Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 79 days, net -83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,676–18,800 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Oct 2026, 22:27
18,696
+6
22 Oct 2026, 19:38
18,690
-2
21 Oct 2026, 14:26
18,692
-12
18 Oct 2026, 12:36
18,704
+3
17 Oct 2026, 09:16
18,701
-4
16 Oct 2026, 08:07
18,705
+1
15 Oct 2026, 09:41
18,704
+5
14 Oct 2026, 11:56
18,699
+2
12 Oct 2026, 23:46
18,697
+4
8 Oct 2026, 12:15
18,693
-16
4 Oct 2026, 01:22
18,709
-2
25 Sept 2026, 10:17
18,711
-2
18 Sept 2026, 23:37
18,713
-4
16 Sept 2026, 16:16
18,717
-5
14 Sept 2026, 20:21
18,722
-4
13 Sept 2026, 08:58
18,726
-14
11 Sept 2026, 08:41
18,740
-4
8 Sept 2026, 11:38
18,744
+2
3 Sept 2026, 10:08
18,742
-4
2 Sept 2026, 07:46
18,746
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
59 reactions across 27 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19
32.2%
🔥
14
23.7%
👍
13
22.0%
🎉
4
6.78%
👏
3
5.08%
❤🔥
2
3.39%
💯
2
3.39%
🗿
1
1.69%
🤩
1
1.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.50%
1 of 40 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,560
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,170
over 39 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwHNLhZ
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Аналитика начинается не с дашборда: как понять, какое решение должен поддерживать отчёт
Сложность: ★☆☆ | Время чтения: 6 мин
Автор делится структурой подхода к проектированию и построению дашбордрв, к которой пришёл на практике.
📎 Читать статью
💙Бизнес-анализ | ИТ | ИИ
💬Бизнес-анализ | ИТ | ИИ
Как построить управляемый Data Lakehouse за неделю на Evolution Data Platform ⤵️
На вебинаре 8 сентября эксперты Cloud.ru покажут, как за неделю с нуля построить архитектуру Data Lakehouse на Evolution Data Platform — от загрузки сырых данных до курированных витрин — с помощью управляемых сервисов, без эксплуатационной нагрузки и с фокусом на бизнес-результат.
В программе:
▶️принципы построения Lakehouse-архитекту…
Fine Talks: куда движется корпоративная аналитика
Собираемся, чтобы разобраться без лозунгов: что реально меняется в работе BI-команд с приходом ИИ, где он уже даёт результат, а где упирается в состояние данных. Одни ждут, что чат-бот заменит аналитика, другие уверены, что до их данных это не доедет.
В программе:
✅ дискуссия с практиками из СИБУР и t2: три версии показателя «выручка» в разных отчётах, матрица досту…
Data Lakehouse по‑русски: как не утонуть в болоте импортозамещения
Сложность: ★☆☆ | Время чтения: 23 мин
В статье попробуем отделить архитектурную концепцию от маркетинга и
разобраться, как на самом деле идут проекты внедрения Data Lakehouse
в России: какие решения доступны на рынке, какие проблемы платформа
не решает, когда её внедрение имеет смысл и как выбрать подход
к миграции.
📎 Читать статью
💙Бизнес-анализ …
Теория и практика DWH: все виды SCD по Кимбаллу
Сложность: ★★☆ | Время чтения: 4 мин
В статье рассматриваются медленно меняющиеся измерения – slowly changing dimensions (SCD)
📎 Читать статью
💙Бизнес-анализ | ИТ | ИИ
💬Бизнес-анализ | ИТ | ИИ
Исповедь бизнес-аналитика: о 25 отказах за день, первом тимлиде и любви к сложным задачам
Сложность: ☆☆☆ | Время чтения: 11 мин
Автор делится личным опытом перехода в аналитики.
📎 Читать статью
💙Бизнес-анализ | ИТ | ИИ
💬Бизнес-анализ | ИТ | ИИ
Все станут архитекторами? Как AI схлопывает привычные IT-профессии
Сложность: ☆☆☆ | Время чтения: 7 мин
В статье рассказывается про то, какие части разработки уже сегодня передаются искусственному интеллекту и как под его влиянием трансформируются процессы и роли в IT.
📎 Читать статью
💙Бизнес-анализ | ИТ | ИИ
💬Бизнес-анализ | ИТ | ИИ
🎉3💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @bamrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
GetAnalyst - Навыки • Системный анализ • Бизнес-анализ @getanalysts · 22,645 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
Клуб анонимных аналитиков @analyst_club · 33,420 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Системный Аналитик @sys_sa · 19,102 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 3 October 2026
Системный и Бизнес-анализ @ba_sa_analytics · 52,666 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Системный анализ | Ольга Пономарева @system_analyse · 31,339 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
pmclub — учим управлять @pmclub · 20,660 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
Секреты аналитики | Data Science, BI, Tableau @analytics_secrets · 46,987 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бизнес-анализ | ИТ | ИИ” (@bamrus), 18,696 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bamrus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.