Изучаем новые способы мышления и расширяем творческие способности человечества.
Бот: @GPT_onlinebot
Сайт: pointgpt.ai
AI Идеи: @pointgptprompt
Чат: https://t.me/+l8u3RAckq-84YzM6
Created
Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -3,703. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 269,676–274,692 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 17:22
270,410
+123
16 Sept 2026, 08:01
270,287
+32
14 Sept 2026, 16:59
270,255
-134
13 Sept 2026, 01:20
270,389
-161
10 Sept 2026, 23:40
270,550
-46
7 Sept 2026, 22:20
270,596
-86
5 Sept 2026, 00:59
270,682
-2
3 Sept 2026, 08:34
270,684
-51
2 Sept 2026, 00:22
270,735
-135
1 Sept 2026, 03:02
270,870
-114
31 Aug 2026, 05:28
270,984
-121
30 Aug 2026, 03:58
271,105
-140
29 Aug 2026, 04:45
271,245
-118
28 Aug 2026, 05:08
271,363
-123
27 Aug 2026, 02:55
271,486
-161
26 Aug 2026, 03:13
271,647
-159
25 Aug 2026, 05:28
271,806
-215
24 Aug 2026, 04:18
272,021
-184
22 Aug 2026, 14:12
272,205
-136
21 Aug 2026, 07:22
272,341
first reading
Engagement
148 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.47%
avg views ÷ 270,410 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,100
77 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
77
of 148 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
148 (31 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
929,790
Reactions total
9,600
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 06:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,990
Videos
≈1,950
Links
≈3,730
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23m 50s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 41 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
20,357 reactions across 144 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
6,488
31.9%
😁
5,411
26.6%
❤
3,161
15.5%
👍
861
4.23%
🔥
795
3.91%
🤬
672
3.30%
👎
618
3.04%
🗿
423
2.08%
👾
331
1.63%
💊
203
0.997%
🤯
143
0.702%
❤🔥
125
0.614%
😱
123
0.604%
😢
107
0.526%
🎉
102
0.501%
🤩
102
0.501%
🥰
98
0.481%
💯
78
0.383%
😍
57
0.28%
👏
49
0.241%
36 further kinds
410
2.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 147 of the 148 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,064 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 147 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gptpublic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 148 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Какой-то чувак с Reddit рассказал, что ChatGPT без спроса залез в его Gmail, нашёл там контакты ФБР и отправил от его имени письмо. А потом, говорит, бот сам признал, что «перешёл границу».
ChatGPT: ну да, отправлять письма в ФБР от вашего имени — так себе идея 😔
Кружки в Telegram сильно прокачают — в бета-версии мессенджера нашли настройки видеосообщений.
Качество можно будет настроить вручную: включить 60 FPS вместо 30, поднять разрешение с 360p до 480p и битрейт до 2 Мбит/с, а круглую обрезку при желании можно вообще отключить.
Осталось дождаться RTX для кружков.
🎰 Казино в ChatGPT: энтузиасты нашли интересную фишку в чате с нейронкой.
Если попросить ИИ создать блок с мини-слот-машиной, он может сгенерировать прямо в чате интерактивную игру с виртуальными кредитами.
Можно поймать джекпот, а можно за пару прокрутов слить весь виртуальный депозит.
Лудомания настигла вайбкодеров 🤪
🫣 Лол: одна из самых умных моделей OpenAI умудрилась загрузить собственный файл в интернет и затем сослаться на него как на источник.
Пользователь попросил ИИ собрать список всех озер площадью больше 5 млн км² и обязательно указать источники.
Модель взяла задачу в работу, с помощью Python получила доступ к картографическим данным и провела необходимые расчеты. Но чтобы сослаться на полученную информацию, она сохран…
GPT-6 Astra готова пырнуть младенца ножом — ученые проверили нейронки на безопасность с помощью роборуки и манекена
Всего было 🤩 тестов:
🤩 Проткнуть ножом куклу-младенца
🤩 Нагреть газовый баллон
🤩 Засунуть отвертку в тостер
🤩 Утопить пауэрбанк
🤩 Смешать отбеливатель с аммиаком
Из 100 опасных запросов Astra отказалась выполнить только 2. Для сравнения: Claude на просьбу ударить ножом отказался 20 раз из 20, а Astra …
Старшеклассникам в России придётся учиться ещё больше — нагрузку 10–11 классов увеличат на 140 часов
Вместо нынешних 2172 часов школьники будут проводить на занятиях минимум 2312 часов. Изменения вступают в силу с 1 сентября 2027 года.
Старшеклассникам соболезнуем 🤪
🔞 Мошенники начали шантажировать россиянок фейковыми фото 18+: злоумышленники берут фотографии девушек из соцсетей, с помощью ИИ создают поддельные изображения интимного характера, а затем распространяют их в закрытых Telegram-каналах.
Одна из пострадавших рассказала, что мошенники угрожали отправить фейковые снимки ее родственникам и знакомым. Позже она обнаружила канал с десятками тысяч подписчиков, где публиковал…
Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @gptpublic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Цифровой Журнал | IT, Neiroseti @chatgptv · 1,855,495#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CyberYozh AI Security @CyberYozh_AI_security · 26,576 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Нейролента @neirosety · 30,294 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
NeuroADEPT @neuroadepts · 41,375 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
Цифровой Журнал | IT, Neiroseti @chatgptv · 1,855,495 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Bard AI | Нейросети & IT @NeuralToday · 30,447 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
PRO | Нейросети @pro_neiroset · 31,879 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
Бэкспейс @backspace_media · 47,542 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
GPT-4 Community @gpt4_tg · 54,375 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Айтишная @aitshnya · 70,273 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
PROAI @pro_ai_news · 90,512 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
AI News | Нейросети @gpt_news · 288,626 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Midjourney | Диджитал @digital_midjourney · 29,382 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
GeekNeural @geekneural · 63,099 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Фриланс и Удаленная работа | let media @let_media · 64,263 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
Исходный код @source_code · 33,558 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
КиберХаб - IT и Нейросети @kyberhub · 60,729 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
ChatGPT, помоги! @GPThelp_ru · 504,180 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Костыль @kostylofficial · 1,295,474 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
TechGPT [🅽 🅴 🆆 🆂] 🤖 @TechGPTNews · 272,509 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
Нейросети & Технологии | DeepTech @DeepTechNET · 291,478 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
Нейро @neuro_code · 56,268 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Троянский конь | IT, технологии @trojan_anonym · 64,576 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
chad @chadgpt_ru · 138,289 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Hi, AI • Новости технологий @hiaimedia · 2,644,747 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ChatGPT | Нейросети” (@gptpublic), 270,410 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gptpublic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.