🚨 Meta забирает таргетинг по полу и возрасту🚨 А ведь всё к этому шло: сначала Advantage+, потом галочка "использовать пол и возраст только как рекомендацию". Все мы привыкли к ручным настройкам, а теперь их убирают.... Что будет вместо? Value rules или правила ценности. Внутри них можно ЗАДАТЬ ПРИОРИТЕТ в сегменте и сказать Фейсбуку: что например, 25–35 для тебя не приоритет. Тут самое интересное. Максимальный коэ…

Channel
Зацени мой CTR
@ohmyclick
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,568subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001350136518 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ohmyclick |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ohmyclick |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:55 | 8,568 | +64 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:44 | 8,504 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 8,508 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 8,510 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 8,508 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 8,515 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 8,519 | -10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 8,529 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 8,541 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:21 | 8,551 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 8,558 | first reading |
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.9%
- avg views ÷ 8,568 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 936
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (31 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,601 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 14s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 5
- of 46 we hold a reading for · 11%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ohmyclick. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
😎 Крипто-трафик на Tier 2: что показывает VavadaPart Прямой рекламодатель Vavada входит в топ-10 онлайн-казино в регионе. У бренда сильное медийное присутствие и crypto-friendly оффер: 〰️ RS до 60%; 〰️ CPA до 300 USD; 〰️ Полная локализация бренда: платежки, язык, валюта. Принимают все разрешенные источники, включая In-App, Facebook, PPC, UAC и SEO. А если до сих пор думаете, что Vavada — СНГ-шный бренд, ребята да…
Кто еще не состоит у нас в чате? Нас 1111 человек, заходите, общайтесь, пока фейбук не работает, можем пообсуждать другие темы 😂
MELLAFF раздает подарки своим подписчикам! Что на этот раз? 🥇 PS5 Digital Slim — Чтобы поиграть с корешами дома под кальянчик 🥇 Apple Watch Series 11 — Чтобы подарить себе, своей девушке или мамулику 🥇 AirPods Max 2 — Чтобы слушать музычку, когда работаешь Так-же в рамках этой акции, ребята будут выбирать счастливчиков и дарить фирменный мерч! Звучит хайпово) А условия максимально простые: 🔘 Подпишись на Telegram…
Как всем известно, вчера и сегодня ФБ выкашивает все кабинеты, а значит заливов нет ☹️ Такое, кстати уже было совсем недавно, а именно 7 августа. Но как я и говорил ранее, я подготавливаю воронки для пролива Узбекистана. Прошлые заливы, которые давали качество были на Gate of Olympus, но там я не мог попасть в цену депозита (хотя казалось бы, реклу трафик окупился). Для себя выделил 2 новые воронки под залив: — To…
↔️ Как создать свою партнёрскую программу за 24 часа? Каждый, кто делал партнёрку, видел одно и то же: недели уходят на базовые задачи, месяцы – на запуск, а стабильности нет ни в первый месяц, ни через год Поэтому наши друзья из команды Alanbase подготовили подробный материал, где по шагам описали, как запустить работающую партнёрку за 24 часа – без хаоса, костылей и многонедельной подготовки В статье разобрали:…
Толкового результата получить по Египту на слоты — не удалось. Причины следующие: Залив = реджект Актив = микроспенд + бан Актив с инсталами = нет конверта в регу Единственные результаты с хорошими дешевыми инсталами получилось на слот "Book Of Ra". Так-же прилетел деп (не отбился в фб). Не особо нравится мне затея продолжать эту история, есть вариант залить Узбекистан по которому у меня были хорошие результаты. М…
Вышел новый апдейт у 🐬 Dolphin{anty}, и тут сразу две вещи, которые могут пригодиться в работе. Во-первых, обновили список голосов в браузере. Теперь среди них есть Google Voices, поэтому голосовой отпечаток стал ближе к обычному Chrome. А вот второе обновление мне кажется даже интереснее. Расширения Manifest V2 в Dolphin продолжают работать, несмотря на постепенный отказ от них в обычном Chrome. Если у вас есть …
Есть свои базы номеров? Попробуйте монетизировать их в финансах 🤑 Как понять, кому из базы можно предложить финансовый продукт и заработать на уже имеющейся аудитории? Расскажем в прямом эфире 27 августа в 14:00 МСК. Покажем, как работать с LEADS Чекером, находить подходящие офферы и получать больше из своей базы. Регистрируйтесь на эфир. Узнать подробности у SMART-агента.
Начал тестировать EG фулл слотовые подходы🎰 — Красочные креативы в виде "777" и "барабанов" — Яркие, агрессивные прила от Banda app — Тестирование двух языков (англ, араб) Плюс, не буду обходить стороной самый известный слот "Book Of Ra", сделаю тестовые кампании и сравню результаты. Сейчас на фоне общего залива всех людей, хочу протестировать не такие банальные подходы и слоты как льёт весь рынок. Еще смотрел …
Арбитражники делятся на два типа: – Те, кто работает с агентами – Вторые работают агентами, но параллельно уже поднимают свой фарм-отдел. И все понимают, что всё нужно диверсифицировать! Сплит — уже не опция, а обязательный инструмент для теста связки: одна и та же связка на разных агентах и пачках акков дает разный результат. И чем плотнее штормит Facebook или Google, тем логичнее мысль о своем фарме. Логика тут…
iGaming отмывает деньги нарк0пл0щадки? Так кампания MORI WIN открыла свой продукт в iGaming индустрии, но ради какой цели? Заработать деньги простых работяг?😂 — Не думаю Коллеги, к которым придут по рекламе, надо будет понимать и осознавать: Что при взаимодействии с данной кампанией возможны риски! Так высказался Сергей CEO 1win в чате iGaming chat. ✍️ MONOPOLY ADS — Пополнение Wire — 2%, Криптой — 3% и всё! 🟣 Do…
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @ohmyclick. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@ohmyclick edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 19 August 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
И последний вопрос!
- Закрыл в плюс61%
- Закрыл в минус16%
- Закрыл в ноль24%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Заполняете ли Вы ФП перед заливом?
- Да18%
- Нет35%
- Минимально (аватарку)32%
- Максимально (аву + посты)21%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Отпустило ли сейчас фейсбук по реджектам и банам?
- Да15%
- Нет31%
- 50 на 5049%
- Проблем не было11%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Я заливаю трафик с аккаунтов
- Агентские68%
- Фармы37%
- Самореги5%
- Автореги9%
- Тренды3%
- Аккаунты + автозалив6%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сегодня хочу провести 5 опроса, ответьте на них пожалуйста! Это будет важно понимать, какая аудитория меня читает и строить вокруг этого контент.
- Indigo1%
- OctoBrowser5%
- Dolphin{anty}10%
- Morelogin0%
- Vision63%
- AdsPower24%
- Multilogin0%
- NeAntik(Иванов)1%
- Свой в комменты1%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@piratecpa · 28,866
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 9 September 2026
@cpa_lenta · 122,281
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
@thepartnerkin · 31,127
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 6 September 2026
@cpalenta · 82,676
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
@hr_affiliate · 33,791
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 6 September 2026
@web1win · 8
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Зацени мой CTR” (@ohmyclick), 8,568 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ohmyclick.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.