Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лиса Рулит Фан-Клуб

Channel

Лиса Рулит Фан-Клуб

@lisarulit_forever

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,866subscribers

-339 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001205108437
TypeChannel
Username@lisarulit_forever
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lisarulit_forever

Topic

Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,86614,20514,035.57 August 2026 — 14,205 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,205 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,198 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,199 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,194 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,188 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,178 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,167 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,161 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,159 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,158 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,154 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,153 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,154 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,156 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,152 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,148 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,146 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,139 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,136 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,137 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,140 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,124 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,119 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,108 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,094 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,093 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,071 subscribers26 September 2026 — 14,053 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,016 subscribers8 October 2026 — 13,989 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,970 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,962 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,956 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,955 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,951 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,950 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,946 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,934 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,922 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,917 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,910 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,912 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,905 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,900 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,893 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,891 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,886 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,878 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,881 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,875 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,866 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
52 measurements spanning 89 days, net -339. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,815–14,256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 06:3013,866-9
3 Nov 2026, 07:1413,875-6
1 Nov 2026, 06:0713,881+3
31 Oct 2026, 07:5413,878-8
30 Oct 2026, 06:3513,886-5
29 Oct 2026, 03:1913,891-2
28 Oct 2026, 03:0713,893-7
26 Oct 2026, 23:3013,900-5
25 Oct 2026, 23:1913,905-7
25 Oct 2026, 00:0713,912+2
24 Oct 2026, 00:2013,910-7
23 Oct 2026, 02:3813,917-5
21 Oct 2026, 23:3613,922-12
20 Oct 2026, 17:3613,934-12
19 Oct 2026, 13:5913,946-4
18 Oct 2026, 13:3813,950-1
17 Oct 2026, 16:3113,951-4
16 Oct 2026, 13:5413,955-1
15 Oct 2026, 15:0413,956-6
14 Oct 2026, 16:1913,962first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.18%
avg views ÷ 13,866 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held41 (24 March 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total19,271
Reactions total323
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 05:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13m 07s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,425 reactions across 40 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍52536.8%
❤44931.5%
🔥23916.8%
😁14810.4%
🍌382.67%
custom 5465575995622835380261.82%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,425 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
501
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 40 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
501
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lisarulit_forever. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC460 views10 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Что только не увидишь в Тайланде 😂💩

😁9👍1

3 Nov 2026, 09:28 UTC599 views10 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @lisarulit777Photo

Мне пришёл транспортный налог на Tesla, хотя в Москве его не должно быть. Написала в группу теславодов. Пришёл почти всем. Есть уже опыт успешного возражения и возврата денег, хотя поначалу ответ в личном кабинете: «Вы заплатите, потом разберёмся». Одному владельцу ответили, что отправят запрос в ГИБДД. Интересно, что они планируют запрашивать? Действительно ли Тесла является электромобилем? Короче, я заплатила се…

😁9❤1

2 Nov 2026, 19:45 UTC801 views26 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Понедельник - удачный день?

❤14🔥6🍌4👍2

2 Nov 2026, 08:34 UTC951 views11 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Спасибо за ваши ответы ❤️ Результаты говорят о многом, Лиса всегда актуальна 👌🦊

🔥6👍4❤1

1 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,060 views21 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

На аукцион RM Sotheby’s выставили уникальный суперкар Galpin GTR1, созданный в единственном экземпляре на базе серийного Ford GT. Машина, оцениваемая организаторами торгов в сумму от 550 до 750 тысяч долларов (примерно 44–60 миллионов рублей), уйдёт с молотка 28 января 2027 года. Проект был разработан специалистами Galpin Auto Sports (это спортивное подразделение крупнейшего дилера Ford в США) к 60-летнему юбилею ко…

👍19🍌1custom 54655759956228353801

31 Oct 2026, 16:59 UTC≈1,120 views16 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Poll

Как давно вы смотрите Лису Рулит?

  1. Менее года5%
  2. 2-3 года29%
  3. Более 5 лет48%
  4. Фанат с самого начала 🏆19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤16

31 Oct 2026, 16:58 UTC≈1,090 views48 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Как давно вы знаете Лису?

👍31❤9🔥7🍌1

31 Oct 2026, 06:33 UTC≈1,180 views38 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Лисы много не бывает 🦊

❤25🔥8👍3🍌2

30 Oct 2026, 18:48 UTC≈1,250 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Poll

Ваш выбор?

  1. Белый46%
  2. Желтый54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤5

30 Oct 2026, 18:47 UTC≈1,230 views14 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Желтый или белый? 👇

👍14

30 Oct 2026, 15:51 UTC≈1,180 views9 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @lisarulit777Photo

Это в Коммерсанте вышла публикация. Обсуждали эту тему примерно год назад. Потом как-то затихли. Суть простая: Интерполовские машины разрешат легализовывать, ставить на учёт и эксплуатировать с пометкой в птс. Для многих граждан, которых киданули, продав им ворованную или лизинговую машину из заграницы, это спасение. Правда, с такой пометкой, это ваше вечное авто. Но не раскроем ли мы ящик Пандоры? Понимаете, о ч…

😁9

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @lisarulit_forever. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Oct 2026, 16:59 UTCAnonymous Poll212 voters

Как давно вы смотрите Лису Рулит?

  1. Менее года5%
  2. 2-3 года29%
  3. Более 5 лет48%
  4. Фанат с самого начала 🏆19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Oct 2026, 18:48 UTCAnonymous Poll134 voters

Ваш выбор?

  1. Белый46%
  2. Желтый54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

жиза и арбитраж
@aff_owner · 17,603
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 September 2026
Noticias del Mundo y Venezuela
@NotiMundoyVzla · 21,385
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 September 2026
Фильмы | Киноклуб Майкл
@Kinoklub_Michael · 21,095
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 September 2026
ಕನ್ನಡ ಕ್ವಿಜ್‌ ಚಾನೆಲ್‌ | KPSC | KEA | FDA | SDA
@kannada_kpsc_quiz · 39,696
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 30 August 2026
SVIATOSLAV ₿ GUSEV
@SviatoslavHusiev · 26,486
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 31 August 2026
НеКазань
@nokazan · 19,720
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 4 October 2026
GimmeAI Channel [EN]
@GimmeAI · 25,300
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 September 2026
Fixed.One: новости мира Apple и не только…
@FixedOneNews · 21,032
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лиса Рулит Фан-Клуб” (@lisarulit_forever), 13,866 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lisarulit_forever.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.