Метакогниция и йогачара наблюдают за тобой с твоим продуктом В 1970-х психолог Джон Флавелл обнаржил, что дети с возрастом не просто лучше запоминают, а начинают отслеживать, что именно они запоминают и как они управляют этим процессом. Так в 1979 году появился термин метакогниция. За полторы тысячи лет до Флавелла последователи ветви буддизма Йогачара разбирали тот же вопрос с другой стороны: может ли сознание зна…

Channel
Product Management & AI
@ruspm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,245subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001085528491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ruspm |
| Description | Product Management & AI Occultism, Philosophy & Logic, YO: @mirvla (c-f 𓇶 Meteoagent.com). SATOR AREPO TE8ET OPERA ROTAS Каналы для продактов: https://t.me/addlist/YvmnHCHUp700Nzky |
| Created | 27 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ruspm |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 25,245 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 25,250 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 25,248 | +9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 25,239 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 25,238 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 25,241 | +20 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 25,221 | +8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 25,213 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:40 | 25,204 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 25,208 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 25,207 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 25,214 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:20 | 25,215 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 25,217 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 25,217 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.2%
- avg views ÷ 25,245 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,100
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (14 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 76,480 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈771
- Videos
- ≈408
- Links
- ≈1,190
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 41m 57s
- Average length
- 3m 00s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 7.41%
- 2 of 27 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 2
- posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 3,430
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 6,190
- over 25 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjcbP8af | 1 | 22 July 2026 | 22 July 2026 |
| 2SDnjecfw1u | 1 | 20 August 2026 | 20 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Яндекс 5 сентября проводит deep tech night — конференцию о вызовах, с которыми IT-индустрия сталкивается в эпоху AI Особенно интересно, как всё это выглядит глазами с точки зрения продакта: где ИИ действительно меняет подход к продукту, а где пока остаётся просто инструментом. Эксперты Яндекса выступят с докладами на тему разработки, инфраструктуры и данных под призмой ИИ на примерах реальных кейсов и опыта своих к…
Video, posted without a caption
80 продуктовых стратегий, сгруппированных по категориям с примерами и их сочетаемость друг с другом (от простых к сложным) ...Если ваш продукт "где-то" застрял, то единственными правильными вопросами будут: 1) на какой оси координат мы сейчас конкурируем? 2) есть ли соседние, где у нас есть преимущество? Потому что смена оси на сильную всегда дешевле, чем усиление текущей слабой
Ребята из AI for Work делают практический марафон желаний по вкату в ИИ-агенты. В методике нет лекций, есть только пошаговые короткие задания, разделённые на 3 раунда: 1. Базовые настройки: доступы, разрешения, персонализированные настройки, работа с файлами (отчёты, таблички, презентации, документы, аудио-видео), настройка памяти и установка ИИ-инструментов. 2. Коннекторы. Как соединять ИИ-агента и внешние сервисы…
Как структурировать продукт для ИИ: 6 элементов для ИИ-агентов Новая точка ценности возникает в создании интерфейса-протокола-API, который позволяет ИИ понимать ваш продукт и действовать в нём (назовём это AIX вдобавок к привычному UX). AIX, как и UX, ломается не на сложных, а на неявных действиях Чтобы продукт стал более удобным для ИИ, его можно разложить на несколько элементов: 1) Структурированный контекст, …
В Сан-Франциско хайпится клининг от ИИ-роботов Стоимость уборки: $30/h за робота. Роботы (пока ещё) не полностью автономны и человек-оператор контролирует ИИ, направляя его на различных уровнях уборки. На видео таймлапс с ускорением в х5 (реальное время уборки составило около 40 минут). P.S. На сайте овербукинг и лист ожидания ))
Июльский дайджест продактов в жаре и свете её Солнца – От лошадей к стартапам – Цена фичи – Contextual Product Management – Про «чтобы что» – Закон Фолкленда – Закон Брукса – Правило 7% – 3 Истины Систем – Главное из AEO – Be NICE – Diff-in-Diff: A/B-тест невозможен – Немного про контрольные карты – Process Communication Model – Как перестать быть незаменимым – The truth about being a manager – Что проверять в AI…
Сергей Брин принял участие в неформальной сессии, посвященной передовым системам ИИ, и признался в том, о чём молчат руководители ИИ-лабораторий: TLDR: Даже те, кто создаёт ИИ-модели, не до конца понимают, что именно они создали😌 – Возможности из разных областей науки начинают переплетаться и усиливать друг друга так, как никто специально не проектировал (например, обучение ИИ программированию и математическому мыш…
Taste, Judgment and AI Вкус — это способность распознать качество и выдающееся мастерство, даже не имея на руках явных доказательств. Способность судить — это готовность сделать выбор и взять на себя риск, связанный с ним. Именно на этих двух качествах зиждется создание по-настоящему Великих Продуктов. Вкус во многом подобен фильтру и формируется благодаря практике и умению чувствовать и понимать, что именно делае…
Вокруг ИИ-агенты, вайбкодинг, а у вас бизнес, рутина и даже некогда сесть и разобраться? В Битрикс24 есть всё для того, чтобы начать использовать новые фишки ИИ в числе первых. Это ИИ-сервис для бизнеса, где нейросети встроены прямо в рабочие процессы: – База для любого бизнеса: CRM, задачи, мессенджер – Нейросети и агенты: помогают с задачами, ищут информацию, пишут тексты и т.д. – Вайбкодинг для всех с подсказка…
Всё уже существует в пространстве бесконечной неопределённости вариантов, из-за чего Всё не имеет какого-либо объёма данных и скорости своей передачи (упростим, сказав, что бесконечны), и всегда (всегда = время не существует) находится в состоянии постоянной резонации такого пространства как Единого-Целого. Так Супер~Сознание работает в одном-едином-постоянно-бесконечном режиме "наблюдения~и~понимания всего~и~сразу"…
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ruspm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 145,572 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@baseyan · 772 postsАким Талибов | Постоянный Улучшатель
@AkimAGS · 4391 postДедлайн Хайлайт
@deadlinehighlight · 1281 postСлишком много меня 🌿
@heretoomuchme · 611 postЗаметки e-коммерса
@karamovaadelyya · 611 postМакс про переезд, эксперименты в IT и немного общего о рынке
@mstylife · 641 postГерман Орлов I Код ценности
@orlov_german · 2391 postПривычки
@privychki · 21 postUltra𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭Design.hta
@ultraproduct · 8821 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@AImademyday · 1,3941 postAlexcouncil⚡
@alexcouncil · 13,6891 postПлохой менеджер Артём Арюткин
@badTechProject · 14,4051 postDepeche Prod
@depecheprod · 921 postInspired Product Manager
@inspired_PM · 1,9211 postTeamlead Good Reads – ежедневные советы про менеджмент людей и команд
@leadgr · 28,3161 postLapidus
@leonid_lapidus · 6911 postПолтора продакта || Галя Ширанкова
@poltora_producta · 3,3821 postЛев Корнев - Развитие продукта
@product_lev · 7771 postПритчи продуктолога
@product_proverbs · 11,0261 postProduct games с Кристиной Гусевой
@productgames · 10,3231 postСтепа и продукты
@Stepa_and_Products · 1221 postStrategic move: стратегия, продукт и AI
@strategic_move · 16,9091 postТЕХНО: Яндекс про технологии
@techno_yandex · 231,7341 postThe Product Samurai
@theproductsamurai · 1,3461 postКем я хочу стать когда вырасту?
@whatiwannabe · 2,6501 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@temno · 80,150
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
@forproducts · 68,606
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
@mspiridonov · 64,213
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
@zarubezhom_jobs · 100,406
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@disruptors_official · 71,491
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
@google_sheets · 60,766
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Product Management & AI” (@ruspm), 25,245 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruspm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.