Авторский канал Алексея Пилько о мировой политике: новости, аналитика, прогнозы.
Зарегистрирован в Роскомнадзоре: Уведомление № 040887.
Для связи: [email protected]
Created
4 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
47,900 average views per post against 60,081 subscribers — an engagement rate of 79.8%. Across the 8,453 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.06% and 21.2%, with a median of 10.4%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (10 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Posts measured
17 of 17 published in the window (0 exact, 17 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
814,900
Mature posts only
79.8% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 9 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 32 days, net +502. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59,490–60,194 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 20:38
60,081
-19
4 Sept 2026, 05:56
60,100
+2
2 Sept 2026, 17:23
60,098
-6
1 Sept 2026, 14:04
60,104
-9
31 Aug 2026, 10:47
60,113
+1
30 Aug 2026, 10:13
60,112
+7
29 Aug 2026, 11:49
60,105
-4
28 Aug 2026, 10:28
60,109
+18
27 Aug 2026, 13:53
60,091
+110
26 Aug 2026, 11:37
59,981
+7
25 Aug 2026, 12:59
59,974
+6
24 Aug 2026, 09:44
59,968
-30
22 Aug 2026, 15:15
59,998
-7
21 Aug 2026, 08:44
60,005
+3
20 Aug 2026, 06:38
60,002
+40
19 Aug 2026, 09:03
59,962
+8
18 Aug 2026, 12:25
59,954
-12
17 Aug 2026, 12:38
59,966
-4
16 Aug 2026, 07:05
59,970
-1
14 Aug 2026, 16:04
59,971
first reading
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
79.8%
avg views ÷ 60,081 subscribers
Avg views / post
47,900
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held
42 (10 July 2026 – 5 September 2026)
Views total
814,900
Reactions total
15,156
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 20:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈106
Videos
≈18
Links
≈2,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
43,451 reactions across 42 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
23,769
54.7%
👍
7,268
16.7%
🤔
5,476
12.6%
❤
2,306
5.31%
🔥
1,574
3.62%
😁
1,174
2.70%
👏
362
0.833%
🤨
339
0.78%
🐳
287
0.661%
🤯
268
0.617%
🙏
253
0.582%
😱
210
0.483%
😢
80
0.184%
🎅
45
0.104%
👌
19
0.044%
⚡
14
0.032%
🥰
7
0.016%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43,451 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Зачем Стивен Уиткофф и Джаред Кушнер снова приехали в Москву? Попытаться выиграть время для Украины, руководство которой потерпело фиаско в попытке "дальнобойной" эскалацией заставить Россию пойти на "заморозку" конфликта по линии фронта. Эффективность украинских ударов постепенно сходит на нет и стоили очень дорого (именно из-за этого сейчас в военном бюджете Украины образовалась дыра на 27 млрд долларов). При этом…
Стрим завершён. Видеозапись доступна на закрытом канале "Филипповский, 13".
Сегодня в 18.00 мск на нашем закрытом канале состоится стрим, посвящённый вопросу мобилизации в России. Среди обсуждаемых вопросов:
• Почему осенью 2022 года была объявлена частичная мобилизация, а не сделана ставка на добровольный контракт?
• Какова вероятность новой мобилизации в этом и следующем году?
• Как может развиваться конфликт н…
После неудачной попытки эскалации в виде роста дальнобойных ударов по российской энергетике и логистике (ущерб был нанесён, но не удалось добиться критического ущерба для экономики России и заставить её изменить политику в украинском вопросе) активизировались миротворческие усилия как Соединённых Штатов, так и ряда других стран. Москву пытаются убедить "заморозить" конфликт по линии боевого соприкосновения в обмен на…
И для завершения темы: о визите директора ЦРУ в Москву в нашем новостном выпуске на ютуб-канале "Филипповский, 13". Если коротко: спасибо, что прислали матёрого волка Рэтклифа, а не Уиткоффа и Кушнера. Разговор всегда приятно вести с идейным оппонентом.
Целью визита директора ЦРУ Джона Рэтклиффа в Москву была попытка остановить эскалацию в Европе, на которую готова пойти Россия. Именно в таком ключе подают информацию о переговорах с главным американским разведчиком западные средства массовой информации. И это похоже на правду, поскольку страны НАТО пересекли к прокси-войне против России все мыслимые и немыслимые "красные линии". Видимо, в Кремле приготовились отвеча…
В Москву приехал американский "суперястреб" - директор ЦРУ Джон Рэтклифф. Его визит явно не был запланирован и организовывался спонтанно. В дипломатии такое происходит, когда случилось что-то непредвиденное или намечаются какие-либо резкие шаги. Рэтклифф - фигура в администрации Трампа далеко не безобидная: именно он был горячим сторонником недавних американских военных операций в Венесуэле и Иране. Также он успешно …
Администрация Трампа взяла паузу в вооружённом конфликте с Ираном, но лишь по одной причине: закончились патроны. И теперь делает ставку на экономическое удушение Тегерана, то есть попытку создать в стране экономический коллапс и запустить политические перемены. Впрочем, в иранском случае они имеют дело со страной, которая почти полвека находится под санкциями и пока устояла под их прессом. Тем более, что Иран явно в…
Заявления Зеленского о дефиците бюджета Минобороны Украины в размере 27 млрд долларов показательны: оказывается всю выделенную до конца года военную помощь украинское руководство "спустило" за несколько месяцев интенсивной воздушной кампании (так называемых "дипстрайков" и "миддлстрайков") с целью создать в России социально-экономический кризис и раскачать ситуацию в преддверии парламентских выборов. Теперь деньги за…
Противостояние Турции и Израиля в Сирии ставят администрацию Трампа в сложное положение, поскольку в своих внешнеполитических планах в ближневосточном регионе она опиралась на обе эти страны. Тель-Авив - традиционный союзник Вашингтона, оставить которого пока не способна ни одна американская администрация. Причём даже в ситуации, когда израильская политика противоречит интересам США.
На Анкару Соединённые Штаты были…
Стрим завершён. Видеозапись доступна на закрытом канале.
Сегодня на закрытом канале "Филипповский, 13" состоится стрим, посвящённый возможному прямому вооружённому конфликту между Россией и НАТО. Среди обсуждаемых вопросов:
• Сложились ли сегодня условия для нападения НАТО на Россию и какой характер оно может принять?
• Приступит ли Москва к нанесению ударов по предприятиям европейской военной промышленности, рабо…
Прокси-война между Россией и НАТО постепенно, но неумолимо приближается к последнему акту - прямому вооружённому конфликту между ними. По ту сторону барьера полагают, что рано или поздно (с учётом приличного темпа, который набрало производство беспилотников для Украины) российское ПВО будет перегружено и может случиться трагедия, после которой общественное мнение заставит политическое руководство России вплотную заня…
💯1,110🤔261❤94🤯50😢35😱30🔥26👍25
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @pintofmind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@pintofmind edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 47 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Олег Ясинский @olegyasynsky · 59,249 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Ватфор | Автострадный think tank @vatfor · 31,656 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
Павел Щелин. Официальный канал. @common_sen · 82,279 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Алексей Бобровский @alexbobrowski · 37,096 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
Профессор смотрит в мiръ. Авторский Анонимный канал Дмитрия Евстафьева @dimonundmir · 208,131 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
У Жукова @uzhukova · 41,456 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Парламент с Кнопкой @parbut · 33,148 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Коты и кошка Крамника @kramnikcat · 39,237 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
РУССТРАТ @russtrat · 108,761 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Россия в глобальной политике @ru_global · 54,241 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Елена Панина @EvPanina · 154,150 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Простые числа @primenumbers2021 · 68,520 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Клим Жуков @klimzhukoff · 138,367 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Семен Уралов @su2050 · 81,269 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
Шемякин, усни! @gillshem · 38,771 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Евгений Спицын @SpicynEY · 28,972 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
ЦИФРОВАЯ ИСТОРИЯ – Егор Яковлев @egoryakovleff · 61,660 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
4 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пинта разума” (@pintofmind), 60,081 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pintofmind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.