Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психиатр Елисеенко

Channel

Психиатр Елисеенко

@Lorcerpsy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,231subscribers

+174 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567852335
TypeChannel
Username@Lorcerpsy
DescriptionАвторский канал врача-психиатра Антона Елисеенко. Пишу о различных ментальных заболеваниях, используя доказательные методы. Консультирую очно(г.Москва) и онлайн. https://t.me/Lorcerchat чат для подписчиков @Lorcer по вопросам записи
Created26 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lorcerpsy

Growth

16,03516,23116,1336 August 2026 — 16,057 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,057 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,080 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,086 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,074 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,071 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,074 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,076 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,063 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,058 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,047 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,038 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,035 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,040 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,194 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,195 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,185 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,187 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,213 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,226 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,219 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,224 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,218 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,222 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,231 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 27 days, net +174. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,006–16,260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 04:3316,231+9
1 Sept 2026, 02:0816,222+4
31 Aug 2026, 01:1616,218-6
29 Aug 2026, 21:4316,224+5
28 Aug 2026, 20:0416,219-7
27 Aug 2026, 23:2516,226+13
26 Aug 2026, 22:1316,213+26
26 Aug 2026, 01:1416,187+2
25 Aug 2026, 00:4716,185-10
23 Aug 2026, 11:3816,195+1
21 Aug 2026, 18:5716,194+154
20 Aug 2026, 14:3616,040+5
19 Aug 2026, 17:1416,035-3
18 Aug 2026, 17:3516,038-9
17 Aug 2026, 14:0916,047-11
16 Aug 2026, 08:1616,058-5
14 Aug 2026, 18:5616,063-13
13 Aug 2026, 07:0516,076+2
11 Aug 2026, 05:2116,074+3
10 Aug 2026, 03:1216,071first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.0%
avg views ÷ 16,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,410
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held50 (19 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total109,196
Reactions total2,644
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 17:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
978
Videos
243
Links
743

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,899 reactions across 49 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,81657.5%
💯60312.3%
👍2956.02%
💔2775.65%
🔥2585.27%
2565.23%
😢1062.16%
🙏541.10%
🤔360.735%
🌚240.49%
😭240.49%
🥴240.49%
🤯190.388%
🤣180.367%
🗿170.347%
🥰170.347%
👎90.184%
80.163%
👀70.143%
🎉60.122%
9 further kinds250.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,960 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 07:24 UTC946 views40 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Мне часто в социальных сетях попадаются ролики и подкасты, в которых герои обсуждают кричащих в общественных местах детей. В этих диалогах часто проскакивают фразы из серии «он невменяемый», «чадо из ада» и тому подобнее. Разумеется, никто не говорит в контексте диагноза, но это натолкнуло меня на тему для поста: как отличить «сложного» ребенка от ребенка с психическим расстройством? Начну с того, что дети не крича

27💯10👍3

1 Sept 2026, 07:12 UTC≈1,660 views77 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Не «манипуляция», а крик о помощи: самоповреждение у подростков и что с этим делать. Недавно наткнулся на ужасающую статистику. Согласно данным метанализа 22% подростков, начиная с 13 лет, регулярно занимаются самоповреждениями. Причем, у девочек показатели выше, чем у ребят. К сожалению, self-harm сегодня — не редкость, а распространенная клиническая проблема. ❗️Такая форма аутоагрессии совершается без намерен

38💔36💯2👍1

31 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,950 views54 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Примерно каждый третий человек с депрессией или шизофренией не реагирует на существующие лекарства, которые в основном воздействуют на моноаминовые нейромедиаторы. Это говорит о том, что существующий универсальный подход к лечению этих заболеваний может быть неприемлемым. Поэтому важно выявление биологических механизмов, лежащих в основе нейропсихиатрических заболеваний. Иммунная дисфункция играет важную роль в разв

38🔥14🤔2

30 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC≈2,710 views124 reactionsread 2 September 2026

кПТСР: когда люди ошибочно принимают ваше выживание за черты характера. Часть 1. Автор healing.the.mosaic (IG)* Перевод Anne Green Moon Дисклеймер: понимание, откуда исходят реакции на травму, автоматически не оправдывает того, как они влияют на других людей. Ответственность все ещё важна, но она не обязана идти от ненависти к себе. Почему так происходит? кПТСР может повлиять на то, как ваш мозг и тело реагируют н

71💔41🙏72👀2🤔1

29 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC≈2,880 views60 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Когда шизофрения меняет мои мысли. Автор schizophrenic.nyc (IG)* Перевод Anne Green Moon Дисклеймер: этот пост не является диагностическим инструментом. Шизофрения влияет не только на то, что я вижу или слышу. Она может влиять и на то, как я мыслю. Мысль находится в моей голове. Но она не всегда ощущается как то, что исходит от меня. Она кажется чем-то отдельным. Будто бы я изучаю ее со стороны, а не создаю. Я

40💔12🔥5👍2😭1

28 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈2,650 views72 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Ответ. 1. ГТР. 2. Социальная фобия 3. ПТСР

54💯14🔥4

28 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC≈2,920 views83 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Тревога бывает разная! И у каждого диагноза она своя. Ниже — описание жалоб трех пациентов. Попробуйте угадать, какая у каждого из них ментальная проблема. Пациент 1. Длительная постоянная фоновая тревога обо всем подряд: о здоровье, работе, неполитых цветах. Проблемы со сном и концентрацией. Беспричинная боль в области поясницы. Пациент 2. Волнообразный страх, который возникает перед ситуациями,в которых человек

6014🤔6🤷‍♀2🗿1

27 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC≈3,580 views87 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Вроде как мы все знаем задачу антидепрессанта — это вернуть способность радоваться. А на деле часть людей на длительном приеме СИОЗС описывают ровно обратное: не тревожно, не грустно, но и не радостно тоже. Просто какая-то серость вместо эмоций: что день рождения, что скандал на работе – реакции ноль. 📎В англоязычной литературе это называют emotional blunting, а мы часто называем эмоциональным притуплением. Челове

46👍13💯135🔥5💔4🎉1

26 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,970 views104 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Дети и гаджеты: можно ли заключить «перемирие»? Я думаю, вы часто видите картину: ребенок еще ходить не начал, а уже вполне осознано обращается с телефоном. Норма ли это? И вообще, с какого возраста можно знакомить ребенка с гаджетами? Поделюсь своим мнением, возможно не популярным и возможно спровоцирует споры в комментариях, но ведь для этого мы все и находимся?) Гаджеты действительно меняют работу систем воспри

💯5142🔥9🤣2

25 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC≈3,180 views117 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Флешбэки – просто воспоминание? Мы нередко разбираем тему психологических травм, и как будто бы пришло время немного разобрать казалось бы очевидный, но не для всех понятный феномен флешбэка. Иногда люди называют флешбэком любое неприятное или навязчивое воспоминание. Но для меня, конечно, это понятие куда глубже. 🔹Обычное воспоминание, каким бы тяжелым оно ни было, всегда имеет отсылку в прошлое. Можно вспомнить н

💯51💔2925👍43🙏3🌚1🎉1

25 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC≈2,730 views70 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Всем привет! Сегодня хочу посоветовать двух врачей, которые берутся за сложные случаи и ведут интересные блоги о психиатрии, на которые стоит подписаться — сам их с большим удовольствием читаю. 🔹Мотренко Софья. Работает со сложными случаями и подробно объясняет происхождение диагноза, схему лечения и выбор препаратов, оставаясь на связи с пациентами между приемами. Не обязательно сразу записываться — можно сначала

31🔥26🥰8💅32

24 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC≈2,920 views56 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Стресс разрушает все! Не только вашу жизнь, но и ваш организм. Во время стресса в кровь выбрасываются адреналин и кортизол, учащается сердцебиение, нарушается концентрация внимания. Если он превращается в хронический, это приводит к очень неприятным последствиям. В своей практике я часто вижу людей, у которых именно стресс стал триггером развития других ментальных расстройств. Как психика создает дополнительный ст

37👍12🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @Lorcerpsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Lorcerpsy edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 40,751 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Психотерапевт Прибытков
@pribytkov_psy · 39,823
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
Доктор Сычев
@dr_sychev · 49,026
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Алексей Красиков®️️️🍀
@krasikovAlexey · 41,169
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Чистые Когниции
@pure_cognitions · 37,619
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психиатр Елисеенко” (@Lorcerpsy), 16,231 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lorcerpsy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.