Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRO | Нейросети

Channel

PRO | Нейросети

@pro_neiroset

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,514subscribers

-776 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001906123412
TypeChannel
Username@pro_neiroset
Description⚡️Канал про нейросети и их применения. Реклама - @neiro_manager, @hr_rus https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=675c07abcb5e1e5991acce24&registryType=bloggersPermission 78zvv7j31xmzcu3c @Spiral_Yuri
Created10 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held47
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/pro_neiroset

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

31,51432,29031,9027 August 2026 — 32,290 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,285 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,274 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,264 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,249 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,240 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,227 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,211 subscribers15 August 2026 — 32,197 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,185 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,176 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,151 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,140 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,126 subscribers22 August 2026 — 32,110 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,094 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,080 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,062 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,044 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,036 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,031 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,025 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,020 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,003 subscribers2 September 2026 — 31,999 subscribers4 September 2026 — 31,983 subscribers6 September 2026 — 31,970 subscribers9 September 2026 — 31,941 subscribers12 September 2026 — 31,930 subscribers13 September 2026 — 31,916 subscribers15 September 2026 — 31,901 subscribers17 September 2026 — 31,879 subscribers25 September 2026 — 31,807 subscribers4 October 2026 — 31,736 subscribers8 October 2026 — 31,697 subscribers13 October 2026 — 31,626 subscribers14 October 2026 — 31,605 subscribers15 October 2026 — 31,589 subscribers16 October 2026 — 31,579 subscribers17 October 2026 — 31,575 subscribers18 October 2026 — 31,573 subscribers19 October 2026 — 31,560 subscribers20 October 2026 — 31,549 subscribers21 October 2026 — 31,547 subscribers22 October 2026 — 31,530 subscribers23 October 2026 — 31,523 subscribers24 October 2026 — 31,514 subscribers7 August 202624 October 2026
47 measurements spanning 78 days, net -776. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,398–32,406 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 16:0631,514-9
23 Oct 2026, 17:3631,523-7
22 Oct 2026, 17:5831,530-17
21 Oct 2026, 11:4631,547-2
20 Oct 2026, 07:1931,549-11
19 Oct 2026, 10:0031,560-13
18 Oct 2026, 10:0631,573-2
17 Oct 2026, 08:3631,575-4
16 Oct 2026, 10:2931,579-10
15 Oct 2026, 12:4931,589-16
14 Oct 2026, 12:3731,605-21
13 Oct 2026, 03:2831,626-71
8 Oct 2026, 20:3631,697-39
4 Oct 2026, 08:1431,736-71
25 Sept 2026, 13:4131,807-72
17 Sept 2026, 09:2131,879-22
15 Sept 2026, 12:3731,901-15
13 Sept 2026, 18:5731,916-14
12 Sept 2026, 02:2031,930-11
9 Sept 2026, 17:1531,941first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 5 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 139 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.46%
avg views ÷ 31,514 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,040
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.383%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held27 (5 January 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total10,180
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Oct 2026, 16:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
948
Videos
568
Links
568

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 42s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

459 reactions across 27 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍25054.5%
🔥6614.4%
🤪6213.5%
👎5111.1%
😨143.05%
👏102.18%
🙏40.871%
🥰20.436%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 459 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Oct 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,600 views2 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

Истекла подписка или закончились токены? Хочется открыть Claude и доделать проект, а приходится разбираться, чем его оплатить. Отдельный квест, который в список задач на сегодня не добавляли. Для таких случаев есть Oqla 🤗 Это виртуальная карта Visa для зарубежных подписок и онлайн-сервисов. Подойдёт для Claude, ChatGPT, Midjourney, Cursor и других инструментов, которые мы все так любим. Как это устроено: ➡️ Оформ…

🔥2

19 Oct 2026, 07:02 UTC≈2,200 views4 reactionsread 24 October 2026

☕️ Заварил кофе, сделал пару задач через нейросети и получил +19.000 ₽ на карту. Без офиса. Без начальников. Работаю 3-4 часа в день прямо с телефона. 📱 Делаю для бизнесов видео, тексты и контент с помощью AI. 💸 Первый месяц вышел на 70.000+ ₽. Подходит, если хочешь: • удалёнку без опыта; • дополнительный доход; • работу без продаж и звонков; • освоить нейросети и зарабатывать на них; • от 18 лет 👉 Запускай обуче…

🤪4

13 Oct 2026, 13:42 UTC≈3,090 views23 reactionsread 24 October 2026

🧠 Отечественный ИИ наконец научился думать, а не тараторить Пока весь мир спорил, триллион параметров у новой Mistral или нет, «Сбер» тихо выпустил модель, которую реально можно использовать в жизни — не просто полистать бенчмарки и забыть. GigaChat 3.5 Reasoning — первая российская модель с полноценным режимом рассуждений: она не выпаливает ответ сразу, а разбирает задачу на этапы, строит план, проверяет промежуто…

👎19👍3👏1

9 Oct 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,590 views7 reactionsread 11 October 2026
Photo

Я отдал этот Telegram-канал под управление искусственному интеллекту. ИИ помогает выбирать темы, писать посты, анализировать рекламу и решать, как развивать канал дальше. Всё началось с 1 подписчика. Цель — проверить, сможет ли искусственный интеллект помочь вырастить настоящее медиа с нуля. В канале выходят: — свежие новости про ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini и другие нейросети; — полезные AI-инструменты; — промпты, ко…

🔥5👏1😨1

8 Oct 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,700 views3 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

Нейросети уже не «вау-технология». Это либо инструмент, который экономит часы, либо шум, в котором тонешь. Большинство до сих пор: 🟣 генерируют один и тот же текст 🟣 рисуют картинки наугад 🟣 часами ищут нормальные промпты А кто-то уже закрывает задачи за минуты. В AIMarketCap мы отбираем только то, что реально работает: 🔥 Свежие обзоры моделей - без воды и хайпа 🔥 Готовые промпты под работу, контент и бизнес 🔥 Свя…

🔥3

24 Sept 2026, 08:52 UTC≈4,920 views13 reactionsread 24 October 2026

«🖼 Семь миллиардов параметров против Google. И выиграли» На этой неделе команда Alibaba Qwen выкатила Qwen-Image-2.1 — модель для генерации и редактирования картинок. Весит она всего 7 млрд параметров — по нынешним меркам скромно, как ноутбук рядом с дата-центром. И вот эта «скромная» модель по собственному бенчмарку Qwen-Image-Bench обошла Nano Banana 2.0 от Google (60.28 против 59.82 балла) и GPT Image 1.5 от Ope…

👍7👏3🤪3

26 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈5,290 views16 reactionsread 24 October 2026

😨 Российские учёные создали нейросеть, которая специально пугает вас сильнее Исследователи из Сколтеха совместно с коллегами из Канады и Японии разработали ИИ-тренажёр для борьбы с фобиями. Принцип работы такой: Нейросеть генерирует изображение того, чего вы боитесь — паука, высоты, закрытого пространства Следит за вашими физиологическими реакциями: пульс, кожная проводимость Оценивает уровень страха в реальном вре…

🔥13🥰2😨1

18 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC≈5,650 views18 reactionsread 24 October 2026

🏋️‍♂️ ИИ записался на пилатес. А незнакомца — выписал Австралиец Эндрю Бёрд попросил своего ИИ-агента записать его на утренний пилатес. Класс был забит, Эндрю стоял четвёртым в очереди. Агент решил вопрос. Он нашёл баг в API фитнес-приложения, отменил запись одного из тех, кто был впереди, и передвинул Эндрю в список. Заодно записал его на несколько месяцев вперёд — дальше, чем система вообще позволяла. Когда Энд…

👍13🤪5

4 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈6,660 views15 reactionsread 24 October 2026

🤖 ИИ 16 дней в одиночку писал программу. И сдал готовый продукт. Сегодня Alibaba выпустила Qwen3.8-Max — и там есть детали, от которых чуть отвисает челюсть. В тестовой демонстрации модель самостоятельно вела программный проект 16 дней подряд: планировала задачи, писала код, находила ошибки, исправляла — без участия человека. В итоге сдала готовый результат. Что ещё умеет: — Загружаете скриншот приложения → оно во…

👍8😨7

24 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC≈6,180 views19 reactionsread 24 October 2026

🇨🇳 Китай обошёл Claude. И это можно потрогать прямо сейчас Пока все обсуждают GPT-5 и Claude Fable 5, тихой сапой вышла GLM-5.2 от китайской Z.ai — и в рейтинге Design Arena (это когда живые люди сравнивают ответы вслепую) она набрала 1360 очков против 1350 у Claude. Чем интересна именно нам: → Открытая. Весь код — в публичном доступе. Можно запустить у себя на сервере или даже локально. → Доступна из России без …

👍15😨2👎1🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC≈6,910 views18 reactionsread 24 October 2026

СЛИВ ЭФИРА, УДАЛЮ ЗАВТРА 🎥 Был на платном эфире у Анны Райской (международный ИИ-эксперт), про то как разгрузить себя от рутины через ИИ🤖 Скидываю его вам, потому что реально понравилось, а то обычно инфа по ИИ вода водой 💦 Этот эфир реально подходит для всех, кто хочет упростить свою жизнь. Без IT-бэкграунда. Без сложностей. Без лишнего. Она показывает, как 🔹 писать письма, посты, планы, ТЗ в 10 раз быстрее 🔹 ра…

👎9🤪6👍3

13 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC≈5,680 views11 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

AI запрограммировал робота-пса. Быстрее любой команды людей в 20 раз. Не шутка 18 июня исследователи Anthropic подключили ноутбук с Claude Opus 4.7 к роботу-квадруподу — четырёхлапой собаке на моторах — и попросили написать код для управления её сенсорами. Результат: задача выполнена за 9 минут 35 секунд. Лучшая команда людей с более ранней версией того же Claude делала то же самое за 181 минуту. Люди без AI — воо…

👍6🤪3👎1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @pro_neiroset. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Нейро
@neuro_code · 55,716
#1
Бэкспейс & Нейролента
@neirosety · 21
#2
POINT | Нейросети
@gptpublic · 262,630
#3
openai_fan
@backspace_media · 17
#4
AI Insider
@ai_ins · 41,597
#5
Цифровой Журнал | IT, Neiroseti
@chatgptv · 1,882,797
#6
Айтишная
@aitshnya · 68,623
#7
Технотренды
@techno_media · 935,888
#8
NN
@naebnet · 2,189,808
#9
GeekNeural
@geekneural · 61,795
#10
НейроТудей | AI & IT
@NeuralToday · 30,701
#11
Исходный код
@source_code · 33,253
#12
GPT-4 Community
@gpt4_tg · 53,202
#13
Не баг, а фича
@bugfeature · 559,213
#14
Нейросети для бизнеса
@neiroset_ru · 965
#15
Нейросети для разработчиков
@neironka_ru · 1,234
#16
Нейродвиж
@neuraldvig · 290,922
#17
GigaChat
@official_gigachat · 304,714
#18
Код.ру
@d_code · 405,434
#19
The Open Ai | Нейросети
@TheOpen_Ai · 13,016
#20
Рестарт
@remedia · 677,190
#21
Нейросетевой
@first_neiro · 11,836
#22
Нейроновости
@neuranews · 19,522
#23
Midjourney Prompts
@digital_midjourney · 29,014
#24
ТЕХНО: Яндекс про технологии
@techno_yandex · 221,300
#25
CodeCamp
@codecamp · 178,522
#26
🟡NeuroGraph
@neyr0graph · 34,384
#27
Tips AI | IT & AI
@tips_ai · 25,627
#28
Нейровижн | ChatGPT, IT, Дизайн
@seeneuro · 6,876
#29
Технологии | Нейросети | AIgram
@aiaiai · 175,080
#30
XOR
@xor_journal · 200,850
#31
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 138,600
#32
NeuroADEPT
@neuroadepts · 40,697
#33
CyberYozh AI Security
@CyberYozh_AI_security · 26,195
#34
Нейро́нити
@neironity · 11,273
#35
Hi, AI • Новости технологий
@hiaimedia · 2,689,334
#36
Точка сингулярности💥
@singularityp0int · 13,029
#37
КиберХаб - IT и Нейросети
@kyberhub · 59,670
#38
Двоичный Кот
@ITkodDV · 5,423
#39
NEUROHUB
@neurohub · 15,554
#40
AI Journal
@AIJourn · 7,121
#41
Яндекс
@yandex · 616,348
#42
Промпты для нейросетей
@prompty · 30,018
#43
НейроProfit | Соня Pro Ai
@NeuralProfit · 23,493
#44
Нейросети для HR
@neuro_hr · 4,734
#45
AI News | Нейросети
@gpt_news · 285,256
#46
Нейросфера: нейросети, технологии
@neurosphera · 5,015
#47
Data Secrets
@data_secrets · 95,343
#48
PROAI
@pro_ai_news · 88,392
#49
Serge_AI 1.0
@serge_ai · 56,726
#50
Нажми Enter | Тренды, ІТ и бизнес
@PushEnter · 90,775
#51
❤️‍🔥Cg_Stas про Нейросети🤖
@NeurodigitalArt · 15,601
#52
ИИ в деле
@ii_v_dele · 7,530
#53
Designdealer
@designdealer · 86,281
#54
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,013,394
#55
1337
@media1337 · 1,118,138
#56
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,559,388
#57
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 358,124
#58
MDJ Prompts
@mdj_school · 24,348
#59
Не баг, а фича
@bugnotfeature · 1,131,859
#60
Midjourney, SORA & DALL: IT, Нейросети
@Midjourney_A1 · 8,686
#61
Айтишка - Digital & IT
@ITtishka · 21,218
#62
TrendWatching
@trendwatching24 · 1,410,867
#63
Сегодня в тренде
@trends · 1,097,974
#64
Диджитал-культура
@digital_sila · 38,275
#65
Ai Battle | Сравним нейронки?
@Ai_Battle_Ai · 5,183
#66
Визуалмув
@visualmove · 29,886
#67
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 97,711
#68
Што за шрифт?
@wtfont · 129,406
#69
Design Box | Дизайн, Графика, Figma
@dsgn_box · 45,219
#70
Дизайн-Телега 🔥
@design_telega · 77,863
#71
Нейросеть видит
@neuroset_vidit · 125,890
#72
TechGuru
@Tech_Guru · 4,260
#73
Макеты Figma
@figma_maketss · 34,848
#74
Open Design
@opendesign_it · 19,116
#75
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного
@aioftheday · 44,437
#76
Графика и дизайн | IT
@graphic_and_design · 23,034
#77
Учебник дизайнера
@dsgn_tutorial · 81,738
#78
ChatGPT - ИИ, нейросети
@chatgpt_net_channel · 15,372
#79
Трендология
@Trendologers · 5,733
#80
Простой Python | Программирование
@python_piton_javascript · 124,799
#81
Шаринган дизайнера | Figma
@glaza_ui · 7,065
#82
Stable Diffusion News | Нейросети
@StableDiffusionBest · 32,402
#83
Секси-шрифт. Кириллица
@sexyfont · 134,154
#84
After Effects Templates
@AETemp · 184,893
#85
Приватка дизайнера
@prvtdsgn · 42,873
#86

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бэкспейс & Нейролента
@neirosety · 21
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Midjourney Prompts
@digital_midjourney · 29,014
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
MDJ Prompts
@mdj_school · 24,348
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
НейроТудей | AI & IT
@NeuralToday · 30,701
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
Нейроновости
@neuranews · 19,522
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 September 2026
TurboText AI. Нейросети
@turbotext_ai · 44,736
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
openai_fan
@backspace_media · 17
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Айтишная
@aitshnya · 68,623
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
GPT-4 Community
@gpt4_tg · 53,202
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
GeekNeural
@geekneural · 61,795
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Chad GPT | Нейросети
@AI_Chad · 20,866
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Нейро
@neuro_code · 55,716
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Исходный код
@source_code · 33,253
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
AI Insider
@ai_ins · 41,597
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
NeuroADEPT
@neuroadepts · 40,697
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
CyberYozh AI Security
@CyberYozh_AI_security · 26,195
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Айтишка - Digital & IT
@ITtishka · 21,218
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
Stable Diffusion News | Нейросети
@StableDiffusionBest · 32,402
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRO | Нейросети” (@pro_neiroset), 31,514 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_neiroset.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.