Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Клуб анонимных аналитиков

Channel

Клуб анонимных аналитиков

@analyst_club

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,337subscribers

-469 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001788488602
TypeChannel
Username@analyst_club
DescriptionКанал Алексея Колоколова об аналитике, визуализации данных и дашбордах. Навигация: https://t.me/analyst_club/3 Чат клуба: https://t.me/+1cO-ZjpIJtRkODJi Заявление на регистрацию в Роскомнадзоре №5207373407
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/analyst_club

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

33,33733,80633,571.56 August 2026 — 33,806 subscribers6 August 2026 — 33,804 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,793 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,768 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,726 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,697 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,684 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,687 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,686 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,665 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,658 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,659 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,660 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,647 subscribers21 August 2026 — 33,651 subscribers23 August 2026 — 33,648 subscribers24 August 2026 — 33,643 subscribers26 August 2026 — 33,642 subscribers27 August 2026 — 33,641 subscribers27 August 2026 — 33,647 subscribers28 August 2026 — 33,648 subscribers29 August 2026 — 33,649 subscribers30 August 2026 — 33,653 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,652 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,643 subscribers3 September 2026 — 33,639 subscribers4 September 2026 — 33,626 subscribers7 September 2026 — 33,600 subscribers10 September 2026 — 33,585 subscribers12 September 2026 — 33,580 subscribers14 September 2026 — 33,569 subscribers16 September 2026 — 33,564 subscribers18 September 2026 — 33,554 subscribers1 October 2026 — 33,470 subscribers6 October 2026 — 33,462 subscribers11 October 2026 — 33,427 subscribers14 October 2026 — 33,414 subscribers15 October 2026 — 33,401 subscribers16 October 2026 — 33,403 subscribers17 October 2026 — 33,395 subscribers17 October 2026 — 33,386 subscribers19 October 2026 — 33,383 subscribers20 October 2026 — 33,426 subscribers21 October 2026 — 33,421 subscribers22 October 2026 — 33,420 subscribers24 October 2026 — 33,408 subscribers25 October 2026 — 33,391 subscribers26 October 2026 — 33,381 subscribers27 October 2026 — 33,384 subscribers28 October 2026 — 33,370 subscribers29 October 2026 — 33,364 subscribers30 October 2026 — 33,368 subscribers31 October 2026 — 33,367 subscribers1 November 2026 — 33,368 subscribers2 November 2026 — 33,363 subscribers3 November 2026 — 33,360 subscribers4 November 2026 — 33,352 subscribers5 November 2026 — 33,340 subscribers6 November 2026 — 33,337 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -469. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,267–33,876 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 13:3533,337-3
5 Nov 2026, 10:3933,340-12
4 Nov 2026, 08:3033,352-8
3 Nov 2026, 11:1633,360-3
2 Nov 2026, 07:5533,363-5
1 Nov 2026, 07:5733,368+1
31 Oct 2026, 11:1533,367-1
30 Oct 2026, 12:5633,368+4
29 Oct 2026, 12:1133,364-6
28 Oct 2026, 12:1633,370-14
27 Oct 2026, 14:0633,384+3
26 Oct 2026, 12:2733,381-10
25 Oct 2026, 14:4633,391-17
24 Oct 2026, 11:3533,408-12
22 Oct 2026, 11:3033,420-1
21 Oct 2026, 02:2733,421-5
20 Oct 2026, 01:2733,426+43
19 Oct 2026, 01:5733,383-3
17 Oct 2026, 22:3633,386-9
17 Oct 2026, 02:0633,395first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 166 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.81%
avg views ÷ 33,337 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.712%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held102 (18 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total82,200
Reactions total585
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 06:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,480
Videos
≈146
Links
≈918

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
31m 11s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,415 reactions across 101 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥76131.5%
❤54922.7%
👍43618.1%
😁1546.38%
🤣923.81%
👎883.64%
💯542.24%
💔361.49%
😐331.37%
✍321.33%
👌301.24%
🤔281.16%
🤓271.12%
👏190.787%
❤‍🔥160.663%
🥱130.538%
🙈100.414%
🎉90.373%
🥰60.248%
😱50.207%
7 further kinds170.704%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,425 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 102 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @analyst_club. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 102 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (39.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,200 views24 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥13👍7🤓4

6 Nov 2026, 07:21 UTC≈1,760 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

Ваши отношения с Экселем теперь?

  1. Так же часто стабильно видимся66%
  2. Стали реже встречаться25%
  3. Еще чаще на фоне этих ИИ9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤5

6 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC≈1,740 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

В начале года мы прощались с Экселем, а теперь интересно — и правда ли вы стали проводить с ним меньше времени?

👍1

5 Nov 2026, 15:14 UTC≈2,020 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

И финальная напоминалка — завтра симулятор принятия решений в Москве! Столешников 14, 18:30

👍4🔥2❤1

5 Nov 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,990 views25 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Ну что, у кого ещё Claude заблочили? 🤡 Мы вот тоже остались без любимой нейронки. Но нашу новую рубрику с комиксами бросать не собираемся, поэтому переехали со всем контекстом в ChatGPT. Казалось бы, что может пойти не так? В общем, видео перед вами. Судите сами))) А сюжет-то был про то, что если завтра случится цифровой блэкаут. Нейронки недоступны, VPN не работает. И тут всех обходит тот самый консервативный ана…

🤣15❤5🙈5

4 Nov 2026, 06:54 UTC≈2,090 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

А давайте исключим финансовые показатели! Я часто наблюдаю у клиентов перекос в сторону финансовых метрик, которые показывают тот самый "посмертный учет", но не помогают принимать решения. Оно и понятно, финансы - более оцифрованная сфера (не у всех) и хочется начать строить аналитику с данных, которые стабильно ведутся в учетной системе. Но такой подход может рождать не non-actionable дашборды, в которых только з…

👍2❤1

3 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈2,190 views29 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Андрей Федотов завершил свой месячный челлендж! Помните Андрея (предыстория), менеджера проектов из Астаны, который решил за месяц создать с помощью ИИ систему бюджетного планирования для крупного проекта в нефтегазовой отрасли. Задача была масштабная: собрать в одном приложении около 200 источников данных, на основе которых компания ежегодно формирует бюджет. Это бизнес-планы, капитальные и операционные затраты, ф…

👍19🔥9😁1

2 Nov 2026, 16:56 UTC≈2,390 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Инсайты с симулятора В пятницу мы провели в Екб первый симулятор на платформе Правда, и вот что получилось: Лидировала команда во главе с руководителем доставки в продуктовом ритейле. А в последнем раунде один шустрый игрок догадался обвалить рынок и они вырвались на 1 место! Это говорит о том, что симуляция удалась — все, как в реальном бизнесе: 🔺Те, кто принимал решения на данных и на опыте — лидировали 🔺Не вс…

❤6🔥4

30 Oct 2026, 11:25 UTC≈3,610 views38 reactionsread 7 November 2026
File

⛔️ «Не трогать эксельку!!! Она тут больше вас работает!» Даже в компаниях с миллиардными оборотами данные до сих пор живут в Excel, Google Таблицах и Яндекс Таблицах. А красивую интерактивную отчётность хочется всем. Желательно прямо сейчас, а не после полугодового внедрения BI-системы. Так вот, необязательно ничего ломать и перестраивать. 🤌 Можно самостоятельно собрать HTML-дашборд с помощью ИИ и подключить к не…

👍21❤10🔥7

28 Oct 2026, 16:44 UTC≈3,630 views14 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Куб для постановки задачи Вчера проводил установочное задание на курсе Влияние через данные, к нему обновил методу постановки задачи. Канвасов для описания требований к дашбордам много, но все они сделаны для аналитиков, а заказчики их не читают. Я попробовал в центр модели поставить человека - ЛПР (лицо, принимающее решение). Его окружают: 🔺Бизнес-процессы 🔺Показатели 🔺Выводы 🔺Решения От бизнес процессов мы опус…

👍8❤3🔥3

27 Oct 2026, 13:49 UTC≈3,510 views15 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Как принимать НЕверные решения с дашбордом Руководитель просит инструмент, который поможет принимать решения. А когда дело доходит до ТЗ, описывает очередную сводную таблицу, как в Экселе последние 20 лет Аналитик тем временем строит архитектурный шедевр из 47 графиков, 12 фильтров и показателей, о существовании которых бизнес даже не подозревал. В итоге все при деле, дашборд есть, но решения по-прежнему принимают…

❤10🔥4👍1

26 Oct 2026, 18:20 UTC≈2,740 views19 reactionsread 7 November 2026

🏗 Контроль ресурсов на удалённых площадках Юлия Ненахова — бизнес-аналитик Строительного холдинга «ЕНКО». Компания строит объекты социального назначения в Ханты-Мансийском округе. Компания растёт, проектов становится больше, а контролировать происходящее на удалённых площадках непросто. Подрядчик говорит, что у него на объекте столько-то людей, а у нас данные не сходятся. Потом пытаемся понять, где расхождение и п…

❤13🔥3👍2✍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @analyst_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@analyst_club edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 October 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Nov 2026, 07:21 UTCAnonymous Poll454 voters

Ваши отношения с Экселем теперь?

  1. Так же часто стабильно видимся66%
  2. Стали реже встречаться25%
  3. Еще чаще на фоне этих ИИ9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Oct 2026, 14:59 UTCAnonymous Poll405 voters

Как вы влияете на принятие решений в своей компании?

  1. Никак 😞29%
  2. Косвенно. Мой босс, коллеги опираются на мои отчеты44%
  3. Сильно. Босс, коллеги не могут без моих данных14%
  4. Я Босс и принимаю решения 😎13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Sept 2026, 11:32 UTCAnonymous Poll241 voters

Какие бизнес-процессы вы хотели бы улучшить или автоматизировать?

  1. Продажи (обработка заявок, КП, анализ воронки,прогноз продаж)23%
  2. Маркетинг (анализ эффективности каналов и окупаемости вложений.)21%
  3. • Работа с клиентами (обработка обращений, ИИ-консультанты, сопровождение)12%
  4. Управление персоналом (отбор резюме, адаптация,13%
  5. Управление запасами и закупками32%
  6. Управление проектами (планирование ресурсов, коммуникации в команде)27%
  7. Исследования и проектирование, техническая документация21%
  8. Управленческая отчетность и стратегия68%

The shares total 217%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTCAnonymous Poll404 voters

А вы вообще делаете ИИ дашборды?

  1. Да, вовсю делаю дашборды не хуже ваших22%
  2. Пробую с ИИ, но как у вас не получается19%
  3. Хочу, но руки не доходят, пока в Эксель (PBI и др)39%
  4. Не нужно (не рискую) давать данные ИИ21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Reveal the Data
@revealthedata · 27,712
#1
настенька и графики
@nastengraph · 28,087
#2
LEFT JOIN
@leftjoin · 41,512
#3
Дашбордец
@dashboardets · 8,802
#4
Дата-сторителлинг
@data_publication · 11,916
#5
Это разве аналитика?
@eto_analytica · 4,613
#6
data.csv
@data_csv · 13,780
#7
Аналитика данных / Data Study
@data_study · 9,419
#8
Бизнес-анализ | ИТ | ИИ
@bamrus · 18,662
#9
Datalytics
@datalytx · 8,783
#10
Аналитика и growth mind-set
@analyticsgrowthmindset · 17,405
#11
Борзило
@y_borzilo · 5,532
#12
karpov.courses
@KarpovCourses · 27,299
#13
Продакт аналитикс
@productanalyticsfordummies · 9,397
#14
Зарплатник Аналитика
@zarplatnik_analytics · 11,698
#15
This is Data
@thisisdata · 6,167
#16
ANDRON ALEXANYAN
@andron_233 · 6,193
#17
Это считается
@eto_schitaetsya · 4,281
#18
Google Таблицы
@google_sheets · 59,508
#19
Datanomika
@datanomika · 2,700
#20
Секреты аналитики | Data Science, BI, Tableau
@analytics_secrets · 46,872
#21
Симулейтив
@simulative_official · 7,406
#22
vizbra
@vizbra · 821
#23
RTD: Ссылки и репосты
@rtdlinks · 568
#24
Analyst IT
@analysis_it · 12,378
#25
LEFT JOIN Insider
@leftjoin_insider · 1,424
#26
Data Driven культура от AW BI
@awbi_ru · 1,712
#27
Мир аналитика данных
@analysts_world · 4,590
#28
Business | System analyst
@ba_and_sa · 19,725
#29
Excel Hacks | Бухгалтерия и Аналитика
@hacks_excel · 283,237
#30
Рациональные числа
@rationalnumbers · 25,567
#31
Коля Валиотти • Дата консалтинг
@datakolya · 800
#32
BApedia | Бизнес-анализ
@ba_wiki · 4,044
#33
Госпожа аналитик 💚 Ия Зотова
@Lady_Analyst · 2,242
#34
Тагир Анализирует
@tagir_analyzes · 11,658
#35
Data Bar | О data-проектах
@data_bar · 2,258
#36
DZENDESIGN
@DenisZdesign · 1,456
#37
Директ-ПРО // Новости Power BI
@pro_powerbi · 932
#38
ПРО ДАННЫЕ И ДАТА-ИНЖЕНЕРОВ
@directprobi · 2,249
#39
Визуализируй это!
@visualize_it · 2,794
#40
Я твой продукт анализировал
@datadeepdive · 1,674
#41
Заметки Аналитика | IT
@notes_analyst · 7,905
#42
👄 Астольфо 👄
@biheadhunter · 57
#43
Базы данных | Access, SQL, Big Data
@databases_secrets · 30,026
#44
Красивая аналитика | HR | Tech
@whrdata · 18,108
#45
Веб-аналитика от Якова Осипенкова / osipenkov.ru
@clicksider · 5,792
#46
Канал Алексея Куличевского
@kulichevskiy · 3,421
#47
Visiology Official
@visiology_official · 1,924
#48
R4marketing | канал Алексея Селезнёва | Язык R
@R4marketing · 4,038
#49
Системный и Бизнес-анализ
@ba_sa_analytics · 52,520
#50
People Analytics
@People_Analytics · 2,000
#51
Tableau в России
@tableau_ru · 2,351
#52
Первый Продуктовый
@firstanalyticsguide · 12,164
#53
H0H1: про HR-аналитику
@h0h1_hr_analytics · 2,229
#54
Start Career in DS
@start_ds · 11,468
#55
Без aspera
@bezaspera · 73,345
#56
Аналитика. Это просто
@analyticsizzi · 933
#57
Якушев Дмитрий | Про работу в Excel
@DimHelpWithExcel · 11,537
#58
Продакты не нужны
@betternotworse · 28,339
#59
Power BI Design
@Design_PowerBI · 13,682
#60
Диаграммы и презентации
@kirsha_vis · 7,955
#61
Data-comics
@datavizcomics · 6,467
#62
Чартомойка
@chartomojka · 14,792
#63
Инжиниринг Данных
@rockyourdata · 23,686
#64
Data Nature 🕊
@datanature · 6,214
#65
Финансовый анализ в Power BI и Excel
@finalyticspro · 8,012
#66
novichkov.net
@novichkovnet · 3,345
#67
No Data No Growth | Pavel Bukhtik
@nodatanogrowth · 12,777
#68
Сделай это красиво
@perfectgraphs · 5,176
#69
Designing Numbers
@designing_numbers · 5,111
#70
Лаборатория данных
@datalaboratory · 3,095
#71
Анализ данных (Data analysis)
@data_analysis_ml · 51,930
#72
Глеб Михайлов
@mikhaylovgleb · 14,240
#73
Дата-арт
@dataart11 · 2,302
#74
Александр Гинько (автор и переводчик)
@alexanderginko_books · 2,770
#75
Время Валеры
@cryptovalerii · 32,031
#76
Для тех, кто в танке
@pbi_pq_from_tank · 3,681
#77
Dataviz jobs
@dataviz_jobs · 3,771
#78
Системный анализ | Ольга Пономарева
@system_analyse · 31,224
#79
Data Coffee
@datacoffee · 2,635
#80
Крис про аналитику🧠🦾
@kris_the_analyst · 4,460
#81
Data Secrets
@data_secrets · 96,013
#82
Job for Analysts & Data Scientists
@foranalysts · 37,785
#83
КУМБА! Low-code инжиниринг данных
@bi_cumba · 639
#84
Data Science. SQL hub
@sqlhub · 36,042
#85
Excel Everyday
@excel_everyday · 52,061
#86
Визуализация данных в Excel
@excellent_school · 7,328
#87
Weekly Charts
@weekly_charts · 1,393
#88
FineBI в России
@finebi_ru · 930
#89
Библиотека Системного Аналитика
@lib_analyst · 13,956
#90
Dax Pro Solutions
@dax_pro · 2,391
#91
Датавиз в BI • Алиса Ручкина
@finebi_design · 2,216
#92
Базы данных & SQL
@db_in_it · 7,259
#93
Tableau's Viz of the Day
@vizoftheday · 2,209
#94
табличный дизайн
@thisisnotatable · 7,239
#95
Датавизнутая
@dataviz_addict · 1,175
#96

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Google Таблицы
@google_sheets · 59,508
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
Секреты аналитики | Data Science, BI, Tableau
@analytics_secrets · 46,872
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
Магия Excel
@lemur_excel · 49,852
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Reveal the Data
@revealthedata · 27,712
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
ЭКСЕЛЬХАК
@excelhackru · 73,895
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Excel Everyday
@excel_everyday · 52,061
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
настенька и графики
@nastengraph · 28,087
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Финансовый анализ
@fin_analytics · 41,574
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
LEFT JOIN
@leftjoin · 41,512
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Системный и Бизнес-анализ
@ba_sa_analytics · 52,520
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Управление персоналом | hr, карьера, кадры
@secrets_hr · 21,850
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
Базы данных | Access, SQL, Big Data
@databases_secrets · 30,026
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
karpov.courses
@KarpovCourses · 27,299
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Инжиниринг Данных
@rockyourdata · 23,686
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Клуб анонимных аналитиков” (@analyst_club), 33,337 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/analyst_club.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.