25 measurements spanning 30 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,807–23,835 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 10:37
23,828
+1
3 Sept 2026, 14:59
23,827
-4
2 Sept 2026, 11:02
23,831
-1
1 Sept 2026, 08:37
23,832
+6
31 Aug 2026, 05:58
23,826
+7
30 Aug 2026, 06:45
23,819
+6
28 Aug 2026, 04:02
23,813
+2
27 Aug 2026, 03:35
23,811
-4
26 Aug 2026, 06:34
23,815
+2
25 Aug 2026, 08:57
23,813
-10
24 Aug 2026, 08:08
23,823
+5
22 Aug 2026, 13:45
23,818
+4
21 Aug 2026, 01:45
23,814
+1
19 Aug 2026, 23:35
23,813
-12
18 Aug 2026, 22:57
23,825
+3
17 Aug 2026, 19:54
23,822
+4
15 Aug 2026, 01:07
23,818
-2
13 Aug 2026, 14:06
23,820
+9
12 Aug 2026, 16:52
23,811
+1
11 Aug 2026, 17:28
23,810
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.7%
avg views ÷ 23,828 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
15 (27 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
106,490
Reactions total
1,682
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,624 reactions across 13 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,321
50.3%
🔥
648
24.7%
😁
259
9.87%
🤣
187
7.13%
😱
62
2.36%
🤬
56
2.13%
👏
31
1.18%
✍
17
0.648%
🤔
14
0.534%
🤯
6
0.229%
👀
5
0.191%
⚡
3
0.114%
💯
3
0.114%
🌚
2
0.076%
🙏
2
0.076%
🤝
2
0.076%
🥴
2
0.076%
❤🔥
1
0.038%
🎄
1
0.038%
👎
1
0.038%
1 further kind
1
0.038%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,896 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tech_debunker. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
66.7%
10 of 15 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
10
posts carrying an erid · 10 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
9,800
over 10 measured posts
Median views · rest
13,800
over 5 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcG9gLs
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2SDnjcPrRyM
1
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
2SDnjcUD1oq
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
2SDnjcif9oW
1
28 July 2026
28 July 2026
2SDnjcizqgX
1
3 August 2026
3 August 2026
2SDnjdPKnY3
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
2SDnjdb4bKR
1
27 July 2026
27 July 2026
2SDnjeG7YfM
1
2 September 2026
2 September 2026
2SDnjeZyisM
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2SDnjemoHD5
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Недорогие брендовые энергостанции 220 В. Подборка 09.2026
В таблице компактный список брендовых моделей от производителей, чьи фирменные магазины есть на Ali.
Комментарии к таблице
Сортировка – по цене. В первых столбцах заявленная емкость, рабочая мощность розеток 220 В, пиковая мощность 220 В, форма синусоиды, наличие и мощность портов Type-C, наличие и мощность розеток 12 В, наличие беспроводной зарядки для гад…
LiitoKala LiFePO4 60 А*ч – проверка на долговременную мощность
После краткого теста емкости и отдачи в комментариях засомневались, что подобные модели (да еще и по распродажным ценам) действительно могут выдавать вдолгую 100 А, которые для них заявлены. Давайте проверим.
Тест с превышающей нагрузкой
Выставил ~109 А (пограничный уровень, при котором данный аккумулятор стабильно удерживает напряжение). Через 10 мину…
Таблицы тестов пауэрбанков 5000-20000 мА*ч. 08.2026
Поскольку в предыдущих версиях таблицах накопилось почти 90 протестированных моделей, пришлось их разделить на два сегмента. В данном посте – первый с пауэрбанками емкостью 5000-20000 мА*ч.
Комментарии к таблицам
Измеренные емкости пауэрбанков могут иметь общую погрешность ~5-7%, поскольку измерялись при немного отличающихся нагрузках.
Измеренная мощность: указа…
Тест автомобильного насоса Vention KRZ
Компактный аккумуляторный, с очень привлекательной ценой для данного бренда – ~2420 руб. в «комбо».
Заявлена производительность 32 л/мин., давление до 10 бар. Плюс фонарик и функция пауэрбанка с отдачей 10 Вт. Емкость встроенного аккумулятора – 5200 мА*ч. Есть индикатор давления с четырьмя запоминаемыми уровнями автоотключения.
В комплекте четыре насадки, короткий шланг и жес…
Анализ сетевых фильтров. 08.2026
Один из ключевых выводов – все модели из таблицы с ценами до 3 тыс. руб. (кроме пары фейковых) защищают вашу технику ~одинаково за счет одного варистора. А теперь к деталям.
На чем основана защита
Начальный уровень – копеечный варистор (в розницу 14D471K идут по 11 руб. за штуку). Защищает от перенапряжения. Как только происходит скачок в сети, он начинает пропускать ток и слегка г…
Наглядное сравнение фонарей на дистанции 50 м
На первый взгляд фонари – достаточно простые устройства, однако у каждого из них своя форма светового пятна со своим нелинейным распределением яркости от центра к краям (если они вообще есть). В итоге замеры освещенности в разных точках и на разных расстояниях не дадут полной картины. Нужны живые фото в правильной обстановке.
Перепробовал несколько мест и локаций, но ид…
Популярный фейковый сетевой фильтр
Взял наугад одну из самых популярных моделей с маркетплейсов – некую MN-2503. Цена ~600 руб. У карточки товара одних только отзывов 17 тыс. Правда, к ней привязано еще несколько моделей фильтров, и конкретно у этого отзывов лишь около семисот.
Обещают защиту от импульсных помех, короткого замыкания, перенапряжения, перегрузки и возгорания. Не хватает только обещаний счастья в жизн…
Краткий тест Deko DKBL20DU3, купленного на распродаже за 900 руб.
Не знаю, что там происходит в фирменном магазине Deko на Ali, но уже несколько раз цены внезапно становились в 2-5 раз ниже типичных (примеры из моего второго канала: раз, два, три).
Данный шуруповерт вместе с кейсом, аккумулятором, зарядкой, набором бит и сверел был приобретен за 904 руб. с доставкой из РФ. Сейчас цена ~4500 руб.
Пару лет назад изм…
Фейковые планшеты. Что нового в 2026 году. Ч.2
Продолжим подсчет «ущерба», который понесут несведущие покупатели. Про общую картину, а также про реальные объемы памяти и накопителя, писал постом выше, теперь про чип, экран, аккумулятор, камеры.
Чип (SoC)
В этот раз в карточке товара нет сказочных обещаний про Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. Заявляют скромный десятиядерный «Медиатек» MT6799, более известный как Helio X30 родом…
Популярный фейковый планшет. Что нового в 2026 году. Ч.1
Пару лет назад изучал одну из самых популярных фейковых моделей Lingbo A20. Обманули тогда с каждой деталью (кратко тут, полная версия – на Хабре). Стало любопытно, что изменилось в 2026 году.
Заказал популярную на маркетплейсах модель TechzoX S9 Ultra 2026 с заявленными 32 ГБ ОЗУ и 1 ТБ накопителем. Цена – 13 тыс. руб.
Что прислали
В коробке оказался Lingb…
Еще один популярный аккумулятор формфактора Makita LXT
Если не путаю, Shidoku – совсем свежий отечественный бренд. Прошел бы мимо, но подметил, что на паре маркетплейсов они сильно вкладываются в продвижение, собирают сотни заказов. Подумалось, может они при цене чуть выше популярных проверенных китайцев чем-то лучше их? Тем более, что обещают качество.
Взял на пробу модель SH-H4 емкостью 2 А*ч. Ориентировочная цен…
Молотки Deko
Недавно Deko устроил распродажу инструмента по 350-550 руб. за набор, о которой писал во втором канале. По сути – комплект по цене коробки от него.
В комментариях высказывали мнение, что молотки там ненадежные. Отнесся скептически, поскольку не первый год использую большой набор Deko, с которым не было проблем. Но, оказалось, молоток молотку рознь.
До полноценных тестов не дошло
Заказал этот набор, п…
👍94🔥20😁11🤯6
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @tech_debunker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Yan_Dilan @yan_dilan · 78,725 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tech Debunker” (@tech_debunker), 23,828 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tech_debunker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.