Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Чартомойка

Channel

Чартомойка

@chartomojka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,873subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001109735806
TypeChannel
Username@chartomojka
Created9 February 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chartomojka

Growth

14,87314,89414,883.56 August 2026 — 14,889 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,889 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,886 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,888 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,887 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,889 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,888 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,887 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,890 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,892 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,894 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,891 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,892 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,894 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,890 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,886 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,890 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,888 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,890 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,892 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,887 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,886 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,885 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,886 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,882 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,878 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,877 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,873 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 34 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,870–14,897 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 00:1714,873-4
5 Sept 2026, 18:3914,877-1
3 Sept 2026, 20:5714,878-4
2 Sept 2026, 09:0814,882-4
1 Sept 2026, 09:0514,886+1
31 Aug 2026, 12:2514,885-1
30 Aug 2026, 11:4814,886-1
29 Aug 2026, 14:3314,887-5
28 Aug 2026, 17:5814,892+2
27 Aug 2026, 20:2514,890+2
26 Aug 2026, 20:2714,888-2
25 Aug 2026, 23:1714,890+4
25 Aug 2026, 01:5614,886-4
23 Aug 2026, 13:5614,890-4
21 Aug 2026, 23:5914,894+2
20 Aug 2026, 18:0814,892+1
19 Aug 2026, 18:4814,891-3
18 Aug 2026, 17:3314,894+2
16 Aug 2026, 08:5314,892+2
14 Aug 2026, 23:4414,890first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 20 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 14,873 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,300
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held15 (20 February 202612 August 2026)
Views total2,300
Reactions total90
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,535 reactions across 15 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁65442.6%
20313.2%
🤣1519.84%
🤯986.38%
🔥936.06%
😱684.43%
👍603.91%
🏆523.39%
👏452.93%
🤔201.30%
🤡140.912%
👎110.717%
💯110.717%
🥰100.651%
😍80.521%
🍌70.456%
🤩60.391%
💩50.326%
😢50.326%
🥴40.261%
5 further kinds100.651%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,535 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈2,300 views90 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @interactivenewsVideo

Сегодня вечером в Европе будет полное солнечное затмение. И я очень рад, что мой проект про затмения попал в подборку Datawrapper рядом с отличными проектами Reuters и The New York Times — командами, чью работу я бесконечно уважаю. Для меня это большая честь. Вообще, мне кажется, такой формат все еще вполне способен привлекать читателей: не обязательно эксплейнер со скроллителлингом, а скорее большой интерактивный

48👍18🔥16👏8

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

29 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC≈3,870 views65 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В бургере есть булочка? Кетчуп? Майонез? Лук? Быть не может, никогда бы не подумал. ИИ-иллюстрация занимает пол-экрана. Справа два числа. В заге — риторический вопрос. В источниках расчеты на основе Росстата. Может быть вместо взрыв схемы бургера показать график роста и сравнить с инфляцией? Можно будет например увидеть динамику изменений, в какие моменты рост становился быстрее и отрывался от инфляции. Нет, лучш

😁42🤣17💯2🔥2😢2

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

27 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC≈3,860 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Полностью согласен с Лёшей, ИИ меняет подход к визуализации. И это прекрасно. Но накладывает больше ответственности в части "знать, что делаешь". Кстати, по-дружески очень советую курс Лёши. Если бы я сейчас только начинал эта заниматься, обязательно записался бы. https://t.me/perfectgraphs/381

9👍8🥰7😁2👏1🔥1

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

24 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC≈5,270 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Датавраппер наносит ответный удар. Они добавили возможность делать каскадную диаграмму (waterfall) и.. двойные оси! С которыми Лиза Шарлотта Мут (тогда ещё Рост) ранее активно боролась. Впрочем, теперь она говорит, что изменила свое мнение и даже написала статью когда и как правильно их использовать. Читаем: https://www.datawrapper.de/blog/dual-axis-charts-guide

😁17🤯92🔥1

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

18 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC≈5,040 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Просто симпатичная подборка иконических датавиз-проектов от Яна Хольтца. В закладки для вдохновения https://www.dataviz-inspiration.com/

17👍7🔥6

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

19 Jun 2026, 18:13 UTC≈6,870 views111 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁81🤣18🔥102

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

11 Jun 2026, 12:29 UTC≈8,680 views61 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

В честь начинающегося ЧМ по футболу запилил небольшой интерактивчик про перелеты команд и углеродный след от них. Ссылка: worldcup.bogachev.fr Там цифры не очень большие, а вот если брать с болельщиками, которые летают с матча на матч - в 500-1500 раз больше. По разным оценкам на ближайшем чемпионате углеродный удар составит 8-9 млн тонн CO2. Это больше чем годовые выбросы небольшой страны типа Кипра 🤷🏻 Но всё

26🔥14👎10❤‍🔥3💩2🤡2😁2💔1

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

14 May 2026, 09:53 UTC≈6,970 views134 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Свежий график Коммерсанта, и то, как его видят читатели.

😁88👏19🤯16💯91👎1

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

1 Apr 2026, 18:21 UTC≈8,210 views148 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

И ещё один шедевр Via Отвратительные графики

🤣87🤯379🔥4🐳3👍3😢3😁2

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

23 Mar 2026, 21:07 UTC≈8,500 views78 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

График Маримекко считается достаточно сложным и узкоспециализированным. Но тут сделан так хорошо, что легко будет понят и теми, кто не знает что такое график Маримекко. #датавизприемы

65👍13

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

21 Mar 2026, 08:15 UTC≈6,780 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Шапка NYT прямо сейчас с грубой ошибкой. Кто угадает что не так? UPD. Правильный ответ в комментариях. А к чему это? К тому, что даже лучшие из лучших ошибаются. И это нормально

🤔1510

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

11 Mar 2026, 16:41 UTC≈7,400 views140 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @bankstaPhoto

На немецком телевидении 17% партии «Альтернатива для Германии» оказались меньше 11% партии «Зелёных». @banksta

😁96👏16🤡125🤔4🔥2🤬2🥰2

Signed Aleksandr Bogachev

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @chartomojka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Excel Everyday
@excel_everyday · 52,417
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Магия Excel
@lemur_excel · 49,881
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Google Таблицы
@google_sheets · 60,646
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
Клуб анонимных аналитиков
@analyst_club · 33,600
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
LEFT JOIN
@leftjoin · 42,187
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чартомойка” (@chartomojka), 14,873 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chartomojka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.