Channel photo updated

Channel
Яндекс Реклама
@YANtech
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
51,334subscribers
+2,667 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001125222609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YANtech |
| Description | Яндекс Реклама — о том, как реклама работает сегодня. Новые решения, аналитика рынка и опыт Яндекса — всё, что важно маркетологам и бизнесу. ВК: https://clck.ru/3SqW5m MAX: https://max.ru/yandex_adv Регистрация РКН: https://clck.ru/3SimkC |
| Created | 20 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YANtech |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 51,334 | +811 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 50,523 | +682 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 49,841 | +262 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 49,579 | +145 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 49,434 | +77 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 49,357 | +58 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 49,299 | +202 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 49,097 | +87 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:02 | 49,010 | +128 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 48,882 | +82 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:46 | 48,800 | +54 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:26 | 48,746 | +92 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 48,654 | +11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 48,643 | +40 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 48,603 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 48,604 | +15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 48,589 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 48,600 | -15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 48,615 | -28 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 48,643 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 125 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.4%
- avg views ÷ 51,334 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10,500
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.408%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (25 June 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 73,210 |
| Reactions total | 299 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 19:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,900
- Videos
- ≈101
- Links
- ≈1,570
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 56s
- Average length
- 58s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,096 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 347 | 31.7% | |
| ❤ | 187 | 17.1% | |
| 👍 | 129 | 11.8% | |
| 👀 | 109 | 9.95% | |
| custom 5355010635342060462 | 104 | 9.49% | |
| custom 5361905470896383193 | 92 | 8.39% | |
| ⚡ | 89 | 8.12% | |
| custom 5307709030934812694 | 20 | 1.82% | |
| custom 5229145609415469011 | 19 | 1.73% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,096 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 3.70%
- 1 of 27 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 21,500
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 7,040
- over 25 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FobjAh17fpxWPK4XB1CeufYQWRv1ezW | 1 | 30 September 2026 | 30 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 2 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
📌У фармбрендов появились конкуренты, которых не найти на соседней полке Сегодня интерес к здоровью возникает задолго до выбора препарата: 53% людей следят за физическим или ментальным состоянием, а 57% — за показателями с помощью устройств и приложений. Что с этим делать фармбренду? Спросили у сертифицированного премиум-партнёра MGCom. 📌Схема „проблема → препарат → преимущества продукта“ работает всё хуже. Человек…
❤19👍12👀6⚡2
Теперь можно планировать свой день на📌📌 Программа уже на сайте — выбирайте темы и спикеров, которых точно не хочется пропустить. А теперь вопрос к вам: с кем из спикеров вы бы хотели поговорить лично и что спросили бы? Пишите в комментариях — возможно, именно ваш вопрос найдёт ответ. 📌 Программа и регистрация на REKONFA
❤21🔥21👍10👀5
📌 Даже любимому бренду не гарантировано место в корзине. Да, речь про Чёрную пятницу. 66% опрошенных проверяют его акции, но в корзину могут попасть и другие: каждый пятый на распродаже покупает марки, которые без скидки не по карману. Для бизнеса это шанс заинтересовать тех, кто раньше проходил мимо, а что может в этом помочь — ниже. 📌 #Цифры_ПРО Чёрную пятницу
🔥19❤13👍8👀5
📌 Как думаете, сколько покупателей заранее решают, какую сумму потратить на Чёрную пятницу?
- 20%71%
- 30%18%
- 40%11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👀12🔥10👍5
Posted without readable text
⚡16custom 522914560941546901113👀9🔥4
Posted without readable text
🔥26⚡15👍9custom 52291456094154690116
⚡ Обновления, β̶ и новые сценарии для ваших задач Регулярно рассказываем о новинках в Директе и появившихся возможностях в канале «Яндекс Реклама ПРО». А раз в сезон собираем главное в одном большом дайджесте. Все летние обновления ↓ Перфоманс-продвижение ⚫Вывели стратегию «Максимум прибыли» из беты ⚫Добавили возможности для работы с ЕПК в приложении Директа ⚫Запустили бесплатный динамический коллтрекингᵝ ⚫Внедрил…
🔥13⚡8👍8👀4
360° внимания, пожалуйста 📌 Создали единый центр управления охватными онлайн- и офлайн-кампаниями в Директе — Панораму. В одной кампании — Прайм-баннерᵝ, медийное видео, Connected TV, а скоро и цифровая наружная рекламаᵝ. 📌 Что под капотом? Умный кросс-канальный охват 120+ млн пользователей, сквозная настройка частоты показов, более 600 таргетингов без наценок и прозрачная аналитика — всё в одном инструменте. За…
🔥19👍17⚡6👀2
📌 REKONFA 2026 — встречаемся 15 октября Большая конференция Яндекс Рекламы возвращается. 📌📌📌📌📌📌📌📌📌 В этом году вместе с экспертами Яндекса и рынка обсудим, чем живёт digital-реклама: ИИ и персонализацию, технологии и практический опыт бизнеса. Традиционно программа не ограничится докладами: можно разобрать задачи с продуктовыми командами, обменяться опытом с коллегами и пройти digital-квест. 📌 Москва, ВТБ Арена …
🔥27custom 536190547089638319324👍15⚡2
📌📌 Новости с Yandex Ecom Open Air — в одной сводке На ежегодном летнем фестивале говорим о главных изменениях в ecom — для специалистов, которые уже работают в индустрии или только планируют начать. Вот что можно сделать уже сегодня: 📌 Присоединиться к закрытому тестированию Теперь скидочный бюджет можно доверить алгоритмам. С магазина — товары, сумма и максимальная скидка. С алгоритма — персональные предложения …
👍14custom 536190547089638319313🔥9
📌 Yandex Ecom Open Air — как это было Ежегодная встреча тех, кто развивает ecommerce, завершилась — но мы сохранили главное. Изучить дискуссии о трендах и технологиях, кейсах и опыте индустрии можно в записи. Сориентироваться по темам поможет программа. 📌 Смотреть запись 📌 — с каждого, кто развивает ecommerce
custom 536190547089638319355🔥13⚡9👀2
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @YANtech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@YANtech edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 22 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📌 Как думаете, сколько покупателей заранее решают, какую сумму потратить на Чёрную пятницу?
- 20%71%
- 30%18%
- 40%11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔍 Как думаете, что обычно находится на пике поискового интереса в августе?
- Подарок для учителя16%
- Канцтовары для школы77%
- Страховка для детей7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@TargetStorm · 52 postsНовости контекстной рекламы⚡️
@adsnewstg · 1272 postsSaytum's official channel
@SaytumGroup · 41 postrta agenda
@agendaRTA · 1,0841 postбумеры смотрят телек
@boomers_TV · 159,1381 postНеадекват в отделе маркетинга
@brynskikh_m · 241 postЕЛИСЕЕВ про Директ | Канал
@eliseev_direct · 641 postБар в телеграм (канал)
@greenbarvtelegram · 1,2391 postipos.digital - все о диджитал
@ipos_digital · 2191 postJam Agency: контекстная реклама
@jamagency · 3241 postKatdsgn | дизайню жизнь
@katdsgn_freelance · 2731 postо чём говорят коллеги
@kollegi · 199,3121 postНабор в клуб САМ СЕБЕ СММщик
@sam_sebe_smmshik · 171 postГромов о контексте
@ya_gromov · 8,6791 postГук Светлана • Яндекс Реклама
@yandex_guk · 1,0181 postЯндекс Реклама ПРО
@yndx_ed · 56,2551 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@yndx_ed · 56,2558 postsЯндекс отзывы Yandex
@otzyvy9 · 12,6006 postsREKONFA Live
@rekonfalive2025 · 5,1374 postsГромов о контексте
@ya_gromov · 8,6793 posts🔸Радар рекламы | Андрей Вершинин & Контекстная реклама
@radar_ads · 282 postsБережинская про контекст и фриланс
@ab_context · 4961 postBono digital x creative
@bonodigital · 3321 postДайджест: Трафик и Конверсии
@digest_kolyas · 1001 postЖадор Петербург | Михаил Иванов
@ivanovnovnovnov · 3,1781 postKilka
@Kilka_Polina · 4741 postKINEMÓTOR
@kinemotor_production · 2,0801 postДневник контекстолога l Николай Мальцев про Директ
@maltsevads · 3451 postSEOReader
@SEOReader · 51 postНовобранец в Маркетинге
@SwiftMarketing · 1451 postКоляс Грибов | Трафик и Конверсии
@thekolyas_tg · 1,2861 postГук Светлана • Яндекс Реклама
@yandex_guk · 1,0181 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@yndx_ed · 56,255#1
@ya_gromov · 8,679#2
@worldppc · 12,401#3
@smmrus · 125,193#4
@promopages · 11,423#5
@pbondareva · 19,494#6
@YAN_analytic · 20,950#7
@mariamdirect · 4,131#8
@yandex_fedorov · 4,193#9
@ppc_bigbrain · 3,886#10
@yandexbusiness · 78,359#11
@yandex · 615,293#12
@best_direkt · 9,557#13
@eLama_russia · 16,461#14
@adindex · 30,785#15
@gnusnyi_marketing · 6,748#16
@memes_kontext · 1,341#17
@vk_ads · 15,172#18
@the_demin_cycle · 2,644#19
@sostav · 56,157#20
@yourtypicalclient · 47,636#21
@dmcrus · 11,116#22
@k_gorbunov · 10,022#23
@moscowmap · 2,659,334#24
@budni_evangelista · 7,169#25
@trafficonwb · 3,857#26
@bossmarketer · 5,115#27
@lider · 182,272#28
@pomogay_marketing · 5,370#29
@truedigitalclub · 2,248#30
@dnative · 80,869#31
@mediaresearchesanalytics · 17,926#32
@okkaminsights · 13,836#33
@sharonovblog · 2,679#34
@cossaru · 10,017#35
@authors_adv · 5,142 (as read 26 August 2026)#36
@adv_system · 30,001#37
@marketingold · 123,957#38
@blogcalltouch · 12,296#39
@ppckantrop · 863#40
@YANpartner · 10,911#41
@boringmarketer · 7,513#42
@digital_bar · 8,566#43
@GTdigest · 382#44
@kurovmax · 1,746#45
@poschitai · 2,047#46
@yandex_direct_strokov · 7,511#47
@arwm_agency · 1,091#48
@petrochenkow · 47,102#49
@adindex_live · 5,700#50
@ppc_info · 1,173#51
@prais_pro_marketing · 1,590#52
@Godketing · 112,697#53
@realweb_team · 4,593#54
@cmo4cmo · 5,236#55
@pstmarketing · 65,646#56
@yagla · 9,583#57
@bogdanmarketing · 6,879#58
@aaaredmarketing · 275,353#59
@epromo_group · 801#60
@direct_phil · 2,472#61
@cases_adindex · 5,579#62
@roistat_com · 14,213#63
@feedomania · 1,256#64
@goloburdov_ads · 4,960#65
@yandex_guk · 1,018#66
@ppclife · 1,258#67
@imsecretlab · 2,569#68
@glvrdru · 69,492#69
@DigitalAgafonov · 951#70
@coreboot_marketing · 6,827#71
@sale_caviar · 192,579#72
@clicksider · 5,807#73
@bbbreaking · 1,974,828#74
@vcnews · 112,113#75
@hikollegi · 55,917#76
@meduzalive · 1,121,240#77
@kontext_channel · 864,966#78
@techno_yandex · 223,412#79
@creative · 133,947#80
@bredformance · 2,521#81
@sbermarketing · 228,981#82
@temalebedev · 970,373#83
@setters · 83,875#84
@morejobs · 84,290#85
@smmruslite · 5,789#86
@yurydud · 858,795#87
@marketingmemes · 2,536#88
@alfabank · 986,841#89
@GuerrillaMarketing · 104,844#90
@odigital · 10,145#91
@rozetked · 666,897#92
@dankmarketing · 59,163#93
@mash · 3,108,224#94
@directquiz · 2,793#95
@kinopoisk · 802,270#96
@otdel_memedia · 3,167#97
@bloodysx · 1,178,189#98
@prbezposhady · 151,489#99
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@YAN_analytic · 20,950
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 September 2026
@yndx_ed · 56,255
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
@yandexbusiness · 78,359
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
@mrkt_practicum · 25,242
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
@pbondareva · 19,494
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 October 2026
@adv_system · 30,001
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
@yourtypicalclient · 47,636
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026
@ffadru · 25,944
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 September 2026
@yandex · 615,293
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 August 2026
@marketolog_marketing · 82,437
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
@target_nata · 21,931
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
@DataInsight · 20,104
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
@excel_everyday · 52,300
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
@chadgpt_ru · 139,265
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
@yndx_practicum · 33,934
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
@avito_b2b · 146,766
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
@adindex · 30,785
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 7 September 2026
@bitrix24_ru · 29,170
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
@sbermarketing · 228,981
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@cerebrotg · 19,023
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 October 2026
@profit_maker · 45,709
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
@pervmarketing · 132,856
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
@dgalera · 19,150
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 4 October 2026
@bs_marketplace · 26,913
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яндекс Реклама” (@YANtech), 51,334 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YANtech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.