Самые интересные статьи, видео и новости, связанные с управлением людьми, командами, разработкой и продуктами.
РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67b4386d2a44e21839a0f87f
Продуктовая папка: https://t.me/addlist/YvmnHCHUp700Nzky
Реклама: @tanyasanovna
Created
9 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 59 days, net -359. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,010–28,477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 06:01
28,064
-56
25 Sept 2026, 13:18
28,120
-70
17 Sept 2026, 09:38
28,190
-17
15 Sept 2026, 05:57
28,207
-12
13 Sept 2026, 11:18
28,219
+12
11 Sept 2026, 12:18
28,207
-2
8 Sept 2026, 21:17
28,209
-20
5 Sept 2026, 11:55
28,229
-5
3 Sept 2026, 11:02
28,234
-9
2 Sept 2026, 03:43
28,243
-3
1 Sept 2026, 06:58
28,246
-8
31 Aug 2026, 10:04
28,254
-6
30 Aug 2026, 12:54
28,260
-5
29 Aug 2026, 09:47
28,265
-3
28 Aug 2026, 07:47
28,268
-11
27 Aug 2026, 05:54
28,279
-9
26 Aug 2026, 03:32
28,288
-10
25 Aug 2026, 04:48
28,298
-11
23 Aug 2026, 22:37
28,309
-7
22 Aug 2026, 08:16
28,316
first reading
Engagement
82 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 28,064 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,720
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.558%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 82 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
82 (16 July 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
155,620
Reactions total
868
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 16:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈381
Videos
≈5
Links
≈1,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,529 reactions across 79 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
980
38.8%
👎
547
21.6%
❤
534
21.1%
🔥
468
18.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,598 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 82 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @leadgr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 82 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
17.1%
14 of 82 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
14
posts carrying an erid · 14 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,850
over 14 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,570
over 68 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcdN5qu
1
15 September 2026
15 September 2026
2SDnjcsadbZ
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2VSb5w4uqrS
1
17 August 2026
17 August 2026
2VSb5x8bQfC
1
21 September 2026
21 September 2026
2Vtzqug4oJi
1
23 July 2026
23 July 2026
2Vtzquo2GYz
1
4 August 2026
4 August 2026
2Vtzqv2b9Uf
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
2VtzqvCpdWU
1
7 September 2026
7 September 2026
2VtzqvFZJLt
1
28 September 2026
28 September 2026
2VtzqvZkHX2
1
23 September 2026
23 September 2026
2VtzqxHA76c
1
14 September 2026
14 September 2026
2VtzqxNthGw
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 2 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Бесплатный онлайн-тулкит по выживанию в IT для руководителей
Зарплатные гонки и “розовые единороги” в IT закончились. Layoffs говорит, что ожидаемое кол-во увольнений в 2026-м будет ровно в десять раз выше, нежели в 2021-м. LinkedIn переполнен постами о поиске работы, Хабр — очередными разборами рынка, а фраза “реорганизация” звучит, скажем так, по-другому.
Мы, в Стратоплане, хотели бы, чтобы руководители сегодня н…
Путь менеджера в 2026
Менеджеров сейчас пытаются закопать все, кому не лень – но при этом без них все равно никак. AI не поменял фундаментальных ограничений человеческой натуры, и нам все так же нужно уметь планировать работу, выстраивать процессы коммуникации, решать человеческие проблемы и помогать друг другу расти. В статье – довольно трезвый взгляд на то, что меняется в работе менеджера в 2026 году:
👉Надо занов…
Я открыл клуб Подлодки про AI в разработке уже полгода назад. Он сильно помог участникам изменить рабочие процессы в их командах и научиться самим работать с агентами. За это время мы:
👉Провели 90 стримов про harness engineering и внедрение AI в команды
👉Собрали большую базу знаний про AI в разработке
👉Устроили аж два хакатона – делали автономные фабрики фичей и самообучающихся агентов
👉Собрали сообщество, в котором…
Зачем платить за софт, когда все можно завайбкодить
Смотрите, какой веселый эксперимент нашел. Ребята решили проверить, можно ли заменить какую-то платную внутреннюю корпоративную систему на самодельную реализацию, написанную с агентами за два дня. На вход взяли подробную документацию, описанные юзкейсы, руководства и демки.
На выходе, ожидаемо, получили довольно убедительно выглядящий прототип, который, тем не мен…
Ходят слухи, что Amazon начал пытаться нанять обратно часть людей из списка сокращенных ранее в этом году.
Но топы не могут ошибаться, поэтому Amazon не отыгрывает свои решения, а запускает перспективный проект под кодовым названием "Boomeranf Reengagement Initiative". А такое уже тянет на повышенную премию в performance review!
Про новое чувство потока
Вообще, мышление на основе первых принципов – это какой-то ну очень надоевший баззворд, который регулярно вставляют в абстрактные статьи про менеджмент. Но конкретно эта статья мне понравилась тем, что дает этому подходу очень приземленное объяснение.
Мыслить от первых принципов – значит откинуть весь свой прошлый опыт и знания, которые могут ограничивать пространство решений, вспомнить, ка…
🏗 Строим мультиагентные системы для разработки на Podlodka AI Crew
Инженерные задачи редко состоит из одного действия. В традиционной разработке их распределяют между несколькими специалистами.
Мультиагентный подход переносит ту же логику в среду искусственного интеллекта: вместо одного исполнителя над задачей работают несколько виртуальных агентов. Но как построить такую систему и сделать её эффективной?
Эксперты…
Про профилактику выгораний
Очень часто причина выгорания находится не в количестве выполняемой работы, а в том, что она не приводит ни к каким ощутимым победам – не наступает момент вознаграждения за усилия. Это особенно верно для длинных проектов, или работы с очень отложенным эффектом. Иначе говоря, чем более абстрактна, далека или недостижима цель, тем больше вероятность того, что в команде будет наступать чувств…
«ИИ уже в работе: как превратить личную продуктивность в результат компании».
Бесплатная видеолекция Яндекс Практикума и Яндекс 360
ИИ-зация даётся не всем. Российские компании массово внедряют ИИ, тратят время и ресурсы, но только 30% участников рынка получают реальный бизнес-эффект.
На каком этапе процесс ломается и ИИ остаётся «игрушкой» для сотрудников? Узнайте в видеолекции, как строить ИИ-трансформацию, и пол…
Как менеджерам перестать быть кожаными роутерами
В период гиперроста компаний роль очень многих менеджеров сводилась к тому, чтобы быть кожаными роутерами – передавать информацию от руководства своей команде, и статус-апдейты обратно своим менеджерам. Сегодня ценность этой задачи заметно падает – слоев в компании становится меньше, а нужную информацию, при условии ее правильной организации, можно найти без участия д…
Про силовые тренировки
Я в этом канале периодически напоминаю, что самый лучший способ для профилактики стресса, свойственного менеджерской работе – это спорт, а особенно – силовые тренировки.
Мы еще два года назад записали великолепную серию выпусков Подлодки про то, как вкатиться в силовые тренировки – и про то, как составить программу, и про то, как максимально эффективно нагружать мыщцы, и про то, как питаться …
Узнайте о лучших практиках от топ-менеджеров технологических компаний
📌8 октября, Москва, Кластер «Ломоносов»
На бесплатной конференции об ИТ-инфраструктуре, ИИ, данных и кибербезопасности. Selectel ТехноДень соберет на одной площадке топ-менеджеров, технических директоров и экспертов в сфере ИИ, ИБ и разработки, чтобы обсудить актуальные ИТ-тренды 2027.
На повестке:
🔺Искусственный интеллект: как эффективно внедря…
👍3👎2❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @leadgr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Менеджер от боженьки @pm_god · 25,138 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
FEDOR BORSHEV @pmdaily · 23,644 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Максим Дорофеев: Прокрастинация и джедайские техники @mnogosdelal · 25,991 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
I’m CTO, bitch @ctobtch · 20,276 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 September 2026
Профсоюз работников IT @ruitunion · 35,972 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
Нормально делай, нормально будет / Саша Клименко @normalno_delaj · 21,663 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Job for Chiefs (TOP vacancies) @forchiefs · 38,703 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
запуск завтра @ctodaily · 33,717 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
ProductDo: практика продакта @productdo · 24,136 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Нестыдная фасилитация @no_shame_facilitation · 22,786 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
Фичизм @fichism · 25,311 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
AvitoTech @avitotech · 25,713 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Цифровой этикет @digitaletiquette · 24,313 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 16 September 2026
🔥 Дмитрий Ирешев: AI • Продукты • Проекты @dmitrii_ireshev_Agile_PMP · 29,666 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Yandex for Developers @Yandex4Developers · 28,543 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Product Management & AI @ruspm · 25,139 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Black product owner | Тигран Басеян о продакт менеджменте и стартапах @blackproduct · 21,819 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
getmatch: канал про карьеру в IT @g_jobchannel · 18,879 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 October 2026
Продукторий Владимира Меркушева @vladimir_merkushev · 21,943 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах @brainshare · 21,902 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
Про Управление @ProYpravlenca · 33,059 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 6 September 2026
No Flame No Game @proproduct · 38,721 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Код Желтый @kod_zheltyi · 33,251 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
pmclub — учим управлять @pmclub · 20,719 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Teamlead Good Reads – ежедневные советы про менеджмент людей и команд” (@leadgr), 28,064 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leadgr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.