Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
54 measurements spanning 91 days, net -145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,270–12,459 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 23:17
12,292
-1
4 Nov 2026, 00:11
12,293
-3
2 Nov 2026, 21:25
12,296
-2
1 Nov 2026, 19:08
12,298
-5
31 Oct 2026, 16:16
12,303
-4
30 Oct 2026, 15:54
12,307
-2
29 Oct 2026, 15:05
12,309
-1
28 Oct 2026, 13:01
12,310
+1
27 Oct 2026, 14:39
12,309
-3
25 Oct 2026, 16:51
12,312
-5
24 Oct 2026, 17:06
12,317
+1
23 Oct 2026, 14:31
12,316
-2
22 Oct 2026, 13:11
12,318
+2
21 Oct 2026, 09:20
12,316
-4
20 Oct 2026, 10:34
12,320
-2
19 Oct 2026, 07:17
12,322
-4
17 Oct 2026, 06:35
12,326
-1
15 Oct 2026, 09:56
12,327
-1
14 Oct 2026, 13:28
12,328
+1
12 Oct 2026, 23:01
12,327
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈994
Videos
≈198
Links
≈1,420
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 24s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,164 reactions across 28 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
704
32.5%
👍
398
18.4%
😁
397
18.3%
🔥
330
15.2%
👎
147
6.79%
😱
96
4.44%
😢
92
4.25%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,164 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
42
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 28 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @niketasfm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
3.45%
1 of 29 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,980
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
6,300
over 27 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
CQH36pWzJqVHxua12TokGLyn1S2Vf7eu17C7mZ9YxGdNyP
1
21 August 2026
21 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Вышел подкаст и исследование Newsroom × It Makes Sense про личный бренд. Посмотрите, почитайте и попробуйте сами
Многие до сих пор считают, что персональный бренд — это чисто профессиональная штука. Мол, у меня есть должность, вот она вместе с моим именем и образует мой профессиональный бренд. Но тогда тебя чаще знают как «сотрудника такой-то компании». А если ты ещё и слишком часто меняешь место работы, то становиш…
Flipper удалённо включает вибраторы
Гении из Flipper Devices запулили совершенно безумный, но похоже вполне реальный ролик: с помощью функции передачи сигнала до 1 ГГц можно активировать работу вибраторов. Конечно, только тех, которые работают под управлением радиопультов ДУ, и для этого нужно записать их соответствующий сигнал активации.
Любой девайс таким образом не включить — например, те, которые активируются ч…
Аукцион по продаже места на макбуке
26 августа французский индихакер по имени Винсент из Бордо запустил необычный аукцион: он решил продавать места на своём ещё не купленном макбуке. Суть идеи была в том, чтобы собственно профинансировать таким образом покупку этого самого макбука, собрав пару тысяч евро на сайте brandmymac.com через аукцион: кто больше готов заплатить за рекламное место, тот его и получит.
За день…
Нишевый или NPC
Наткнулся на мем выше пару дней назад и с тех пор думал, чем именно он цепляет, в какой нерв бьёт и почему работает. С одной стороны, мысль о стабильной жизни, основанной на ширпотребных столпах, полностью лишающих любой уникальности, — тотальная безнадёга.
С другой, легко представить себе такого знакомого и подумать «Ну я-то точно не такой». А какой?
Вот я в 33 года стал обладателем электрухи Les …
Для тех, кто работает в коммуникациях, контенте, медиа или SMM (неважно, с клиентской или агентской стороны) — просьба пройти короткий пятничный опрос, который мы делаем вместе с Newsroom.
Делаем исследование на тему того, как профессионалы занимаются персональным брендом. Но полезно будет и тем, кто сам занялся своим брендом (а не только работает с чужими).
За прохождение пошерим исследование и ещё приятный бонус …
В 36 лет понял, что приятно заниматься собой — здоровьем, самочувствием, внешним видом, кукухой. Не дошёл пока только до спорта. Но наскоками это делать не получается: нужно формировать привычки.
Привычку нельзя просто скачать и установить. Для того, чтобы она вошла в твою жизнь, нужно принять решение — я как раз такой человек, который будет дохрена обдумывать, прежде чем его принять — но это только полбеды: нужно п…
Стелс-режим или build in public
Прочитал на днях пересказ истории про англоязычного фаундера, который решил делать свой проект в формате build in public — то есть делиться ходом развития в реальном времени, рассказывать о готовящихся фичах, успешных решениях и провалах. Так вот, чел пожаловался, что в какой-то момент просто пришёл конкурент с инвестициями и скопировал проект за сутки, а теперь вовсю рекламирует. Вот…
Anthropic, OpenAI и Google будут помечать создаваемые тексты невидимыми ИИ-вотермарками
Статья 50 европейского AI Act вступила в силу. Провайдеров обязали помечать ИИ-генерации — но самому проверить эти метки пока нельзя.
10 августа Anthropic обновила справочную статью о том, как Claude помечает сгенерированный контент. В текст теперь будут вплетать незаметные водяные знаки — это происходит на уровне модели, поэтом…
Когда SMM только появлялся как понятие, среди специалистов устаканился профессиональный мем про создание контента для соцсетей завода. Мол, если ты серьёзное промышленное предприятие, что тебе делать в соцсетях? Кто подпишется на завод и что он там будет постить — как выпускает кирпичи или делает станки?
И вроде юмор понятный, но и времени с тех пор прошло достаточно. И многие правильно поняли, что рассказывать исто…
OpenAI и ещё около тысячи сотрудников других лабораторий, включая Google, Anthropic, META, подписали письмо «Pacing the Frontier»
Вот его содержание:
Искусственный интеллект может помочь создать кардинально лучшее будущее, однако такой исход не гарантирован. Ведущие мировые ИИ-компании полагают, что они могут быть близки к автоматизации исследований в области искусственного интеллекта. Трудно точно предсказать, наск…
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @niketasfm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Информация опасносте @alexmakus · 18,753 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 October 2026
addmeto @addmeto · 71,948 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
запуск завтра @ctodaily · 33,727 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Fixed.One: новости мира Apple и не только… @FixedOneNews · 21,017 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
Техасский Вестник @starbasepost · 19,242 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 October 2026
42 секунды @ftsec · 19,404 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026
Denis Sexy IT 🤖 @denissexy · 140,405 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
TechSparks @techsparks · 46,785 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Игромир @Igromir_cloud · 57,396 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
🤖 The Bell Tech @Bell_tech · 20,842 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
Tech Debunker @tech_debunker · 24,326 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
FEDOR BORSHEV @pmdaily · 23,640 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
ФИНСАЙД @finside · 20,207 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Радиорубка Лихачёва” (@niketasfm), 12,292 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/niketasfm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.