Всё так
💔8❤4😁2😭2

Channel
@themedia
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,669subscribers
-195 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001009546257 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @themedia |
| Description | Проект Александра Амзина о медиа и журналистике Аналитика, тренды и новости. Верим в журналистику и собираем сообщество профессионалов. Клуб: https://t.me/+WKiI6ncBxj1kXVNV Сайт: themedia.center По всем вопросам: @alamzin Реклама не размещается |
| Created | 23 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/themedia |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Recorded in 2019 as “Мы и Жо” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:09 | 10,669 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:59 | 10,674 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:50 | 10,678 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:00 | 10,683 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:11 | 10,685 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 10,693 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:17 | 10,694 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:09 | 10,700 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:09 | 10,701 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 10,705 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:09 | 10,713 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 10,717 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 10,720 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:48 | 10,726 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 10,728 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:35 | 10,727 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 10,732 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:26 | 10,734 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:37 | 10,738 | +1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 10,737 | first reading |
220 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 220 (4 August 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 12,889 |
| Reactions total | 198 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,514 reactions across 172 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 337 | 22.3% | |
| ❤ | 263 | 17.4% | |
| 👍 | 146 | 9.64% | |
| 😢 | 93 | 6.14% | |
| 💯 | 75 | 4.95% | |
| 💔 | 56 | 3.70% | |
| 😭 | 52 | 3.43% | |
| 🤬 | 51 | 3.37% | |
| 🤯 | 51 | 3.37% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 2.58% | |
| 🤮 | 31 | 2.05% | |
| 💊 | 30 | 1.98% | |
| 👌 | 28 | 1.85% | |
| 👀 | 25 | 1.65% | |
| ❤🔥 | 23 | 1.52% | |
| 🤡 | 20 | 1.32% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 1.19% | |
| 🙈 | 16 | 1.06% | |
| 🤷♂ | 15 | 0.991% | |
| 💩 | 14 | 0.925% | |
| 23 further kinds | 131 | 8.65% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 176 of the 220 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,514 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 220 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Всё так
💔8❤4😁2😭2
Против 22‑летней жительницы Татарстана возбудили дело о «фейках». Под описание из релиза СК подходит Асия Несоевая, выдумывавшая истории для независимых изданий Сотрудники управления Следственного комитета по Татарстану передали в суд уголовное дело о распространении военных «фейков» из корыстных побуждений, которое возбудили против 22-летней жительницы села в Высокогорском районе республики, сообщили в ведомстве. П…
Виталик Бутерин опубликовал свои правила цифрового минимализма: 1. X вреден. Там многовато любителей Гитлера и крипто-нигилистов. Вместо того, чтобы уйти из X, Виталик просто отказался от его ленты и пишет через клиент Firefly. Тем самым он избегает Алгоритма™ (в этой части его поста слово «Гитлер» употреблено семь раз). 2. Переведите телефон в авиарежим. Бутерин провел такой эксперимент в течение 100 дней и осталс…
❤7
Человеческая рекомендательная система Изобретатель слова «вайбкодинг» Андрей Карпаты увидел, в какой треш превратились рекомендации YouTube, и решил: хватит это терпеть. Он попросил ИИ сделать агрегатор всех YouTube-видео, упоминавшихся на Hacker News, где тусуются айтишники и стартаперы. Получился очень крутой и реально интересный HackerTube. Самое замечательное, что эту идею подхватили другие. Теперь у нас есть …
❤7🥴1
Posted without readable text
Google теперь поддерживает запрет на обучение ИИ в robots.txt. Это благая весть для многих медиа, которые надеются позднее монетизировать свои данные. Раньше эту инструкцию уже поддерживали Bing, OpenAI и Anthropic, но без крупнейшего поисковика в мире на них мало кто обращал внимание. Выглядеть, согласно отраслевому предложению, это должно примерно так: User-Agent: __usage_ai-training Disallow: / Allow: /press-k…
👍2🤡1
Google Docs, что ты делаешь, прекрати
😁20❤2🤪2
31 октября, Хэллоуин. Сегодня последний день, когда вы можете оценить состояние российской журналистики за этот месяц (или изменить свою оценку). Не забудьте!
👍1
(в сторону) И только тут до меня дошло, что сегодня, 30 октября, День памяти жертв политических репрессий А ведь еще пятничных иноагентов не объявили
😢17💯7
Reddit уберет контент за регистрационную стену, тот станет доступен в основном залогиненным пользователям Менеджеры говорят, что это «улучшит пользовательский опыт», но пока не решили, что покажут без логина Но заботятся они не о людях, а о том, как выстроить оборону от ботов. ИИ пожирает важный для Reddit человеческий трафик из поиска Признаюсь, меня всегда огорчает, когда продуктовая стратегия вырастает из защит…
Заявление из канала «Новой». PDF-версия: https://storage.googleapis.com/novaya-static/pdf/2026/10/30/nas-ubili.pdf
💔6
❗️️️️Нас убили. Заявление «Новой газеты»* о прекращении своей жизни 18+. НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ ИНТЕРНЕТ-ИЗДАНИЕ «НОВАЯ ГАЗЕТА» ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА ИНТЕРНЕТ-ИЗДАНИЕ «НОВАЯ ГАЗЕТА» 9 ноября мы погасим свет в нашем доме, где прожили 30 лет, выключим сервера и уйдем. Газеты больше нет. Российские власти и российские спе…
💔24😭12😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 220 posts we hold for @themedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
а как у вас?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Многие СМИ в телеграме дают возможность поддержать их посты звездочками. Вы поддерживали?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Из чистого интереса: вы знаете слово «крыжик»?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сколько абзацев в телеграмном посте вы способны выдержать без зевоты и прокручивания?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 220 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 61 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@themedia named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔎 Мы и Жо — медиа и журналистика” (@themedia), 10,669 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/themedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.