Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Affiliate Buddha

Channel

Affiliate Buddha

@AffiliateBuddha

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,655subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001616579425
TypeChannel
Username@AffiliateBuddha
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AffiliateBuddha

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,6393,6613,6507 August 2026 — 3,647 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,646 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,645 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,640 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,642 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,639 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,645 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,651 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,648 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,650 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,650 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,661 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,656 subscribers19 September 2026 — 3,655 subscribers3,6557 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,636–3,664 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:593,655-1
14 Sept 2026, 14:403,656-5
10 Sept 2026, 22:373,661+11
6 Sept 2026, 05:223,650no change
6 Sept 2026, 00:003,650+2
1 Sept 2026, 18:183,648-3
29 Aug 2026, 11:053,651+6
26 Aug 2026, 19:443,645+6
23 Aug 2026, 19:153,639-3
20 Aug 2026, 11:033,642+2
17 Aug 2026, 10:433,640-5
13 Aug 2026, 12:163,645-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:063,646-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:313,647first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 21 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.58%
avg views ÷ 3,655 subscribers
Avg views / post
350
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held12 (21 August 20264 September 2026)
Views total3,852
Reactions total191
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

203 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7235.5%
🔥7034.5%
🥰2612.8%
💯125.91%
👍94.43%
custom 522227365744688004173.45%
custom 545192870268005370931.48%
🫡31.48%
🎉10.493%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AffiliateBuddha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 August 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTC189 views12 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Сколько бы ни хоронили Fb — в итоге все дороги снова ведут туда. Протестил новый сорс, поигрались с TikTok, In-App, посмотрел на цифры — и снова открываешь Ads Manager😁 Потому что FB может штормить, банить, бесить и заставлять седеть раньше времени, но когда связка летит — вопросы быстро заканчиваются. Если задача не очередной раз обсудить, «умер ли FB», а просто нормально заливать — можете потестить ребят из Rent

6🔥4👍2

4 Sept 2026, 10:42 UTC197 views14 reactionsread 6 September 2026

#мыслитимлида рубрика от нашего тимлида, который, пока он не решился на блог, поэтому делюсь его мыслями, если зайдет, продолжим. 💰 Как можно потерять несколько тысяч долларов работая с агентами. Сверки, сверки, сверки… Сколько же боли, седых волос и потерянных нервных клеток скрывается в этом слове. 💬 Сегодня история о том, как мы в один прекрасный день обнаружили, что у нас просто не хватает N-к $. Причём до эт

6💯5🔥3

2 Sept 2026, 04:18 UTC303 views14 reactionsread 6 September 2026

ЭПОХА ЛЁГКИХ ДЕНЕГ ЗАКОНЧИЛАСЬ? 🎞 Вторая часть подкаста с Костей и Мишей уже на YouTube. Сегодня 2ое сентября, день независимости Вьетнама, что положило конец французскому колониальному правлению. Так совпало, продолжение наших съемок у памятника в честь этой даты. Поговорили про: 🔘первые ошибки и страх перед Fb; 🔘как один креатив может перевернуть всю связку; 🔘почему рекламодатель может убить экономику; 🔘что сег

6🔥5🥰3

31 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC348 views24 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥107🥰5💯2

27 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC499 views23 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

В понедельник продолжим. Если у вас есть вопросы к Сереге, пиши в комментариях под постом, я задам их. 🎙 Снял подкаст с Серегой из «Зацени мой CTR». Получился выпуск не только про арбитраж, а вообще про то, как сегодня меняется роль человека внутри нашей сферы. Отдельно много говорили про медийность. 🔘Что она реально дает специалисту? 🔘Зачем сильному практику вообще вести Telegram? 🔘Можно ли сегодня расти в индус

9🔥8🥰4🫡1custom 54519287026800537091

26 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC408 views18 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

7🔥6👍3custom 54519287026800537092

25 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC566 views24 reactions1 Starread 6 September 2026

РЕЛОКАЦИЯ В ДАНАНГ: жизнь арбитражников без фильтров 🎞 Новый выпуск уже на YouTube. Подкаст записал в свой первый приезд во Вьетнам, скоро будут новые выпуски. Поговорили про: 🔘 почему именно Вьетнам, а не Бали и другие страны Азии; 🔘 сколько стоит жизнь в Дананге; 🔘 жильё, еда, байки, спорт и развлечения; 🔘 как релокация влияет на продуктивность и голову; 🔘 комьюнити, знакомства и отношения; 🔘 путь в арбитраж: о

8🔥8🥰5🎉1💯1🫡1

24 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC394 views15 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

4️⃣ Все свои покупки в отпуске оплачивал проверенным сервисом. 💳 В одной аппке выпустил виртуалку → добавил в Apple Pay → спокойно платишь за границей. С этого же баланса за 5 секунд отправляешь деньги по СБП в СНГ. С этой же карты оплачиваешь ChatGPT, подписки, сервисы и вообще всё, что обычно превращается в квест с оплатой. @Cardspaysbot— ну это просто моё почтение. Максимально удобно. Короче, если не хочется п

🔥64💯4👍1

24 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC313 views18 reactionsread 6 September 2026

Доброго понедельника. В субботу собирались Affiliate Chat Vietnam, забронировали весь этаж, нарубили музыки и устроили мини турнир по бильярду. Комьюнити в Азии растет с каждой неделей. Вчера прошли первые съемки. Пока новые материалы в монтажке, предлагаю ознакомиться уже с опубликованными видео этим летом. 🎞 🔘Подкаст с Семеном Верушкиным, где обсудили, как управлять командой и развивать мышление предпринимателя.

6🥰5🔥4custom 52222736574468800413

22 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC312 views16 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥75🥰3🫡1

22 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC323 views13 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

День на максимальном дзене 🙏 После эко-вылазки захотелось сменить ритм и уйти в абсолютную тишину. Взял байк и устроил себе культурный трип по храмам Дананга. Начал с макро-масштабов — проведал «Большого Будду-братика». Постоял рядом с этой гигантской каменной статуей, прочувствовал масштаб и колоссальный труд. А потом уехал в совсем камерное место — тихий храм в центре города, где в пруду неторопливо плавают чере

🔥54custom 52222736574468800414

21 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC352 views12 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Один день из жизни в отпуске. Иногда лучший нетворкинг — это не конференции, а совместный суботник. Не то чтобы я мусорил в своей жизни, но было дело. Сейчас отношусь к этому иначе. Природа дает нам так много всего, но из-за работы в сфере ты порой не видишь, что делают другие люди: мысли онли о трафике, заливах, процессах. Вылазка с комьюнити «Чистый Дананг» подсветила важную вещь: когда зацикливаешься только на с

4🔥4👍3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @AffiliateBuddha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЖП
@cpalenta · 57,455
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
Partnerkin | Арбитраж трафика
@thepartnerkin · 32,256
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 6 September 2026
CPALENTA | Арбитраж трафика
@cpa_lenta · 122,026
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
Owner 1win
@owner1w · 24,594
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
R2B.News
@reg2bet · 25,043
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 5 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Affiliate Buddha” (@AffiliateBuddha), 3,655 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AffiliateBuddha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.