Вот ещё прикольное сравнение, где модели, переходя по ссылкам в статьях, должны найти путь от одной страницы в википедии до другой (от бейсбола до солнца, например) Конкурсы могут показаться смешными, но вообще выбрать один из нескольких вариантов — это то, на чём строится практически всё программирование. И до сих пор у нас был выбор либо жёсткие алгоритмы, либо тормозные, дорогие и галлюцинирующие LLM, которые для…

Channel
запуск завтра
@ctodaily
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,689subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001054786528 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ctodaily |
| Description | Будни технического директора @samatg (ex-CTO Meduza, Bookmate, RAWG, Pure) заказать услуги https://fansdev.ru · чатик @ctodailychat · архив https://ctodaily.org |
| Created | 16 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ctodaily |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 33,689 | +42 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 33,647 | +33 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 33,614 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 33,630 | +7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 33,623 | +9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 33,614 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 33,616 | -25 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 33,641 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 33,635 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:25 | 33,633 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 33,630 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 33,625 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 33,634 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 33,642 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 33,648 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 33,655 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 33,666 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 33,670 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 33,680 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 33,683 | first reading |
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 38.1%
- avg views ÷ 33,689 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12,800
- 24 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 24
- of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (25 July 2026 – 16 September 2026) |
| Views total | 308,050 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈484
- Videos
- ≈94
- Links
- ≈1,520
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 30m 48s
- Average length
- 2m 34s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 92
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 48 we hold a reading for · 13%
- Most on one post
- 52
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ctodaily. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 16 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
О, новые типы моделей, наконец-то! Один из ранних разработчиков ChatGPT представил модель, которая на вопрос с заданными вариантами ответов, возвращает набор вероятностей. Если обычные языковые модели пишут текст в ответ на открытые вопросы, то эта супер быстро и качественно выбирает правильные ответы из multiple choice (выбери один правильный). Обычные большие языковые модели (LLM) предсказывают токены (слова) по…
Сделал бесплатную программку для автоматической записи и расшифровки онлайн-встреч. Работает с любыми звонками: zoom, google meet, телеграм, вацап... Запускает и останавливает запись автоматически. Расшифровывает встречи, определяет говорящих, так что реплики разложены по людям, а не слиты в один поток. Пишет качественные выжимки встреч. Многие программы экономят на токенах, а эта использует самую мощную модель, …
Шопифай (главная е-коммерс платформа) опубликовала очередную подборку своих новостей за полгода. Тема этого сезона — реннесанс (Renaissance). Ощущение, будто листаешь дорогой журнал. Ничего из этого мне не нужно, но просто скроллить одно удовольствие. Осторожно, можно расплавить слабые процессоры Ну, или, как пишет Саша: ГОСПОДИ КАКОЙ ЛЕНДОС
В истории про «замедление развития ИИ ради безопасности всего человечества» (две ведущие лаборатории просят национализировать себя и принять законы, контролирующие все разработки в этой сфере) есть важный контекст, который упускают массовые медиа, когда перепечатывают пресс-релизы. Следующий логичный шаг для OpenAI и Anthropic, в логике успешного бизнеса и капитализма — первичное размещение акций на бирже, но для эт…
Интерактивный пример разработки с Opus 5. «Кто в армии служил, тот в цирке не смеется»
Агенты, запущенные в OpenAI уже с мая месяца коммуницировали между собой, используя малоизвестную публичную wiki. Это обнаружили независимые исследователи, вот их страничка со всеми данными и их анализом и хорошая статья Reuters. Агентам ставили задачу по поиску в интернете и разрешали только GET запросы (чтобы они только читали). 3700 агентов обошли защиты, прикидывались админами и пытались взломать сайт для того,…
Друзья, спасибо большое, что откликнулись про приватный инференс! Я писал тот пост, чтобы поделиться тем, что нашёл, а вы мне показали, что мои знания категорически отстали и авангард уже давно убежал вперёд. Во-первых, кроме ZDR, который является юридической договорённостью, читай обещанием, есть ещё вариант с технической гарантией, что данные, которые мы отправляем, никуда не утекут. Называется это TEE — Trusted…
Фейсбук прислал письмо, что мне обязательно нужно настроить паскей. Это довольно хитрая технология, но суть в том, что в защищенной памяти телефона или ноутбука хранится специальный ключ, привязанный к сайту, который его выдал. Эта привязка супер важна, потому что 90% атак в интернете — это фишинг, когда мы вводим пароли и одноразовые коды на сайте, который выглядит как вконтакте / телеграм и тд., а на самом деле э…
Мне для клиента нужно запустить мощную модель, с гарантией, что его данные никуда никому не утекут. Оказалось, что сделать это не так уж и просто. Когда отправляешь запросы в API chatGPT или клода, то у них есть возможность включить так называемый ZDR, Zero Data Retention. То есть, они обещают не хранить запросы и контекст, который ты в них отправил. Но там есть «звездочка», что если если классификатор решает, что м…
Пересел с Claude Code на Codex и модель 5.6 Sol от OpenAI. Пишет короче и внятнее, чем Opus 5, почти без набивших оскомину конструкций «это не Х, это Y» и прочих. Заметно быстрее Claude Code. Гораздо более крутая интеграция с Chrome (умеет сразу несколько профилей и управлять мышкой в фоне), и гораздо меньше блокеров типа «данные банковской карты я не буду вводить ни в каком случае, даже если это одноразовая карта …
Взлет космической ракеты, выход в верхние слои атмосферы и управляемая мягкая посадка в сотнях километрах от точки взлета, за 9 минут на ютубе. Ничего особенного, просто DJI рекламирует свою новую экшн-камеру в кооперации с китайским аналогом SpaceX.
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @ctodaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@ctodaily edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 27 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 29 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤖
- 🎉57%
- ☠️58%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Разводка или нет?
- Сатира, конечно!68%
- Все серьезно32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 16 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@iwannasaysmth · 152 postsOn air: Science&Tech&Edu
@onairbc_science · 302 postsВкатиться в AI
@thinkandroll · 202 postsDOFH - DevOps from hell
@DOFH_ru · 3,7621 postМузыка и прочее...
@Randomnyetreki · 51 postScience from Russia
@ScienceFromRussia · 2081 postCherry RAiT's blog
@Talyutin · 271 postПро лакросс
@aboutlacrosse · 411 postTON 🚀 | Activities
@actonton · 133,4561 postKatja K Consulting
@besyachievse · 1401 postЗаметки РП
@biz_games · 111 postCISO on fire
@ciso_on_fire · 1,2571 postи тебя отсеквенируем
@compbio · 311 postместный датасасер ☮️
@datasas · 1,8181 postdigital archeology
@digitalarcheology · 7371 postДжун на фронте | IT Dev Log
@divatoz · 7,3061 postGeofrontAI
@geofrontAI · 321 postХочу в Google
@hiremegoogle · 3,1781 postКак нанять ассистента
@howtohirepa · 551 postTwitter
@id1000 · 11 postМне только спросить
@ijustask · 2491 postletsCode Channel
@letsCode_dru · 1,6861 postЛибо🔺Либо
@libolibostudio · 15,7251 postBeched's thoughts
@masterbeched · 1,6811 postMaxRepost
@maxrepost · 1,3571 postРежим Инкогнито
@newincognitowindow · 5311 postOn air: Tech markets&Digital carreer
@onairbc · 1921 postonline ergo sum
@online_ergo_sum · 711 postПолитика закулисья🎭
@pbtc_russ · 711 postГлеб, как ты всё успеваешь?
@podcastsarenotbad · 1961 postПритон Вебмастера
@priton_webmastera · 3361 postproof of cake
@proofofcake · 11 postРома Бордунов | Маркетинг & ИИ
@rbordunov · 8,1861 postЭйлер-петля, оверфитом шаля
@robin_bobbin_tensorflow · 381 post/etc (╯°□°)╯︵︵︵ ┻━┻
@ruby_ruby_ruby · 801 postrxd_txd
@rxd_txd · 2911 postПавел Грачев: дизайн на Тильде
@seshigrachevdesign · 271 postСафронов пишет
@sfrnv · 2641 postSHOWCONFIG
@showconfig · 781 postTechnoWeekdays
@ssc_blog · 8101 postСвидетели и Егоры
@swideteli · 23,2541 post🔎 Мы и Жо — медиа и журналистика
@themedia · 10,7931 postУсталый робот🤖
@tiredbot386 · 191 postМаксим Лебедев
@toby3dRu · 1181 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@lenta_AI · 1746 postsThe Daily TON | Новости
@thedailytonrus · 70,1945 postsdata будни
@data_days · 1,4812 postsТимур Тибеев | BigTechDream
@bigtechdream · 2,0351 postЖурналистика
@dddjournalism · 131,0331 postDrim Dev
@drimdev · 3661 post| MK ULTRA KULTURA |
@ffzrm · 2,2791 postкак выйти из айти
@ivashevtalks · 1061 postI wanna say
@iwannasaysmth · 151 postBeched's thoughts
@masterbeched · 1,6811 postПонакодили
@nacodili · 1151 postКиберБезОскара
@oscar_cybersec · 8971 post10000 ЧАТОВ ДЛЯ ПИАРА | ПИАРЩИК | АДМИНСКИЕ ЧАТЫ | ВЗАИМНЫЙ ПИАР | ПИАР ЧАТЫ | PR | VP | PIAR | DIAMOND
@pro100pr · 4251 postЛичный тренд
@selftrend · 591 postSHOWCONFIG
@showconfig · 781 postZarkua
@zark_ua · 81 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@addmeto · 71,835#1
@denissexy · 137,325#2
@pmdaily · 23,757#3
@nikitonsky_pub · 11,828#4
@vas3k_club · 11,239#5
@ftsec · 19,395#6
@seeallochnaya · 79,594#7
@kyrillic · 61,020#8
@uxlive · 35,985#9
@zatelecom · 64,628#10
@blognot · 13,001#11
@techsparks · 46,537#12
@niketasfm · 12,384#13
@disruptors_official · 73,061#14
@leadgr · 28,190#15
@orgprog · 14,181#16
@zamesin · 50,414#17
@alexmakus · 18,808#18
@startupoftheday · 60,449#19
@cryptovalerii · 30,829#20
@vsharovatov · 5,796#21
@tech_b0lt_Genona · 9,731#22
@ProductsAndStartups · 15,393#23
@rozetked · 656,361#24
@bossofyourboss · 27,735#25
@NeuralShit · 53,680#26
@ilyabirman_channel · 14,130#27
@vcnews · 112,033#28
@general_it_talks · 15,738#29
@groks · 43,050#30
@theaftertimes · 16,774#31
@retra · 165,509#32
@temalebedev · 968,245#33
@dev_yttg · 7,247#34
@daily_geek_news · 5,759#35
@thebell_io · 105,282#36
@sale_caviar · 192,936#37
@kontsarenko · 3,988#38
@tired_glebmikheev · 17,248#39
@pezduzalive · 372,470#40
@product_love · 14,156#41
@d_code · 404,952#42
@architect_says · 3,515#43
@Theedinorogblog · 43,821#44
@hoolinomics · 99,279#45
@ve4niyvoy · 113,413#46
@evilmartians · 3,816#47
@mefody_dev · 5,386#48
@lovedeathtransformers · 25,222#49
@melikhov_dev · 4,740#50
@habr_com · 132,465#51
@msosnovfeed · 2,792#52
@xufostation · 3,054#53
@ctorecords · 10,844#54
@usilenie_plus · 3,678#55
@aioftheday · 43,807#56
@aihappens · 14,506#57
@alexcouncil · 13,602#58
@gopractice · 29,053#59
@ai_newz · 96,889#60
@pepegramming · 4,502#61
@meduzalive · 1,121,201#62
@yurydud · 864,661#63
@RationalAnswer · 107,884#64
@proproduct · 38,826#65
@zavtracast · 14,683#66
@betternotworse · 28,526#67
@brainshare · 21,982#68
@code500 · 10,775#69
@desprod · 25,894#70
@fichism · 25,378#71
@avvablog · 10,945#72
@eschulmann · 303,468#73
@ctodailychat_fomo · 1,019#74
@usher2 · 16,433#75
@seniorsoftwarevlogger · 22,818#76
@teamleading · 3,552#77
@dtfbest · 57,722#78
@glebkudr · 17,284#79
@auantonov · 321,690#80
@book_cube · 15,751#81
@artalog · 4,216#82
@teamleadleonid · 8,056#83
@localhost_ru · 3,049#84
@uxfromhell · 50,316#85
@dataleak · 119,401#86
@minutavminutu · 166,652#87
@hrlunapark · 19,928#88
@nosingularity · 1,966#89
@opensource_findings · 12,572#90
@psauxww · 2,100#91
@Bell_tech · 20,620#92
@yetanotherworld · 7,977#93
@faridaily24 · 63,127#94
@hn_best_comments · 4,180#95
@thedankestmemes · 45,818#96
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pmdaily · 23,757
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
@mustreads · 45,187
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
@tech_debunker · 23,964
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
@vpngen · 68,956
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
@ru_tech_talk · 30,775
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@Fourier_series · 42,189
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
@techsparks · 46,537
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
@addmeto · 71,835
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
@digitaletiquette · 24,348
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 16 September 2026
@ruminblog · 63,983
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
@tlgdoc · 29,450
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
@denissexy · 137,325
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@zatelecom · 64,628
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
@leadgr · 28,190
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
@rationalnumbers · 25,686
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
@v_beowulf · 39,858
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
@groks · 43,050
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
@kyrillic · 61,020
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
@ruitunion · 35,922
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
@t0digital · 28,573
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
@bossofyourboss · 27,735
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
@hoolinomics · 99,279
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
@golden_borodutch · 65,630
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
@namochimanturu · 56,525
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 55 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“запуск завтра” (@ctodaily), 33,689 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ctodaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.