21 measurements spanning 22 days, net -140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,405–22,593 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 03:07
22,431
+4
27 Aug 2026, 03:03
22,427
-8
26 Aug 2026, 04:23
22,435
-10
25 Aug 2026, 02:34
22,445
-5
23 Aug 2026, 16:35
22,450
-18
21 Aug 2026, 23:48
22,468
-5
20 Aug 2026, 18:43
22,473
-12
19 Aug 2026, 15:06
22,485
+4
18 Aug 2026, 12:36
22,481
-4
17 Aug 2026, 12:27
22,485
-13
16 Aug 2026, 04:05
22,498
-11
14 Aug 2026, 15:05
22,509
-6
13 Aug 2026, 03:35
22,515
-23
12 Aug 2026, 00:32
22,538
+1
11 Aug 2026, 00:25
22,537
-5
10 Aug 2026, 00:31
22,542
-8
9 Aug 2026, 00:51
22,550
-10
7 Aug 2026, 21:07
22,560
-10
6 Aug 2026, 19:40
22,570
-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:04
22,571
first reading
Engagement
229 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.86%
avg views ÷ 22,431 subscribers
Avg views / post
418
228 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
229
of 229 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 196 of 228 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
229 (4 August 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
95,335
Reactions total
1,311
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16m 10s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,233 reactions across 176 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
342
27.7%
👍
190
15.4%
😁
183
14.8%
🔥
130
10.5%
🤣
49
3.97%
💯
40
3.24%
🥰
34
2.76%
🤡
29
2.35%
🤮
29
2.35%
🙈
26
2.11%
💩
20
1.62%
🖕
15
1.22%
🤯
13
1.05%
👌
12
0.973%
❤🔥
10
0.811%
👎
10
0.811%
👏
8
0.649%
🌚
7
0.568%
🤨
7
0.568%
🥴
7
0.568%
28 further kinds
72
5.84%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 196 of the 229 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,311reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 229 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 228 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FixedOneNews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 229 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Только что складной iPhone Ultra стал на 50-процентов привлекательнее. По слухам, помимо белой и черной моделей также будет доступна насыщенно-красная расцветка. Не факт, что именно такая, как на картинке выше, но тоже красивая.
И хотя мы все еще не хотим себе такой айфон, подержать в руках уже придется.
@FixedOneNews
Какой верный признак скорого окончания лета в Fixed.one? Мы ищем курьеров!
Наши сезонные летние «директора по логистике» с начала сентября уходят на учебу, и нам теперь надо, как минимум, два постоянных курьера.
Что от них хочется:
— аккуратность;
— доброжелательность;
— грамотная речь;
— умение пользоваться картами и ориентироваться в Москве.
Что надо будет делать:
— ездить по партнерам и поставщикам;
— забирать …
Почему Apple вообще выкатила Mac mini и Mac Studio в конце августа? Кажется, ответ прячется в календаре
Apple редко удивляет чем-то по-настоящему нетипичным — компания живет по расписанию, отточенному годами: весна для обновления линеек, июнь для WWDC, сентябрь для главного шоу с айфонами, и иногда октябрь для «хвостов». Поэтому релиз новых Mac mini и Mac Studio на новых чипах M5 и M6 Ultra в конце августа выглядит …
Добавим с нашей колокольни. Важно разделять две процедуры — это загрузку из App Store приложения локально на компьютер с тем, чтобы потом его можно было куда-то поставить. И, собственно, сама установка уже имеющегося файла приложения.
Так вот уже пару недель как мы наблюдаем проблемы именно с загрузкой приложений из App Store. Поэтому у нас многие приложения мы скачать так не успели. При попытке стукнуться в App Sto…
Apple изменила процесс авторизации при обращении к серверам App Store. Из-за этого сторонние программы вроде iMazing, ipatool и аналогичных IPA Downloader больше не могут пройти проверку учетной записи так, как раньше. Как следствие, теперь нельзя поставить программы, которые удалили из App Store и прочую запрещенку вроде торрент-качалок.
На самом деле такое случается регулярно, например, подобное уже было весной пр…
Apple бесплатно проапгрейдит Mac mini M4 покупателям, которые не успели вовремя получить свой заказ
Apple начала рассылать некоторым покупателям Mac mini с процессором M4 письма о приятном сюрпризе: их ещё не отправленный заказ автоматически обновили до новой версии этого компьютера с процессором M6 — и совершенно бесплатно. Причина проста и приземлённа — компания на этой неделе представила обновлённый Mac mini, и в…
Есть машины, которые просто едут, едут и снова едут. В мире компьютеров Apple таковой сейчас можно считать MacBook Pro на процессоре M1 — модели уже шесть лет скоро будет, а она до сих пор актуальна для большинства пользователей. Одна такая залетела и к нам на продажу, а для своих скидочку придумаем, конечно.
— MacBook Pro 13″ M1 256GB Space Grey — рабочая лошадка для каждого из нас — 47900 рублей.
Из других поступ…
На фоне сегодняшних новостей о скорой презентации Apple будет уместно вспомнить как проводилась презентация самого первого айфона. Говорят, это было одно из лучших выступлений Джобса, а мы бы отметили команду неприметных инженеров, которые ему помогали.
Прекрасный ролик от наших коллег рассказывает подробнее.
Первый iPhone едва работал, но его показ вошёл в историю
Рассказываем, как команда Apple превратила нестабильный прототип в образ смартфона будущего.
Подписывайтесь 👉 @techno_yandex
А между тем энтузиасты уже накропали промо-видео для складного iPhone Ultra и даже попробовали голос Джона Тернуса на него наложить.
В целом отметим качество исполнения ролика, а все ТТХ потенциальной новинки собраны на основе последних слухов и предположений. То есть на выходе все может быть не так (хотя это и вряд ли).
@FixedOneNews
iPhone 17 снова всех обошел, пока рынок смартфонов дружно ужимается
Аналитическая компания Counterpoint Research опубликовала свежий квартальный рейтинг продаж смартфонов, и обычная версия iPhone 17 второй квартал подряд удерживает первое место в мире с долей 6% от всех проданных устройств. На втором и третьем местах расположились iPhone 17 Pro Max и iPhone 17 Pro — тройка лидеров целиком принадлежит Apple. Причем в…
⚡️Теперь официально: презентация новых моделей iPhone состоится 9 сентября!
Apple объявила, что традиционная осенняя презентация, посвящённая новым iPhone, состоится в кампусе Apple 9 сентября. Мероприятие начнётся в 20:00 часов по московскому времени, на него пригласят ограниченный круг представителей прессы, а трансляцию покажут на сайте компании, в приложении Apple TV и на YouTube.
Безусловно, построено мероприя…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 229 posts we hold for @FixedOneNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 229 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 308,328 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fixed.One: новости мира Apple и не только…” (@FixedOneNews), 22,431 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FixedOneNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.