Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ряды Фурье

Channel

Ряды Фурье

@Fourier_series

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

42,189subscribers

+1,190 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001929154720
TypeChannel
Username@Fourier_series
DescriptionВступайте в ряды Фурье! То, что вы пропустили про современную науку. Криво, однобоко и местами с этого угораем. Пруфы. Канал ведут @milfgard и @enjoykaz. По сотрудничеству к @enjoykaz. https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a1eb2823097106f3204821
Created4 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Fourier_series

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

40,99942,18941,5946 August 2026 — 40,999 subscribers6 August 2026 — 40,999 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,007 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,042 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,064 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,077 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,101 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,122 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,144 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,185 subscribers16 August 2026 — 41,251 subscribers17 August 2026 — 41,276 subscribers18 August 2026 — 41,286 subscribers19 August 2026 — 41,302 subscribers20 August 2026 — 41,344 subscribers22 August 2026 — 41,370 subscribers23 August 2026 — 41,437 subscribers25 August 2026 — 41,460 subscribers26 August 2026 — 41,579 subscribers27 August 2026 — 41,627 subscribers28 August 2026 — 41,652 subscribers29 August 2026 — 41,670 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,694 subscribers31 August 2026 — 41,718 subscribers1 September 2026 — 41,741 subscribers2 September 2026 — 41,770 subscribers3 September 2026 — 41,803 subscribers5 September 2026 — 41,830 subscribers8 September 2026 — 41,918 subscribers11 September 2026 — 42,035 subscribers13 September 2026 — 42,048 subscribers14 September 2026 — 42,064 subscribers16 September 2026 — 42,127 subscribers18 September 2026 — 42,189 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +1,190. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,821–42,368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:5942,189+62
16 Sept 2026, 09:1942,127+63
14 Sept 2026, 18:1642,064+16
13 Sept 2026, 04:2142,048+13
11 Sept 2026, 06:5942,035+117
8 Sept 2026, 11:3641,918+88
5 Sept 2026, 03:3841,830+27
3 Sept 2026, 09:2841,803+33
2 Sept 2026, 05:2741,770+29
1 Sept 2026, 04:2741,741+23
31 Aug 2026, 05:0741,718+24
30 Aug 2026, 04:3841,694+24
29 Aug 2026, 07:5641,670+18
28 Aug 2026, 08:1341,652+25
27 Aug 2026, 04:5741,627+48
26 Aug 2026, 03:2241,579+119
25 Aug 2026, 04:2341,460+23
23 Aug 2026, 21:0741,437+67
22 Aug 2026, 02:1341,370+26
20 Aug 2026, 22:2441,344first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.2%
avg views ÷ 42,189 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,300
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held66 (10 July 202623 September 2026)
Views total473,980
Reactions total12,177
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
399
Videos
30
Links
624

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

27,583 reactions across 66 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9,10833.0%
🔥8,93932.4%
👍2,3908.66%
😁1,8786.81%
💩8893.22%
❤‍🔥7592.75%
👀4191.52%
💊3181.15%
🤣3111.13%
🤯3021.09%
🥴2360.856%
🤩1930.7%
1910.692%
😱1540.558%
🕊1470.533%
🤓1470.533%
😢1440.522%
💔1380.5%
🤔1150.417%
1100.399%
23 further kinds6952.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,583 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
231
across the posts below
Posts paid on
58
of 66 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
44
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Fourier_series. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC≈3,980 views175 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026

Если вы много думаете о чём-то грустном или тревожном — возможно, это у вас вырабатывается белок, который ведёт к Альцгеймеру. Если что, это такое нейродегенеративное заболевание, от которого уезжает память и вообще когнитивные способности. Накапливаются бета-амилоиды — они слипаются в бляшки — и тау-белки клубками внутри клеток. Люди с депрессией или повышенной тревожностью чаще болеют Альцгеймером. Взяли 292 чел

😢63🔥36💊3524🤯9🗿8

22 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC≈8,610 views516 reactions2 Starsread 23 September 2026

Простите, что врываемся в ваш сон, но сегодня у нас ещё одна старая научная сказка на ночь про ложку масла. Тут письма, которые Королевское общество напечатало как есть. Врач Уильям Браунригг пишет Бенджамину Франклину (это который 100 баксов) в 1773 году и пересылает письмо преподобного Фариша из Карлайла; Франклин отвечает из Лондона, в его письмо вложено ещё одно, от Тенгнагеля графу Бентинку из Батавии. Так в X

271🔥123👍89❤‍🔥22🤗10💊1

21 Sept 2026, 12:34 UTC≈10,600 views420 reactions2 Starsread 23 September 2026

Тут вывели мышей без верхней половины мозга. Потом трём из них положили в череп кортикальные органоиды из клеток мозга человека. Зачем, а главное, нафига они так сделали? Ну, наш мозг обычно нельзя вскрыть и поэкспериментировать на нём. Мешают этические комитеты. Поэтому нейробиологи выращивают маленькие шарики из нейронов коры. В пробирке они созревают плохо, в крысе или мышке — хорошо. Но в крысе родные нейроны ра

🤯205🔥12453😢18👀13💊7

19 Sept 2026, 12:50 UTC≈14,000 views323 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026

Люди с домашними животными жирнее или стройнее? Были у нас учёные, которые считали, что собаки помогают владельцам худеть за счёт обмена метаногенными бактериями. И тут врывается @manwithoutface: Исследования не показывают такой связи. Скорее обратную - если хозяин страдает от ожирения, то велика вероятность, что и питомец будет тоже :) но не наоборот Короче, теперь разбираемся, как же это работает. До этого влад

👍177🔥735512😢5🆒1

18 Sept 2026, 12:09 UTC≈14,700 views353 reactionsread 23 September 2026

— А вот у меня сестра выпила эту таблетку и помогло! Это нифига не доказывает. Может, помогла вода. Может, она бы сама выздоровела и без таблетки. Может, съела в дополнение заячий помёт. Чтобы проверить, что же сработало, надо получить полную копию человека и одной версии дать таблетку, а второй не дать. И дальше держать их в идеально одинаковых условиях. Так сделать пока сложно, поэтому есть такие штуки — клиничес

184🔥110💊36🤓11💯7🎃5

16 Sept 2026, 12:51 UTC≈16,800 views508 reactions4 Starsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Есть такой рак-богомол. Этот хрен видит 12 цветных каналов (мы только 3, если что, а пчёлы и птицы 4) и 6 поляризационных (мы ни одного). Цвет — это длина волны. Поляризация — в какую сторону она колеблется. Муравьи ориентируются по поляризованному свету неба, водные жуки находят так поверхность воды. У рака всё это в диапазоне от ультрафиолета до конца видимого нам света (без инфракрасного). То есть у него все зад

🔥32473👀63😁27🤯14🤩7

15 Sept 2026, 16:51 UTC≈15,800 views657 reactions2 Starsread 23 September 2026
Video

Простите, что врываемся в ваш сон, но у нас сказка на ночь про шмелей. Очень короткая. Далеко-далеко выдры жонглируют камнями, макаки перебирают гальку, а человеки берут мид. В общем, все играют. Непонятно с насекомыми. Думали, они прям совсем глупые и очень серьёзные. Это обычно сочетается. Но вот в одной из далёких-далёких лабораторий шмелей учили катать шарики, чтобы они меняли их на сироп. И что-то эти шарики ш

379🤩108👍72❤‍🔥49🥰37👾12

15 Sept 2026, 10:31 UTC≈14,900 views414 reactions3 Starsread 23 September 2026

Помните пост, где мы рассказывали, как математика Николая замечательно подкололи с честным знаком? Ну, короче, к нам постучала пресс-служба ЦРПТ по поводу этой публикации. "Просим вас удалить или дополнить материал нашим комментарием. Мы в свою очередь открыты к диалогу и готовы предоставить любую необходимую информацию. Спасибо!" Ну, что ж, приятно, когда кто-то открыт к диалогу. Вначале они там немного учат Нико

🔥193😁15431👍15🙈14👻7

14 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC≈13,600 views287 reactions2 Starsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Примерно половина людей в мире жирные. В смысле, страдают ожирением или проблемами с метаболизмом. В основном они выражаются в ожирении. И вот, предположим, такой пациент честно жрёт положенное количество калорий (а не пытается обмануть себя или программу учёта) и честно тренируется. Но! Ему же нужно трекать прогресс, правильно? В особенности сложно понять, когда организм уже перешёл с дневного питания на расщеплени

🔥15767👍44🤓8🤩74

12 Sept 2026, 12:15 UTC≈14,600 views333 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026

@agams спросил про куда там делись все исследования про выращивание новых зубов. Зуб — не ткань. Создание такого объекта вызывается специальным конструктором, и там дофига этапов и химических сигналов. Код у нас есть, а вот стартовых ресурсов нет. Но можно заново запустить эмбриональную программу. Это иногда случается — так-то зубы хотят расти по всему организму. Точнее, там, где мигрируют первичные половые клетки,

134🔥93😱60👍25🤓13🤯8

11 Sept 2026, 13:28 UTC≈15,100 views476 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026

Был в биологии большой проект, почти как БАК — Геном человека. 3 миллиарда долларов, 13 лет, тысячи учёных со всех стран. Ждали, что мы прочитаем исходник человека и сразу всё станет понятно. Например, найдём ген для каждой болезни. Но выяснилось, что ДНК всех людей совпадает на ≈99,9%. То есть вы в своей основе вот почти точно такой же, как Эйнштейн, Месси или там какой-нибудь австрийский художник. Ну, может, чуть

👍230❤‍🔥102🔥7154💊11🙏8

10 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC≈16,600 views501 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

В чате попросили день накидывания мемов (собственно, он уже идёт!). Накидайте, пожалуйста, странных мемов!

❤‍🔥224🔥139😁10518😨87

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @Fourier_series. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Fourier_series edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTCAnonymous Poll3,160 voters approx.

Нужны ли ещё такие вечерние посты?

  1. Да, хочу ещё добрую сказку на ночь!95%
  2. Нет, слишком поздно, пишите днём, как обычно!5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Психолог Сергей Иванов
@ivanovsa_psy · 75
4 posts
Будда вне закона
@buddhainlaw · 239
3 posts
Ёж за ЗОЖ!
@ru_healthlife · 1,368
3 posts
Norlin Games
@NorlinGames · 248
2 posts
Большая книга Бо-Бо
@Ufa_Pediatr · 1,118
2 posts
Злоключения Ильи
@adventureofilya · 112
2 posts
АНЧА БАРАНОВА
@anchabaranova · 35,710
2 posts
Леонардо Ди Ванче
@skvir · 21,191
2 posts
Think Metabolic
@thinkmetabolic · 107
2 posts
«Коллекционер книг»
@A_book_collector · 64
1 post
Fedor&Music
@FE_music · 475
1 post
хроники Искателя 🦄
@Iskatel_13 · 3,328
1 post
Дизайн Образования
@LXD_education · 14,478
1 post
ПостПлутарх
@PostPlutarch · 33
1 post
Pseudomys_delicatus
@Pseudomys_delicatus · 82
1 post
လ — Обобщённо об обобщениях
@aboutpolit · 137
1 post
Alien Vampires
@alienvampiress · 32
1 post
Мир Сновидений и Астрология ✨
@astrodreams · 107
1 post
Kuzmin.pro
@avtooko · 1,597
1 post
Байесятина
@bayesyatinaa · 3,629
1 post
БиоТехСинтег | Биотех-Синтеграция
@biotechsynteg · 427
1 post
Софья Новосад
@dr_sofia_novosad · 282
1 post
Трезвый политолог
@drunkenpolitolog · 11,325
1 post
Это твой дом 🌦 🌱 🐾
@eto_tvoi_dorn · 91
1 post
Eurecable News
@eurecable · 6
1 post
Evening Prophet
@eveningprophet · 18,031
1 post
доказательный ⎵ пробел
@evidencespace · 1,331
1 post
Grechka Channel
@grechkachannel · 174
1 post
Хатифнатты в поисках огородов
@hatifnatteninsearch · 85
1 post
Фи́ФА (канал о честной Фармакалогии и ФАрмации)
@honestpharma · 567
1 post
In search of time
@in_search_of_time · 136
1 post
"В трансе" с Ольгой Бендер
@inevotrance · 71
1 post
Кайдзен своими словами
@kaizen_luchina · 339
1 post
Kamína
@kaminabro · 25
1 post
Khorny - Horny
@khornyhorny · 67
1 post
Князь Балконский
@knyazbalkonskiy · 9
1 post
Man, Death & Ethics
@mandeathandethics · 829
1 post
Mewone!
@mew_sect · 773
1 post
cheloVechek
@miroVechek · 1
1 post
Прикольный article
@nicearticle · 456
1 post
Мультидименшинал Гриднев
@omnidimeme · 155
1 post
PhysReal
@physreal · 57
1 post
Квантор возможности
@possibility_quantifier · 8
1 post
Ёстика
@stat_vladimir · 223
1 post
Syntax and the City
@syntaxandcity · 163
1 post
Техно-медбрат
@tehnomedbrat · 56
1 post
AI гараж
@winopit · 41
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 66 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного
@aioftheday · 43,807
#1
FSCP
@F_S_C_P · 13,430
#2
Дизраптор
@disruptors_official · 73,061
#3
Грокс
@groks · 43,050
#4
Neural Shit
@NeuralShit · 53,680
#5
kyrillic
@kyrillic · 61,020
#6
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,509
#7
запуск завтра
@ctodaily · 33,689
#8
Чванство
@chvans · 15,208
#9
Хабр
@habr_com · 132,465
#10
Техножрица 👩‍💻👩‍🏫👩‍🔧
@tech_priestess · 14,855
#11
UX Live 🔥
@uxlive · 35,985
#12
Santry's Singularity blog
@SantryBlog · 3,325
#13
N + 1
@nplusone · 64,280
#14
Гомеостатическая Вселенная
@homeostatic_universe · 3,878
#15
Progresspunks
@progresspunk · 2,635
#16
Блуждающий нерв
@dtulinov · 10,203
#17
Ваня Замесин
@zamesin · 50,414
#18
Познавательная минутка от Курышева
@tasteofrain · 11,453
#19
Boi diaries
@ohmyboi · 1,227
#20
Красные пики
@red_spades · 7,729
#21
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 137,325
#22
addmeto
@addmeto · 71,835
#23
Сиолошная
@seeallochnaya · 79,594
#24
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 96,889
#25
Стартап дня. Александр Горный.
@startupoftheday · 60,449
#26
Байесятина
@bayesyatinaa · 3,629
#27
Культурный
@culturnyy · 5,250
#28
Kedr to Earth | Земля, я Кедр
@kedr2earth · 10,113
#29
Вастрик.Клуб
@vas3k_club · 11,239
#30
RationalAnswer | Павел Комаровский
@RationalAnswer · 107,884
#31
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,690
#32
Авва
@avvablog · 10,945
#33
TechSparks
@techsparks · 46,537
#34
Метаверсище и ИИще
@cgevent · 52,361
#35
Венчур Менна и Горного
@menngornal · 6,056
#36
artjockey
@artjockey · 82,359
#37
Малоизвестное интересное
@theworldisnoteasy · 74,000
#38
Киба у аппарата
@kibaonline · 5,250
#39
Стой под стрелой
@nikitonsky_pub · 11,828
#40
Селедка над шубой
@furherring · 5,897
#41
42 секунды
@ftsec · 19,395
#42
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД
@whalesgohigh · 61,691
#43
e/acc
@cryptoEssay · 62,598
#44
Кримсон Дайджест
@crimsondigest · 141,567
#45
Метаверсошная
@olya_tashit · 13,039
#46
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 303,468
#47
LLM под капотом
@llm_under_hood · 29,146
#48
Леонид Каганов
@lleodnevnik · 9,162
#49
Мараховское время
@vmarahovsky · 60,783
#50
Сергей Марков: машинное обучение, искусство и шитпостинг
@oulenspiegel_channel · 11,102
#51
Фичизм
@fichism · 25,378
#52
Yashernet
@yashernet · 5,330
#53
Хулиномика
@hoolinomics · 99,279
#54
Венчур в картинках
@ventureinpics · 11,222
#55
ЗаТелеком 🌐
@zatelecom · 64,628
#56
Концептариум
@conceptarium · 2,700
#57
Упал, поднялся — блог Славы Рюмина
@ruminblog · 63,983
#58
Альфина (телеграм-река)
@alphynarium · 9,026
#59
Тру финансы
@truefinance · 6,165
#60
На Zzzzzападном фронте без перемен
@ve4niyvoy · 113,413
#61
Kali Novskaya
@rybolos_channel · 19,011
#62
New Yorko Times
@new_yorko_times · 10,554
#63
Время Валеры
@cryptovalerii · 30,829
#64
AI Happens
@aihappens · 14,506
#65
Рациональные числа
@rationalnumbers · 25,686
#66
Техасский Вестник
@starbasepost · 18,901
#67
linkmeup
@linkmeup_podcast · 17,369
#68
Segment@tion fault
@psauxww · 2,100
#69
(Не)занимательная антропология
@anthro_fun · 75,680
#70
Простая экономика
@prostoecon · 295,976
#71
FEDOR BORSHEV
@pmdaily · 23,757
#72
Информация опасносте
@alexmakus · 18,808
#73
Victor Osyka, техноцивилизация
@Victor_Osyka · 10,268
#74
Фининди | Александр Елисеев
@Finindie · 72,841
#75
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,422
#76
Цифровой геноцид
@gulagdigital · 5,210
#77
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов
@bossofyourboss · 27,735
#78
Продакты не нужны
@betternotworse · 28,526
#79
Лингвошутки
@lingvojokes · 21,017
#80
Ai molodca
@strangedalle · 46,847
#81
Массаракш Дролери
@greenhedgehog_d · 966
#82
Doque Embedded
@doque_embedded · 3,773
#83
Ppprompt | Sexy AI Prompts & Experiments | by @ponchiknews
@ppprompt · 15,394
#84
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика
@temno · 79,763
#85
Китайский русский
@russiachinese · 5,017
#86
БлоGнот
@blognot · 13,001
#87
DOFH - DevOps from hell
@DOFH_ru · 3,762
#88
Liza Loves Biology
@liza_loves_biology · 7,284
#89
Futuris
@Futuris · 5,828
#90
Илья Мартын
@illia_martyn · 5,083
#91
HN Best Comments
@hn_best_comments · 4,180
#92
Странная планета
@strangeplanetrus · 22,609
#93

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AI и точка.
@ai4telegram · 922,526
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 August 2026
Tech Debunker
@tech_debunker · 23,964
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ряды Фурье” (@Fourier_series), 42,189 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fourier_series.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.