Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АйТиБорода

Channel

АйТиБорода

@itbeard

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,197subscribers

-107 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001305323621
TypeChannel
Username@itbeard
Created15 August 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/itbeard

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

19,19719,30419,250.56 August 2026 — 19,304 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,301 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,294 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,289 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,281 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,273 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,264 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,257 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,251 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,248 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,242 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,240 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,238 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,236 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,235 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,224 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,226 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,217 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,213 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,205 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,207 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,202 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,197 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 28 days, net -107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,181–19,320 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 06:3619,197-5
2 Sept 2026, 01:5819,202-5
1 Sept 2026, 05:0619,207+2
31 Aug 2026, 01:4619,205-8
30 Aug 2026, 00:3919,213-4
28 Aug 2026, 22:5719,217-9
27 Aug 2026, 23:1319,226+2
26 Aug 2026, 22:1819,224-11
25 Aug 2026, 20:3319,235-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:4319,236-2
23 Aug 2026, 02:3519,238-2
20 Aug 2026, 12:2419,240-2
19 Aug 2026, 15:3219,242-6
18 Aug 2026, 12:5419,248-3
17 Aug 2026, 13:2719,251-6
16 Aug 2026, 05:4719,257-7
14 Aug 2026, 18:1719,264-9
13 Aug 2026, 06:1819,273-8
12 Aug 2026, 07:0219,281-8
9 Aug 2026, 03:5319,289first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 22 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.0%
avg views ÷ 19,197 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,470
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held25 (22 May 202628 August 2026)
Views total13,860
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
54
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
54
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @itbeard. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 May 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 3 September 2026

⚡️ Новый выпуск "на Вайбе" уже онлайн! Сегодня выясняем, правда ли новый Codex и Astra уже через три месяца заставят нынешние модели выглядеть примитивными, обсуждаем Gemini 3.7 Flash, покупку Cursor компанией SpaceX, дата-центры в космосе и рекордные заработки Nvidia. Смотрим на открытые GLM 5.3 Flash и MiniMax Music 3.0, интеграцию DeepSeek в Codex, будущее Suno, поиск Mistral, плагины GitHub, рекламу в ChatGPT, И

12 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTCviews —

АйТиБорода pinned «🔥 Новое интервью уже на канале АйТиБорода - говорим про highload на рубях и AI на огромной кодовой базе 20 000 сообщений в секунду, сотни баз данных и огромный Ruby-монолит, который нельзя просто выключить и переписать. Со Стасом, Principal Engineering Manager…»

12 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC≈3,790 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔥 Новое интервью уже на канале АйТиБорода - говорим про highload на рубях и AI на огромной кодовой базе 20 000 сообщений в секунду, сотни баз данных и огромный Ruby-монолит, который нельзя просто выключить и переписать. Со Стасом, Principal Engineering Manager в SOFTSWISS, разбираем высоконагруженную архитектуру iGaming-платформы: Kafka, PostgreSQL, Kubernetes, масштабирование и распил монолита. А ещё честно выясняе

11 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈3,620 viewsread 3 September 2026

⚡️ Долгожданный новый выпуск "на Вайбе" уже онлайн! Месяц в США по AI-программе Госдепа показал: американский технооптимизм трещит по швам, а разработка уже превращается в Dark Factory, где человек почти не видит код. Разбираем GPT-5.6, Opus 5, Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4, AI Act, взлом Hugging Face, авторское право и интернет, который захватывают AI-агенты. Большое возвращение «ПНВ» — с поездкой по Америке, главными новос

6 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈4,410 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @evocodersPhoto

⚡️ Запись воркшопа "INITE Architecture: от AI-продуктов к субъектной операционной системе" уже доступна клубчанам! На воркшопе разбираем Как INITE собирает agents, MCP/skills, Temporal, SurrealDB, Dify/n8n, вертикальные продукты и business interfaces в единую экосистему. Что уже готово, что in progress и куда всё это растёт. Спикер — Михаил Савченко, СЕО inite.ai. ЧТО ВНУТРИ - Эволюция SaaS: от классической архитек

28 Jul 2026, 04:48 UTC≈4,560 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @evocodersPhoto

📰 ТОП-4 новости ИИ в программировании из 71-го дайджеста клуба Эволюция Кода 🔸 Anthropic представила Claude Opus 5 и Claude Sonnet 5 Opus 5 почти догоняет Fable 5 в CursorBench 3.2, но обходится примерно вдвое дешевле за выполненную задачу. Цена осталась на уровне Opus 4.8 — $5/$25 за миллион токенов. Sonnet 5 приблизился по возможностям к Opus 4.8, став заметно более доступной моделью для программирования и агентны

27 Jul 2026, 21:40 UTC≈3,450 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @evocoders

🔥 Обновил сразу три больших курса по ИИ-разработке — больше 30 крупных изменений. Если вы работаете с ИИ, то знаете главную проблему: информация устаревает быстрее, чем успеваешь её изучить. Модели сменяют друг друга, появляются новые протоколы и инструменты, а вчерашние рекомендации уже сегодня могут быть бесполезны. Поэтому я снова перелопатил Базу Знаний «Эволюции Кода»: актуализировал материалы, добавил новые г

16 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC≈4,760 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @evocodersPhoto

📞 Запись клубного созвона №37 / 14 июля 2026 ЧТО ВНУТРИ - ИИ-вакансия для SE, который/ая будет работать в паре с Dark Factory - Разгребание легаси и AI-инженерия - Fable 5 vs Soul: первые впечатления - Бенчмарки, кернелы и работа моделей - Концепция Dark Factory и оркестрация агентов - Безопасность и работа агентов на локальных машинах - Итоги сравнения Soul и Fable - Рекомендации по VPS и облакам для разработки -

16 Jul 2026, 08:22 UTC≈4,850 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#adv Мои друзья из SOFTSWISS приглашают всех вас на Tech Race Summit, который пройдёт 10 сентября в Варшаве. 30+ спикеров из бигтех-компаний, включая Amazon, Oracle, Gсore и Cloudflare, поделятся своим видением будущего тех-индустрии. Траектории развития технологий, стратегии адаптации – всё это из первых уст от тех, кто задает тренды. Для кого этот саммит? Для специалистов из разных сегментов tech-индустрии – от и

14 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC≈5,130 viewsread 3 September 2026

Вчера глобально похерился домен t.me, когда восстановят неизвестно. Заменяйте на telegram.me либо telegram.org.

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @itbeard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Digital Ниндзя
@digital_ninjaa · 39,776
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Alek OS
@Alek_OS · 33,033
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АйТиБорода” (@itbeard), 19,197 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itbeard.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.