Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SEOшница

Channel

SEOшница

@bakushevaseo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,266subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001134879272
TypeChannel
Username@bakushevaseo
Created31 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bakushevaseo

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,2288,2828,2556 August 2026 — 8,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,235 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,244 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,249 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,253 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,263 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,268 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,280 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,277 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,282 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,266 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,265 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,266 subscribers8,2666 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,220–8,290 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 11:418,266+1
12 Sept 2026, 19:408,265-1
9 Sept 2026, 05:588,266-16
3 Sept 2026, 14:028,282+5
31 Aug 2026, 13:268,277-3
28 Aug 2026, 05:548,280+12
25 Aug 2026, 05:468,268+5
22 Aug 2026, 04:098,263+10
18 Aug 2026, 14:368,253+4
15 Aug 2026, 05:148,249+5
9 Aug 2026, 04:118,244+9
6 Aug 2026, 13:208,235+7
6 Aug 2026, 04:308,228no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:288,228first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 28 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 04s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

411 reactions across 26 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24559.6%
🔥9122.1%
👏317.54%
🥰235.60%
🤩133.16%
❤‍🔥81.95%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 411 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 30 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bakushevaseo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,460 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @sergey1win

If I had to choose just one factor that determines whether a person will achieve a breakthrough in absolutely any endeavor - it would be ambition. Not intelligence, and certainly not innate talent. All of that is secondary and can be developed. But you can't force a person to move forward if they don't internally want more and consciously go where the odds of success are below 30%. And do it without complaining abou

9👏4🔥3

22 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC≈1,560 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026

"У корпоративных менеджеров, с которыми приходилось работать в YC масштаб мышления, вера в себя и амбиции всегда на катастрофически низком уровне, у них не было ни дня чтобы над ними не стоял бы начальник, родитель или еще кто-то и скорее всего его всю жизнь наказывали за креативность, инициативу и большие запросы" "Самый эффективный способ взрастить амбиции неуверенного в себе человека - серия небольших регулярных

21

22 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC≈1,460 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

смотрю его щас https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os5aEWojxDA

🔥62

19 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC≈1,600 views11 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026

Из интересного..Сделала пост из того видоса что кидала ранее. Как инвестируют лучшие венчурные фонды мира 1. Команда - главный критерий Все топ-фонды говорят одно: команда важнее идеи. • Основатель с глубокой экспертизой в нише • Лучше - серийный предприниматель (уже ошибался и знает цену ошибкам) • Complementary co-founders: технарь + бизнесмен • Доказанная способность нанимать сильных людей • Одержимость пробл

🔥64❤‍🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC≈1,520 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @product_marketing_punkrock

Press Gazette: статьи на поддельных сайтах Forbes предлагают в сети по $10 000 Издание выпустило расследование про два сайта, Forbes LA и Forbes Liechtenstein. Forbes подтвердил Press Gazette, что обе площадки поддельные, и заявил, что принимает меры. Настоящих лицензионных редакций у Forbes около полусотни в 80 странах, ни Лос-Анджелеса, ни Лихтенштейна среди них нет. Сайты выпускают десятки AI-материалов от имени

4🔥3❤‍🔥2🥰1

18 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC≈1,780 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

София в новой роли 😎

2👏1

18 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC≈1,800 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @pressaffVideo

📺 «Минус $150 000 и седые волосы». София Бычкова о цене медийности, сложных кейсах и командообразовании София Бычкова — экс-коммерческий и операционный директор Inside, создатель шоу Inside Bar, а сейчас — овнер собственной SEO-команды Prime. София трижды пыталась запустить собственный in-house и трижды уходила в минус — суммарно на $150 000. SEO-команда, которую она собрала в декабре, стала четвертой попыткой: сей

6🔥5

17 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC≈1,850 viewsread 28 August 2026

Интересно про инвестиции https://youtu.be/l-9A66gBJeo?is=htIpTdAKe3M2n_Yr

15 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTCviews —

SEOшница pinned «Мысли о будущем SEO-аффилиата в перспективе 5-6 лет. Что будет с этим бизнесом когда ChatGPT отвечает на всё? Смотря что ты делаешь. Что умрёт Контент-фермы, PBN-сетки, страницы «ключ + кнопка». Google это уже видит и фильтрует. ИИ дорубит остальное. …»

4 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈3,120 views20 reactions4 Starsread 28 August 2026

Где-то выше я писала, что профессиональной ценностью является сегодня вовлеченность, а не опыт. Оно же "здесь и сейчас" в работе, а не "я знаю все, поэтому я столько стою". Ты стоишь ровно столько насколько ты здесь и сейчас, в текущих реалиях, в текущих изменениях и адаптивен. После просмотра последнего интервью с Маском можно глобализировать (не только с точки зрения профессионального аспекта), что когда все стане

20

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @bakushevaseo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SEO HR, digital-вакансии, офис и удалёнка
@seohr · 24,935
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
Owner 1win
@owner1w · 24,594
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
R2B.News
@reg2bet · 25,043
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
ЖП
@cpalenta · 57,455
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
PIRATE CPA // Channel
@piratecpa · 28,911
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 9 September 2026
CPALENTA | Арбитраж трафика
@cpa_lenta · 122,026
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
Арбитраж. Все вакансии в одном месте. LENKEP
@Arbitrazh_vakansii_rabota · 27,985
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
Partnerkin | Арбитраж трафика
@thepartnerkin · 32,256
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 6 September 2026
CPA HUNTER | Вакансии арбитража трафика
@hr_affiliate · 34,212
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 9 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SEOшница” (@bakushevaseo), 8,266 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bakushevaseo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.