Авторский блог про маркетинг, медиа, бизнес и не только. Мнение авторов субъективно и может не совпадать с вашим
Реклама и обратная связь: @mLccrew
https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=672dfdbae9b24e448c4a6b9d®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
22 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 42 days, net +166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 125,098–125,395 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 07:41
125,361
+49
15 Sept 2026, 05:55
125,312
+5
13 Sept 2026, 11:20
125,307
+10
11 Sept 2026, 17:56
125,297
+52
9 Sept 2026, 02:20
125,245
+21
5 Sept 2026, 15:57
125,224
+54
3 Sept 2026, 19:40
125,170
+38
2 Sept 2026, 13:44
125,132
-5
1 Sept 2026, 12:08
125,137
-21
31 Aug 2026, 13:26
125,158
+6
30 Aug 2026, 10:43
125,152
-19
29 Aug 2026, 13:05
125,171
-2
28 Aug 2026, 13:33
125,173
-18
27 Aug 2026, 12:25
125,191
-85
26 Aug 2026, 10:24
125,276
+86
25 Aug 2026, 13:22
125,190
-14
24 Aug 2026, 16:15
125,204
-11
23 Aug 2026, 02:58
125,215
+15
21 Aug 2026, 13:18
125,200
+4
20 Aug 2026, 11:04
125,196
first reading
Engagement
137 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.81%
avg views ÷ 125,361 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,030
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 137 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
137 (4 August 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
500,750
Reactions total
6,248
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,890
Videos
≈1,990
Links
≈5,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
20m 16s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,742 reactions across 133 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,704
43.8%
😁
2,527
23.5%
🔥
2,314
21.5%
🌚
1,197
11.1%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 137 of the 137 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,959 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 137 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 137 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @smmrus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 137 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.92%
4 of 137 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
5,370
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
6,220
over 133 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjdyt3kF
1
2 September 2026
2 September 2026
2VtzquX5ty9
1
1 September 2026
1 September 2026
2VtzqvbFK55
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
2VtzqwTJxKD
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 137 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
New Balance решили открыть поп-ап Runners Table, посвящённый беговому чемпионату World Athletics Road Running.
Для этого бренд арендовал ресторан и превратил его во временное пространство для бегунов. Кроме, собственно, еды, здесь проводили воркшопы, вечеринки и другие совместные активности для бегунов.
Этот поп-ап от New Balance — ещё одно подтверждение того, что бренды делают всё больший упор на комьюнити и работ…
СберСтрахование жизни стало самым дорогим страховым брендом России
Компания заняла 25-е место в рейтинге 100 самых дорогих брендов России BrandLab 2026 и стала №1 среди страховых компаний. Стоимость бренда СберСтрахования жизни оценили в 128,7 млрд рублей — на 4% больше, чем годом ранее.
Высокая оценка выглядит закономерно: СберСтрахование жизни — крупнейший игрок рынка страхования жизни. По итогам 2025 года сборы …
Rexona превратила движения Лионеля Месси в шрифт.
Аргентинская Rexona представила шрифт, который необычно отдаёт дань Месси, недавно завершившему карьеру в национальной сборной. Его движения превратили в шрифт. Финты, ускорения, развороты, траектория мяча — именно из этого дизайнеры сделали графические символы. Проект называется GOAT Font (Greatest of All Time).
Вот, с одной стороны, креатив крутой, сделано реально…
Интервью во время прыжка с парашютом — редкость даже за рубежом. Встречаются отдельные журналистские эксперименты, но в устойчивый формат они так и не превратились: свободное падение длится меньше минуты, а ветер и шум почти исключают нормальный разговор.
В Т-Бизнесе решили проверить формат на совладельце екатеринбургского бара «Вечно молодой» Никите Бобунце. Прыжок для него был первым, но это не помешало прямо в св…
Converse вляпался в рекламный кошмар. Аудитория увидела в их креативе совсем не то, что планировал бренд.
Корейское подразделение выпустило кампанию с Кариной из aespa. На одном из кадров певица стоит в белом образе рядом с чёрными кедами, но свет и композиция сложились крайне неудачно: часть одежды стала похожа на остроконечный капюшон Ку-клукс-клана, а висящая обувь у некоторых пользователей вызвала ассоциации с л…
Как маркетингу наращивать эффективность, когда бюджет не растет? Об этом — Mindbox Конференция: два дня, 40+ спикеров.
В первый день — кейсы CRM-маркетинга и рекламы. Например:
— Burger King получил 2% инкрементальной выручки после перезапуска приложения;
— «Читай-город» скрестил Директ с ML-алгоритмами: +56% к выручке с клика;
— РБК собрал 100+ персональных попапов: конверсия из попапа до 27,5%.
Второй день — л…
Duolingo тоже решили, что надо сделать креативы для New York Fashion Week. Понятное дело, они выбрали ту тему, которая им ближе всего — языки.
Они создали The Phonetic Collection — коллекцию одежды, на которой написано, как правильно произносить названия брендов.
Идея появилась из исследования того, как американцы произносят названия брендов. Так, например, более 60% американцев заявили, что знают, как правильно пр…
Сначала RIMOWA выпустила чемодан для дартса, а теперь они объединились с Faber-Castell для создания специального чемодана для художников — Artist Case. Понятное дело, что этот чемодан сделан из фирменного анодированного рифлёного алюминия, которым знамениты чемоданы RIMOWA.
Внутри Artist Case находится двухуровневая система хранения для 120 цветных карандашей Faber-Castell и специальных графитовых карандашей, точилк…
KFC решили расширить свои креативы с маринованными огурцами.
Сначала они выпустили курточку с маринованными огурцами, вдохновлённую ИИ-слоп-видео, чтобы прорекламировать свою новую линейку меню Pickle Mania.
И новое меню так хорошо зашло, что они решили создать целую огуречную эстетику — Picklecore.
Так что в компанию к курточке KFC теперь добавятся очки, серьги, духи и другие аксессуары.
Кроме этого, KFC передел…
На рынке цифрового финтех-маркетинга формируется новый сегмент, в котором главным активом выступает лояльность аудитории. В ходе профильной конференции «День финтех-медиа» представители индустрии обсудили трансформацию банковских супераппов в витрины лайфстайл-сервисов.
Значимым драйвером эффективности здесь становится своевременность предложения. Исполнительный директор Sberads Екатерина Стрельникова подчеркнула, ч…
Ситуативы от брендов вокруг Недели моды в Нью-Йорке продолжаются.
Burger King решили воспеть куриный наггетс и выпустили миниатюрную сумку Le Nugguette.
Это микро-сумка, которая по размеру идеально подходит для одного наггетса.
Во время Недели моды, с 12 по 16 сентября, Burger King каждый день продавал по 100 таких сумок за 350 рублей.
Есть ощущение, что перепродавать эти сумки будут в сотни раз дороже.
«Система дала сбой»
Золотое Яблоко отозвало все претензии 😁
😁104❤73🔥24🌚14
Showing the 12 most recent of 137 posts we hold for @smmrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 73 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Котлер.Media @atlasonair · 34,422 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
Маркетинг / Диджитал @marketingj · 22,513 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
ХОТ ДИДЖИТАЛ от Влада Ситникова @HotDigital · 23,545 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
mads media @mads_courses · 26,050 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Спортивный маркетолог 🏟️ @celebasport · 26,815 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
вай, так можно было? @tellmevai · 50,044 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Sostav @sostav · 56,006 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
Маркетинговый ход @MarketingPloy · 69,882 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
DNative — блог Ткачука про SMM @dnative · 81,416 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 August 2026
СберМаркетинг @sbermarketing · 199,027 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Психология Маркетинга @marketpsy · 174,466 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
кабачковая икра по акции @sale_caviar · 192,936 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Красный маркетинг Гиязова @aaaredmarketing · 276,635 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
WOW Реклама | Маркетинг @wowadvertise · 28,421 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
AdIndex @adindex · 30,241 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 7 September 2026
Партизанский Маркетинг @GuerrillaMarketing · 104,686 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
vc.ru @vcnews · 112,033 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Маркировка и налог на рекламу: главные новости (ЕРИР) @adv_system · 30,080 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
ParaGraph @paradigm_graphics · 34,990 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Яндекс Реклама @YANtech · 49,841 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026
Попсовый маркетинг @popsmarketing · 111,393 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
олдскульный маркетинг @marketingold · 124,357 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Креатив со звездочкой @creative · 134,236 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Инструменты маркетолога @profit_maker · 45,843 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 461 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Юрент(ru.wikipedia.org) “…«Юрент» периодически публикует социальную рекламу{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/smmrus/11586|title=С любопытством наблюдаю за тем, как изменился подход кикшеринга…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Русский маркетинг” (@smmrus), 125,361 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smmrus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.