Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔎 Мы и Жо — медиа и журналистика

Channel

🔎 Мы и Жо — медиа и журналистика

@themedia

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,669subscribers

-195 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001009546257
TypeChannel
Username@themedia
DescriptionПроект Александра Амзина о медиа и журналистике Аналитика, тренды и новости. Верим в журналистику и собираем сообщество профессионалов. Клуб: https://t.me/+WKiI6ncBxj1kXVNV Сайт: themedia.center По всем вопросам: @alamzin Реклама не размещается
Created23 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/themedia

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Мы и Жо” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

10,66910,86410,766.55 August 2026 — 10,864 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,861 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,855 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,848 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,844 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,845 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,847 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,848 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,843 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,845 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,852 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,849 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,850 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,828 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,843 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,855 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,849 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,847 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,841 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,829 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,822 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,816 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,813 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,810 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,808 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,805 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,798 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,794 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,799 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,794 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,792 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,793 subscribers2 October 2026 — 10,781 subscribers7 October 2026 — 10,767 subscribers11 October 2026 — 10,757 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,744 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,738 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,737 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,738 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,734 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,732 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,727 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,728 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,726 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,720 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,717 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,713 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,705 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,701 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,700 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,694 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,693 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,685 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,683 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,678 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,674 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,669 subscribers5 August 20264 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 91 days, net -195. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,640–10,893 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 07:0910,669-5
3 Nov 2026, 06:5910,674-4
2 Nov 2026, 05:5010,678-5
1 Nov 2026, 08:0010,683-2
31 Oct 2026, 05:1110,685-8
30 Oct 2026, 06:4610,693-1
29 Oct 2026, 08:1710,694-6
28 Oct 2026, 09:0910,700-1
27 Oct 2026, 06:0910,701-4
26 Oct 2026, 05:2710,705-8
25 Oct 2026, 06:0910,713-4
24 Oct 2026, 06:1810,717-3
23 Oct 2026, 09:3810,720-6
22 Oct 2026, 07:4810,726-2
21 Oct 2026, 02:3810,728+1
20 Oct 2026, 03:3510,727-5
19 Oct 2026, 00:4910,732-2
18 Oct 2026, 01:2610,734-4
17 Oct 2026, 03:3710,738+1
16 Oct 2026, 05:5710,737first reading

Engagement

220 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.71%
avg views ÷ 10,669 subscribers
Avg views / post
716
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 220 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held220 (4 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total12,889
Reactions total198
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,970
Videos
≈61
Links
≈6,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 02s
Average length
2m 46s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,514 reactions across 172 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁33722.3%
❤26317.4%
👍1469.64%
😢936.14%
💯754.95%
💔563.70%
😭523.43%
🤬513.37%
🤯513.37%
🔥392.58%
🤮312.05%
💊301.98%
👌281.85%
👀251.65%
❤‍🔥231.52%
🤡201.32%
🤣181.19%
🙈161.06%
🤷‍♂150.991%
💩140.925%
23 further kinds1318.65%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 176 of the 220 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,514 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 220 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 15:29 UTC439 views0 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @mediazona_exclusivePhoto

Против 22‑летней жительницы Татарстана возбудили дело о «фейках». Под описание из релиза СК подходит Асия Несоевая, выдумывавшая истории для независимых изданий Сотрудники управления Следственного комитета по Татарстану передали в суд уголовное дело о распространении военных «фейков» из корыстных побуждений, которое возбудили против 22-летней жительницы села в Высокогорском районе республики, сообщили в ведомстве. П…

2 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC706 views7 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Виталик Бутерин опубликовал свои правила цифрового минимализма: 1. X вреден. Там многовато любителей Гитлера и крипто-нигилистов. Вместо того, чтобы уйти из X, Виталик просто отказался от его ленты и пишет через клиент Firefly. Тем самым он избегает Алгоритма™ (в этой части его поста слово «Гитлер» употреблено семь раз). 2. Переведите телефон в авиарежим. Бутерин провел такой эксперимент в течение 100 дней и осталс…

❤7

2 Nov 2026, 09:56 UTC736 views8 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Человеческая рекомендательная система Изобретатель слова «вайбкодинг» Андрей Карпаты увидел, в какой треш превратились рекомендации YouTube, и решил: хватит это терпеть. Он попросил ИИ сделать агрегатор всех YouTube-видео, упоминавшихся на Hacker News, где тусуются айтишники и стартаперы. Получился очень крутой и реально интересный HackerTube. Самое замечательное, что эту идею подхватили другие. Теперь у нас есть …

❤7🥴1

1 Nov 2026, 12:15 UTC737 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Google теперь поддерживает запрет на обучение ИИ в robots.txt. Это благая весть для многих медиа, которые надеются позднее монетизировать свои данные. Раньше эту инструкцию уже поддерживали Bing, OpenAI и Anthropic, но без крупнейшего поисковика в мире на них мало кто обращал внимание. Выглядеть, согласно отраслевому предложению, это должно примерно так: User-Agent: __usage_ai-training Disallow: / Allow: /press-k…

👍2🤡1

31 Oct 2026, 12:49 UTC754 views24 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @sasha_amzinPhoto

Google Docs, что ты делаешь, прекрати

😁20❤2🤪2

31 Oct 2026, 11:28 UTC789 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026

31 октября, Хэллоуин. Сегодня последний день, когда вы можете оценить состояние российской журналистики за этот месяц (или изменить свою оценку). Не забудьте!

👍1

30 Oct 2026, 12:33 UTC838 views24 reactionsread 4 November 2026

(в сторону) И только тут до меня дошло, что сегодня, 30 октября, День памяти жертв политических репрессий А ведь еще пятничных иноагентов не объявили

😢17💯7

30 Oct 2026, 11:01 UTC864 viewsread 4 November 2026

Reddit уберет контент за регистрационную стену, тот станет доступен в основном залогиненным пользователям Менеджеры говорят, что это «улучшит пользовательский опыт», но пока не решили, что покажут без логина Но заботятся они не о людях, а о том, как выстроить оборону от ботов. ИИ пожирает важный для Reddit человеческий трафик из поиска Признаюсь, меня всегда огорчает, когда продуктовая стратегия вырастает из защит…

30 Oct 2026, 08:10 UTC728 views6 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Заявление из канала «Новой». PDF-версия: https://storage.googleapis.com/novaya-static/pdf/2026/10/30/nas-ubili.pdf

💔6

30 Oct 2026, 08:10 UTC668 views38 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @novaya_pishet

❗️️️️Нас убили. Заявление «Новой газеты»* о прекращении своей жизни 18+. НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ ИНТЕРНЕТ-ИЗДАНИЕ «НОВАЯ ГАЗЕТА» ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА ИНТЕРНЕТ-ИЗДАНИЕ «НОВАЯ ГАЗЕТА» 9 ноября мы погасим свет в нашем доме, где прожили 30 лет, выключим сервера и уйдем. Газеты больше нет. Российские власти и российские спе…

💔24😭12😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 220 posts we hold for @themedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTCAnonymous Poll93 voters

а как у вас?

  1. блин, да31%
  2. блин, нет9%
  3. у меня когда как27%
  4. думаю, это все-таки зависит от автора, а не от читателя22%
  5. мне только результаты посмотреть12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTCAnonymous Poll115 voters

Многие СМИ в телеграме дают возможность поддержать их посты звездочками. Вы поддерживали?

  1. Да, конечно, довольно часто и помногу1%
  2. Да, довольно часто, но немного1%
  3. Да, но редко10%
  4. Не помню, возможно2%
  5. Нет, звездами не пользуюсь65%
  6. Нет, звезд жалко5%
  7. Нет, это небезопасно6%
  8. Нет, другой вариант или несколько вариантов сразу3%
  9. Хочу сначала посмотреть результаты6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTCAnonymous Poll166 voters

Из чистого интереса: вы знаете слово «крыжик»?

  1. Да, это русский вариант чекбокса или радиобаттона15%
  2. Да, но это что-то еще8%
  3. Нет59%
  4. Кажется, что-то знакомое7%
  5. Просто хочу посмотреть ответы10%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTCFinal Results131 voters

Сколько абзацев в телеграмном посте вы способны выдержать без зевоты и прокручивания?

  1. Главное — одна строчка, я выхватываю заголовки2%
  2. Одного-двух абзацев вполне хватает. Как в «Раньше всех. Ну почти»8%
  3. Я считаю, что пост — это как новость, но на один абзац короче. То есть три абзаца норм18%
  4. Текст он и есть текст, четыре-шесть абзацев тоже норм, главное чтобы все уместилось14%
  5. Мне длина не так важна, как осмысленность. Я даже простыни аналитические иногда читаю40%
  6. Мало что пролистываю. Поддерживаю новый формат статей в телеграме, наконец-то моя длина2%
  7. Я вообще не по текстам, больше люблю картинки и видосы0%
  8. По-разному бывает, все от подачи зависит10%
  9. Затрудняюсь ответить0%
  10. Не буду отвечать, хочу глянуть результаты5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 220 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Republishes 61 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,118,319
20 posts
42 секунды
@ftsec · 19,407
7 posts
Агентство. Новости
@agentstvonews · 103,901
5 posts
Медиазона. Эксклюзив
@mediazona_exclusive · 14,580
5 posts
The Bell
@thebell_io · 105,115
4 posts
Ведомости Московского Государства
@Vedomosti_Moskovskogo_Gosudarstv · 5,872
3 posts
Метаверсище и ИИще
@cgevent · 53,509
3 posts
Местами
@mestamedia · 3,140
3 posts
На полях
@napolyahmedia · 108
3 posts
Записки из опенспейса
@openspace_notes · 2,315
3 posts
Планёрка
@planerka_org · 48,224
3 posts
Teller
@tellercompany · 1,186
3 posts
(Не)занимательная антропология
@anthro_fun · 74,961
2 posts
Breaking Trends
@breakingtrends · 32,806
2 posts
Медуза — все новости
@meduza_news · 122,018
2 posts
Plot
@plottwist_m · 35,882
2 posts
Tech Talk
@ru_tech_talk · 31,513
2 posts
Саша Амзин и СЯУ
@sasha_amzin · 355
2 posts
VODоворOTT
@vodott · 14,597
2 posts
Дежурный smmщик
@whoisdutytoday · 8,204
2 posts
ЗаТелеком 🌐
@zatelecom · 64,579
2 posts
Апостольская Православная Церковь
@ApostolicOrtodox · 882
1 post
🤖 The Bell Tech
@Bell_tech · 20,827
1 post
Лениздат
@Lenizdatru · 749
1 post
Арина Бородина
@arinab1973 · 14,375
1 post
БлоGнот
@blognot · 13,446
1 post
BULAVKA
@bulavkavshoke · 1,946
1 post
запуск завтра
@ctodaily · 33,742
1 post
Дата-сторителлинг
@data_publication · 11,917
1 post
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 140,221
1 post
Французский вестник 🇫🇷 French Dispatch
@fr_dispatch · 18,217
1 post
Глобальная сеть журналистов-расследователей
@gijnRu · 5,688
1 post
Максим Ильяхов (Главред)
@glvrdru · 69,295
1 post
Хайтек+
@htech_plus · 64,068
1 post
Важные истории
@istories_media · 125,646
1 post
Makarov Media Lab💡
@ivanmakarovlab · 2,039
1 post
Kloop
@kloopnews · 9,723
1 post
Коммерсантъ
@kommersant · 295,077
1 post
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 865,858
1 post
Лентач
@lentachold · 391,800
1 post
Журналисты и медийщики
@mediatusovka · 18,808
1 post
Мигалка: новости проекта
@migalka_project · 2,991
1 post
New Media
@n_e_w_media · 17,120
1 post
Не туда
@netudasmm · 41,513
1 post
Новая газета Европа
@novaya_europe · 117,116
1 post
Новая газета
@novaya_pishet · 211,015
1 post
Это Осетинская!
@osetinskayaliza · 17,657
1 post
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,547
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Журналистика
@dddjournalism · 131,360
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Журналисты и медийщики
@mediatusovka · 18,808
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 October 2026
Планёрка
@planerka_org · 48,224
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
Кедр.медиа
@kedr_media · 30,565
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
Грамотность на «Меле»
@gramota_mel · 20,099
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 September 2026
ПроСМИсь
@prosmis · 103,598
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
Паша и его прокрастинация
@abbsol · 29,430
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Breaking Trends
@breakingtrends · 32,806
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 4 September 2026
Если быть точным
@tochno_st · 19,579
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 October 2026
Коса — медиа для женщин
@kosa_media · 21,294
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 September 2026
Такие дела
@takiedela · 24,705
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 September 2026
Рецепты Лайфхакера
@lh_eda · 38,418
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
Йод | Лайфхакер
@lh_health · 22,625
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
The Content is The Queen
@thecontentisthequeen · 21,469
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
Job for Media & Content
@forallmedia · 23,492
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 September 2026
Work for writers
@Work4writers · 34,636
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 3 September 2026
Moneyhack
@moneyhack · 19,280
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔎 Мы и Жо — медиа и журналистика” (@themedia), 10,669 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/themedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.