Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for еба́ные идеи для резерча

Channel

еба́ные идеи для резерча

@ebaresearch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,318subscribers

+52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001240032956
TypeChannel
Username@ebaresearch
Created21 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ebaresearch

Growth

5,2585,3185,2886 August 2026 — 5,266 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,265 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,258 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,261 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,270 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,280 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,285 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,297 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,308 subscribers6 September 2026 — 5,318 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 31 days, net +52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,249–5,327 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 03:195,318+10
29 Aug 2026, 23:455,308+11
26 Aug 2026, 17:425,297+12
24 Aug 2026, 04:245,285+5
20 Aug 2026, 04:115,280+10
16 Aug 2026, 18:045,270+9
13 Aug 2026, 01:035,261+3
10 Aug 2026, 10:245,258-7
7 Aug 2026, 05:065,265-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:225,266first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 5,318 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held24 (1 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,150
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,569 reactions across 24 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥴2,569100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,569 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,930 views182 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ты абсолютно прав. Угрожать ревьюверу было плохой идеей. К сожалению, уже ничего не поделать, он понизил оценку и пожаловался AC. Я внёс этот инцидент в свою память, чтобы этого не произошло вновь.

🥴182

7 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈2,310 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сразу после этого слово взял директор по ИИ Яндекса. Он согласился с Пашей, повторив его цитату слово в слово. Присутствующие в зале инженеры отметили, что спикер сгенерировал ответ на основе высокой вероятности успеха предыдущей фразы.

🥴108

7 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈2,310 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Паша Ванг недавно сходил на дискуссию посвященную проблемам развития ИИ. Вместе с ним на сцене сидело много других лидеров Российских технологических компаний. Главная цитата Паши, которая вызвала бурю оваций: LLM — это просто стохастичный попугай, она ничего не понимает. Предсказывание слова за словом.

🥴81

31 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC≈5,570 views182 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Игроки из Team Yandex будут получать на 30% меньше золота за крипов по сравнению с другими командами

🥴182

25 Jul 2026, 06:22 UTC≈5,260 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026

— это твоя статья? — да а что? — у тебя экспы неправильные)) — 21векк

🥴84

16 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC≈6,000 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ebány lab начинает работу над новым бенчмарком оценки фронтирных навыков LLM - и нам нужна ваша помощь Отправляйте в комментарии короткое описание ваших стартапов / стартапов ваших (пока ещё) друзей Посмотрим, какой процент из них ваншотается кодексом!

🥴77

9 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC≈6,010 views91 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Паша Ванг сходил на KOI8-R. Говорит, что еда была вкусной, но завезли мало девушек

🥴91

7 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC≈5,060 views138 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Делегация Яндекса зачем-то привезла свою лошадь в Сеул

🥴138

6 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC≈14,400 views242 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Была замечена делегация Яндекса на ICML в Сеуле

🥴242

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @ebaresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Data Secrets
@data_secrets · 93,166
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
XOR
@xor_journal · 150,246
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Сиолошная
@seeallochnaya · 79,260
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
LLM под капотом
@llm_under_hood · 29,013
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
Время Валеры
@cryptovalerii · 30,813
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Machine learning Interview
@machinelearning_interview · 30,274
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
Neural Shit
@NeuralShit · 53,230
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Codeforces Official
@codeforces_official · 73,150
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 96,728
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
Т-Образование
@tbank_education · 112,760
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Machinelearning
@ai_machinelearning_big_data · 281,893
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 136,970
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Яндекс нанимает | Вакансии для разработчиков
@ya_jobs · 32,693
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Поступашки - ШАД, Стажировки и Магистратура
@postypashki_old · 44,751
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
Яндекс Образование
@Education_Yandex · 37,895
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Зоопарк из слоновой кости
@ivoryzoo · 31,408
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
Sci_Career
@sci_career · 30,323
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“еба́ные идеи для резерча” (@ebaresearch), 5,318 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebaresearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.