Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Стой под стрелой

Channel

Стой под стрелой

@nikitonsky_pub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

11,882subscribers

+80 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001339432494
TypeChannel
Username@nikitonsky_pub
DescriptionВедет @nikitonsky. По вопросам рекламы @nikitonsky
Created10 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nikitonsky_pub

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,78211,89911,840.56 August 2026 — 11,802 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,802 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,801 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,795 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,799 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,801 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,800 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,798 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,790 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,782 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,783 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,782 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,786 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,793 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,791 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,801 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,806 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,804 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,794 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,795 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,799 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,842 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,839 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,837 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,835 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,837 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,834 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,832 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,827 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,819 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,818 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,824 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,828 subscribers24 September 2026 — 11,832 subscribers3 October 2026 — 11,850 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,860 subscribers12 October 2026 — 11,875 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,889 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,891 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,899 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,892 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,886 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,888 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,893 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,892 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,890 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,888 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,881 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,885 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,889 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,893 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,895 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,896 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,892 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,890 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,886 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,889 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,882 subscribers11,8826 August 20265 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 92 days, net +80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,764–11,917 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 23:2611,882-7
4 Nov 2026, 04:3911,889+3
3 Nov 2026, 01:3411,886-4
2 Nov 2026, 04:3111,890-2
1 Nov 2026, 05:1911,892-4
30 Oct 2026, 05:3911,896+1
29 Oct 2026, 08:2811,895+2
28 Oct 2026, 06:3011,893+4
27 Oct 2026, 09:5911,889+4
26 Oct 2026, 12:2911,885+4
25 Oct 2026, 08:5611,881-7
24 Oct 2026, 08:4011,888-2
23 Oct 2026, 10:1011,890-2
21 Oct 2026, 08:3011,892-1
20 Oct 2026, 09:5011,893+5
19 Oct 2026, 06:4611,888+2
18 Oct 2026, 06:2711,886-6
17 Oct 2026, 06:3611,892-7
16 Oct 2026, 08:4511,899+8
15 Oct 2026, 09:1911,891first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
77.8%
avg views ÷ 11,882 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,250
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held42 (4 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total55,470
Reactions total1,748
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 07:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

11,138 reactions across 41 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯2,23520.1%
😁2,11419.0%
❤1,80416.2%
👍1,36412.2%
🤡9598.61%
💔3693.31%
🤣3252.92%
😢3202.87%
😭2552.29%
🤔1941.74%
✍1631.46%
🤪1431.28%
🖕840.754%
🎅760.682%
🌚700.628%
💊650.584%
🤷‍♂630.566%
👎620.557%
🔥570.512%
💩490.44%
33 further kinds3673.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,379 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 23:28 UTC≈4,770 views170 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Узнал, что ИИ компании ввели моду называть сотрудников не Software Engineer, как раньше, а Member of Techincal Staff. С одной стороны, понятно, пинать агентов это тот еще инжиниринг, это явно уже другой какой-то род деятельности (но что там все еще делает слово technical?) А с другой немножко не нравится месседж. Раньше ты вроде как был инженером, и это как бы твое свойство, твоя айдентити, которая ни от чего не за…

😭59🤷‍♂56👍21😁11💯10🤡8🤣2❤1

Signed Nikita Prokopov

30 Oct 2026, 21:13 UTC≈8,400 views442 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Пришел коллега и говорит: там заказчики жалуются, что у нас Кложа плохо рендерится. Я тут с агентом набросал, посмотри, адекватно ли выглядит? Я открываю и вижу: начало положено, но вот тут забыли, вот тут решение не то приняли, вот тут можно проще, вот тут вот так еще бывает, эта штука вот то значит, а не это. Шутка ли — пятнадцать лет я писал только и исключительно Кложу, причем руками, причем в огромных количест…

😢230😭113❤36💯27🤡13🫡8💔7💩3

Signed Nikita Prokopov

24 Oct 2026, 11:24 UTC≈9,930 views98 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Кто ждал пост про ИИ, в следующий раз, может быть. Я не то чтобы большой игрок в компьютерные игры, скорее интересующийся. Т.е. периодически что-то запускаю, где-то пару уровней пройду, где-то может кампанию до середины, но не особо втягиваюсь (если это не Dead Cells). Поэтому критерий оценки у меня немножко своеобразные: мне должно быть интересно и красиво, а уж насколько там глубокий геймплей я скорее всего никогд…

🤔37🤡20❤17👍17🔥2⚡1🍌1🎅1

Signed Nikita Prokopov

16 Oct 2026, 20:41 UTC≈10,300 views410 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Про что написать следующий пост? Голосуем: 1. Про ИИ 2. Про ИИ 3. Про ИИ 4. Про ИИ 5. Посмотреть результаты

😁208🖕76💊38🤡29💯17😭14👾7🍌6

Signed Nikita Prokopov

15 Oct 2026, 00:29 UTC≈12,200 views435 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Всю жизнь я работаю с компьютерами, и главный выработанный мной скилл — не удивляться тупизне и абсурдности происходящего. В обычной жизни как? Есть важное и есть неважное, есть срочное и есть не срочное, есть сложное и есть несложное. И люди как-то эти вещи соотносят. Скажем, улетит ли рейсовый самолет, если пилот забыл дома пилотку? Скорее всего улетит. Будут ли у вас дотошно проверять билет, если ваш поезд уже отх…

💯240❤95👍47🤡26💩6🔥5⚡4🤝4

Signed Nikita Prokopov

12 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC≈9,870 views193 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Олег Андреев попросил разместить объявление, вот оно: Привет, меня зовут Олег. В прошлой жизни я создал Tonkeeper, TON API и половину ТОН-экосистемы. Теперь настало время сделать невозможное и круто проапгрейдить Биткоин. Наша команда ищет опытного бекенд-разработчика. Rust, Go, блокчейн. Для Сейфли (safely.app) и Флейма (runflame.org). С нас — неограниченные перспективы, с вас — взрослая ответственность. Пишите на…

🤣73🤡38❤18🤮16💩14🔥9🤔8💊7

Signed Nikita Prokopov

2 Oct 2026, 11:44 UTC≈19,000 views643 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Поскольку я больше не безработный, напоминание себе на следующий раз о поиске работы, потому что я опять забуду и опять по тем же граблям начну бегать. - Рекрутеры не твои друзья. - Поговорить и ударить по рукам «вроде нормальный пацан, пошли попробуем» не бывает (ну или я не видел). - Рекрутеры не говорят прямо, их сообщения надо расшифровывать. - «Давай просто поговорим» значит что тебя будут дрючить и надо готови…

❤288✍162😢70👍43💔31🤡17😁13🤬9

Signed Nikita Prokopov

26 Sept 2026, 21:28 UTC≈16,100 views320 reactionsread 6 November 2026

По соцсетям гуляет контроверсивный ролик с недавнего Rails World, в котором DHH со сцены странным голосом произносит фразу «Rust is [an] amazing [language] if you never, ever, ever, ever, have to look at it yourself». Я, если честно, не знаю, в чем конкретно все остальные видят контроверсивность, каюсь, не слежу (ну, кроме его фашистских взглядов, понятно), но с утверждением хотел бы поспорить. Тезис, как я понимаю,…

🤡148👍68❤37😁26👎11💯11💊7👾4

Signed Nikita Prokopov

21 Sept 2026, 23:25 UTC≈12,400 views325 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Самое обидное это конечно что ты вынашиваешь какую-то там идею неделю, две, месяц, год, жизнь. Потом садишься рассказать о ней агенту, он слушает, потом урчит пятнадцать минут, и такой: все, сделал. Пятнадцать минут! Идея всей жизни за пятнадцать минут! Никакого уважения.

🤣133💯80🤡53❤23🥰18👾6😭5😁3

Signed Nikita Prokopov

15 Sept 2026, 13:34 UTC≈16,800 views260 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Возник еще вопрос, почему не подписать поле ввода внутри, а когда на него нажимаешь, подпись уезжает наверх. Действительно, почему? И место, вроде, сэкономим, и поле без подписи не оставим. Первая причина это нестабильность. Интерфейс переходит из одного состояния в другое, потому что может. Как собачка из анекдота. Представьте наполовину заполненную форму. У первой половины полей подпись сверху, а значение внутри.…

💯145👍42😁24❤17🤡16🎅8🔥4🥱3

Signed Nikita Prokopov

15 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC≈12,900 views291 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Просто подпишите поля Есть такой тренд — писать название поля на форме внутри, плейсхолдером. Выглядит минималистично — один прямоугольник, внутри написано «Фамилия», вводишь фамилию — показывает фамилию. Ничего лишнего. Проблема в том, что у такого интерфейса возникает временно́е измерение — чтобы понять, что на нем сейчас, тебе нужно а) видеть и б) помнить, каким он был какое-то время назад. Не проблема, если теб…

💯206👍51❤19🤡7😁4🎅3👀1

Signed Nikita Prokopov

11 Sept 2026, 15:28 UTC≈11,000 views251 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Мы все ругаем русских локализаторов и конечно за дело, но я вот как-то пошел у себя в Берлине на Энни Холл Вуди Аллена и очень удивился, увидев на афише Der Stadtneurotiker (Городской невротик). Странно, подумал я, как тогда они локализуют остальные его фильмы? Городской невротик-2? Городской невротик возвращается? А сегодня пытался объяснить преподователю немецкого, что собрался на Смертельное оружие, и решил гляну…

😁162❤37🤣20😱13👍5💩4🍌3🔥3

Signed Nikita Prokopov

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @nikitonsky_pub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@nikitonsky_pub edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

запуск завтра
@ctodaily · 33,727
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
The ExtremeCode Times
@extremecode · 35,836
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
Virginia Bēowulf | английский язык
@v_beowulf · 40,548
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Информация опасносте
@alexmakus · 18,753
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 October 2026
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 140,405
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
UX Live 🔥
@uxlive · 36,176
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
addmeto
@addmeto · 71,948
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
Fixed.One: новости мира Apple и не только…
@FixedOneNews · 21,017
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
42 секунды
@ftsec · 19,404
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026
Ряды Фурье
@Fourier_series · 43,817
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
Golden Borodutch
@golden_borodutch · 63,198
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
Техасский Вестник
@starbasepost · 19,242
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 October 2026
АйТиБорода
@itbeard · 19,012
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 October 2026
RationalAnswer | Павел Комаровский
@RationalAnswer · 109,004
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
I’m CTO, bitch
@ctobtch · 20,267
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 September 2026
Намочи манту
@namochimanturu · 56,223
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Digital Ниндзя
@digital_ninjaa · 40,476
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
TechSparks
@techsparks · 46,785
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Alek OS
@Alek_OS · 32,324
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
kyrillic
@kyrillic · 61,196
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Hacker News

This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Стой под стрелой” (@nikitonsky_pub), 11,882 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikitonsky_pub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.