Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Познавательная минутка от Курышева

Channel

Познавательная минутка от Курышева

@tasteofrain

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,453subscribers

-162 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001516830288
TypeChannel
Username@tasteofrain
Created20 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tasteofrain

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 31% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,45311,61511,5346 August 2026 — 11,615 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,615 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,614 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,613 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,606 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,602 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,600 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,592 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,589 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,592 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,586 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,579 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,575 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,573 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,570 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,567 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,561 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,557 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,555 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,548 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,543 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,537 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,532 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,531 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,530 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,525 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,519 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,507 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,476 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,463 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,455 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,453 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,429–11,639 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:4111,453-2
16 Sept 2026, 02:1911,455-8
14 Sept 2026, 06:1811,463-13
12 Sept 2026, 11:3811,476-31
10 Sept 2026, 08:5911,507-12
7 Sept 2026, 04:0011,519-6
4 Sept 2026, 12:1911,525-5
3 Sept 2026, 00:2911,530-1
2 Sept 2026, 01:3211,531-1
1 Sept 2026, 04:3511,532-5
31 Aug 2026, 07:5511,537-6
30 Aug 2026, 06:2711,543-5
29 Aug 2026, 05:3311,548-7
28 Aug 2026, 02:1711,555-2
27 Aug 2026, 05:2811,557-4
26 Aug 2026, 03:4211,561-6
25 Aug 2026, 05:1811,567-3
22 Aug 2026, 15:0411,570-3
19 Aug 2026, 22:4811,573-2
17 Aug 2026, 19:5611,575first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 19 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,106 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
50946.0%
🔥28425.7%
😁17515.8%
👍807.23%
😢191.72%
❤‍🔥161.45%
🤔121.08%
🐳80.723%
🎉20.181%
💩10.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 16 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tasteofrain. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 December 2025 to 27 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2026, 06:39 UTC≈3,280 views80 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

Приветы всем! Я тут не писал аж с конца марта 🙀 Это надо прекращать, напишу за лето 30 постов, тем более что накопилось много классных тем. Кстати, как обычно, жду в комментах любые предложения по темам — что актуально, про что хочется поговорить. Но сегодня у меня хороший повод. Меня позвали на подкаст Саша Мурзов — уникальный экзек коуч и консультант по развитию, а также мастер точных формулировок и Илья Потапенк

58🔥14👍5😁3

25 Mar 2026, 17:56 UTC≈6,520 views159 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Иногда меня спрашивают: "Какой лучший проект по вайбкодингу ты видел?". Лучший пока я придумал сам: агент, который находит абсолютно всё, что доступно в паблике, из того что когда-либо говорил Жириновский, а потом ставит на Polymarket ставки, как будто бы он и есть Жириновский. Идея топ — дарю.

😁11626👍12🔥5

24 Mar 2026, 13:28 UTC≈5,500 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Я тут вписался в очередные "диалоги о рыбалке" (С). Позвали поговорить с умными людьми про то, как не охренеть от всего что происходит в мире. Тут вам и про FOMO от новых технологий, и нестабильность от политики и общее ощущение безумия в последнее время. Ну и про то как жить то с этим всем. Там много интересных ребят и все про своё будут рассказывать. Я хочу порассуждать вслух на тему ИИ как зеркала — какими мы ста

25❤‍🔥2

11 Mar 2026, 21:37 UTC≈4,960 views89 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026

Хочу закончить свое прочтение The Great Transition v 2.0 от Джордана Холла. Это часть 3: Pistis. В прошлой серии мы вроде как вырвались из Египта — то есть базовой цивилизационной игры, Game A. Исход — это выход из институциональной экономики, а дальше начинается пустыня, по которой бродить 40 лет не хочется (хотя возможно и надо). По-сути ключевой тезис Джордана тут в том, что он считает, что AI радикально поменяе

59🔥28👍2

Signed Evgeny Kuryshev

11 Mar 2026, 21:37 UTC≈3,220 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

22

Signed Evgeny Kuryshev

7 Mar 2026, 07:56 UTC≈4,080 views123 reactions10 Starsread 2 September 2026

Продолжаю свое прочтение The Great Transition v 2.0 от Джордана Холла. Это часть 2: Исход. Мы остановились на том, что рассмотрели дефицитарность, как некую базовую установку и человека, и общества. В общем-то текущая цивилизационная игра (Game A, как ее называет эта тусовочка) строится на контроле этого самого дефицита. Какие-то общества выбрали авторитарные модели контроля, другие — бюрократию, третьи — рынок. Но

🔥6739👍17

Signed Evgeny Kuryshev

7 Mar 2026, 07:56 UTC≈2,930 views10 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

9🎉1

Signed Evgeny Kuryshev

5 Mar 2026, 20:30 UTC≈3,400 views266 reactions4 Starsread 2 September 2026

Короче тут мой любимый Джордан Холл написал продолжение своей крутой статьи The Coming Great Transition из 2014 года — The Coming Great Transition v 2.0. Джордан такой странный чёрт — успешный tech предприниматель, сделал DivX и не только, а еще футурист и, внимание, теолог. Я с ним познакомился через всю тусовку Game B (написал серию про эту тусовочку тут) и Джима Ратта. Мы тут оказались в жутковатом мире, где люди

🔥14578👍29❤‍🔥14

Signed Evgeny Kuryshev

5 Mar 2026, 20:30 UTC≈2,590 views48 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁47🔥1

Signed Evgeny Kuryshev

4 Mar 2026, 12:21 UTC≈2,590 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @SergeXXI

INITIAL SERGE OFFERING Сегодня у меня для вас возможность поучаствовать в том что делаем я и мои партнеры Если вкратце, у нас есть приватный проект с группой топовых партнеров включающих предпринимателей инвесторов и лидеров мнений весьма известных и в Рунете и в Silicon Valley, проект в котором мы совместно запускаем различные продукты которыми владеем коллективно, мы это назвали Network Equity Основное направлен

10😁6🔥3🤔1

Signed Evgeny Kuryshev

4 Mar 2026, 12:21 UTC≈2,550 views8 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026

Серж там что-то новое мутит у себя, я радуюсь что он кажется в конструктивной и продуктивной зоне.

🔥8

Signed Evgeny Kuryshev

3 Mar 2026, 13:15 UTC≈3,240 views103 reactions14 Starsread 2 September 2026

Раз уж канал расчехлил после долгого молчания, то надо продолжать, правильно же? Меня как и многих нормально так нахлобучила agentic-лихорадка и тесно связанный с этим парадокс: Мы оказались в ситуации, где миллионы людей вдруг получили могущественные способности, ну почти как супергерои Marvel, но мир в основном обогатился некоторым набором AI-погремушек и китчен-аппов. Мы так долго кричали, мол, дайте нам побольш

79👍14🤔10

Signed Evgeny Kuryshev

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @tasteofrain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Телеграмма от Максима Юрина
@yumaks · 42,473
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 29 August 2026
Matskevich - brains, love and robots
@Matskevich · 25,302
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Максим Спиридонов
@mspiridonov · 66,824
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
Соколова наизнанку
@naiznankuo · 58,587
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Итак, это Панов
@itakblet · 24,951
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
Ваня Замесин
@zamesin · 50,414
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Daily Reminder
@justakindreminder · 36,685
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Kostya Gorsky’s Channel
@desprod · 25,894
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Ряды Фурье
@Fourier_series · 42,189
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
kyrillic
@kyrillic · 61,020
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Малоизвестное интересное
@theworldisnoteasy · 74,000
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Dumik
@dumik · 22,244
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
e/acc
@cryptoEssay · 62,598
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Kumar & Solo
@solokumi · 37,644
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Кутергин в огне 🔥
@kutergin_on_fire · 61,804
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
The Edinorog 🦄
@Theedinorogblog · 43,821
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Кирилл Фомичев
@fomichevkirill · 28,567
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
ХУЦПА <-> Женя Давыдов
@hutzp · 45,406
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
FEDOR BORSHEV
@pmdaily · 23,757
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Гуринович делится!
@gurinovich_shares · 29,494
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Mikhail Tokovinin
@mtokovinin · 108,209
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Olymarkes Daily
@markesdaily · 28,205
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного
@aioftheday · 43,807
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Мастриды
@mustreads · 45,187
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Познавательная минутка от Курышева” (@tasteofrain), 11,453 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tasteofrain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.