Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UX Work

Channel

UX Work

@uxwork

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,149subscribers

+61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001366546821
TypeChannel
Username@uxwork
DescriptionТезисы избранных материалов о карьере в UX-дизайне, а также избранные вакансии, где надо думать, а не рисовать лендосы Прислать вакансию: https://forms.gle/p1onD61xG1jDQ7Xy5 О UX-дизайне: @uxnotes Рекламодателям: uxnotes.ru/ads Est. 2018 · Автор: @zGrav
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/uxwork

Growth

8,0888,1498,118.56 August 2026 — 8,088 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,088 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,090 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,089 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,144 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,149 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 16 days, net +61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,079–8,158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 13:178,149+5
15 Aug 2026, 20:448,144+55
12 Aug 2026, 09:448,089-1
9 Aug 2026, 00:518,090+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:048,088no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:048,088first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.0%
avg views ÷ 8,149 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,120
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.738%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held29 (3 June 202622 August 2026)
Views total33,898
Reactions total143
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
1,370

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

208 reactions across 23 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10751.4%
👍3818.3%
🤮178.17%
💩146.73%
🖕52.40%
🤡52.40%
😁41.92%
😢41.92%
❤‍🔥31.44%
👎31.44%
😭31.44%
🌭10.481%
🍌10.481%
👏10.481%
💯10.481%
🔥10.481%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
3.45%
1 of 29 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,660
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,860
over 28 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvFhZrB111 August 202611 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 22 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC353 views8 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Леся Гордиенко написала о проверке работодателя при устройстве на работу. — За красивыми словами скрываться может что угодно; — Риски: зарплата складывается из маленького оклада и непонятно как вычисляемой премии, серая зарплата, текучка, проблемы у компании вроде арестованных счетов, токсичность коллектива; — Когда стоит задуматься о проверке: зарплата выше рынка и размытые обязанности, слишком мало требований в ср

6👍2

20 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC835 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026

UI/UX Designer, senior · Trynexis #Грузия (Тбилиси) #агентство Английский язык на уровне A2–B1. Обязательное требование — наличие в портфолио примеров дизайна мобильных приложений https://hh.ru/vacancy/136215782

🤮41👏1

18 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 22 August 2026

Продуктовый дизайнер, senior · Профи.ру #удалённо (откуда угодно) #Москва #продукт https://profi.ru/vacancies/senior_product__designer/

16 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC≈1,350 views14 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Александр Дудзинский написал, как оформлять резюме и портфолио и готовиться к откликам и интервью. — Прежде чем откликаться, письменно ответьте, какие компании вам подходят, чего вы хотите от новой работы и что из себя представляете как специалист; — Если есть метч, общаться проще: вы говорите увереннее, появляется энергия; — Обозначьте свою специализацию. Если вы дженералист, выберите 1–2 области, в которых сильны;

10❤‍🔥3👍1

16 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 22 August 2026

Product designer, senior · i-Digital (платформа для создания корпоративных соцсетей) #удалённо #СПб #продукт https://hh.ru/vacancy/135783637

13 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 22 August 2026
Poll

Как думаете, вы проработаете в айти до пенсии? (Если ещё не работаете, сможете ли найти работу в айти и проработать в этой сфере до пенсии?)

  1. Скорее да21%
  2. Может да, может нет32%
  3. Скорее нет33%
  4. Я не из айти и переходить в эту сферу не планирую14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,770 views0 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Продуктовый дизайнер · Pragmatica #агентство (аутстаф) — Lead в новое направление: арт-директить команду, вести процессы и формировать визуальную стратегию направления. #удалённо #Москва #СПб — Senior в команду лояльности (b2c): проектировать сценарии, UI и дизайн-систему в паре с аналитикой. #удалённо (только из России) #Москва — Middle, senior в крупный b2c-сервис: проводить дискавери точек роста продукта, готов

11 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,660 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqvFhZrBPhoto

Дизайн уже не тот. И это хорошая новость. ДизайнКонф II — конференция от Британской высшей школы дизайна о том, как сегодня устроена индустрия и какие навыки теперь определяют современного дизайнера. За один день мы разберем четыре направления современного коммуникационного дизайна: графический дизайн, моушн, UX/UI и арт-дирекшн. Вместе с экспертами из Яндекса, Т-Банка, Самоката, The WAK, Щуки, Tuman, Щелочь, Ambi

💩4😁42😭1

8 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC≈1,800 views19 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Божена Иванова опросила 36 дизайн-лидов и хедов и выяснила, на что они смотрят в портфолио при найме (опрос проводился чуть больше года назад). — Больше половины считают приемлемым форматом сайт → Ноушен → Фигму; — Приемлемость формата зависит от времени, которое есть у менеджера. Если времени много, 61% готовы изучать Фигму, 56% — Биханс. Если его мало, Фигма падает до 44%, Биханс — до 28%; — 2–3 кейса — оптимально

15👍4

3 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,860 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Product designer, senior · Playneta (mobile & game interfaces) #удалённо (откуда угодно) #продукт https://hh.ru/vacancy/135721094 Откликаться: https://forms.gle/eLRA6sdE4cWX62YG6

1

1 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC≈1,790 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Методист / Instructional Designer, middle, senior · Plata (Learning & Development Team) #удалённо (не из России) #Сербия (поддержка релокации) #Мексика #продукт https://plata.careers/vacancy/details?id=5140585008 Задачи в формате performance-проблемы с метрикой: ваша работа спроектировать минимально достаточное решение, которое меняет поведение, и доказать, что оно сработало. Опыт в корпоративном или B2B-обучении о

5

31 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC≈1,680 views16 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Оставшиеся советы из книги Юрия Ушакова «Не сойти с айти». Как сохранить себя, если ИИ всё-таки отжал у вас работу в айти: — Увлечения вне работы, а также близкие, которые ценят вас не за статус и зарплату, делают вас устойчивее; — Работа — это не то, кто вы есть. Если можете ответить на вопрос «Кто я?» без упоминания профессии, у вас есть внутренняя опора; — К отсутствию работы стоит готовиться, пока она есть: про

10😢4👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @uxwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTCAnonymous Poll3,660 voters approx.

Как думаете, вы проработаете в айти до пенсии? (Если ещё не работаете, сможете ли найти работу в айти и проработать в этой сфере до пенсии?)

  1. Скорее да21%
  2. Может да, может нет32%
  3. Скорее нет33%
  4. Я не из айти и переходить в эту сферу не планирую14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 84,218 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА
@designer_ru · 78,401
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Design Hunters
@designhunters · 79,894
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Джуниор Вакансии Стажировки IT
@juniors_rabota_jobs · 66,556
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UX Work” (@uxwork), 8,149 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uxwork.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.