Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Паша и его прокрастинация

Channel

Паша и его прокрастинация

@abbsol

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,518subscribers

-264 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001020367488
TypeChannel
Username@abbsol
DescriptionВы всё делаете неправильно, сейчас расскажем, как надо 🔥 Рассказывают Ира Михеева, Серёжа Антонов, Юля Манохина, Даша Бондарева, Настя Андронова, Паша Федоров, Валера, Виталик Вебер. Реклама: @volodyazavr #9XBEE
Created9 January 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held49
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/abbsol

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

29,42129,83429,627.55 August 2026 — 29,782 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,782 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,802 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,800 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,795 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,787 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,785 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,778 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,772 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,757 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,738 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,726 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,717 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,701 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,680 subscribers22 August 2026 — 29,666 subscribers23 August 2026 — 29,639 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,625 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,623 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,617 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,610 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,602 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,589 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,592 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,584 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,569 subscribers3 September 2026 — 29,564 subscribers5 September 2026 — 29,536 subscribers8 September 2026 — 29,505 subscribers11 September 2026 — 29,485 subscribers13 September 2026 — 29,450 subscribers14 September 2026 — 29,421 subscribers16 September 2026 — 29,464 subscribers18 September 2026 — 29,625 subscribers25 September 2026 — 29,834 subscribers4 October 2026 — 29,704 subscribers8 October 2026 — 29,650 subscribers13 October 2026 — 29,614 subscribers14 October 2026 — 29,593 subscribers15 October 2026 — 29,585 subscribers16 October 2026 — 29,575 subscribers17 October 2026 — 29,571 subscribers18 October 2026 — 29,556 subscribers19 October 2026 — 29,550 subscribers21 October 2026 — 29,546 subscribers22 October 2026 — 29,533 subscribers23 October 2026 — 29,514 subscribers24 October 2026 — 29,513 subscribers25 October 2026 — 29,518 subscribers29,5185 August 202625 October 2026
49 measurements spanning 80 days, net -264. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,359–29,896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 05:3129,518+5
24 Oct 2026, 04:0529,513-1
23 Oct 2026, 02:3829,514-19
22 Oct 2026, 03:4929,533-13
21 Oct 2026, 00:0429,546-4
19 Oct 2026, 21:3029,550-6
18 Oct 2026, 21:3629,556-15
17 Oct 2026, 18:1929,571-4
16 Oct 2026, 20:5529,575-10
15 Oct 2026, 19:0629,585-8
14 Oct 2026, 15:4129,593-21
13 Oct 2026, 03:4829,614-36
8 Oct 2026, 18:2229,650-54
4 Oct 2026, 04:5829,704-130
25 Sept 2026, 10:5729,834+209
18 Sept 2026, 21:5729,625+161
16 Sept 2026, 15:3929,464+43
14 Sept 2026, 19:1829,421-29
13 Sept 2026, 03:3829,450-35
11 Sept 2026, 07:5529,485first reading

Engagement

142 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 129 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.70%
avg views ÷ 29,518 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,980
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 142 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held142 (24 July 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total92,889
Reactions total2,195
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Oct 2026, 05:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,160
Videos
≈108
Links
≈3,240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

6,953 reactions across 139 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,95028.0%
❤1,12316.2%
💯6559.42%
🤔4476.43%
👍3695.31%
🔥2563.68%
✍1672.40%
😭1381.98%
🤯1341.93%
😢1271.83%
🤡1171.68%
🍾1141.64%
🙏1141.64%
🥱1091.57%
🤣1081.55%
🥰831.19%
👀821.18%
👨‍💻711.02%
❤‍🔥650.935%
👌610.877%
32 further kinds6639.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 142 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,168 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
37
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 142 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @abbsol. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 142 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.11%
3 of 142 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,580
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,820
over 139 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjdkDmu5116 October 202616 October 2026
2SDnjf3xjCo14 August 20264 August 2026
2W5zFH1sBWy118 August 202618 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 23 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

23 Oct 2026, 16:00 UTC699 views49 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Работа-работа, перейди на Федота. У него график 2/2, а для меня пятница — святое 😇

😁34❤5🍓5🍌2🍾2👀1

23 Oct 2026, 08:13 UTC≈1,090 views31 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Мы с боссом дружим Россияне стали чаще воспринимать босса как своего друга по сравнению с 2022 годом. Но большинство респондентов всё же считают, что их отношения с начальством скорее деловые (62%). Дружба с руководителем скорее помогает рабочему процессу — так считает 41% респондентов. 36% всё же за то, что она мешает работе, ещё 23% затруднились ответить. Мужчины чаще женщин дружат с боссом и считают, что это по…

😁17👀6❤4🤔4

23 Oct 2026, 06:45 UTC≈1,210 views49 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

Так, у нас новое предсказание.

🥱26😁15🔥7👍1

22 Oct 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,290 views31 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Это не входит в мои обязанности Согласно опросу SuperJob, сказать так могут лишь 13% опрошенных. Остальные берут в работу всё, что даст босс, ещё 16% готовы выполнять дополнительные поручения за доплату. Женщинам чаще, чем мужчинам, подкидывают дополнительную работу (42% против 37%). Также выпускникам вузов чаще, чем спецам со средним профессиональным образованием, дают внеплановые задачи. Молодёжь чаще других тор…

🙏17🤔8💯5👍1

21 Oct 2026, 13:56 UTC≈1,300 views48 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Ситуация: в порыве думджоббинга листаете вакансию и находите одну ровно на то место, которое прямо сейчас занимаете. То есть на замену себе. Что будете делать?

🤔26😁15👀6🎃1

21 Oct 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,340 views30 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Зарплата есть, работы нет Мадогива-дзоку — пожилые сотрудники в Японии, которые изредка перебирают бумажки и всё остальное время просто залипают в одну точку. Консалтинговая фирма Shikigaku провела опрос и выяснила, что почти в половине крупных японских компаний есть «старик, который не работает». Респонденты отмечали, что такие сотрудники на рабочем месте чаще всего курят, перекусывают, болтают, сидят в интернете …

👨‍💻15😁8❤7

21 Oct 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,380 views32 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

Новый отчёт канадской компании Visier показал, что почти половина сотрудников преувеличивает свои навыки владения ИИ перед коллегами и боссом, чтобы соответствовать ожиданиям. 45% признались, что их заставляют подключать ИИ в работу, даже если они не уверены, что смогут сделать что-то толковое. Ярое желание внедрять ИИ в компанию, лишь бы не отставать от трендов, приводит к тому, что сотрудники зачастую лишь делают …

😢22💯5🤔5

20 Oct 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,330 views41 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

Что бесит рекрутеров в резюме? Эйчары стали чаще раздражаться из-за определённых слов в резюме. На первом месте среди слов-триггеров — многозадачность (21%). Далее идут стрессоустойчивость (15%) и ответственность (14%). Однако не только слова раздражают специалистов по подбору персонала. Их также бесит, когда соискатели оформляют своё резюме с ошибками. Многих раздражает, когда соискатель указывает зарплату по дого…

✍15😁13🤔8💯2🥱2👍1

19 Oct 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,420 views30 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Соискатели стали реже пропускать собеседования В 2024 году доля неявок на собеседования среди руководителей составляла 18% против 8% в этом году. Аналогичная тенденция наблюдается и среди линейных специалистов: доля неявок снизилась с 30% в 2024 году до 18% в 2026 году. Среди рабочего персонала показатель сократился на 5%. Кроме того, в этом году рекрутеры всё реже стали связывать неявки с погодой, днём недели или …

🤔15❤6💯5😭4

17 Oct 2026, 10:29 UTC≈15,200 views31 reactionsread 25 October 2026

🤯 400 откликов и ноль офферов. Это мой знакомый. Потом я нашёл тех, кто отправил по 800, и дно оказалось нормой. Записал видос: почему так вышло и что делать, если работа нужна прямо сейчас. В комментах можно поныть, разрешаю. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWzay6LQKBs

❤18😭9🤔4

17 Oct 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,730 views33 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

Чувство юмора помогает в построении карьеры Так ответили 56% участников опроса SuperJob. Ещё 19% считают, что шутки никак не влияют на работу. Люди в возрасте 45 лет и старше чаще других возрастных групп считают, что юмор помогает при трудоустройстве и построении карьеры. Так выяснилось, что чем больше человек зарабатывает, тем сильнее он уверен в том, что юмор положительно влияет на карьеру. Половина опрошенных р…

✍17❤6🤔5👨‍💻3👍2

16 Oct 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,310 views65 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Вы-хо-дны-е! Они как поход в магазин голодным: хочется взять всё. А потом лежишь дома и нет сил даже фильм выбрать.

💯40🍾13🍌6💘4👀2

Showing the 12 most recent of 142 posts we hold for @abbsol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTCAnonymous Poll427 voters

У вас были токсичные коллеги?

  1. Были69%
  2. Работаю в таком коллективе19%
  3. Я сам токсик27%
  4. Нет4%
  5. Напишу в комментах1%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 23 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Максим Ильяхов (Главред)
@glvrdru · 69,419
#1
DNative — блог Ткачука про SMM
@dnative · 80,361
#2
Бескромный
@dbeskromny · 152,660
#3
Федоров, ты задолбал
@fedorovmedia · 3,898
#4
Света редачит, а могла бы …
@duchaks · 5,126
#5
Молянов
@molyanov_blog · 30,561
#6
Корнеев | Первый Маркетинговый
@pervmarketing · 130,947
#7
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,567
#8
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 125,114
#9
Кинжал
@Le_kinzhal · 46,162
#10
Палиндром
@rdslv · 8,481
#11
Копилка текстов | Маркетинг, копирайтинг
@smotri_kakoi_text · 7,118 (as read 8 September 2026)
#12
Безжалостная Ильяхова
@irinausichenko · 6,917
#13
Сделаемская школа
@sdelaem_education · 12,767
#14
Саша Чижов
@blogsmm · 38,106
#15
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 46,846
#16
Редакция Рыба
@ryba_team · 20,150
#17
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 177,286
#18
18—expl—crea
@eclecthoughts · 2,803
#19
Ля, какой текст
@what_the_text · 5,280
#20
Марфицин
@writingtools · 8,450
#21
Плавучая редакция
@editboat · 12,563
#22
Клуб главредов
@glavredbossclub · 4,125
#23
Илья Еремин | Контент-маркетинг
@bzdynko · 4,213
#24
Канал Иры Моториной
@redachredach · 8,376
#25
Записки редакторки
@zapiski_redaktorki · 93,891
#26
Дайджест копирайтера
@copywritersdigest · 9,611
#27
Нейроцех
@neurozeh · 13,846
#28
Спросите Киру
@ask_kira · 4,742
#29
Клиент
@yourtypicalclient · 47,633
#30
Большая книга о соцсетях — Ильяхов, Скрябин
@social_book · 3,132
#31
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 967,552
#32
Редактор Сон
@yavrybe · 1,863
#33
🔎 Мы и Жо — медиа и журналистика
@themedia · 10,717
#34
Зашкваркетинг
@dankmarketing · 58,874
#35
vc.ru
@vcnews · 112,109
#36
Вебер в деле
@vebervdele · 1,272
#37
БУДУ
@budujobs · 134,062
#38
Умный копирайтинг
@smartcopywriting · 11,445
#39
Т—Ж
@t_jrnl · 98,395
#40
Радио Рыба | Контент
@madcopy_blog · 1,378
#41
Таня прочитала
@rishavant · 2,946
#42
Сарычева
@svarila_kompotique · 11,314
#43
Школа Рыбы
@parilkateam · 2,115
#44
Бухта Карбышева SEO для бренд-медиа
@karbyshev_seo · 2,812
#45
Дольче вита в Авито
@dolceavito · 2,963
#46
🎅🏻дима ротмистров я контент-маркетинг
@dicopywrite1 · 3,692
#47
Sostav
@sostav · 56,304
#48
Пиздатель Ира Белова | Внутрянка медиа и книги
@irapizdatel · 900
#49
UX Live 🔥
@uxlive · 36,172
#50
Партизанский Маркетинг
@GuerrillaMarketing · 105,158
#51
Диджитал-склад
@digital_storage · 2,835
#52
олдскульный маркетинг
@marketingold · 123,412
#53
Кто студент
@studentbureau · 1,456
#54
Волохин
@several_letters · 2,717 (as read 8 September 2026)
#55
{Иноземцев}
@boringeditor · 3,636
#56
🦅 Стратегия и маркетинг — Сергей Предко
@stratmarketing · 18,195
#57
Это работа для редактора
@glvrd_job · 22,883
#58
Норм работа
@normrabota · 141,868
#59
SETTERS Media
@setters · 83,537
#60
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,976,428
#61
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,119,838
#62
Что почитать редактору
@redaktoru · 14,933
#63
Доктрина Скрябина
@scryabins · 7,448
#64
Влад не шутит
@vlad_efd · 9,032
#65
Алексей Ткачук — Личный блог
@tkachuk_aliaksey · 4,680
#66
Мемы про работу
@projectmemes · 3,251
#67
Антонов без Б.
@antonovbezb · 4,755
#68
Ждём резюме l Лайфхакер
@zdemcv · 80,178
#69
бумеры смотрят телек
@boomers_TV · 157,851
#70
Breaking Trends
@breakingtrends · 32,789
#71
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,175,117
#72
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 866,741
#73
Креатив со звездочкой
@creative · 133,800
#74
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 300,667
#75
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,643
#76
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 798,610
#77
Работа с текстами — вакансии
@work_editor · 32,068
#78
Дудь
@yurydud · 854,323
#79
Work for writers
@Work4writers · 34,601
#80
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 329,530
#81
Работа в медиа
@dddwork · 111,553
#82
РМ lite
@smmruslite · 5,773
#83
Ересь Скрябина
@scrheresy · 1,941
#84
Скинь ссылку
@linkskiny · 202
#85
Копирайтер, редактор — удаленная работа
@self_ma · 33,657
#86
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 300,981
#87
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,311
#88
Редактор с чашкой чёрного
@klimovawrites · 1,747
#89
Пиши Касука
@pishi_kasuka · 26,366
#90
Норм удалёнка
@normremote · 36,325
#91
Планёрка
@planerka_org · 49,434
#92
Не туда
@netudasmm · 41,246
#93
Сторишеринг
@storysharing · 3,867
#94
«Карьера» The Blueprint
@theblueprintcareer · 143,549
#95
A-Teams | Карьера
@huggabletalents · 135,057
#96
Вельман
@alinavelman · 548
#97
Эйч
@careerwithh · 66,150
#98

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Записки редакторки
@zapiski_redaktorki · 93,891
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Корнеев | Первый Маркетинговый
@pervmarketing · 130,947
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
Саша Чижов
@blogsmm · 38,106
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Цифровой этикет
@digitaletiquette · 24,307
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 16 September 2026
Карты, тексты, два ствола
@remingtonist · 27,027
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
DNative — блог Ткачука про SMM
@dnative · 80,361
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 August 2026
Нетология
@netology_ru · 26,812
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 46,846
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026
Кинжал
@Le_kinzhal · 46,162
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Максим Ильяхов (Главред)
@glvrdru · 69,419
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
The Content is The Queen
@thecontentisthequeen · 21,500
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
Купрум
@tolkosprosit · 42,885
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Умный Брокколь | Грамотность
@brokoledu · 42,823
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Йод | Лайфхакер
@lh_health · 22,685
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Дофамин | Лайфхакер
@pofixil · 25,141
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
Молянов
@molyanov_blog · 30,561
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Бескромный
@dbeskromny · 152,660
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026
английский для дебилов
@debilenglish · 60,956
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Грамотность на «Меле»
@gramota_mel · 20,130
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 September 2026
Редакция Рыба
@ryba_team · 20,150
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 September 2026
Свинкины финансы
@svinfin · 34,602
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
Т—Ж Мозг
@t_dopamine · 20,987
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 September 2026
вай, так можно было?
@tellmevai · 47,157
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Полезный Парфун
@ParfunA · 20,709
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Паша и его прокрастинация” (@abbsol), 29,518 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abbsol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.