Photo, posted without a caption
🥰4😁3🔥2

Channel
@excellent_school
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,328subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001185043870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @excellent_school |
| Description | Про диаграммы, дашборды и Excel со вкусом и любовью! ▪️ Обучение в школе Excellent https://excellentschool.ru ▪️ Серия открытых видеоуроков про дашборды в Excel https://clck.ru/3JLbYV ✉️ По вопросам → @school_excellent |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/excellent_school |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:49 | 7,328 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 7,331 | +3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 7,328 | -8 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 7,336 | -1 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 7,337 | -1 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 23:15 | 7,338 | +1 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 7,337 | +4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 7,333 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 7,334 | -6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:14 | 7,340 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 7,336 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 7,338 | +9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 7,329 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:39 | 7,333 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 7,336 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 7,333 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 7,328 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 7,332 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 7,336 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 7,337 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (1 July 2026 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 3,836 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 12:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
311 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 154 | 49.5% | |
| ❤ | 76 | 24.4% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 17.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 4.50% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 2.89% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.965% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.643% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰4😁3🔥2
😈 Два кошмара дата-визуализатора В преддверии праздника давайте-ка разберём две картинки. Первая – это абсолютная классика профессиональных ужасов, а вторая – физическое воплощение одной из самых коварных ловушек визуализации. 🎃 Кошмар 3D круговой Если вам нужно рассказать по-настоящему жуткую историю про доли и проценты, то, конечно же, берите 3D-круговую диаграмму с кучей секторов. Почему это страшнее Фредди Крюге…
👍1🔥1
Попалась на днях диаграмма про расходы на борьбу с онкологией. Думала добавить в рубрику, но в итоге не стала. Сейчас объясню. Автор явно хотел показать резкое сокращение расходов. И вроде бы всё правильно: столбики, цифры, стрелка с −91%. Но не цепляет. Почему? Во-первых, −91% – это сухо. Проценты мы привыкли видеть в отчётах. Они не вызывают эмоций. Если бы в выноске или заголовке стояло что-то вроде «расходы рух…
❤9
Почему эта диаграмма не попала в рубрику #диаграммыдлявдохновения
📹 В этом видео мы показываем, как настроить динамический маркер для данных на графике в Excel. Он позволяет автоматически выделять последнюю фактическую цифру: с появлением данных за новый месяц акцентная точка сама переместится на актуальный период. Больше не придется тратить время на ручное обновление отчетов! Напоминаем, что для всех любителей подобных приемов у нас есть марафон «Фишки диаграмм» 😊 Узнать подробно…
👍18🔥3
На диаграмме показана генерация солнечной энергии в Великобритании по месяцам. В заголовке заявлено: «В 2026 году достигнут исторический максимум». И вот тут начинается самое интересное. Представьте, что на графике была бы только одна линия за 2026 год. Разве он был бы убедительным? Нет. Нам пришлось бы поверить автору на слово: «Это рекорд». Без базы сравнения любой рекорд – просто цифра. Но автор добавляет ряды дан…
🔥9
Сегодня в рубрике #диаграммыдлявдохновения график, который убеждает не словами, а контекстом.
🔥8👍3
📹 В этом видео показываем, как разместить подписи категорий над столбиками линейчатой диаграммы в Excel. Приём особенно полезен, когда названия категорий длинные или когда нужно сделать диаграмму компактнее по ширине. Обычно длинные подписи на вертикальной оси переносятся на несколько строк и выравниваются по центру. Из-за этого диаграмма выглядит неаккуратно, а сами категории сложнее считывать. Такой способ помогает…
🔥25❤2👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥10❤7
Вот смотрите на исходную диаграмму. Вроде бы всё в ней неплохо, но есть пару моментов, которые всё портит 🟢 Начнём с хорошего. «Всего» здесь выделено цветом. И это правильно: «Всего» – не ещё одна категория дохода, а средний ориентир по всем странам. Она стоит особняком. Если покрасить её в тот же цвет, что и остальные, глаз прочитает эту категорию как просто ещё одну строку в списке: ну, всего 18%, а у богатых 27%.…
❤6
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8
Попался тут на глаза отчёт по инвестиционным проектам. Автор явно любитель кольцевых диаграмм 🍩 Сразу скажем: мы ничего не имеем против кольцевой диаграммы как таковой. Это отличный и очень наглядный инструмент, но только при соблюдении нескольких условий: 1⃣ её задача – показать долю, часть от единого целого, 2⃣ в круге не должно быть больше 4–5 сегментов, 3⃣ в сумме они должны составлять 100%. В отчёте использую…
🔥13❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @excellent_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@excellent_school edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Визуализация данных в Excel” (@excellent_school), 7,328 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/excellent_school.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.