Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Открытый кампус «Школа менеджмента Стратоплан»

Channel

Открытый кампус «Школа менеджмента Стратоплан»

@StratoplanSchool

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,289subscribers

+376 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001206076880
TypeChannel
Username@StratoplanSchool
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/StratoplanSchool

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,77917,43217,105.56 August 2026 — 16,913 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,909 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,897 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,889 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,873 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,866 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,857 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,852 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,831 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,826 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,807 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,800 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,786 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,779 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,784 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,791 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,830 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,004 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,145 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,221 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,285 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,297 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,308 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,372 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,419 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,432 subscribers7 September 2026 — 17,412 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,363 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,340 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,329 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,309 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,289 subscribers17,2896 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net +376. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,681–17,530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:0217,289-20
15 Sept 2026, 23:3817,309-20
14 Sept 2026, 08:0017,329-11
12 Sept 2026, 17:3817,340-23
10 Sept 2026, 17:0017,363-49
7 Sept 2026, 13:5817,412-20
3 Sept 2026, 05:5817,432+13
1 Sept 2026, 22:0617,419+47
1 Sept 2026, 00:3617,372+64
31 Aug 2026, 00:0317,308+11
30 Aug 2026, 01:0517,297+12
29 Aug 2026, 01:3717,285+64
27 Aug 2026, 23:5417,221+76
26 Aug 2026, 20:3217,145+141
25 Aug 2026, 20:4317,004+174
24 Aug 2026, 22:4816,830+39
23 Aug 2026, 10:1616,791+7
21 Aug 2026, 18:1916,784+5
20 Aug 2026, 17:4616,779-7
19 Aug 2026, 19:1316,786first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.95%
avg views ÷ 17,289 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held57 (24 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total17,871
Reactions total224
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,294 reactions across 55 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
41832.3%
🔥37629.1%
👍32325.0%
😁513.94%
💯423.25%
🙏251.93%
🤔231.78%
custom 5280603728552942782161.24%
🤩110.85%
🤯90.696%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,294 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC443 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026

📣 Через 10 минут начинаем кейс-разбор с сооснователями «Стратоплана» Славой Панкратовым и Александром Орловым. Что делать в условиях высокой неопределенности, как спасти договоренности с партнером и вернуть самостоятельность топ-команде? Разбираем в прямом эфире 👇

👍21🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 09:06 UTC918 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Поздравляем вас с серединой рабочей недели😊 Если вы узнали себя в менеджере-снежинке, про которого мы говорили в понедельник, добраться до среды — это настоящий подвиг. Без шуток. ❓Сегодня заходим с другой стороны: что, по вашему мнению, вообще держит руководителя на плаву? По нашим наблюдениям, это две главные функциональные обязанности, которые устойчивый руководитель выполняет в равной пропорции. Сегодня разбер

👍76🔥5

1 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,460 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Этой осенью стартует Школа HR Стратоплан — партнеры и разработчики курсов по менеджменту. Потому что мы лучше всего делаем курсы по менеджменту. А HRам и для HRов нужен лучший провайдер курсов по менеджменту. 1 сентября запускается бесплатная Школа HR — профессиональное комьюнити, в котором обучаются, делятся практикой и качают нетворк. Внутри крупнейшая база знаний по управлению персоналом с реальными кейсами и и

18🔥9👍6

31 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC≈1,410 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥97👍7🤯2

29 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,710 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026

В ближайший четверг, 3 сентября, в 12:00 GMT+3 сооснователи Стратоплана Александр Орлов и Слава Панкратов проведут кейс-разбор и покажут, как работают со сложными управленческими запросами в формате Executive-сопровождения Trusted Advisor. Разберем три реальных кейса: 1️⃣«Мне нужно, чтобы кто-нибудь сказал, что я всё делаю правильно» Как фаундеру распорядиться крупным раундом инвестиций, если следующий шаг должен

5👍5💯4

28 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC≈1,640 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Почему самолёты летают, а IT-проекты падают? Вы боитесь летать на самолетах? Серьезно, даже несмотря на то, что это самый безопасный транспорт в мире? Статистика такая не потому, что самолёты не ломаются, а пилоты не ошибаются. Дело в системе: каждую нештатную ситуацию разбирают публично. Чёрные ящики расшифровывают, отчёты публикуют, регламенты переписывают, экипаж гоняют на тренажёрах до автоматизма. Ошибка здесь

👍87🔥5

28 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,670 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Доброго дня, коллеги! 👋 И с новой мемной пятницей вас! Тема этой недели — завершение лета 🍂 Делитесь впечатлениями от того, как стремительно оно прошло и мемами за эту неделю. Ждем ваши мемы у нас на форуме 👇

7👍3🔥2😁2🤔1

27 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,720 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Что за токсичное болото? Я же хочу как лучше! В трансплантологии есть поразительный факт: найти идеально подходящий донорский орган и безупречно провести операцию — это даже не половина успеха. Главная битва начинается на следующий день. Организм распознаёт чужеродные клетки и включает иммунную систему на максимум. Иммунитет делает это не со зла — он просто выполняет свою работу: защищает привычный уклад от вторжен

👍15🔥87💯3

26 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈1,540 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Почему после повышения перестаёт работать то, что работало раньше? «Когда вас повышают, вы сдаёте свой инструмент и получаете оркестр. Самая большая глупость в этот момент — пытаться сыграть за весь оркестр на своей старой скрипке» ❓Есть вопрос, который мы в Стратоплане задаём руководителям уже 16 лет: «Каким инструментарием вы управляете?» И чаще всего в ответ получаем… паузу. Свой управленческий набор большинств

👍96🔥6

25 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC≈1,600 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Почему иногда кажется, что все вокруг идиоты? «В иерархии каждый сотрудник стремится подняться до уровня своей некомпетентности» (Лоуренс Питер, автор культовой книги о менеджменте «Принцип Питера») Обидный принцип. Но каждый руководитель в IT хотя бы раз в жизни побывал его живой иллюстрацией. Включая сооснователя Стратоплана Александра Орлова. *️⃣Вот его личная история одного болезненного повышения: Мне казалос

5👍5🔥4

24 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,680 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Вам тоже понравилась верстка в последнем посте, да? :) Нажимаешь микрошпуньку, там появляется АЖ ОДНА доп.строчка полезного текста! Можно еще раз нажать, она спрячется. Юзабилити :)

😁107

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @StratoplanSchool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTCAnonymous Poll136 voters

Как вы обычно поступаете перед сложным выбором? 👇

  1. Жду до последнего, пока не соберу 100% информации.25%
  2. Прыгаю в неизвестность и разбираюсь по ходу.40%
  3. Долго просчитываю вероятности, вздыхаю и всё равно сомневаюсь.58%
  4. Делегирую решение (и все риски) кому-то другому.4%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTCAnonymous Poll115 voters

Какие управленческие «грабли» чаще всего мешают именно вам?

  1. Проще сделать самому, чем объяснить44%
  2. Надо просто еще поднажать28%
  3. Боссу виднее23%
  4. Всё вышеперечисленное периодически срабатывает29%
  5. Свой вариант (напишу в комментариях)3%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Максим Дорофеев: Прокрастинация и джедайские техники
@mnogosdelal · 26,254
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Менеджер от боженьки
@pm_god · 25,223
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Teamlead Good Reads – ежедневные советы про менеджмент людей и команд
@leadgr · 28,190
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Регулярный менеджмент для руководителей (Евгений Севастьянов)
@regularmanagement · 22,896
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Нестыдная фасилитация
@no_shame_facilitation · 22,868
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Открытый кампус «Школа менеджмента Стратоплан»” (@StratoplanSchool), 17,289 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StratoplanSchool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.