Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,545–9,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 21:01
9,553
-12
12 Sept 2026, 03:55
9,565
-4
7 Sept 2026, 09:58
9,569
-1
2 Sept 2026, 12:04
9,570
-17
30 Aug 2026, 09:28
9,587
-3
27 Aug 2026, 19:06
9,590
-1
25 Aug 2026, 02:27
9,591
-1
21 Aug 2026, 13:27
9,592
+1
15 Aug 2026, 15:56
9,591
-9
12 Aug 2026, 13:37
9,600
-8
9 Aug 2026, 20:57
9,608
+7
7 Aug 2026, 00:06
9,601
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:33
9,601
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
682 reactions across 24 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
537
78.7%
👎
145
21.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 682 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 24 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kotlin_broadcast. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 June 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Kotlin — почти единственный язык, на который переходят потому что хочется
JetBrains выложили разбор реальных миграций языков из опроса Developer Ecosystem 2025 (не «планирую перейти», а «чем писал год назад → чем пишу сейчас»).
Главный паттерн ожидаемый: большинство переездов — это project requirements. Надо — идёшь.
А вот Kotlin выбивается. На него люди переходят не потому что заставили, а потому что «feels bette…
🐱 Valix — валидация на KSP без рефлексии и с ~9× скоростью
Суть библиотеки в том, что аннотируешь data-класс, KSP генерирует обычный процедурный Kotlin-валидатор в build/generated/ksp/. Никакой рефлексии, никаких правил ProGuard, zero cold-start.
data class CreateUserRequest(
@NotBlank val username: String,
@Email val email: String,
@Min(18) val age: Int,
@Sensitive(mask = "[REDACTED]") @MinLength(8…
💉 Вышел Koin Compiler Plugin 1.1.0
Вышло обновление компиляторного плагина Koin для валидации графе в момент компиляции. Главное — переработали механизм compile-time проверки графа, чтобы он стал надёжнее и точнее.
Раньше плагин проверял каждый модуль по отдельности. Это давало ложные ошибки в многомодульных проектах, когда зависимость предоставлялась в другом модуле. Теперь единственный источник истины — полная пр…
🏝 Всем, кто ждал Kotlin 2.4.10 для обновления на новую версию языка — обновляйтесь!
Из того, что реально касается продакшн-кода - исправлена регрессия в Compose Compiler: классы, которые раньше считались stable, в 2.4.0 иногда определялись как runtime/Uncertain.
Если недавно обновились на 2.4.0 и столкнулись со странными лишними рекомпозициями — обновляйтесь на новую версию.
#Kotlin #Compose
🏝 Kotlin/Native в 2.4.20 включает инкрементальную компиляцию klib по умолчанию
В Kotlin 2.4.20-Beta1 включали инкрементальную компиляцию Native: теперь пересобираются только затронутые части klib. На debug-сборках KMP это должно заметно резать время, а это ровно та боль, из-за которой iOS-таргет не хочется перезапускать лишний раз.
Есть честная оговорка от самих JetBrains ⚠️: за инкрементальность можно высоко запла…
❗️Жара со скидками! Всего неделя на обновление рабочего места
С 13 по 19 июля включительно распродажа продукции для рабочего пространства! Скидки до -25% в Ergostol.
В акции участвуют популярные модели столов, рам, кресел и других аксессуаров. Это отличная возможность приобрести их выгодно!
➡️ Со всеми предложениями можно ознакомиться на сайте.
💲Скидка -10% по промокоду ANDROID10 на сайте Ergostol на все стол…
🏝 JetBrains выпустили открытый бенчмарк для оценки AI-агентов на задачах с Kotlin
Раньше о том, насколько агент реально справляется с Kotlin, приходилось судить по внутренним ощущениям. Теперь есть общий ориентир - JetBrains выкатили Kotlin Benchmark: 100+ инженерных задач из реальных open-source репозиториев, методология на базе SWE-bench. Агент читает issue, разбирается в контексте проекта и генерирует патч, кото…
👍30👎9
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @kotlin_broadcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Да я даже не знаю какая версия Kotlin в проекте18%
Не пишу на Kotlin2%
Другой вариант8%
Не участвую в опросе13%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
9
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
9
vacant every time we have ever looked
@kotlin_broadcast named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@koinapplication named in 8 posts, 11 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
@email named in 6 posts, 19 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
@minlength named in 6 posts, 19 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
@sensitive named in 6 posts, 19 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
@validateif named in 6 posts, 19 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
@optin named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 22 August 2026
@jsfun named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 22 August 2026
@intrinsicconstevaluation named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@koinviewmodel named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Teamlead Good Reads – ежедневные советы про менеджмент людей и команд @leadgr · 28,190 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Java библиотека @javalib · 30,666 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
Библиотека джависта | Java, Spring, Maven, Hibernate @javaproglib · 22,055 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
AvitoTech @avitotech · 25,625 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kotlin Multiplatform Broadcast” (@kotlin_broadcast), 9,553 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kotlin_broadcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
