⚡️ Увеличивайте свой профит в PropellerAds ⚡️
— 12 млрд показов в день в 195+ ГЕО
— Таргетинг по Интересам для Пушей
— Супер-конвертящий Direct Click трафик для Onclick кампаний
Регистрируйтесь 👉 https://bit.ly/3Ofyo6S
Реклама в Partnerkin: @vmv31
Created
3 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,345. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,706–32,458 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:38
32,256
+38
16 Sept 2026, 06:16
32,218
+42
14 Sept 2026, 10:39
32,176
+19
12 Sept 2026, 16:58
32,157
+12
10 Sept 2026, 13:39
32,145
+1,018
7 Sept 2026, 10:37
31,127
+19
4 Sept 2026, 17:56
31,108
+14
2 Sept 2026, 23:53
31,094
+10
1 Sept 2026, 19:53
31,084
+26
31 Aug 2026, 17:25
31,058
+17
30 Aug 2026, 17:04
31,041
+2
29 Aug 2026, 17:44
31,039
-6
28 Aug 2026, 15:08
31,045
-1
27 Aug 2026, 13:13
31,046
+10
25 Aug 2026, 16:33
31,036
+10
24 Aug 2026, 17:28
31,026
+12
23 Aug 2026, 03:46
31,014
-3
20 Aug 2026, 15:14
31,017
+8
19 Aug 2026, 18:32
31,009
+19
18 Aug 2026, 20:43
30,990
first reading
Engagement
181 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.84%
avg views ÷ 32,256 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
93 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.787%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
93
of 181 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held
181 (30 July 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Views total
115,175
Reactions total
907
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 03:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,670
Videos
≈699
Links
≈4,350
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 41m
Average length
1m 45s
Measured directly from 58 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,730 reactions across 170 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
524
30.3%
😁
369
21.3%
👍
292
16.9%
🔥
271
15.7%
💯
149
8.61%
😱
36
2.08%
⚡
28
1.62%
🤯
24
1.39%
👏
12
0.694%
😢
12
0.694%
🙏
10
0.578%
🥰
3
0.173%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 181 of the 181 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,867 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 181 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
37
across the posts below
Posts paid on
29
of 181 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thepartnerkin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 181 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥Топ сайд-ивентов для всех, кто едет на SBC Summit в Лиссабон! 🇵🇹
С 29 сентября по 1 октября в Португалии пройдет топовая конфа от SBC Summit. Для тех, кто хочет получить максимум от поездки, мы собрали традиционную подборку самых интересных митапов, вечеринок и нетворкинг-ивентов. Сохраняйте себе!
🇵🇹 iGaming Club by Affpapa
🕒 Когда будет: 28 сентября
📍 Где будет: Ferroviário
👉 Принять участие
🇵🇹 SBC Leaders Summi…
😐 Многие регулируемые казино-бренды в Европе с гордостью говорят, что у них лояльная аудитория
Это с чьих слов? Игрок вносил депозит три месяца подряд — и теперь это, видимо, уже серьезные отношения. По такой логике, как считает автор, ему пора жениться на любимом казино.
Настоящая проверка начинается, когда появляется офшорное казино с действительно более сильным продуктом, успевает заработать доверие и предлагает…
🔝Подборка лучших вакансий недели! Переходи по ссылке и откликайся!
🟣Android Automation Engineer в ViralDrop — минимум бюрократии, высокая автономия и прямое влияние на архитектуру mobile / device-направления
🟣Media Buyer в Trading-проект — готовые кабы и рабочие связки, креативы под твои ТЗ, проверенная воронка, которая стабильно работает 2+ года
🟣CEO / Генеральный директор в SEO-команду — зп: фикс + % от результа…
See you under the Lisbon sun ☀️
01.tech едет на SBC Summit — встречаться с партнерами, обсуждать новые проекты и интеграции и искать новые точки для сотрудничества.
Наша команда на SBC:
⚪️Инна - Head of Game Aggregator
⚪️Виктория - HRD
⚪️Юлия - Business Development Manager
⚪️Лиана - B2B Sales Team Lead
One more thing for your Lisbon calendar: 1️⃣
Let’s meet!
Как делают слоты, которые приносят миллионы
На нашем сайте мы постоянно рассказываем про арбитражников, которые заливают на гемблу и, в частности, на слоты, но гораздо меньше у нас материалов про тех, кто их разрабатывает.
Устраняем этот пробел и делимся с вами текстовой версией интервью Сергея Харченко, product менеджера одной из iGaming-студий, которая занимается разработкой слотов для интернет-казино.
За 14 лет…
💰 Любовь к быстрым деньгам в iGaming
Автор продолжает наблюдать эту тенденцию еще с 2025 года — 90% компаний упорно не хотят перестраиваться под нынешние условия рынка. Причем наиболее уязвимы те, кто привык лутать профит, прикладывая минимум усилий. Рынок их попросту разбаловал.
Приведу пару примеров из того, что я наблюдал в этому году:
1) Компания хочет выйти на новые рынки, но при этом у них абсолютно не адапти…
🧠 Почему Affiliate отделу трудно находить партнеров?
Итак, ты афф. менеджер или даже хед аффилиатки очередного White Label бренда. Скорее всего с лицензией оффшора. Тебя взяли на работу, платят зарплату, поставили план и KPI. Который, ты скорее всего, не выполнишь. И вот почему.
Давай вернемся к компании Coca-Cola. Она продается по всему миру. Это самый известный газированный напиток где угодно. Пил ли ты когда-ниб…
Исторический шторм Meta* Ads: что происходит, что делать и к чему готовиться
Всем привет. На связи Grizzly Gang. Если вы льете с ФБ* последние месяцы, объяснять слово «шторм» особо не нужно. У кого-то кабы не спендят вообще. У кого-то спенд есть, но CPL улетел в космос. У кого-то отлетают карты. У кого-то БМы. У кого-то Meta* внезапно просит селфи или вериф, и ни селфи, ни вериф просто не проходятся. А некоторым вез…
👨💻 Поговорим про найм
Автор обсудил с CEO партнерской сети Alfaleads Network ситуацию с наймом в iGaming и на примере BDM расписал, почему кандидаты на высокие должности могут получать отказы от работодателей.
Сейчас я оказался сразу по обе стороны рынка: продолжаю нанимать людей и одновременно сам рассматриваю новые проекты. Поэтому особенно интересно было послушать, с какими сложностями партнёрка сталкивается пр…
🎰 Операторы казино, которые добавляют спортсбук, часто считают существующую базу почти бесплатным источником игроков на ставки
По опыту автора, это сильно переоценено.
Игрок казино и игрок на ставках по-разному потребляют и видят продукт. В казино цикл очень короткий: выбрал игру, нажал, получил результат, повторил.
В спортсбуке между действием и результатом появляется больше трения: нужно выбрать событие, рынок, …
👍2❤1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 181 posts we hold for @thepartnerkin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@thepartnerkin edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CPALENTA | Арбитраж трафика @cpa_lenta · 122,026 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
PIRATE CPA // Channel @piratecpa · 28,911 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 9 September 2026
Owner 1win @owner1w · 24,594 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
R2B.News @reg2bet · 25,043 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
Арбитраж. Все вакансии в одном месте. LENKEP @Arbitrazh_vakansii_rabota · 27,985 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
CPA HUNTER | Вакансии арбитража трафика @hr_affiliate · 34,212 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 6 September 2026
ЖП @cpalenta · 57,455 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
В школе этому не учат | Бизнес & Digital @delaumoney · 53,334 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 8 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Partnerkin | Арбитраж трафика” (@thepartnerkin), 32,256 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thepartnerkin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.