Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 40 days, net +66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,886–4,981 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 01:36
4,967
no change
15 Sept 2026, 10:39
4,967
-2
12 Sept 2026, 07:16
4,969
-1
12 Sept 2026, 02:41
4,970
+4
8 Sept 2026, 11:55
4,966
+2
7 Sept 2026, 15:57
4,964
-6
3 Sept 2026, 01:29
4,970
+3
2 Sept 2026, 19:26
4,967
+46
30 Aug 2026, 18:57
4,921
-2
30 Aug 2026, 14:04
4,923
-3
27 Aug 2026, 07:04
4,926
no change
24 Aug 2026, 19:17
4,926
+2
24 Aug 2026, 01:09
4,924
-3
20 Aug 2026, 20:42
4,927
+4
20 Aug 2026, 07:26
4,923
+26
17 Aug 2026, 12:44
4,897
-1
17 Aug 2026, 11:08
4,898
-5
13 Aug 2026, 17:48
4,903
no change
13 Aug 2026, 15:37
4,903
+5
10 Aug 2026, 19:16
4,898
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 17 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
649 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🐳
231
35.6%
🔥
138
21.3%
👍
75
11.6%
😁
70
10.8%
🤯
67
10.3%
❤
55
8.47%
🗿
9
1.39%
🙏
3
0.462%
🌚
1
0.154%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 649 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 16 we hold a reading for · 81%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @goloburdov_ads. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 September 2025 to 9 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Топ развлечение этого вечера
1. Взять проблемного или перспективного клиента
2. Через новый мастер Директа выгрузить ~5-15 отчётов в CVS (затем закинуть в zip)
3. Обсудить гипотезы и проблемы с claude
Иногда он пишет странные выводы (я никак не масштабирую ipad трафик на wi-fi), но таблицы читает великолепно, в сложной структуре находит интересные закономерности. Правда, придёться давать много контекста про проект …
Первого клиента по продаже франшиз я взял в 2016 году (привет, Егор)
И с тех пор формула запуска не поменялась. Новый проект с апреля тому подтверждение:
- обещание XXX тыс дохода на YYY нише с доказательствами (открытые точки)
- лёгкое закрытие (получить, узнать, расчитать)
- звонок-квалификация
- созвон с презентацией и бизнес-модель, адаптированная под город
"Дешевые" лиды не миф. Но с ростом бюджета цена лида н…
У меня сегодня день рождения (29 лет) и на днях меня повесткой поздравил военкомат
Вы тоже можете поздравить в комментариях
P.S. все смс о повестке приходят с номера 117.
Ребята из призыва.нет настроили отслеживание этого номера и рассылают предложение всем, кому приходило смс с 117. Таргет топ, я считаю. Спасибо операторам что продают наши данные законно по договору 😌
Яндекс выкатил функцию резервных посадочных страниц при ограничениях интернета
Как понимаю, такие лендинги будут работать при "белых списках". С таргетингом на Москву и южные регионы функция топ уже сейчас
1. Создаёте лендинг https://direct.yandex.ru/dna/library/neuroLandings
2. Подключаете его как резервную страницу в настроках ЕПК кампании
Подробнее про функцию:
https://yandex.ru/adv/news/lendingi-v-direct-vyho…
Авито обновил таргетинги
1. Ретаргетинг по базе и look a like
Теперь можно загружать свою базу телефонов и показывать объявления этой аудитории
Затем можно создать похожую аудиторию и использовать её для таргетинга
В LaL я не особо верю, но протестирую, а функция рекламы по базе точно полезная
2. Узкие таргетинги и условия «и, или, не»
Добавили более глубокие таргетинги, чем раньше (я ждал это). Плюс появились …
В новогодние праздники написал пост (и не выложил), в котором хотел поставить на 2 тренда 2026 года:
• продвижение в MAX (который вырос за пол года до 45 млн ежедневных пользователей)
• таргет Авито (которому 2-3 месяца, а мы только начали запускать)
С паразительной скоростью они начали сбываться:
Вчера в MAX дали возможность всем создавать каналы (зачем я вкладывал в этот канал более 800 тыс ₽ за 3 года?)
Сегодня з…
Лиды с таргета Авито дешевле в 6 раз чем из Яндекса
Получил это сообщение от клиента, с которым работаем с августа 2022 года
За 3 дня мы получили:
31 лид из Яндекс Директа за 51 150₽
28 лидов из таргета Авито за 10 000₽
Да, новый инструмент, запущен пару месяцев назад
Да, кабинет сырой
Да, отсутсвуется обучение и показываемся всем из категории (почти медийка, только оплата за клики)
Да, подойдёт не под каждую нишу…
Теперь, когда спрашивают:
какой баланс нужно держать на аккаунте относительно расхода?
Можно скидывать этот скрин
P.S. Проект не мой, пришёл на консультацию (отзывы)
Предварительные итоги эксперимента: борба с фродом через смс верификацию
Количество и цена верифицированного лида не изменились
Кампании обучились на тех, кто верифицирует номер
Количество спам лидов/заявок без подтверждения снизилось
Если раньше было соотношение: на 1 подтвержденный лид получали +2 спам лида, то в декабре стало +0.5 спам лида
Декабрь в принципе спорный месяц, поэтому итоги подведу в конце января.…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @goloburdov_ads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Яндекс Реклама ПРО @yndx_ed · 56,438 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
Яндекс Реклама @YANtech · 49,841 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Голобурдов в прямом эфире | Маркетинг” (@goloburdov_ads), 4,967 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goloburdov_ads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.