Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дофамин | Лайфхакер

Channel

Дофамин | Лайфхакер

@pofixil

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,148subscribers

-584 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001692609944
TypeChannel
Username@pofixil
DescriptionКанал @lifehackerru о том, как быть счастливым и устойчивым даже в сложные времена. Реклама: @semenyukk Другие наши каналы: https://t.me/addlist/pJ4cr-lPkcJiYzAy Регистрация: clck.ru/3NsvUb
Created13 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held47
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/pofixil

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,14825,73225,4405 August 2026 — 25,732 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,732 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,726 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,727 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,725 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,709 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,700 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,695 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,684 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,677 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,669 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,661 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,649 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,638 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,630 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,619 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,612 subscribers22 August 2026 — 25,601 subscribers24 August 2026 — 25,600 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,592 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,579 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,573 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,564 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,553 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,538 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,535 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,522 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,504 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,493 subscribers7 September 2026 — 25,463 subscribers10 September 2026 — 25,428 subscribers12 September 2026 — 25,413 subscribers14 September 2026 — 25,401 subscribers16 September 2026 — 25,392 subscribers18 September 2026 — 25,377 subscribers1 October 2026 — 25,275 subscribers6 October 2026 — 25,248 subscribers10 October 2026 — 25,225 subscribers13 October 2026 — 25,201 subscribers15 October 2026 — 25,195 subscribers16 October 2026 — 25,189 subscribers17 October 2026 — 25,185 subscribers18 October 2026 — 25,172 subscribers19 October 2026 — 25,177 subscribers20 October 2026 — 25,172 subscribers21 October 2026 — 25,157 subscribers22 October 2026 — 25,148 subscribers5 August 202622 October 2026
47 measurements spanning 78 days, net -584. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,060–25,820 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 16:1525,148-9
21 Oct 2026, 13:4825,157-15
20 Oct 2026, 12:3825,172-5
19 Oct 2026, 09:5625,177+5
18 Oct 2026, 08:0025,172-13
17 Oct 2026, 05:0825,185-4
16 Oct 2026, 04:0625,189-6
15 Oct 2026, 00:3625,195-6
13 Oct 2026, 19:4025,201-24
10 Oct 2026, 08:0225,225-23
6 Oct 2026, 06:1625,248-27
1 Oct 2026, 04:5425,275-102
18 Sept 2026, 11:3625,377-15
16 Sept 2026, 03:3625,392-9
14 Sept 2026, 09:5525,401-12
12 Sept 2026, 17:1825,413-15
10 Sept 2026, 15:5525,428-35
7 Sept 2026, 11:4125,463-30
4 Sept 2026, 14:1625,493-11
2 Sept 2026, 23:3525,504first reading

Engagement

147 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.20%
avg views ÷ 25,148 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 147 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held147 (31 July 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total126,813
Reactions total4,321
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Oct 2026, 21:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,820
Videos
≈6
Links
≈2,640

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,687 reactions across 144 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,70738.3%
🔥1,25312.9%
🌚8148.40%
💅7998.25%
❤‍🔥5505.68%
🥰4574.72%
👀3793.91%
custom 51973346592597093133123.22%
🦄3113.21%
😁2542.62%
😍1451.50%
🗿1421.47%
💯1221.26%
👍1131.17%
🥴700.723%
💔490.506%
😢480.496%
🕊470.485%
🙏350.361%
👎290.299%
9 further kinds510.526%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 147 of the 147 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,999 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 147 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 147 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pofixil. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 147 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 22 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Oct 2026, 15:48 UTC542 views14 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

5 секретов памяти: как запоминать легко и надолго Простое руководство для тех, кому приходится держать в голове массу информации по работе или учёбе. 💦 Поймите Очень часто люди пытаются просто зазубривать незнакомые слова и фразы, даже не понимая их значения. Возможно, этого хватит на несколько дней, скажем, для сдачи экзамена. Если, конечно, лектор не попросит объяснить, что вы понимаете под абляцией и какие же пр…

❤12❤‍🔥1custom 51973346592597093131

22 Oct 2026, 10:11 UTC≈1,460 views15 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥8❤4👍2custom 51973346592597093131

22 Oct 2026, 07:25 UTC901 views147 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Вы ведёте ежедневники или планеры? ❤️ — да, регулярно пишу в них 💅 — да, но в электронном варианте 🦄 — заметки в телефоне — вот мой планер 🌚 — нет, всё держу в голове

❤66🦄36🌚30💅15

21 Oct 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,180 views24 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

40 признаков, что ваши базовые потребности не удовлетворяются Американский психолог Абрахам Маслоу считал, что основные потребности человека можно расположить на пяти уровнях иерархической структуры: физиологические на первом, психологические — на четырёх остальных. Это не значит, что какими-то из них можно пренебречь — все они в идеале должны удовлетворяться. В противном случае мы не только умрём от голода и холод…

❤11❤‍🔥6custom 51973346592597093134😢3

21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC≈1,250 views22 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Что бы вы сделали, если бы у вас был неограниченный запас денег? Принимаются любые ответы!

❤15❤‍🔥4custom 51973346592597093133

20 Oct 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,360 views25 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

8 мифов о настоящей дружбе, с которыми пора расстаться ⭐️Друг познаётся в беде ⭐️Настоящий друг должен быть только один ⭐️Настоящая дружба не ржавеет И ещё 5 мифов → 🥰 Дофамин

❤‍🔥12👍5❤4👎2🔥2

20 Oct 2026, 07:20 UTC≈1,410 views248 reactionsread 22 October 2026

У вас остались друзья со школы? 🔥 — да, мы всё ещё хорошо общаемся! ❤️ — есть знакомые, иногда видимся/списываемся 🌚 — нет

🌚108🔥92❤48

19 Oct 2026, 15:41 UTC≈1,520 views17 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

4 вопроса, которые помогут отличить плохой совет от хорошего Когда советы повсюду — от кабинета врача до нашего собственного телефона — как понять, каким из них стоит следовать, а каким нет? Разобраться в этом помогут четыре вопроса: читать → 🥰 Дофамин

custom 51973346592597093138❤7🔥2

19 Oct 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,580 views24 reactionsread 22 October 2026

У вас есть любимая кружка? Кидайте фото в комментарии!

❤‍🔥11custom 51973346592597093137👍5🔥1

18 Oct 2026, 16:54 UTC≈1,730 views30 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Эксперимент Милгрэма: как привычка подчиняться может сподвигнуть на ужасные вещи В начале 60‑х годов XX века психолог Йельского университета Стэнли Милгрэм исследовал оправдания обвиняемых нацистов в ходе Нюрнбергского процесса. Их защита часто основывалась на повиновении приказам начальства. В 1961 году, после суда над офицером СС Адольфом Эйхманом, известным как «архитектор Холокоста», Милгрэм решил проверить, мо…

😢14💔9❤‍🔥3💯3🔥1

18 Oct 2026, 09:06 UTC≈1,630 views53 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤41custom 519733465925970931310🔥2

17 Oct 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,650 views35 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Йога для начинающих: комплексы упражнений на 5, 10 и 15 минут Показываем простые движения для энергичности, ясности и отличного самочувствия: смотреть упражнения → 🥰 Дофамин

😁28❤5🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 147 posts we hold for @pofixil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Лайфхакер
@lifehackerru · 67,770
#1
Йод | Лайфхакер
@lh_health · 22,707
#2
Спокойное место
@tish_blagodat · 8,941
#3
Горящая изба
@BurningHut · 27,227
#4
Рецепты Лайфхакера
@lh_eda · 38,512
#5
Технологии | Лайфхакер
@lhdigest · 12,590
#6
Кинжал
@Le_kinzhal · 46,200
#7
Занудный Стас
@ZanudnyjGTD · 626
#8
Клуб модных жаб
@clubzhab · 4,319
#9
Т—Ж
@t_jrnl · 98,436
#10
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 970,409
#11
Кружок Пономаря
@ponomaround · 1,053
#12
Максим Ильяхов (Главред)
@glvrdru · 69,424
#13
Паша и его прокрастинация
@abbsol · 29,533
#14
Школа здорового взрослого
@HealthyAdultLife · 10,583
#15
Света редачит, а могла бы …
@duchaks · 5,126
#16
Т—Ж Мозг
@t_dopamine · 20,992
#17
Купрум
@tolkosprosit · 42,897
#18
Т—Ж Образование
@t_obrazovanie · 11,355
#19
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 122,052
#20
0% токсичности
@stop_toxic · 34,070
#21
Чтобы не выгорать
@notburningout · 43,659
#22
Учебник Т—Ж
@t_uchebnik · 57,857
#23
Безжалостная Ильяхова
@irinausichenko · 6,919
#24
Ок, ясно
@yasno_live · 111,838
#25
Сделаемская школа
@sdelaem_education · 12,773
#26
Копилка текстов | Маркетинг, копирайтинг
@smotri_kakoi_text · 7,128 (as read 14 September 2026)
#27
Редакция Рыба
@ryba_team · 20,129
#28
Чистые Когниции
@pure_cognitions · 37,791
#29
олдскульный маркетинг
@marketingold · 123,480
#30
Записки редакторки
@zapiski_redaktorki · 93,940
#31
З—Ж
@t_zdorov · 19,433
#32
Бескромный
@dbeskromny · 152,704
#33
Alter
@psyalter_ru · 26,610
#34
Теории и Практики
@tandp_ru · 22,089
#35
Daily Reminder
@justakindreminder · 36,437
#36
Психология | Psychologies
@PsychologiesRussia · 53,216
#37
Школа Рыбы
@parilkateam · 2,113
#38
Т—Ж Спорт
@t_sportik · 8,864
#39
бёрнинг батт
@burningbutt · 8,574
#40
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,342
#41
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,119,942
#42
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,594
#43
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 799,165
#44
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 329,675
#45
Ждём резюме l Лайфхакер
@zdemcv · 80,140
#46
ситуация менструация
@krasnodarguests · 753
#47
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 177,629
#48
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 156,399
#49
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 300,659
#50
Палиндром
@rdslv · 8,481
#51
Сегодня в тренде
@trends · 1,101,246
#52
Это работа для редактора
@glvrd_job · 22,885
#53
Журнал НОЖ
@knifemedia · 101,845
#54
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 125,148
#55
Федоров, ты задолбал
@fedorovmedia · 3,900
#56
БУДУ
@budujobs · 133,956
#57
Т—Ж Технокульт
@t_technocult · 15,320
#58
vc.ru
@vcnews · 112,151
#59
Редактор с чашкой чёрного
@klimovawrites · 1,748
#60
Передали коллегам
@collegi · 135,993
#61
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 301,089
#62
Большая книга о соцсетях — Ильяхов, Скрябин
@social_book · 3,128
#63
Ты в тренде или уходи
@trendsetter · 1,474,342
#64
Пикабу
@pikabu · 255,067
#65
Молянов
@molyanov_blog · 30,427
#66
бумеры смотрят телек
@boomers_TV · 157,988
#67
Доктрина Скрябина
@scryabins · 7,446
#68
SETTERS Media
@setters · 83,587
#69
ФейкМашина
@fakemashine · 1,343
#70
Т—Ж Едакция
@t_foooood · 7,909
#71
Афиша Daily
@afishadaily · 70,745
#72
А!
@aaamagazine · 79,629
#73
Щёки и предубеждения
@winnie_fucking_pooh · 217
#74
Илья Еремин | Контент-маркетинг
@bzdynko · 4,218
#75
Naked Science
@nsmag · 191,040
#76
careerspace
@careerspace · 164,640
#77
Игорь, начинайте работу
@oplata_skoro_budet · 576,477
#78
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,278
#79
Радио Рыба | Контент
@madcopy_blog · 1,377
#80
Ересь Скрябина
@scrheresy · 1,942
#81
«Карьера» The Blueprint
@theblueprintcareer · 143,514
#82
Т—Ж Свой угол
@t_nedviga · 17,283
#83
Wonderzine
@wonderzinemag · 16,222
#84
Яндекс
@yandex · 617,708
#85
Московская ЩУКА
@moscow_pike · 64,177
#86
Норм работа
@normrabota · 141,801
#87
Нейроцех
@neurozeh · 13,687
#88
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 370,394
#89
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,301
#90
первой эякулирует бухгалтерия
@buhcumlter · 36,970
#91
Креатив со звездочкой
@creative · 133,837
#92
Город
@t_gorod · 68,490
#93
Правила жизни
@pravilamagru · 63,622
#94
A-Teams | Карьера
@huggabletalents · 134,901
#95

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Йод | Лайфхакер
@lh_health · 22,707
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Лайфхакер
@lifehackerru · 67,770
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
0% токсичности
@stop_toxic · 34,070
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
Рецепты Лайфхакера
@lh_eda · 38,512
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
Горящая изба
@BurningHut · 27,227
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 September 2026
Психология | Psychologies
@PsychologiesRussia · 53,216
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
Т—Ж Мозг
@t_dopamine · 20,992
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дофамин | Лайфхакер” (@pofixil), 25,148 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pofixil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.