Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Senior Software Vlogger

Channel

Senior Software Vlogger

@seniorsoftwarevlogger

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,877subscribers

-73 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001133377416
TypeChannel
Username@seniorsoftwarevlogger
Created21 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/seniorsoftwarevlogger

Growth

22,87722,95222,914.56 August 2026 — 22,950 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,950 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,952 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,942 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,934 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,924 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,915 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,909 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,910 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,898 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,903 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,901 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,903 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,911 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,918 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,898 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,894 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,891 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,900 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,895 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,892 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,887 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,884 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,881 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,877 subscribers6 August 20261 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 26 days, net -73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,866–22,963 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 12:0522,877-4
31 Aug 2026, 12:5322,881-3
30 Aug 2026, 14:0322,884-3
29 Aug 2026, 16:2722,887-5
28 Aug 2026, 16:4622,892-3
27 Aug 2026, 16:1322,895-5
26 Aug 2026, 17:0322,900+9
25 Aug 2026, 18:1922,891-3
24 Aug 2026, 17:4822,894-4
22 Aug 2026, 23:5922,898-20
21 Aug 2026, 12:5622,918+7
20 Aug 2026, 15:2222,911+8
19 Aug 2026, 15:1222,903+2
18 Aug 2026, 15:1222,901-2
16 Aug 2026, 04:2322,903+5
14 Aug 2026, 15:4622,898-12
13 Aug 2026, 08:5322,910+1
12 Aug 2026, 05:5222,909-6
11 Aug 2026, 04:2822,915-9
10 Aug 2026, 03:2122,924first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.0%
avg views ÷ 22,877 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,460
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.892%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 June 202625 August 2026)
Views total50,780
Reactions total453
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,701 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁53831.6%
👍31318.4%
20612.1%
💯19511.5%
🔥19011.2%
563.29%
🤣462.70%
🤓392.29%
🌚271.59%
🫡191.12%
👀130.764%
🆒120.705%
👏120.705%
🤩120.705%
🤯80.47%
😱40.235%
😢30.176%
👌20.118%
custom 581865153890143774810.059%
👾10.059%
4 further kinds40.235%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,701 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seniorsoftwarevlogger. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
10.0%
2 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
10,300
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
12,100
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 25 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈5,340 views36 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Реакт сложнее Питона, котятки. https://t.me/extremecode/1516

💯15😁145👀2

22 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC≈9,260 views114 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Клод выслушав голосовушку с очередным приложением от меня.

😁1055👀3🆒1

22 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈6,990 views22 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Простое приложение сейчас пишется сетью с одного нетехнического промпта. Еще один промпт - чтобы устранить недочеты... и еще пол года доработок в таком режиме когда действительно начинаешь приложение использовать, хехе. Само понятие "простое приложение" существенно расширилось. Раньше это что было? Туду лист? Приложение с 1-2 сущностями и одной фичей? Теперь - сложная комбинация любых готорых решений. У меня есть ми

10👍81💯1🤩1😍1

9 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈10,700 views54 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026
Photo

Гергей пленных не берет. Он вообще в последний год очень жёстко разносит разный булщит. Прямо вскрылся наш родной токсик 🤤 У меня продукт полностью пишет ИИ например. Поэтому у меня реально мозг в раскоряку. С одной стороны для меня это работает, с другой - вижу много примеров как люди жгут токены, число комитов улетает в космос, а пользователи видят только инциденты. Причем это не "наемный глупенький менеджер", а

🤓35🆒86👍3👌2

7 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC≈9,430 views131 reactions2 Starsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Ваши вопросы к представителям компании на собеседовании - очень важный этап. Он же может стать решающим. Я как то на собеседовании в Мету на менеджера спросил могу ли я уволить всю команду в один день и нанять новую. В те далекие долэйофные годы следующего этапа не последовало. Это был один из вопросов Бугаенко "на менедждера", в Лондон я переезжать не планировал поэтому ради прикола решил спросить. Один раз живем.

🔥64👍2423👏12😁3💯2👀1🤓1

3 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC≈9,060 views96 reactionsread 1 September 2026

В прошлом посте я писал как делать не нужно, и как это воспринимается на разных уровнях. Лёха ответил мне на мой вызов и расписал с примерами как делать нужно! Понятное дело что везде есть куча нюансов и всегда всё нужно применять на свою в ситуацию, а не в лоб. Привожу цитату без редактуры. Читать Лёху можно здесь: https://x.com/mr_mig_by ✂️ - - - - - - Так, softwarevlogger меня затроллил, и я решил повестись. О

👍541614🔥6🤓2🌚1💯1😁1

2 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈11,700 views213 reactions5 Starsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯119😁83🤩5👍2🔥2🤣1🫡1

2 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC≈9,990 views124 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026
Photo

Задавать такой вопрос действительно недостаточно, а вот карьерное продвижение тут можно как сломать так и заработать. Этот вопрос вообще лучше задавать себе, а озвучивать реакцию уже с другой позиции. Напишу как это воспринимается на разных уровнях, как именно ты становишься тем самым "проблемным" сеньором, хотя ты вроде бы даже часто прав и в целом говоришь правильные вещи. 1. Что ты делаешь как IC / Senior / St

👍75💯2512😁4🔥2🆒21🌚1

29 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC≈10,300 views117 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Advertisement

Есть у меня пятно в биографии. Я же после ВУЗа поступил в аспирантуру, но так как я завалил вступительную философию, то поступить удалось только на платный. Так как я был молод, горяч и горделив, то обучение прямо скажем не задалось и вообще говоря даже не началось. Оглядываясь назад на то, как я провел это время, лучше бы если бы таки отучился и закончил. По разным причинам. Тем более, что я так или иначе вернулся

😁63🤣34👍98🌚3

22 Jul 2026, 17:51 UTC≈12,100 views53 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @it_philVideo

Что-то я чувствую себя как в этом эпизоде. Я опять проверяю границы агентов. @softwarevlogger прислал мне репозиторий и сказал: «Я это сделал тремя промптами». Смотрю — а там идея пересекается с тем, что делаю я. Я просто скормил знания о своём проекте и об этом репозитории и сказал: изучи, сопоставь, а классные идеи, которых у нас нет, — укради. И fabble украл эти идеи, делегировал опусам (я, кстати, до сих пор н

😁3411👍7🤣1

19 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC≈15,100 views118 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026
Photo

Как я за $20/мес проект пилю Сегодня Summit AI Notes это почти 150к строк кода на свифте с тестами, что не включает сайт https://summitnotes.app Количество строк быстро росло примерно до января. В этот момент проект набирал основные тяжелые фичи. Первые три месяца я был в поиске. В октябре я понял что из этого что-то может получиться. В ноябре у меня был один месяц между работами и я вложился на полную, потому что

🔥8321🤩5😁4👍3👀1😱1

12 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC≈15,000 views157 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @git_rebaseVideo

Когда выучил высоконагруженные системы @git_rebase / send memes

😁146🔥722

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @seniorsoftwarevlogger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 182,445 of 1,629,419 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Digital Ниндзя
@digital_ninjaa · 39,700
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Осознанная Меркантильность | Антон Назаров
@m0rtymerr_channel · 79,787
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Владилен: IT в эпоху AI
@vladm · 39,469
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Guru Era Digital
@egurudigital · 81,380
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
Golang
@Golang_google · 40,402
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
NOP::Nuances of Programming
@nuancesprog · 56,760
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Senior Software Vlogger” (@seniorsoftwarevlogger), 22,877 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seniorsoftwarevlogger.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.