Channel
@ppc_bigbrain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,889subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001760715604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ppc_bigbrain |
| Created | 15 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ppc_bigbrain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:35 | 3,889 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 3,892 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 3,893 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 3,897 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 3,896 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 3,898 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 3,897 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 3,897 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
эмэйзинг нейродрисня когда пытаешься вправить нейтронке мозги из задницы в процессор, создав ей пачку скиллов с сотней руководств по тому, как думать, а она всё ещё тупорылая шопездец via @ppc_bigbrain
ну и чё теперь делать? а ведь был шанс via @ppc_bigbrain
маркетологи, как вам портрет платежеспособной аудитории? сохраняем или осуждаем? via @ppc_bigbrain
Что вы попробовали в своей карьере из любых родов деятельности один раз и сразу поняли, что это не для вас? Начну с себя. Меня за 13 лет в контекстной рекламе хватило на один раз в жизни: - На настройку 1 смарт кампании в Google Ads. - На настройку 1 мастера кампаний в Яндекс Директе. - На 1 разговор с менеджером Гугла об аудите моего аккаунта Google Ads. - На 1 разговор с менеджером Яндекса об аудите моего аккаун…
шта? абисните плес, я прост с деревни шёл 8к26 век, впнологи щщщетали цену клика калкурентов через время появления ремаркетинга песдос есус, дай им мозгов пишите в элэс, пащщетаю в калбайне цену клика ваших кончкурентов через разницу в градусах между вашим углом стояния раком при настройке МК и восьмым козырем бубной в четверг via @ppc_bigbrain
«а мы агентство, которое скликивает рекламу по заказу яндекса» кулстори от того, кто умеет делать хорошо и кому нет причин не доверять via @ppc_bigbrain
когда бог директа раздавал хромосомы, но не хватило на целую индустрию via @ppc_bigbrain
я как бы ни на что не намекаю, но люди интересуются via @ppc_bigbrain
изучайте портреты ца, говорили они фильтруйте интенты запросов, говорили они сегментируйте семантику, говорили они пишите релевантные заголовки, говорили они via @ppc_bigbrain
автоматизация, которую мы заслужили via @ppc_bigbrain
Меня жизнь к такому не готовила. Как реагировать на то, что легенда веб-аналитики, на книгах и статьях которого выучилось всё русскоязычное сообщество интернет-маркетинга, советует меня своим ученикам? Для этого существует какая-то специальная медалька в списке карьерных ачивок? А в форме подорожника есть? via @ppc_bigbrain
Что изучать для BI-разработки и работы с данными. Предыдущие посты серии: 1. Документация по промптам. 2. Выбор нейронок. 3. Подготовка к разработке. 4. Оптимизация кода. 5. Если код не "летает". 6. Минимизируем вычисления. 7. Фатальный пример вычислений. 8. Порядок обработки данных. 9. Смерть производительности. Часть 1. 10. Смерть производительности. Часть 2. 11. Плохие и хорошие примеры. 12. Когда в PQ сортирова…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ppc_bigbrain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PPC для сверхразумов | Александр Хитро” (@ppc_bigbrain), 3,889 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppc_bigbrain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.