Проджект менеджмент в IT.
Пишу про современные деливери практики, продуктовую разработку и как быть классным менеджером.
—
Сообщество менеджеров: @pm_sovet
Реклама: @pm_god_ads
5035224435
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
47 measurements spanning 77 days, net -313. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,053–25,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Oct 2026, 12:00
25,116
-2
20 Oct 2026, 09:36
25,118
+16
19 Oct 2026, 11:21
25,102
-2
18 Oct 2026, 09:28
25,104
+2
17 Oct 2026, 12:30
25,102
-11
16 Oct 2026, 12:38
25,113
-3
15 Oct 2026, 16:11
25,116
-3
14 Oct 2026, 14:50
25,119
-7
13 Oct 2026, 06:34
25,126
+5
9 Oct 2026, 00:19
25,121
-17
4 Oct 2026, 12:01
25,138
-27
26 Sept 2026, 03:19
25,165
-58
17 Sept 2026, 10:17
25,223
-15
15 Sept 2026, 07:59
25,238
+2
13 Sept 2026, 13:58
25,236
-7
11 Sept 2026, 17:15
25,243
-11
9 Sept 2026, 05:58
25,254
-13
6 Sept 2026, 00:41
25,267
-9
3 Sept 2026, 17:38
25,276
-7
2 Sept 2026, 13:18
25,283
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.8%
avg views ÷ 25,116 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,990
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held
28 (23 March 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total
19,940
Reactions total
392
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Oct 2026, 00:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
109
Videos
4
Links
294
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,268 reactions across 28 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
715
21.9%
🔥
634
19.4%
❤
584
17.9%
👍
484
14.8%
💯
331
10.1%
🤣
172
5.26%
🤯
77
2.36%
🤔
59
1.81%
👎
42
1.29%
😭
36
1.10%
👀
20
0.612%
🤮
19
0.581%
✍
17
0.52%
🫡
17
0.52%
🤝
13
0.398%
⚡
11
0.337%
😨
6
0.184%
🤡
5
0.153%
😱
4
0.122%
❤🔥
3
0.092%
11 further kinds
19
0.581%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,268 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
7.14%
2 of 28 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
6,270
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
8,880
over 26 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 13 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Пример оценки фичи
Представьте, что ведете проект а-ля мессенджер. Заказчик присылает вам такое письмо:
Хочу фичу, чтобы можно было отправлять фото в чат. Сколько будет стоить?
Давайте разберем, что делать.
Если на проекте есть бизнес-аналитик, просим его расписать юзкейсы. Если нет – пишем сами (ну как, сами 🪄🤖), примерно так:
📌 получить доступ к галерее;
📌 выбрать фото + превью перед отправкой;
📌 загрузить фот…
Project manager (m/f/d)
На немецком рынке у многих вакансий после названия должности стоит загадочное (m/f/d). Причём не только в ИТ.
Сперва я подумал, что может временная работа, типо с мая по февраль. Окалось проще.
m/f/d означает, что приветствуются кандидаты всех гендеров: female, male, diverse. Этим работодатель подчеркивает, что ему без разницы, что у менеджера между ног. Главное, чтоб работа делалась.
Аббр…
#реклама_по_любви
У Стратоплана новый ивент на следующей неделе. Будем говорить о том, что делать, чтобы зимой не уволили 😅. Вот как ребята сами анонсируют ивент:
Зарплатные гонки и “розовые единороги” в IT закончились. layoff говорит, что ожидаемое кол-во увольнений в 2026-ом будет ровно в десять раз выше, нежели в 2021-ом. LinkedIn переполнен постами о поиске работы, Хабр — очередными разборами рынка, а фраза “ре…
Чем мне помогает АИ – работа с таблицами
Заметный буст от АИ лично для меня случился в таблицах (которые google sheets). Некоторые вещи стали сильно быстрее или проще, вот пара примеров:
1️⃣ Работа с формулами. Раньше надо было разбираться в логике и синтаксисе SUMIF, теперь просто говорю: “посчитай количество задач в колонке A, у которых статусе done в колонке B, и выведи в C12”. Забавно, что два года назад я ходи…
Меня заскамил рекрутер
Столкнулся с новым скамом.
Пишет рекрутер, предлагает вакансию в известную компанию с жирной зарплатой. Поначалу все идет обычно, просит сбросить резюме.
Потом говорит: “Слушай, твое резюме как-то не очень, боюсь не разглядят твой талант. Давай помогу сделать его лучше? У меня как раз есть Джон, который этим занимается”. Разумеется, платно.
Дальше забавно. Если говоришь, что и так сойдет, п…
#реклама
Маркетинг – это та же валидация гипотез, только деньги горят быстрее
Фичу собрали, релиз прошёл, дальше по плану «маркетинг подхватит». На практике кто-то один написал пост, залил пятьсот евро на продвижение, и через неделю никто в команде не может сказать, сработало или нет.
AI эту часть упростил: разобрать аудиторию, собрать пять углов оффера, креатив под каждый, посадочную под сегмент менеджер теперь д…
Старая дата Новая дата сдачи проекта
За последний год попробовал несколько разных вариаций проектных трекеров (все в гугл таблицах).
Одна вещь, которая классно прижилась плюс-минус во всех – оставлять предыдущий ETA (expected time of arrival = когда будет готово), если он обновляется.
Например:
ETA:
Март-25
Апрель-14
Май-1
Май-15
То есть изначальная дата финиша была 25 марта, потом подвинулась на апрель, затем н…
Зачем на самом деле нужны отчеты
Делаем проект на несколько команд. Цель - всем вместе увеличить метрику Х, каждая команда владеет ее кусочком в рамках своих фич.
Выхожу с очередной встречи, где каждый менеджер монотонно отчитывался почему его метрика в таком-то состоянии. Первые разы мне казалось, что мы теряем время, но со временем уловил смысл. Он в том, чтобы люди думали этими метриками и за пределами встречи.
…
Ответы стоят денег
“Сколько пользователей на версии Х столкнулись с багом?”
“Как это решение масштабируется при х10 нагрузке?”
“Что можно выбросить из роудмапа, чтобы починить эту проблему?”
– хорошие сениорные вопросы, которые помогают вскрывать риски и принимать решения.
В определенных условиях.
Проблема в том, что чтобы на них ответить, нужно потратить время: залезть в базу, продумать скейлинг, открыть с ком…
Стоимость владения
10 лет назад я купил свою первую машину – бирюзовый мини купер. До этого у меня был велосипед, который много есть не просил. Новым для меня стало то, что теперь надо тратить ~100$ в месяц на мойку, заправку, масло и т.д. – на велосипеде траты были сильно меньше.
С софтом похожая ситуация – тоже иногда нужно доливать масло. Особенно теперь, когда везде АИ.
Благодаря АИ делать новое вроде бы быстр…
Фит по культуре
Один мой прошлый босс матерился. Иногда он делал презентацию, рисуя на доске жопу для иллюстрации какой-то мысли (иногда архитектуры). Мне было смешно и понятно, потому что я тоже иногда говорю жопа. Но в глазах некоторых менеджеров был ужас. Кто-то из них потом из компании ушел. Не из-за жопы, конечно, но как-то не прижились, культурой не совпали.
Когда нанимаешь человека на работу, важно смотреть,…
😁59👍26💯9❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @pm_god. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 13 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
pmclub — учим управлять @pmclub · 20,653 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
🔥 Дмитрий Ирешев: AI • Продукты • Проекты @dmitrii_ireshev_Agile_PMP · 33,693 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Про Проекты и карьеру в ИТ | Романова @proProject1 · 38,443 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Нормально делай, нормально будет / Саша Клименко @normalno_delaj · 21,570 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
FEDOR BORSHEV @pmdaily · 23,634 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Teamlead Good Reads – ежедневные советы про менеджмент людей и команд @leadgr · 27,944 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
ProductDo: практика продакта @productdo · 24,512 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Максим Дорофеев: Прокрастинация и джедайские техники @mnogosdelal · 25,886 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
No Flame No Game @proproduct · 38,652 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Нестыдная фасилитация @no_shame_facilitation · 22,685 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
Product Management & AI @ruspm · 25,096 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Продукторий Владимира Меркушева @vladimir_merkushev · 21,890 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
Black product owner | Тигран Басеян о продакт менеджменте и стартапах @blackproduct · 21,108 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
Hard Client @hardclient · 22,871 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Fresh Product Manager @FreshProductGo · 19,929 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 September 2026
Про Управление @ProYpravlenca · 33,319 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 6 September 2026
Продакты не нужны @betternotworse · 28,399 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
Job for Products and Projects @forproducts · 70,232 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Вандроўкі @vandroukiby · 38,087 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Менеджер от боженьки” (@pm_god), 25,116 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pm_god.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.