Я вот, сколько себя помню, всегда все забываю… 😶🌫 Если ваш ИИ-агент действует по такой же схеме — это не обязательно баг. В новом выпуске #разбираемся, как устроена память нейросетей и почему иногда им полезно что-то забывать.
❤38🔥19😁16👀1

Channel
@tbank_education
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
113,416subscribers
+2,236 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001170498799 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tbank_education |
| Description | Анонсы стажировок, олимпиад, обучения для школьников в математике и программировании: https://education.tbank.ru Заявление о регистрации № 4973131762 |
| Created | 31 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tbank_education |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 113,416 | +168 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:42 | 113,248 | +72 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 113,176 | +88 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 113,088 | +47 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 113,041 | +76 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 112,965 | +205 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 112,760 | +267 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 112,493 | +347 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:13 | 112,146 | +72 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 112,074 | +24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 112,050 | +61 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 111,989 | +54 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 111,935 | +47 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 111,888 | +129 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 111,759 | +79 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 111,680 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 111,687 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 111,690 | +62 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 111,628 | +47 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 111,581 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (28 July 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 366,250 |
| Reactions total | 2,904 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 09:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,823 reactions across 48 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,394 | 41.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1,840 | 31.6% | |
| ⚡ | 435 | 7.47% | |
| 🥰 | 260 | 4.47% | |
| 🏆 | 244 | 4.19% | |
| 😁 | 218 | 3.74% | |
| 👍 | 172 | 2.95% | |
| 👀 | 104 | 1.79% | |
| custom 5343526399598698336 | 85 | 1.46% | |
| 👎 | 68 | 1.17% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.052% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я вот, сколько себя помню, всегда все забываю… 😶🌫 Если ваш ИИ-агент действует по такой же схеме — это не обязательно баг. В новом выпуске #разбираемся, как устроена память нейросетей и почему иногда им полезно что-то забывать.
❤38🔥19😁16👀1
Posted without readable text
🔥42❤36🏆10👎3👀2😁2
Может ли программа с правильным кодом дать неправильный ответ? ИИ — уже революция или все еще просто хайп? Что можно услышать в океане, кроме шума воды? 🤔 Эти и другие вопросы разберем в цикле открытых лекций по промышленной разработке от Т-Образования, Центрального университета, МШП и Москвариума. В них вместе с практикующими экспертами разберемся, что происходит с технологиями прямо сейчас, как ИИ меняет ИТ-сферу …
❤32🔥12🏆9👍9👎1
Открываем двери для будущих математиков 💡 26 сентября Т-Образование и Школа программистов МШП станут площадками «Первой математической» — олимпиады Школково для учеников 4—7-х классов. В этот день встретимся в пяти городах, чтобы: 🟡 порешать нестандартные задачи, где важны сообразительность и гибкость мышления, а не углубленная подготовка; 🟡 увидеть, что математика может быть интересной, а изучать ее можно не тольк…
❤35🔥25🏆3
Финальный отсчет пошел: регистрация на Мини-CEO закрывается уже через неделю ⏰ Еще сильнее нашей капибары вас ждут топ-менеджеры Т-Банка. С ними на протяжении шести месяцев вы будете работать над крупными проектами компании, предлагать новые решения и смотреть, как они меняют наши продукты. А если попасть в ряды мини-СЕО не получится, мы предложим место на других стажировках и программах Т-Образования — без дополни…
🔥28❤18⚡8👍1🥰1
Хьюстон, у нас олимпиада 🚀 В этом году Всероссийская олимпиада по искусственному интеллекту отправляется в космос: все задачи, датасеты и материалы посвящены этой теме. Участниками могут стать ученики 8—11-х классов, а также студенты колледжей, техникумов и училищ из России и других стран. Награда за успешную миссию: ⭐️ 100 баллов ЕГЭ при поступлении в ведущие технические вузы; ⭐️ льготы в вузах-партнерах; ⭐️ возмо…
❤44🔥19🏆11👍3⚡2
«Просто учиться — не вайб» 😎 Так решил в школе Павел Ефимов, будущий бизнес-аналитик Т-Банка, — и пошел в олимпиады. ▶️ Склейка: участие в сборной Москвы, призовое место на Всеросе, учеба на ПМИ НИУ ВШЭ, стажировка в Т, программа «Мини-СЕО» и смена профессии. В новом посте — о первой провальной олимпиаде, единственной тройке, полезных инструментах для работы и о том, как случайный офисный разговор может стать пово…
🔥52❤39🏆18👎1
Posted without readable text
❤54👍12⚡9🔥7👎3
— Сегодня же 256-й день года! — И что? — Как что?.. Если знаете ответ на этот вопрос — этот праздник, скорее всего, для вас. А если нет, рассказываем: сегодня — День программиста, который выпал на эту дату неслучайно. 256, или 2⁸, — символическое число в ИТ: оно обозначает максимальное количество различных значений, которые можно выразить с помощью одного 8-разрядного байта. ❤️ — Ура, поздравляю 🔥 — Ура, поздравля…
🔥432❤207🥰17👍2👀1😁1
У каждого руководителя в Т-Банке своя карьерная линия: с точками входа, рискованными поворотами и сложными решениями 🚀 А как она может выглядеть, поделились Максим Безруков, Жора Сукасян и Владимир Абазов — топ-менеджеры Мини-CEO. Внутри — о пути в компании, самых волнительных карьерных моментах и о том, что они ищут в будущих участниках программы. Мини-СЕО — это программа на 6 месяцев, за которые вы: ⭐️ поработает…
❤36🔥12👍9
➡️ OpenAI: заявляет о прогрессе в одной из задач тысячелетия, про уравнения Навье — Стокса. ➡️ Наша редакция: отлично. Теперь осталось решить еще несколько задач, над которыми человечество бьется годами: 🟡 Почему про домашку вспоминаешь ровно в тот момент, когда уже лег спать? 🟡 Почему учитель говорит «это легкая задача» именно перед самым сложным номером? 🟡 Почему на контрольной забывается формула, которую дома зна…
😁61❤48👎19🔥15👀2
🟡А что, так можно было?!🟡 Чтобы такая реакция была не про вас, рассказываем: ЕГЭ по русскому можно сдать после 10-го класса — и это опция, доступная любому. В Т-Классе — совместном проекте Т-Образования и московской школы № 57 — так делают все ученики: программа специально построена так, чтобы можно было сдать экзамен досрочно. Спросили ребят, как это выглядит на практике и что дает в итоге, — делимся их ответами в…
❤45🔥17🏆8👀2👍1👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @tbank_education. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 67 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Т-Образование” (@tbank_education), 113,416 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tbank_education.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.