, на какой вы стороне?

  1. Школьные годы чудесные55%
  2. Школьные годы отстой45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁9👍2🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,260 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

👉 Что делать, если вы когда-то завершили в @pmclub курс и доступ закончился, а сейчас понадобилось освежить знания? Ищете работу, дали новый проект или просто вспомнили, что не прошли :) Напишите в бот @pmclub_help_bot и снова отройте доступ на месяц или больше — это стоит от 1900 руб. P.S. Кст, если вы не активировали экзаменационный ваучер — вы всё равно можете пройти экзамен.

🔥54👍3

28 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,620 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

👉 Майк Клэйтон — эксперт в управлении проектами с 30 летним опытом, автор книг, напомнил базу про управление рисками. 🔖Освежите в памяти и сохраните

🔥13🤓2🙏2👍1

27 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC≈1,550 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @blackproductPhoto

Рекомендация книжки: Не усложняй Хочу поделиться и рассказать о книге, которые написали мои друзья Дима и Лера Иленковы. Ребята давно занимаются управлением проектами и очень приятно увидеть как они наконец осуществили мою мечту, выпстить свои наработки в полноценную книгу! О чем книга? Я ее уже прочитал в pdf один из первых, а теперь спешу порекомендовать и вам. Я бы сказал - это приятное дополнительное чтение для

7👍2🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈1,380 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📌 Встречают по одёжке, а продвигают по софт-скиллам. А что это за скиллы, мы обсуждали здесь с Александрой Клименко. Сохраняйте, кто пропустил) 🔗 https://vkvideo.ru/video-85927362_456239429 🔗 https://www.youtube.com/live/0BXEvKKIt5k?si=jEm1sPIzrsUacQNo

3🤓2🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,570 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ребята, приглашаю 10 октября посетить лицензионный TEDx в Белграде! Вот только часть заявленных тем: 📍The art of thinking in the age of AI 📍We’re Learning More Than Ever — And Understanding Less 📍A Planet-Sized Telescope Built for $300 📍Attention: What Acting Taught Me About Chaos Билетики тут, их мало: https://itconnect.tic.rs/ru/t79ylzzw Спикеров отобрали из 150 заявок. Я тоже буду выступать. Если всё пойдёт по

🔥12👍2🤓21

25 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC≈1,680 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#вакансии_недели Project Manager в Lunas Studio * удалёнка, но локация — строго Европа или СНГ (без Польши, Испании, Португалии, Сербии) https://pmclub.pro/tpost/bsgy789x51-project-manager-v-lunas-studio 💯 Разместить вакансию бесплатно: https://pmclub.pro/vacancies/razmestit-vakansiyu

😁18🤷‍♂6🔥3💯1

24 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,550 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Не мелочитесь, действуйте как Павел — проходите все курсы и пишите отзывы. Мир должен знать ваше мнение, отвечаю.

💯4😁3🤓21

21 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,960 views12 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Уже завтра прокачиваем английский)) Регистрация на эфир (YouTube-трансляция): https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdEsXqImwSsSwJhwWh602Q6ITrgya4fopENAK9dRNnW1jcGrw/viewform?usp=send_form Ссылочка появляется после отправки формы.

7🔥3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @pmclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTCAnonymous Poll164 voters

💁‍♀️ В честь такого дня хочется спросить, на какой вы стороне?

  1. Школьные годы чудесные55%
  2. Школьные годы отстой45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTCAnonymous Poll239 voters

Где у вас получается использовать ИИ?

  1. Подготовка встреч и фоллоуапов56%
  2. Разработка ТЗ и постановка задач57%
  3. Управление рисками23%
  4. Составление расписания18%
  5. Подготовка отчетности58%
  6. Создание прототипов31%
  7. Все процессы уже обИИшил12%
  8. Я против ИИшизации10%
  9. Напишу в комментах4%

The shares total 269%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🔥 Дмитрий Ирешев: AI • Продукты • Проекты
@dmitrii_ireshev_Agile_PMP · 27,750
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Про Проекты и карьеру в ИТ | Романова
@proProject1 · 37,220
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Менеджер от боженьки
@pm_god · 25,223
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Вакансии для продактов и проджектов
@product_jobs · 36,067
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Job for Products and Projects
@forproducts · 69,619
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Про Управление
@ProYpravlenca · 32,354
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 6 September 2026
Product Management & AI
@ruspm · 25,204
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Нормально делай, нормально будет / Саша Клименко
@normalno_delaj · 21,737
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Нестыдная фасилитация
@no_shame_facilitation · 22,868
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“pmclub — учим управлять” (@pmclub), 20,773 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pmclub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.