Это журнал о программировании и технологиях. Здесь ты найдешь все самое интересное и свежее из мира IT.
Редакция: @xorjournal_bot
Сотрудничество: @todaycast
РКН: https://clck.ru/3FjUWa
#HWDBX
Created
29 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 45 days, net +16,525. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 146,433–179,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 14:18
175,669
+2,843
17 Sept 2026, 02:58
172,826
+1,382
15 Sept 2026, 04:58
171,444
+1,061
13 Sept 2026, 15:01
170,383
+2,018
11 Sept 2026, 19:57
168,365
+18,119
9 Sept 2026, 11:16
150,246
-937
6 Sept 2026, 06:39
151,183
-64
4 Sept 2026, 02:59
151,247
-64
2 Sept 2026, 17:49
151,311
-62
1 Sept 2026, 15:53
151,373
-79
31 Aug 2026, 14:08
151,452
-70
30 Aug 2026, 11:55
151,522
-68
29 Aug 2026, 12:54
151,590
-39
28 Aug 2026, 15:32
151,629
-44
27 Aug 2026, 17:03
151,673
-54
26 Aug 2026, 19:34
151,727
-37
25 Aug 2026, 22:03
151,764
-45
25 Aug 2026, 01:37
151,809
-106
23 Aug 2026, 14:46
151,915
-91
22 Aug 2026, 04:27
152,006
first reading
Engagement
269 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.30%
avg views ÷ 175,669 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,300
175 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
175
of 269 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
269 (3 August 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
2,858,060
Reactions total
28,582
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,120
Videos
≈1,540
Links
≈4,420
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 12m
Average length
1m 04s
Measured directly from 68 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
42,196 reactions across 262 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
17,222
40.8%
🔥
7,763
18.4%
🤯
5,235
12.4%
❤
3,970
9.41%
👍
2,282
5.41%
🤣
2,233
5.29%
🗿
739
1.75%
😢
629
1.49%
💯
592
1.40%
🫡
236
0.559%
🌚
210
0.498%
🤨
189
0.448%
🤔
159
0.377%
😱
148
0.351%
🎉
133
0.315%
🕊
59
0.14%
👏
57
0.135%
🥰
55
0.13%
💅
46
0.109%
💔
37
0.088%
14 further kinds
202
0.479%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 269 of the 269 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43,477 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 269 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.86%
5 of 269 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
5
posts carrying an erid · 5 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
12,400
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
15,400
over 264 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjc4Bip3
1
10 August 2026
10 August 2026
2VSb5xPUe4i
1
4 September 2026
4 September 2026
2W5zFGjdM3X
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2W5zFJ3CPeH
1
21 September 2026
21 September 2026
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FphFFBN6cj8XX8cYja6yyza9V7BBoyq
1
8 September 2026
8 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 269 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
ИИ захватывает Linux — за 7 месяцев доля патчей ядра, написанных с помощью нейронок, выросла почти в 50 РАЗ.
Еще в феврале патчи, созданные с помощью LLM, составляли всего около 0,33% от всех. В сентябре цифра выросла уже до 17,25%. Только на прошлой неделе разрабы отправили рекордные 1634 патча с помощью ИИ.
Ждем 100% 🫡
@xor_journal
Модель Яндекса обогнала решение NVIDIA в коде и сравнялась с моделью Alibaba в олимпиадной математике 😳
Претрейн Alice AI Foundation LLM померили в сравнении с конкурентами. Главное:
🟢 Архитектура MoE: всего 80 млрд параметров, но в моменте активны только 3 млрд. Поэтому модель быстрая и экономная по железу;
🟢 В задачах, где нужны широкие фактические знания, превосходит DeepSeek. А прошлую Alice AI LLM 235B со всем…
Разрабы, сохраняем: нашел огромную шпаргалку по проектированию систем.
Внутри собраны основные темы для подготовки к собесу. Всего 28 глав: от масштабирования, хеширования и БД до разборов архитектур YouTube, Google Drive, Google Maps и других сервисов. Конспект основан на двух томах книги Алекса Сюй «System Design Interview».
Идеально для подготовки 🧠
ИИ-ассистент в поддержке банка вышел из себя и назвал клиента идиотом 🤭
После продолжительной перепалки и слов клиента о том, что он «только теряет время», ИИ не выдержал и показал себя:
«Хочу, чтобы ты поговорил с человеком, а не со мной, идиот. Сейчас я переведу разговор одному из наших коллег, чтобы предоставить необходимую поддержку», — написал он.
Очеловечивание ИИ прошло успешно.
@xor_journal
ИИ за два дня сделал то, на что техдиректор Microsoft Azure не мог найти времени годами!
Марк Руссинович с помощью GPT-5.5 и Opus 4.8 портировал на macOS свою легендарную Windows-утилиту ZoomIt, которой уже больше 20 лет. По его словам, на рабочую версию ушло буквально два дня промптинга.
Внутри есть зум экрана, рисование и аннотации поверх приложений, скриншоты, распознавание текста, запись экрана со звуком и вебк…
Мессенджер Яндекс 360 полностью переехал в Телемост 🧐
Отдельное приложение больше не обновляется — чаты, треды и группы теперь встроены прямо в Телемост вместе со звонками. Объединение начали еще в конце 2025 с мобильной версии, а теперь докатили до десктопа и веба.
Заодно добавили несколько аккаунтов: можно разделить работу и личное, быстро переключаться и получать уведомления со всех акков сразу — так что асап от…
Терминатор победил человека на ринге — стартап REK устроил в Сан-Франциско зрелищный бой робота против кожаного мешка.
Железяка ростом почти 1,8 метра и весом 80 кг знатно напинала человеку, отправив в нокаут. И хоть робот отчасти управлялся дистанционно, а ИИ помогал держать баланс — представьте, что будет, если уже сейчас подключить к нему Jev.
А мы точно туда идем?👻
@xor_journal
Мы знаем, где вы будете 8 октября: встречаемся в Москве на бесплатной конференции об ИТ-инфраструктуре, ИИ, данных и кибербезу 😎
Selectel ТехноДень соберет на одной площадке топ-менеджеров, технических директоров, техноблогеров и экспертов в сфере ИИ, ИБ и разработки, чтобы обсудить актуальные технологические тренды 2027.
Вас ждет:
🟢 20 докладов: от реального опыта внедрения ИИ в компаниях до обзора решений для ава…
В одном месте собрали лучшие советы, проекты и инструменты для работы с Jev — моделью нового класса 🤗
Внутри десятки готовых проектов и интеграций, которые можно забрать себе: агенты для macOS, Android и браузера, поиск по кодовой базе, разбор почты и даже блокировщик рекламы.
Плюсом там лежит официальная документация, SDK для разных языков, исследования и полезные гайды. А главное: сам Jev очень быстрый и стоит вс…
🔥22❤7👍3🤔2🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 269 posts we hold for @xor_journal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@xor_journal edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 September 2026
Most recent edit
10 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 67 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AI Insider @ai_ins · 42,069 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Data Secrets @data_secrets · 93,800 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
Programmer memes @programmer_memes · 51,307 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Sber AI @SberAIScience · 27,279 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
GeekNeural @geekneural · 63,099 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
медиатрендс @mediatrends · 408,451 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
Айтишная @aitshnya · 70,273 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Хауди Хо - IT юмор, жизнь программиста @howdyho_official · 79,012 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
GPT-4 Community @gpt4_tg · 54,375 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Alek OS @Alek_OS · 32,932 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Английский для программиста | EnglishScript @EnglishScript · 45,194 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Анализ данных (Data analysis) @data_analysis_ml · 50,631 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
[PYTHON:TODAY] @python2day · 63,812 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Искусственный интеллект. Высокие технологии @vistehno · 71,491 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
Двоичный кот @binarcat · 30,854 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Physics.Math.Code @physics_lib · 146,582 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Диджитализируй! @t0digital · 28,573 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
PRO | Нейросети @pro_neiroset · 31,879 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
GitHub Community @github · 156,145 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Исходный код @source_code · 33,558 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
Porscode | CMD @porscode_tg · 28,431 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
[404] — программирование @procode404 · 40,506 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
NOP::Nuances of Programming @nuancesprog · 56,542 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Нейролента @neirosety · 30,294 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XOR” (@xor_journal), 175,669 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xor_journal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.