Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Журнал «Код»

Channel

Журнал «Код»

@thecodemedia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

49,423subscribers

-129 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001448520706
TypeChannel
Username@thecodemedia
DescriptionСтатьи о том, как взломать жизненные проблемы с помощью технологий. Сайт: https://thecode.media Журнал Яндекс Практикума. Номер заявления в РКН — 4970835371 Страница в реестре: https://rknn.link/Yt
Created21 March 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thecodemedia

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

49,42349,55749,4905 August 2026 — 49,552 subscribers6 August 2026 — 49,552 subscribers6 August 2026 — 49,557 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,544 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,540 subscribers9 August 2026 — 49,535 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49,523 subscribers11 August 2026 — 49,504 subscribers12 August 2026 — 49,511 subscribers13 August 2026 — 49,504 subscribers14 August 2026 — 49,494 subscribers16 August 2026 — 49,470 subscribers17 August 2026 — 49,454 subscribers18 August 2026 — 49,450 subscribers19 August 2026 — 49,435 subscribers20 August 2026 — 49,431 subscribers21 August 2026 — 49,423 subscribers5 August 202621 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net -129. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,403–49,577 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 17:2649,423-8
20 Aug 2026, 13:5349,431-4
19 Aug 2026, 15:0349,435-15
18 Aug 2026, 13:5849,450-4
17 Aug 2026, 16:0449,454-16
16 Aug 2026, 08:5349,470-24
14 Aug 2026, 17:2549,494-10
13 Aug 2026, 10:2649,504-7
12 Aug 2026, 12:4349,511+7
11 Aug 2026, 12:0449,504-19
10 Aug 2026, 14:0449,523-12
9 Aug 2026, 15:1749,535-5
8 Aug 2026, 18:4249,540-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:5149,544-13
6 Aug 2026, 16:3249,557+5
6 Aug 2026, 01:4649,552no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:2249,552first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.12%
avg views ÷ 49,423 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,530
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.593%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held45 (31 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total113,960
Reactions total676
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,130
Videos
320
Links
5,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

609 reactions across 41 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19532.0%
👍18229.9%
🔥15024.6%
😁386.24%
🤡254.11%
🤣162.63%
👎30.493%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 676reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,190 views8 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

За 96 часов восемь ИИ-агентов прошли 21 государственную систему — после запуска ими никто не управлял. Защита при этом сработала: подозрительную активность заметили, предупреждения выпустили вовремя. Вот только что именно там происходило, выяснили из-за того, что атакующие кое-что забыли за собой закрыть. Что нашли в отчёте, почему «почти автономная» и кому выгодно это «почти» — разобрали со специалистом по ИБ: http

🔥53

21 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,800 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

ИИ генерирует всё больше кода, а этот код кому-то нужно проверять. Поэтому тестировщики по-прежнему нужны — но и без автоматизации тестов уже никуда. В общем, если захотите стать тестировщиком в 2026 году, придётся учитывать много нюансов. Всё собрали в статье: https://v.thecode.media/5ho1y. Журнал «Код» | Промокод Практикума | Новости мира IT и технологий

5🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC≈1,910 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Навыки работы с ИИ больше не конкурентное преимущество или специфика отдельной профессии, а обязательное требование в большинстве digital-вакансий. К такому выводу пришли Практикум и getmatch в исследовании 2026 года ┐(シ)┌ Прямо сейчас ИИ создает рынок, в котором аналитик, разработчик, дизайнер, продакт, маркетолог и руководитель проекта должны по-новому выполнять свою работу. Да, как вы уже поняли, не без помощи ИИ

👍21

21 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,960 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Давно не было мемов, надо исправлять. Скиньте последний мем про работу в ИТ, с которого вас разнесло, в комментарии. Журнал «Код» | Промокод Практикума | Новости мира IT и технологий

3

20 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC≈2,120 views13 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Кто мы такие, чтобы отрицать тот факт, что ИИ постепенно внедряется во все аспекты жизни, и в нашу карьеру тоже. Яндекс Практикум и getmatch провели исследование вакансии digital- и IT-рынка и выяснили, насколько и у кого ИИ-навыки в резюме делает зарплату выше В статье разобрали результаты исследования и ответили на главный вопрос — что с нами будет дальше: https://v.thecode.media/op451 Журнал «Код» | Промокод Пр

👍73🔥3

20 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈2,160 views30 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🔐 Промпты для аудита безопасности кода 1. Базовый аудит безопасности Ты - senior security engineer с опытом аудита production-систем. Проанализируй [язык]-код на уязвимости безопасности. В первую очередь проверь наличие: - SQL-инъекций и NoSQL-инъекций - XSS (отражённый, хранимый, DOM-based) - Небезопасной десериализации - Уязвимостей аутентификации и авторизации - Утечек чувствительных данных в логах и сообщениях

👍13🔥6🤡52👎2🤣2

19 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈2,210 views15 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Посчитать все строки, найти средний чек и узнать общую выручку можно в SQL — без ручных подсчётов и лишнего кода. Разбираемся, как работают COUNT, SUM, AVG, MIN и MAX, зачем нужен GROUP BY и почему WHERE SUM(amount) > 1000 ломает запрос, а HAVING — нет. https://v.thecode.media/hkczw Журнал «Код» | Промокод Практикума | Новости мира IT и технологий

👍93🔥3

19 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC≈2,220 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Код, ну как вы там, вроде все вышли из отпусков? Как менталка и рабочее состояние? Ответьте на пару вопросов ↓ Журнал «Код» | Промокод Практикума | Новости мира IT и технологий

2

18 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈2,590 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

О как! Если уже добавили в своё резюме, что вы «уверенный пользователь ChatGPT», то в 2026 это выглядит на уровне «уверенный пользователь ПК» из нулевых. В статье узнаете, какие ИИ-навыки можно указывать в резюме, в каких разделах их поставить и как сформулировать опыт, чтобы его заметила ATS и оценил нанимающий менеджер. https://v.thecode.media/vawl9 Журнал «Код» | Промокод Практикума | Новости мира IT и технолог

👍74

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @thecodemedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 381,462 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Типичный программист
@tproger · 78,711
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Библиотека программиста
@proglibrary · 78,409
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Хабр
@habr_com · 131,678
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Английский язык 🇬🇧
@dailyeng · 73,306
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Аудиокниги
@AUDIOKNIGI_CHANNEL · 256,778
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
Selectel
@Selectel · 63,648
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Однажды в трендах
@trendo · 69,017
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Лекториум
@lektorium20 · 115,833
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
ТЕХНО: Яндекс про технологии
@techno_yandex · 231,734
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
XOR
@xor_journal · 152,006
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Журнал «Код»” (@thecodemedia), 49,423 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecodemedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.