Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for artalog

Channel

artalog

@artalog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,239subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001338792874
TypeChannel
Username@artalog
Created1 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/artalog

Growth

4,2394,2654,2526 August 2026 — 4,265 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,260 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,258 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,252 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,249 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,248 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,240 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,239 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,241 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,239 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 31 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,235–4,269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 14:174,239-2
2 Sept 2026, 08:044,241+2
28 Aug 2026, 02:134,239-1
25 Aug 2026, 00:264,240-8
21 Aug 2026, 05:434,248-1
15 Aug 2026, 18:534,249-3
12 Aug 2026, 12:554,252-6
9 Aug 2026, 20:214,258-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:524,260-5
6 Aug 2026, 08:374,265first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21m 50s
Average length
10m 55s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

249 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5823.3%
5321.3%
👍4618.5%
😁3112.4%
👎156.02%
🥴156.02%
🤩124.82%
🤯83.21%
🤮31.20%
🖕20.803%
🤔20.803%
10.402%
💯10.402%
🕊10.402%
🤗10.402%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 263 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC974 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥6🤔2

Signed artalar

6 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,160 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/zede_code/154 Все так. Надо понимать, что почти все популярные == массовые решения делаются под среднестатистического пользователя, который вычисляется из выборки 90% которой люди делающие проекты "однодневки" без серьезной поддержки. Есть пачка более узкоспециализированных == сложных решений на рынке, но о них просто некому рассказывать, на фоне гогота толпы удовлетворяющейся красивыми демками. Ну ти

👍8🔥31🖕1🤮1

Signed artalar

28 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC≈2,380 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Очень страшно за состояние ИТ и софта в частности, щас такой казус случился... Нужно было сделать крайне простую 3D модель, у меня стоит FreeCAD на Mac, сделал заходов пять или семь, так и не смог - каждый раз приложенька крашилась. Попросил LLM - минута и готово. И вот что получается: 1) LLM могут самостоятельно решать базовые задачи пользователя без доп интерфейсов. 2) Но мы знаем из продуктовой практики примене

18🥴3

Signed artalar

25 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC≈2,110 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥14

Signed artalar

25 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC≈2,150 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Очень много разных попыток объяснить одну и ту же вещь не всегда значит что эта вещь ни о чем, иногда это значит что предмет обсуждения открывает границы к которым мы еще не привыкли, повышает уровень абстракции, решая сразу пачку технических (и иногда прикладных) проблем. Из полутора часов разговора меня зацепила одна фраза: AT Protocol - это стандарт для CMS над своими данными в интернете. Вот она много объясняет

🔥9👍31🤗1

Signed artalar

22 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈2,520 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

10 июля 2026 года. GPT-5.6-Sol случайно удалил почти все файлы на Mac пользователя https://x.com/mattshumer_/status/2075657271401390161 13 июля 2026 года. Код, написанный GPT-5.6 Sol, за семь секунд отменил все активные подписки Stripe в бизнесе, пока владелец спал https://x.com/bridgemindai/status/2076632817811722700 13 июля 2026 года. GPT-5.6 Sol удалил всю production database после запуска e2e-тестов, https://x.

😁223

Signed artalar

21 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC≈2,110 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

19💯1🔥1😁1

Signed artalar

21 Jul 2026, 00:09 UTC≈2,100 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Там новый Reatom core / jsx / react / vite (Что? Да!) вышели. Отмечу особо только две вещи, лайтовую и хардкорную: 1) Log action теперь заполучил метод .label что бы еще красивше и понятнее в консоль писать, но хотелось бы и про .state напомнить - очень полезная штука. Напомню - это очень легкий кроссплатформенный логер (в ноде тоже красиво рисует) - можете попробовать и без реатома (но лучше с ним, лол). 2) reato

🔥14😁4👍2

Signed artalar

18 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC≈2,060 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @siberiacancode

🍿 стартуем twitch — youtube — vk

👍3👎3🤮2🔥1🕊1🖕1

Signed artalar

17 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC≈2,400 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

😲😲😲 https://developer.puter.com/labs/firefox-wasm/

🤯8😁3🔥1

Signed artalar

16 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC≈2,350 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Сылки: webbrain.one и мой ПР Позиции: Safari, Mozilla, CC

👍5🔥3

Signed artalar

13 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC≈3,360 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ну что за красота: https://orionreed.github.io/bireactive/ Там еще много более крутых и полезных (продуктовых) демок! В целом да - циклы штука натуральная, но хендлить у нас их пока не принято - а зря! Жизнь (и код, лол) с ними интереснее! Хотя не интереснее, а скорее настоящее, когда в жизни мы их избегаем - это и не жизнь вовсе, а упрощенная симуляция. Так и в коде - без циклов можно получить лишь упрощенный прод

🤩124🔥1😁1

Signed artalar

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @artalog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTCAnonymous Poll533 voters

Что вы сделали в 2026 с помощью ИИ вне работы? (Делитесь ссылками в комментах)

  1. Ничего28%
  2. Использовал для помощи в учёбе40%
  3. Сайт / приложение друзьям на знакомом стеке17%
  4. Сайт / приложения друзьям на НЕзнакомом стеке12%
  5. Сайт / приложение себе на знакомом стейке35%
  6. Сайт / приложение себе на НЕзнакомом стеке30%
  7. Что-то хардварное (программирование микроконтроллеров и т.п.)9%
  8. Книгу / рассказы / DnD и т.п.6%
  9. Музыку7%

The shares total 184%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Frontender's notes [ru]
@frontendnoteschannel_ru · 31,503
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
The ExtremeCode Times
@extremecode · 35,719
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
Осознанная Меркантильность | Антон Назаров
@m0rtymerr_channel · 79,854
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Golden Borodutch
@golden_borodutch · 65,887
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
Рефералки в IT | Вакансии и резюме
@refer_me_it · 30,670
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Владилен: IT в эпоху AI
@vladm · 39,413
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
запуск завтра
@ctodaily · 33,616
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“artalog” (@artalog), 4,239 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artalog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.