я тут. Я ненавижу арбитраж |Чат😠 🐗 Обсудить сплетню в чате можно тут 💵 SERIOUS.PARTNERS - ПОДПИСКИ ЛЕЙ, НОРМАЛЬНО БУДЕТ 💵 Место для вас @dumay by Я ненавижу арбитраж

Channel
ЖП
@cpalenta
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
38,770subscribers
+37,231 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002111275240 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @cpa_express @cpa_feed @cpalenta @CPANewsFeed @rumorsnews |
| Description | Вся желтая пресса про арбитраж трафика от Джозефа Пулитцера |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 292 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cpalenta |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:06 | 38,770 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:08 | 38,771 | no change |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:59 | 38,771 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:27 | 38,776 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:40 | 38,780 | -10 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:29 | 38,790 | no change |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:16 | 38,790 | no change |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:59 | 38,790 | no change |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:51 | 38,790 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:06 | 38,791 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:16 | 38,803 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:04 | 38,806 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:00 | 38,806 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:09 | 38,806 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:30 | 38,811 | -241 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:26 | 39,052 | -165 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:40 | 39,217 | no change |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:50 | 39,217 | no change |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:36 | 39,217 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:58 | 39,225 | first reading |
Engagement
717 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.508%
- avg views ÷ 38,770 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 197
- 236 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.493%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 237
- of 717 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 236 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 717 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 46,467 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 10:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,410
- Videos
- ≈2,930
- Links
- ≈5,350
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 21m
- Average length
- 30s
Measured directly from 164 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
256 reactions across 122 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 90 | 35.2% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 11.7% | |
| 🤣 | 27 | 10.5% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 9.77% | |
| 🤡 | 21 | 8.20% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 7.81% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 2.73% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 2.34% | |
| 🤮 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| 💊 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.781% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 0.781% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.781% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.391% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.391% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.391% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.391% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.391% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 717 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 717 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 237 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🌚 На Sigma в Риме запретили еду, а орбетражные всем стадом не могут покинуть площадку Ходят слухи, что на европейской Сигме орги выкатили уведомление, запретив гостям конфы приносить с собой еду и напитки 🤦♂️ — так, хомячить на стендах теперь нельзя, а все голодные должны нести свои кровные на местные фудкорты и пополнять животы только там. 🕵️♂️ При этом отмечено, что администраторы площадки ходят патрулями, пров…
🤌 Тем временем овнер 1win сорит баблом держит слово: чемпион UFC Пётр Ян за недавнюю защиту пояса получил от Сергея обещанный Rolls-Royce Cullinan Не обделил батя синих и своих киберкотлет: если каэсная тима 1win заберёт предстоящий мажор, Серёга обещнулся подогнать по Роллсу каждому игроку 🔭 Штош, хуле тут скажешь: мотивация безусловно показушная мощная, однако одмену интересней — тренеру Роллс тоже положен, или е…
GGR Partners снова скамят (напрашивается вопрос — с хера с ними всё ещё работают?). ПП Inside (это та, в которой раньше батрачила Сонька Бычкова) вынесла в паблик следующий кейс: GGR Partners получили траф по офферу с заранее зафиксированными условиями (CPA, cap и NO KPI), а после залива эти условия резко начали меняться: сначала ппшке предложили снизить компенсацию с €4.6к до €3.3к, а затем — применить KPI задним ч…
😁 Слобож прибыл на SiGMA в Рим с личной гвардией Пока простые смертные штурмуют конфу, Саша Слобож рассекает по павильонам в сопровождении сразу трёх охранников. Такое ощущение, что на ивент пожаловал не овнер Traffic Devils, а президент небольшой республики. Правда, клетчатая жилетка за $70 немного сбивает градус величия. С таким эскортом полагаются смокинг, чёрные очки и серьёзная рожа, а не прикид панк-рокера. 🐗…
Video message, posted without a caption
🎃 ExGaming закатили тусовку Dead Social Club, насыпав пафоса про готику XIX века и гостей, которые якобы шарят за дресс-код. Правда, уже на втором кадре красуются кавалеры, которые вместо викторианской эстетики, изучали разве что осеннюю коллекцию Zara. Впрочем, чего ещё ждать от конторки, которая в прошлом году рассылала хэллоуинский реквизит с ближайшей помоечки. В этот раз хотя бы мусор по почте не отправляли и н…
❤1
Ева Элфи — лицо педофилии и BC.Game 😐 Если говорить словами iGaming СМИ: "Компания BC(.)GAME назначила Еву Элфи, известного международного цифрового блогера и киберспортсмена, своим официальным глобальным амбассадором бренда" В переводе на мой язык: VIPы могут драть ее как сидорову козу в обмен на игровой счет. Порноактрисами нас уже не удивить. Мы видели Luxury Girl у Pari, Сидни Суини у Novig и Sweetie Fox, котор…
Ну шо, пацаны: индустрия выбирает самого мощного чела в нише 🏆 На realtalk.rich стартовало голосование — «Голос арбитража». Шорт-лист собирали подписчики «Однажды в арбитраже», до финала дожили пятеро: 🟢Евгений Иванов 🟢Макс Довольный 🟢Антон Дрозд 🟢Антон Хоменок 🟢Вредный Букмекер Вот они, слева-направо 😁 У каждого свои фанаты, свои хейтеры и мнение обо всем. У вас месяц, чтобы решить, чье слово весит больше. 👉 Го…
🤡 Настя Щербина не оставляет попыток сбежать в содержанки устроить личную жизнь: пока орбетражные на сёмге дурели с иксовой прикормки Конора Макгрегора, мамзель не растерялась и выдала неистового кринжа в сторьки Так, Мелбетовна тщетно набивалась в пассии ирландскому братишке и кошмарила обольщала бойца своим похабным «экскюзе ми» — рыжий быстро смекнул, шо с таким инглишом проще бахнуть пивка, чем поддерживать бесе…
🤡 Тем временем Настя Щербина окучивает плотно взяла в оборот Конора Макгрегора на Sigma в Риме На тусовку иксов с пафосом вкатился их амбассадор Макгрегор 💪 — естественно, у половины представителей сферы тут же сорвало крышу, и орбетражные побежали пилить с ним контент. 💅 🤦♂️ Но больше всех отличилась CMO Мелбет — дамочка весь вечер вела хроники перемещения ирландского деда, умудрилась знатно его заебать пообщатьс…
Щербина унижается перед МакГрегором. СМО Мелбет заявилась на сборище Иксов, куда, ясное дело, был приглашён и амбассадор холдинга. Девчуля поделилась своим десятисекундным диалогом с бойцом: на (всё ещё ломаном) инглише она спросила, помнит ли МакГрегор некое видео, которе она когда-то для него сняла. Тот, естественно, в душе не ебал, о чём говорит эта девка, и уточнил, подписан ли на неё в инсте — Настюха с гордост…
Showing the 12 most recent of 717 posts we hold for @cpalenta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@cpalenta edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @cpalenta as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 24 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 20 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто победит?
- Бухающему инвалиду детства63%
- Синтоловому пенсионеру43%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Кринж недели
- 1️⃣ Никита Кустов17%
- 2️⃣ JetTon83%
- 3️⃣ Таня Кулагина8%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 717 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@GftZon · 5,9572 postsВот такая вот хуйня, собачка
@ItIsCPALifeSobachka · 8652 postsقرعهکشی | استارز | پرمیوم
@premium_stars_gift · 3,6172 postsАрбитраж трафика с Ивановым
@slovopacana · 79,2172 postsTON Drops Me Gift Giveaway Aggregator
@ton_drops_me_airdrop · 1,8582 postsTonnel Freebies
@TonnelFreebie · 7,5512 postsPGIR NFT
@tonnelir · 3102 postsWe Want You ( Giveaway )
@WeWantYouGuys · 6,8222 postsAffiliate Marketing Info
@Affiliate_Marketing_Info · 111 postTonnel, Portals, Thermos, crypto bot, MRKT Giveaway
@All_Giveaways_1 · 2361 postИз арбитражки в поля. ex.Casinokrisa
@CPA_Farm · 2,1511 postABC Hotel Yerevan | PRE-MAC by Ivanov
@dudilda · 4701 postABC Hotel Yerevan | PRE-MAC by Ivanov
@FatBump · 261 postDaily Giveaways Activity
@FutureDapp · 2791 postGifts 369
@gifts369 · 14,4481 postᬉ𝑆𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘸𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘺 𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑝
@lpremiiuml · 4,7641 postИз арбитражки в поля. ex.Casinokrisa
@nakoldoval · 2,1781 postPremium Boxes | NFT |Gift گیفت | قرعه کشی
@Premiumboxes · 1,9671 postMyanmar Game Store
@slotgamer · 51 postТипичный Мамонт
@tmamont · 54,2221 postTonnel free giveaway
@tonnelfree_giveaway · 1,5941 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@AFF_inside · 530133 postshigh profit — low life
@aff_overheard · 1,87566 postsTopX Partners
@topxpartners · 2,47062 postsЯ ненавижу арбитраж
@arbit_rage · 6,32026 postsAffPapa! Клуб спящих бизнесменов! Потрачено!
@pacan · 6,69818 postsTHE Network
@T_Network · 1,3848 postsКРАВЧЕНКО
@istrebil · 6,1145 postsАрбитреш
@trash_arb · 3065 postsLuckyCards News
@luckycards_info · 6233 postsBROCONF-7 ½ | News
@broconf · 7,3762 postsРепосты кота
@cat_reposted · 22 postsНикита Кустов — СЕО Traffic Cardinal
@cobaka · 2,2562 postsCPA BRO
@cpabrochannel · 3,0132 postsC-LEVEL DEVILS
@devilsclevel · 10,6532 postsR2B
@reg2bet · 26,2852 postsUP-X PARTNERS | AFF
@upx_partners_aff · 352 postsBinoDex Partners
@binodexpartners · 7771 postCPAGRAM - Арбитраж трафика и маркетинг
@cpagram · 7,1921 postHighroller
@highroller_channel · 6,3621 postМакс Огненный / Traffic Cardinal
@nonconformistka · 3,6291 postПОЛИГON by Петя 2.0
@polig_on · 4,5941 postTraffHub | Арбитраж трафика
@traffhub_channel · 6,2871 postTraffnews Radar
@traffnews_radar · 7411 postPrivate inc.
@traffotec · 4,1351 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@varbitrage · 2,016#1
@Fuck_Voice · 3,041#2
@slovopacana · 79,217#3
@aff_overheard · 1,875#4
@pelmennaya_aff · 1,522#5
@affiliatelounge · 956#6
@affiliatebeer · 5,980#7
@DenisenkoDenis · 4,368#8
@marchellord · 321#9
@AdInsideChannel · 2,169#10
@cparu · 3,889#11
@shustoslav · 484#12
@affiliate_party · 659#13
@cpagram · 7,192#14
@damneddiary · 468#15
@AffiliateBuddha · 3,672#16
@adamanttraf · 9,105#17
@MoneyBeatsEvil · 11,012#18
@onlyaff_journal · 1,694#19
@secreetroommedia · 6,949#20
@afftimes · 4,414#21
@ohmyclick · 8,732#22
@affiliatediaries · 6,819#23
@pressaff · 4,379#24
@sashaneedhelp · 1,906#25
@CPA_NEWS_FEED · 1,458#26
@alfaleads_updates · 1,314#27
@Dorvey · 5,436#28
@zorbasmedia · 7,412#29
@Clickbaiters · 955#30
@work_life_job · 3,682#31
@bakushevaseo · 8,286#32
@broconf · 7,376#33
@KINZA360_news · 1,244#34
@leosnack_pub · 606#35
@traffotec · 4,135#36
@marlerinogroup · 4,913#37
@cpapoint · 2,783#38
@m1_top_nutra · 6,181#39
@highroller_channel · 6,362#40
@product_marketing_punkrock · 9,104#41
@air4tt · 2,471#42
@pnch_name · 1,363#43
@reg2bet · 26,285#44
@zmrecruiting_1 · 6,632#45
@trafficcardinal · 19,329#46
@pavelprotraffic · 13,024#47
@raketaibr · 3,922#48
@seodreamteamofficial · 7,544#49
@glorypartners · 4,320#50
@owner1w · 24,079#51
@voystrikov · 1,998#52
@fbm_lenta · 2,557#53
@be01team · 19,073#54
@notasha_i_teksty · 694#55
@yellow_web · 16,787#56
@thepartnerkin · 31,960#57
@nikakuzmicheva · 1,319#58
@tamikgdetraffic · 390#59
@pishimarusia · 712#60
@konvertov · 3,342#61
@adamusfb · 7,070#62
@cpaclubmain · 1,370#63
@gambling_feed · 590#64
@adsninja · 9,985#65
@uAntohi · 973#66
@secrettraff · 7,049#67
@lgaming · 3,491#68
@altercpa · 2,484#69
@makemoneyteam_blog · 9,771#70
@gamblnews · 9,475#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Jobs_kirkuk · 33,054
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЖП” (@cpalenta), 38,770 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cpalenta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.