Авторский канал о стартапах и интернет-бизнесе.
Сотрудничество: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BFSEj7FEQZpB4K83iBXo1yqIoPnwJaVGpsyKDHKSX0s/edit
РКН: https://clck.ru/3FPm3j
Личный аккаунт: @gornal
Сотрудничество: @Vzuhcha
ВП нет
Created
8 February 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
48 measurements spanning 80 days, net +3,298. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,282–62,647 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 14:55
62,120
-16
23 Oct 2026, 11:41
62,136
-7
22 Oct 2026, 13:05
62,143
+2
21 Oct 2026, 09:28
62,141
+13
20 Oct 2026, 09:39
62,128
+9
19 Oct 2026, 13:09
62,119
+55
18 Oct 2026, 15:55
62,064
+23
17 Oct 2026, 13:04
62,041
-9
16 Oct 2026, 14:16
62,050
+49
15 Oct 2026, 16:26
62,001
+188
14 Oct 2026, 19:38
61,813
-12
13 Oct 2026, 12:49
61,825
-47
9 Oct 2026, 09:37
61,872
+501
4 Oct 2026, 20:17
61,371
+738
27 Sept 2026, 08:59
60,633
+184
17 Sept 2026, 15:21
60,449
+202
15 Sept 2026, 13:22
60,247
+129
13 Sept 2026, 19:18
60,118
+38
11 Sept 2026, 21:36
60,080
+288
9 Sept 2026, 09:16
59,792
first reading
Engagement
141 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 167 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 62,120 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,900
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 141 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held
141 (28 July 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total
255,170
Reactions total
4,055
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Oct 2026, 00:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈230
Videos
≈29
Links
≈3,670
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18m 59s
Average length
18m 59s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,365 reactions across 136 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
6,243
46.7%
🔥
5,548
41.5%
🤣
1,405
10.5%
😢
169
1.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 139 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,663 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 139 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @startupoftheday. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 141 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.42%
2 of 141 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,820
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
6,180
over 137 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqwc9JwP
1
23 October 2026
23 October 2026
2VtzqxfDwas
1
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Parafin через 4 года
Стандартный шаблон новой экономики: огромная богатая технологическая платформа, через которую работают сотни тысячи малых и средних бизнесов. Маркетплейс пухнет от денег, поставщики выживают на грани рентабельности. Так работают Amazon, Uber Eats, Booking.com, десятки их.
И теоретически, все они могли бы зарабатывать ещё больше, если б ещё и кредитовали своих поставщиков. Информации через платф…
Сейчас открыта вакансия CEO в компанию Roomlink. Roomlink - это система бронирования отелей для делового туризма. Компания входит в состав Smartway Travel Group.
Задачи, которыми предстоит заниматься:
Полное управление компанией, включая: разработку, продукт, продажи, сопровождение клиентов, маркетинг, клиентский сервис, финансы, HR, юристов;
Реализация стратегического плана бизнеса;
Достижение коммерческих показате…
Получить свои деньги
Тысячи стартапов по всему миру делают разные вариации AI для продажника. Это самое выгодное место для автоматизации: результат сразу влияет на выручку. Если продажи выросли – ничего больше объяснять не надо, пилот успешен, подписка продляется.
Американский #стартапдня Stuut нашел ещё одну нишу с такой же прозрачностью, но гораздо менее конкурентную, чем продажи. Стартап помогает выбивать деньги…
Два года назад я создавал ShareAI, чтобы было с кем поговорить о бизнесе в эпоху искусственного интеллекта. Что внедрять, что не внедрять, что запускать, что не запускать, как все это делать. Правильных ответов никто не знает, так хоть неправильные послушать. Сделать это можно где угодно, я в десятках разных чатов состою, но гипотеза, что закрытость и постоянный состав Клуба создают доверие, а доверие приводит к боле…
Жизнь вокруг пузыря
Только 50% российских предпринимателей и 30% их сотрудников используют AI на работе. Это и так мало, а реальность, видимо, хуже. Исследование проводил Т-Бизнес среди своих клиентов, они, наверное, более продвинуты, чем в среднем по больнице. Кроме самих далеких от 100% чисел интересно соотношение. Владелец бизнеса быстрее адаптируется, чем его подчиненные.
Выбор нейросети подтверждает относитель…
Ещё раз о продавцах лопат
Очень упрощая, ChatGPT хорошо пишет сочинения, потому что обучен на сборнике “1000 лучших сочинений”. Чтобы роботу-гуманоиду хорошо заправлять одеяло в пододеяльник ему нужно обучиться на такой же тысяче “заправок”. А их в интернете нет. Приходится делать.
Канадский #стартапдня Mecka создает библиотеки ручных действий. Стартап платит бариста, поварам, механикам и просто желающим за то, что…
Чужие проблемы
Так много пишут о протестах во Франции, что не могу удержаться от комментария. И мой комментарий очень прост: нас это не касается.
Одни чужие нам люди бьют витрины других чужих нам людей. Это их жизнь, их выбор, их будущее. Не наше. Они как-то к этому пришли после каких-то правильных или ошибочных решений. Пусть у них все закончится хорошо. Если вы там – пусть у вас все тем более закончится хорошо. Н…
Деньги за простой
Промышленное хранение электроэнергии – это всё ещё стартапы и эксперименты. На масштабе генерация должна всегда перекрывать потребление. Люди включили кондиционеры – пожалуйста, и на электростанциях поддайте газу. Причем в ту же секунду, а не через месяц. А у электростанции бывают свои планы, она, может быть, на плановое техобслуживание хотела закрыться.
Если синхронизацию спроса и предложения пол…
Две недели на Шри-Ланке
– Пляжный отдых везде примерно одинаков. Никакого чуда не случилось, на Шри-Ланке он тоже как везде.
– Страна бедная, что, понятно, положительно влияет на соотношение цена / качество и отрицательно на максимально достижимое качество.
– Погода в октябре идеальная.
– В курортных районах русскоязычных туристов тотальное большинство, всё ориентировано на них. В официальной статистике россияне тре…
Рынок труда для выпускников ВУЗов настолько плох, что родители уже не против, когда вы запускаете свой стартап вместо поиска работы.
(c) чужое
#актуальное
Eventbrite через 8 лет
Американский #стартапдня Eventbrite помогает собирать деньги за билеты на мероприятия. Устроители конференций, митапов, бизнес-завтраков и встреч с читателями получают страницу с кратким описанием события и кнопкой "билет". Если вход бесплатный, то посетитель просто регистрируется, если за деньги – ещё и платит. Организатор снимает с себя заботы по программированию лендинга. В простейшем случа…
👍58🔥35
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @startupoftheday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@startupoftheday edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 October 2026
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 237%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Уже полгода помогаю Т-Бизнес рассказывать о себе. А вы что о нем думаете?
Рекомендуют партнёры и коллеги21%
Активно участвует в жизни бизнес-сообществ27%
Удобно использовать / взаимодействовать47%
Быстро решают вопросы35%
Предлагают инновационные решения для бизнеса12%
Надежный банк для бизнеса29%
The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой российский банк вы сейчас порекомендуете знакомому предпринимателю – не по инерции, а всерьёз? С учетом всего: и интерфейса, и надежности, и (не)блокировок, и валютного контроля, и бухгалтерии, и чего угодно ещё?
Т-Бизнес16%
Сбер9%
Альфа-банк39%
Точка33%
ВТБ3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного @aioftheday · 44,433#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Витрина стартапов @showstartup · 26,919 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного @aioftheday · 44,433 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Максим Спиридонов @mspiridonov · 68,625 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика @temno · 79,358 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
Индекс дятла @dindex · 22,247 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Kumar & Solo @solokumi · 38,526 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
The Edinorog 🦄 @Theedinorogblog · 43,733 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Tech Crunch @techcrunchru · 18,335 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 October 2026
Русский ИТ бизнес @bezsmuzi · 33,366 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
42 секунды @ftsec · 19,395 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026
СберСтартап @sberstartup · 40,963 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 29 August 2026
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов @bossofyourboss · 27,405 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Продакты не нужны @betternotworse · 28,371 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
TechSparks @techsparks · 46,772 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
kyrillic @kyrillic · 60,875 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Дизраптор @disruptors_official · 72,486 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
No Flame No Game @proproduct · 38,650 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Ваня Замесин @zamesin · 49,990 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Бизнес Идеи 2.0 | Антон Матвеев @idea2_0 · 101,349 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Forbes. Идеи для бизнеса @forbes_business · 26,732 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 12 September 2026
Без aspera @bezaspera · 72,585 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
RationalAnswer | Павел Комаровский @RationalAnswer · 107,626 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
Mikhail Tokovinin @mtokovinin · 108,819 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Russian Business @rb_ru · 359,855 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 170 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стартап дня. Александр Горный.” (@startupoftheday), 62,120 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startupoftheday.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.