Пишу про войны, политику, историю.
https://t.me/artjockey_lite — второй канал для небольших тематических заметок.
Прямая связь: https://t.me/artjockey_bot
Подписка на платный канал:
https://t.me/artjockeyp_bot
https://boosty.to/artjockey
Created
10 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
70,300 average views per post against 82,359 subscribers — an engagement rate of 85.4%. Across the 8,375 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.07% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.6%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (26 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Posts measured
45 of 45 published in the window (0 exact, 45 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
3,163,800
Mature posts only
87.3% over 43 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 25 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,734. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80,365–82,619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 21:38
82,359
+26
15 Sept 2026, 18:01
82,333
+60
14 Sept 2026, 01:59
82,273
+82
12 Sept 2026, 10:00
82,191
+177
10 Sept 2026, 09:55
82,014
+397
7 Sept 2026, 02:01
81,617
-15
4 Sept 2026, 11:17
81,632
-14
2 Sept 2026, 23:48
81,646
+1
1 Sept 2026, 23:59
81,645
+7
1 Sept 2026, 00:13
81,638
-12
31 Aug 2026, 01:55
81,650
+21
30 Aug 2026, 02:38
81,629
+22
29 Aug 2026, 03:33
81,607
+17
28 Aug 2026, 07:02
81,590
+60
27 Aug 2026, 07:44
81,530
+550
26 Aug 2026, 05:07
80,980
-10
25 Aug 2026, 05:22
80,990
+34
24 Aug 2026, 00:25
80,956
-30
22 Aug 2026, 09:24
80,986
-25
21 Aug 2026, 01:55
81,011
first reading
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
86.2%
avg views ÷ 82,359 subscribers
Avg views / post
71,000
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
85 (31 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
3,193,100
Reactions total
52,653
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 12:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,150
Videos
≈416
Links
≈1,150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 39s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
98,151 reactions across 83 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5866430047887299754
98,151
100.0%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100,251 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,880
across the posts below
Posts paid on
82
of 85 we hold a reading for · 96%
Most on one post
854
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artjockey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Только вчера я написал об экономических последствиях выборов, и вот уже правительство озвучивает планы ввести новые налоги. Однако кроме экономики и мобилизации, есть ещё сфера ограничений для населения, нововведения в которой были отложены на период после выборов.
Блокировки интернета весной сильно всколыхнули население, пока это стало самым сильным триггером, даже сильнее, чем дефицит бензина. Всё же он связан с в…
Обсуждая итоги выборов и сам процесс, не стоит забывать, что есть другой очень важный аспект: а что будет теперь, после них? Электоральный цикл закончился, до следующих выборов далеко, поэтому для любой власти, не только для режима Путина, это время для того, чтобы совершать всякие паскудства, которые принято называть «непопулярными решениями», и о некоторых паскудствах мы даже знаем, а о других можем догадываться.
…
Через три дня в США с государственным визитом прибудет Си Цзиньпин. Это ответный визит после аналогичного приёма для Трампа в Китае весной, на котором стороны попробуют «заключить сделку», как назвал бы это президент США.
Примечателен в этой поездке её статус, государственный визит — это самый высокий дипломатический уровень, который предполагает максимум торжеств: караул, флаги, медведи на велосипедах, клоуны, карл…
Трамп подписал закон «имени Линдси Грэма». Пока неизвестно, начнут ли указанные в нём меры реально действовать — в нём оставили лазейки, чтобы де-факто не вводить ограничения, — но сам факт подписи означает дипломатическую эскалацию, у которой есть причины.
Сначала ещё раз о законе. Первоначальная версия была в значительной мере переписана, теперь закон предполагает не право Трампа, а обязательство Белого дома ввест…
Начинается основная часть выборов, к которым приковано так много внимания. Их сложно назвать судьбоносными, потому что выборов как таковых нет, а есть референдум о поддержке Путина, но возможное влияние результата — причём обеих, и нарисованного, и настоящего — тоже не стоит недооценивать.
Эти выборы в Госдуму уникальны тем, что власть своими действиями впервые смогла добиться политической мобилизации очень широких …
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @artjockey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 46 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ded_Banzay @Ded_Banzay_official · 34,237 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
artjockey заметки @artjockey_lite · 39,796 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Закулисье маркетинга @marketing_back · 55,165 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 August 2026
Печатные выражения @pechat_sallyks · 26,394 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
Малдер расскажет @malderstory · 25,645 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
Тени Руси @tenirusi · 25,548 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Димитриев @russ_orientalist · 130,371 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Интуиция подскажет @intuition2036 · 38,628 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
ДиШ: фантастика и фэнтези @fantasy_jedi · 28,391 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
Ватфор | Автострадный think tank @vatfor · 31,656 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
BspChannel @BSPhistorychannel · 23,323 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
Ёрш @loginoversh · 63,053 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
Китай Наизнанку 🇨🇳 Алексей Райсих @chinabackdoor · 50,446 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Пинта разума @pintofmind · 60,033 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Tech Debunker @tech_debunker · 23,964 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
Глебсмит @glebsmith77 · 28,144 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
K-POWER (Наб.Челны) @k_power_tuning · 62,735 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
Mr.Nadzor Технадзор, Приемка и Ремонт @mrnadzor · 25,258 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Vault 8. Убежище №8. @vault8pro · 39,871 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
Ряды Фурье @Fourier_series · 42,189 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
Клуб правообладателей @bchlaw · 27,259 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Инфляционный шок! @inflation_shock · 39,951 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Упал, поднялся — блог Славы Рюмина @ruminblog · 63,983 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
КИНО CLUB @filmoclub · 22,865 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“artjockey” (@artjockey), 82,359 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artjockey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
