Мир ускоряется, но навыки, которые развивают мышление, будут актуальны всегда. Не забывайте обновлять пул умений, чтобы не отставать от рынка, а Практикум в этом поддержит: выбирайте курсы по ссылке.
❤6🔥4✍3😁1

Channel
@yndx_practicum
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
34,111subscribers
-199 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001792176368 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yndx_practicum |
| Description | Сервис онлайн-образования Помогаем людям расти Выбрать курс и пройти бесплатную вводную часть: https://ya.cc/t/uzWvKXm679f6DR Обратиться в поддержку: @PracticumSupportBot Правила чата: https://clck.ru/3TTvPB Номер заявления в РКН — 4970768733 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yndx_practicum |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 34,111 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 34,113 | -14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 34,127 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:14 | 34,133 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 34,139 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 34,143 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 34,145 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 34,146 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 34,144 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 34,149 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 34,147 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 34,161 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 34,173 | -17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 34,190 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 34,201 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 34,207 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 34,221 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 34,220 | -16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 34,236 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 34,237 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (30 July 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 54,821 |
| Reactions total | 459 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 02:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
748 reactions across 40 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 281 | 37.6% | |
| 🔥 | 175 | 23.4% | |
| 😁 | 116 | 15.5% | |
| 🥰 | 41 | 5.48% | |
| ✍ | 32 | 4.28% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 3.34% | |
| 🤔 | 20 | 2.67% | |
| 🎉 | 19 | 2.54% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 1.47% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 1.34% | |
| 👨💻 | 9 | 1.20% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.668% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.535% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 748 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мир ускоряется, но навыки, которые развивают мышление, будут актуальны всегда. Не забывайте обновлять пул умений, чтобы не отставать от рынка, а Практикум в этом поддержит: выбирайте курсы по ссылке.
❤6🔥4✍3😁1
В профессиональном развитии случаются моменты, когда кажется, что компас сбился: сложно собраться на собеседование, тревожно за будущее профессии. Это нормально. Но если оставить всё как есть, можно надолго застрять в точке «непонятно куда двигаться». Мы собрали несколько историй и инструкций от наставников Практикума. Из статей вы узнаете, как прокачать «мягкие» и «жёсткие» навыки и найти время на магистратуру, даж…
❤2
Мы выбрали другого кандидата Одна фраза, и вашу уверенность тут же подтачивает сомнение: «Может, я недостаточно знаю, я слабый кандидат, а IT — это вообще не моё?» Больно получать отказы после многих часов составления резюме, подготовки к собеседованию и хорошего тестового. Но это не повод паниковать и отказываться от поиска работы. Давайте разберем, как работает процесс найма, вместе с Анной Смирновой, руководител…
❤5✍3👨💻2👍1🤯1😁1
Мы уже привыкли, что нейросети пишут тексты, придумывают креативы, помогают с аналитикой и обработкой заявок. Но результат часто оказывается слишком общим — мелкие нюансы, важные для бизнеса, просто не учитываются. Поговорили с Екатериной Меркуловой, амбассадором Яндекс Практикума, основательницей и CEO Clatch.app, и рассказали, как составлять промпты, которые реально работают на бизнес в статье «Промпты для бизнеса…
❤1
Рынок штормит, и иногда даже опытным специалистам приходится искать новую работу. Конечно, это бывает тревожно: вроде бы индустрия хорошо знакома, но в найме за последние годы случилось много перемен. Подготовили 19 видео от экспертов, которые помогут профи найти опору на нынешнем рынке труда: пересобрать резюме и портфолио под свои сильные стороны, написать актуальные сопроводительные, использовать ИИ для поиска и …
😢9🔥4❤3🤯3
Конечно, стоит говорить с ИИ чёткими промптами, но иногда так накипает… А как вы общаетесь с нейросетями? Отправляйте свои диалоги в комментарии.
😁16❤5
Оксана Любезнова пришла в IT-аналитику в зрелом возрасте, отучилась, — и вышла на работу, которая и нравится, и хорошо оплачивается. Она знает: стереотипы о возрасте — не помеха, если есть мотивация и те, кто поможет разобраться в новом. Её вдохновляющая история — в карточках. А курсы, чтобы получилось так же — в каталоге.
🔥21❤6🥰3👍1
Ветер гонит листы с вакансиями в сторону ИИ, требования становятся жёстче, а найти новую работу — сложнее. Сразу так промозгло на душе и появляется ощущение, что навыки застряли где-то в прошлом. Не нужно отчаиваться — мы запускаем новый проект для прокачки умений #Осенняяhhандра. Это лучшее лекарство от карьерной тревоги. За ближайшие две недели разберём: 🤯 Куда на самом деле движется рынок 🤯 Какие навыки сейчас в …
❤7😁5🔥2🎉1😱1
Что ваша любимая нейросеть написала бы вам? Делитесь мыслями в комментариях!
🔥15😁14❤8
Помните тренд на суперпродуктивность? Казалось, что работать на пределе — нормально, а успевать всё без пауз — единственный способ оставаться востребованным. Но такая гонка не проходит бесследно: постоянное напряжение сказывается на самочувствии, сне и способности восстанавливаться. Собрали в карточках признаки переутомления, которые легко не заметить в плотном графике. А как справляться с выгоранием и переутомление…
❤14✍1
Мы обновили контест — оставляй заявку на стажировку Доступно новое тестовое задание на Яндекс Контесте — самое время попробовать свои силы. Стажировка — это мощное начало карьеры в IT. → → → Сложные продукты и технологии — задачи, на которых реально растёшь → → → Сильная база — каждый третий разработчик в Яндексе начинал как стажёр → → → Поддержка с первого дня — ментор, бадди и комьюнити стажёров → → → Гибкий гра…
🔥5😱3❤2
Благодарим за отклик. Ваш опыт показался нам очень интересным. Мы хотели бы пригласить вас на вебинар «Собеседование в интернет-маркетинге: взгляд работодателя». Он состоится 3 сентября в 19:00 мск. Эксперты расскажут, чего работодатели ждут от кандидатов, разберём структуру интервью. HR даст советы для подготовки к собеседованию и ответы на самые частые вопросы. Переходите по ссылке, чтобы зарегистрироваться.
🤔11❤9🔥5😁2😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @yndx_practicum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яндекс Практикум” (@yndx_practicum), 34,111 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yndx_practicum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.